Nucleic Acids Research, 2003, Vol. 31, No. 10 2576-2585
© 2003 Oxford University Press
Multiple recombination pathways for sister chromatid exchange in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: role of RAD1 and the RAD52 epistasis group genes
Center for Immunology and Microbial Disease, Albany Medical College, 47 New Scotland Avenue, Albany, NY 12208-3479, USA
*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +1 518 262 6651; Fax: +1 518 262 5689; Email: fasullm{at}mail.amc.edu
Sister chromatid exchange (SCE) can occur by several recombination mechanisms, including those directly initiated by double-strand breaks (DSBs), such as gap repair and break-induced replication (BIR), and those initiated when DNA polymerases stall, such as template switching. To elucidate SCE recombination mechanisms, we determined whether spontaneous and DNA damage-associated SCE requires specific genes within the RAD52 and RAD3 epistasis groups in Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains containing two his3 fragments, his3-
5' and his3-
3'::HOcs. SCE frequencies were measured after cells were exposed to UV, X-rays, 4-nitroquinoline 1-oxide (4-NQO) and methyl methanesulfonate (MMS), or when an HO endonuclease-induced DSB was introduced at his3-
3'::HOcs. Our data indicate that genes involved in gap repair, such as RAD55, RAD57 and RAD54, are required for DNA damage-associated SCE but not for spontaneous SCE. RAD50 and RAD59, genes required for BIR, are required for X-ray-associated SCE but not for SCE stimulated by HO-induced DSBs. In comparison with wild type, rates of spontaneous SCE are 10-fold lower in rad51 rad1 but not in either rad51 rad50 or rad51 rad59 double mutants. We propose that gap repair mechanisms are important in DNA damage-associated recombination, whereas alternative pathways, including a template switch pathway, play a role in spontaneous SCE.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. M. Moore, J. Karlin, S. Gonzalez-Barrera, A. Mardiros, M. Lisby, A. Doughty, J. Gilley, R. Rothstein, E. C. Friedberg, and P. L. Fischhaber Rad10 exhibits lesion-dependent genetic requirements for recruitment to DNA double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Nucleic Acids Res., October 1, 2009; 37(19): 6429 - 6438. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Mozlin, C. W. Fung, and L. S. Symington Role of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad51 Paralogs in Sister Chromatid Recombination Genetics, January 1, 2008; 178(1): 113 - 126. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Cortes-Ledesma, C. Tous, and A. Aguilera Different genetic requirements for repair of replication-born double-strand breaks by sister-chromatid recombination and break-induced replication Nucleic Acids Res., October 8, 2007; 35(19): 6560 - 6570. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Navarro, L. Bi, and A. M. Bailis A Mutant Allele of the Transcription Factor IIH Helicase Gene, RAD3, Promotes Loss of Heterozygosity in Response to a DNA Replication Defect in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Genetics, July 1, 2007; 176(3): 1391 - 1402. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. K. Nag, M. Fasullo, Z. Dong, and A. Tronnes Inverted repeat-stimulated sister-chromatid exchange events are RAD1-independent but reduced in a msh2 mutant Nucleic Acids Res., September 15, 2005; 33(16): 5243 - 5249. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Ramey, S. Howar, M. Adkins, J. Linger, J. Spicer, and J. K. Tyler Activation of the DNA Damage Checkpoint in Yeast Lacking the Histone Chaperone Anti-Silencing Function 1 Mol. Cell. Biol., December 1, 2004; 24(23): 10313 - 10327. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. K. Nag, M. Suri, and E. K. Stenson Both CAG repeats and inverted DNA repeats stimulate spontaneous unequal sister-chromatid exchange in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Nucleic Acids Res., October 19, 2004; 32(18): 5677 - 5684. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Bhattacharyya and R. S. Lahue Saccharomyces cerevisiae Srs2 DNA Helicase Selectively Blocks Expansions of Trinucleotide Repeats Mol. Cell. Biol., September 1, 2004; 24(17): 7324 - 7330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Perez Machado, J. I. Gonzalez Borroto, N. Castanedo, A. Creus, and R. Marcos In vitro genotoxicity testing of the furylethylene derivative UC-245 in human cells Mutagenesis, January 1, 2004; 19(1): 75 - 80. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Spell and S. Jinks-Robertson Role of Mismatch Repair in the Fidelity of RAD51- and RAD59-Dependent Recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Genetics, December 1, 2003; 165(4): 1733 - 1744. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



