Nucleic Acids Research, 2003, Vol. 31, No. 15 4503-4516
© 2003 Oxford University Press
Evolutionary clues to DNA polymerase III ß clamp structural mechanisms
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 1 Bungtown Road, PO Box 100, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724, USA
*Tel: +1 516 367 6802; Fax: +1 516 367 8461; Email: neuwald{at}cshl.org
The prokaryotic DNA polymerase III ß homodimeric clamp links the replication complex to DNA during polynucleotide synthesis. This clamp is loaded onto DNA and unloaded by the clamp loader complex, the 
subunit of which by itself can bind to and open the clamp. ß Clamps from diverse bacteria were examined using contrast hierarchical alignment and interaction network (CHAIN) analysis, a statistical approach that categorizes and measures the evolutionary constraints imposed on protein sequences by natural selection. Some constraints are subtle inasmuch as they are unique to certain bacteria. Examination of corresponding molecular interactions within structures of the Escherichia coli ß dimeric and –ß complexes reveals that N320, Y323 and R176, which are subject to very strong constraints, form a substructure that may serve as a platform for leveraging and directing -induced conformational changes. N320 may play a prominent role, as it is strategically situated between this substructure and regions linked to binding and opening of ß’s dimeric interface. R176 appears to act as a relay between the binding site and the clamp’s central hole. Other residues subject to strong constraints are likewise associated with structurally important features. For example, two pairs of interacting residues, R269/E304 and K74/E300, form salt bridges at the dimeric interface, while the C-terminal residues M362, P363, M364 and R365 appear to play key roles in binding. Q149 and K198 appear to sense DNA within the clamp’s central hole while other residues may relay this information to the binding site. Mutagenesis experiments designed to explore possible mechanisms are proposed.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. F. Neuwald Hypothesis: bacterial clamp loader ATPase activation through DNA-dependent repositioning of the catalytic base and of a trans-acting catalytic threonine Nucleic Acids Res., October 6, 2006; 34(18): 5280 - 5290. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. F. Neuwald Evolutionary clues to eukaryotic DNA clamp-loading mechanisms: analysis of the functional constraints imposed on replication factor C AAA+ ATPases Nucleic Acids Res., June 22, 2005; 33(11): 3614 - 3628. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. Kannan and A. F. Neuwald Evolutionary constraints associated with functional specificity of the CMGC protein kinases MAPK, CDK, GSK, SRPK, DYRK, and CK2{alpha} Protein Sci., August 1, 2004; 13(8): 2059 - 2077. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|