Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (268K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dong, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Fasullo, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dong, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Fasullo, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 2003, Vol. 31, No. 10 2576-2585
© 2003 Oxford University Press

Multiple recombination pathways for sister chromatid exchange in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: role of RAD1 and the RAD52 epistasis group genes

Zheng Dong and Michael Fasullo

Center for Immunology and Microbial Disease, Albany Medical College, 47 New Scotland Avenue, Albany, NY 12208-3479, USA

*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +1 518 262 6651; Fax: +1 518 262 5689; Email: fasullm{at}mail.amc.edu

Sister chromatid exchange (SCE) can occur by several recombination mechanisms, including those directly initiated by double-strand breaks (DSBs), such as gap repair and break-induced replication (BIR), and those initiated when DNA polymerases stall, such as template switching. To elucidate SCE recombination mechanisms, we determined whether spontaneous and DNA damage-associated SCE requires specific genes within the RAD52 and RAD3 epistasis groups in Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains containing two his3 fragments, his3-{Delta}5' and his3-{Delta}3'::HOcs. SCE frequencies were measured after cells were exposed to UV, X-rays, 4-nitroquinoline 1-oxide (4-NQO) and methyl methanesulfonate (MMS), or when an HO endonuclease-induced DSB was introduced at his3-{Delta}3'::HOcs. Our data indicate that genes involved in gap repair, such as RAD55, RAD57 and RAD54, are required for DNA damage-associated SCE but not for spontaneous SCE. RAD50 and RAD59, genes required for BIR, are required for X-ray-associated SCE but not for SCE stimulated by HO-induced DSBs. In comparison with wild type, rates of spontaneous SCE are 10-fold lower in rad51 rad1 but not in either rad51 rad50 or rad51 rad59 double mutants. We propose that gap repair mechanisms are important in DNA damage-associated recombination, whereas alternative pathways, including a template switch pathway, play a role in spontaneous SCE.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
D. M. Moore, J. Karlin, S. Gonzalez-Barrera, A. Mardiros, M. Lisby, A. Doughty, J. Gilley, R. Rothstein, E. C. Friedberg, and P. L. Fischhaber
Rad10 exhibits lesion-dependent genetic requirements for recruitment to DNA double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Nucleic Acids Res., October 1, 2009; 37(19): 6429 - 6438.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
A. M. Mozlin, C. W. Fung, and L. S. Symington
Role of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad51 Paralogs in Sister Chromatid Recombination
Genetics, January 1, 2008; 178(1): 113 - 126.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
F. Cortes-Ledesma, C. Tous, and A. Aguilera
Different genetic requirements for repair of replication-born double-strand breaks by sister-chromatid recombination and break-induced replication
Nucleic Acids Res., October 8, 2007; 35(19): 6560 - 6570.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
M. S. Navarro, L. Bi, and A. M. Bailis
A Mutant Allele of the Transcription Factor IIH Helicase Gene, RAD3, Promotes Loss of Heterozygosity in Response to a DNA Replication Defect in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Genetics, July 1, 2007; 176(3): 1391 - 1402.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
D. K. Nag, M. Fasullo, Z. Dong, and A. Tronnes
Inverted repeat-stimulated sister-chromatid exchange events are RAD1-independent but reduced in a msh2 mutant
Nucleic Acids Res., September 15, 2005; 33(16): 5243 - 5249.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
C. J. Ramey, S. Howar, M. Adkins, J. Linger, J. Spicer, and J. K. Tyler
Activation of the DNA Damage Checkpoint in Yeast Lacking the Histone Chaperone Anti-Silencing Function 1
Mol. Cell. Biol., December 1, 2004; 24(23): 10313 - 10327.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
D. K. Nag, M. Suri, and E. K. Stenson
Both CAG repeats and inverted DNA repeats stimulate spontaneous unequal sister-chromatid exchange in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Nucleic Acids Res., October 19, 2004; 32(18): 5677 - 5684.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
S. Bhattacharyya and R. S. Lahue
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Srs2 DNA Helicase Selectively Blocks Expansions of Trinucleotide Repeats
Mol. Cell. Biol., September 1, 2004; 24(17): 7324 - 7330.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
G. Perez Machado, J. I. Gonzalez Borroto, N. Castanedo, A. Creus, and R. Marcos
In vitro genotoxicity testing of the furylethylene derivative UC-245 in human cells
Mutagenesis, January 1, 2004; 19(1): 75 - 80.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
R. M. Spell and S. Jinks-Robertson
Role of Mismatch Repair in the Fidelity of RAD51- and RAD59-Dependent Recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Genetics, December 1, 2003; 165(4): 1733 - 1744.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.