Nucleic Acids Research, 2003, Vol. 31, No. 14 4264-4274
© 2003 Oxford University Press
Molecular modeling of the chromatosome particle
Department of Biochemistry and 2 Bioinformatics Centre, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India
*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +91 80 3600118/3942547; Fax: +91 80 3600118; Email: mrsrao{at}biochem.iisc.ernet.in
In an effort to understand the role of the linker histone in chromatin folding, its structure and location in the nucleosome has been studied by molecular modeling methods. The structure of the globular domain of the rat histone H1d, a highly conserved part of the linker histone, built by homology modeling methods, revealed a three-helical bundle fold that could be described as a helixturnhelix variant with its characteristic properties of binding to DNA at the major groove. Using the information of its preferential binding to four-way Holliday junction (HJ) DNA, a model of the domain complexed to HJ was built, which was subsequently used to position the globular domain onto the nucleosome. The model revealed that the primary binding site of the domain interacts with the extra 20 bp of DNA of the entering duplex at the major groove while the secondary binding site interacts with the minor groove of the central gyre of the DNA superhelix of the nucleosomal core. The positioning of the globular domain served as an anchor to locate the C-terminal domain onto the nucleosome to obtain the structure of the chromatosome particle. The resulting structure had a stem-like appearance, resembling that observed by electron microscopic studies. The C-terminal domain which adopts a high mobility group (HMG)-box-like fold, has the ability to bend DNA, causing DNA condensation or compaction. It was observed that the three S/TPKK motifs in the C-terminal domain interact with the exiting duplex, thus defining the path of linker DNA in the chromatin fiber. This study has provided an insight into the probable individual roles of globular and the C-terminal domains of histone H1 in chromatin organization.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Nikitina, R. P. Ghosh, R. A. Horowitz-Scherer, J. C. Hansen, S. A. Grigoryev, and C. L. Woodcock MeCP2-Chromatin Interactions Include the Formation of Chromatosome-like Structures and Are Altered in Mutations Causing Rett Syndrome J. Biol. Chem., September 21, 2007; 282(38): 28237 - 28245. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Gilbert, I. Thomson, S. Boyle, J. Allan, B. Ramsahoye, and W. A. Bickmore DNA methylation affects nuclear organization, histone modifications, and linker histone binding but not chromatin compaction J. Cell Biol., May 7, 2007; 177(3): 401 - 411. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Arya, Q. Zhang, and T. Schlick Flexible Histone Tails in a New Mesoscopic Oligonucleosome Model Biophys. J., July 1, 2006; 91(1): 133 - 150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Fan and V. A. Roberts Complex of linker histone H5 with the nucleosome and its implications for chromatin packing PNAS, May 30, 2006; 103(22): 8384 - 8389. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Shintomi, M. Iwabuchi, H. Saeki, K. Ura, T. Kishimoto, and K. Ohsumi Nucleosome assembly protein-1 is a linker histone chaperone in Xenopus eggs PNAS, June 7, 2005; 102(23): 8210 - 8215. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Martic, Z. Karetsou, K. Kefala, A. S. Politou, C. R. Clapier, T. Straub, and T. Papamarcaki Parathymosin Affects the Binding of Linker Histone H1 to Nucleosomes and Remodels Chromatin Structure J. Biol. Chem., April 22, 2005; 280(16): 16143 - 16150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Wu and A. Travers A 'one-pot' assay for the accessibility of DNA in a nucleosome core particle Nucleic Acids Res., August 25, 2004; 32(15): e122 - e122. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Hendzel, M. A. Lever, E. Crawford, and J. P. H. Th'ng The C-terminal Domain Is the Primary Determinant of Histone H1 Binding to Chromatin in Vivo J. Biol. Chem., May 7, 2004; 279(19): 20028 - 20034. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||




