Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (148K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Benita, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Humphery-Smith, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Benita, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Humphery-Smith, I.
Related Collections
Right arrow Nucleic acid amplification
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 2003, Vol. 31, No. 16 e99
© 2003 Oxford University Press

Regionalized GC content of template DNA as a predictor of PCR success

Yair Benita*, Ronald S. Oosting, Martin C. Lok, Michael J. Wise1 and Ian Humphery-Smith

Department of Pharmaceutical Proteomics, Utrecht Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Sorbonnelaan 16, Utrecht, The Netherlands and 1 Department of Genetics, Cambridge University, Cambridge CB2 3EH, UK

*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +31 30 253 6817; Fax: +31 30 253 4662; Email: y.benita{at}pharm.uu.nl

A set of 1438 human exons was subjected to nested PCR. The initial success rate using a standard PCR protocol required for ligation-independent cloning was 83.4%. Logistic regression analysis was conducted on 27 primer- and template-related characteristics, of which most could be ignored apart from those related to the GC content of the template. Overall GC content of the template was a good predictor for PCR success; however, specificity and sensitivity values for predicted outcome were improved to 84.3 and 94.8%, respectively, when regionalized GC content was employed. This represented a significant improvement in predictability with respect to GC content alone (P < 0.001; {chi}2) and is expected to increase in relative sensitivity as template size increases. Regionalized GC was calculated with respect to a threshold of 61% GC content and a sliding window of 21 bp across the target sequence. Fine-tuning of PCR conditions is not practicable for all target sequences whenever a large number of genes of different lengths and GC content are to be amplified in parallel, particularly if total open reading frame or domain coverage is essential for recombinant protein synthesis. Thus, the present method is proposed as a means of grouping subsets of genes possessing potentially difficult target sequences so that PCR conditions can be optimized separately in order to obtain improved outcomes.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
T. Chu, K. Bunce, W. A. Hogge, and D. G. Peters
Statistical model for whole genome sequencing and its application to minimally invasive diagnosis of fetal genetic disease
Bioinformatics, May 15, 2009; 25(10): 1244 - 1250.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
R. Andreson, T. Mols, and M. Remm
Predicting failure rate of PCR in large genomes
Nucleic Acids Res., June 1, 2008; 36(11): e66 - e66.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
Y. Benita, M. J. Wise, M. C. Lok, I. Humphery-Smith, and R. S. Oosting
Analysis of High Throughput Protein Expression in Escherichia coli
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, September 1, 2006; 5(9): 1567 - 1580.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
S. Chavali, A. Mahajan, R. Tabassum, S. Maiti, and D. Bharadwaj
Oligonucleotide properties determination and primer designing: a critical examination of predictions
Bioinformatics, October 15, 2005; 21(20): 3918 - 3925.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.