Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (480K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (43)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vinogradov, A. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vinogradov, A. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 2003, Vol. 31, No. 17 5212-5220
© 2003 Oxford University Press

Isochores and tissue-specificity

Alexander E. Vinogradov*

Institute of Cytology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tikhoretsky Avenue 4, St Petersburg 194064, Russia

*Tel: +7 812 247 5310; Fax: +7 812 247 0341; Email: aevin{at}mail.cytspb.rssi.ru

The housekeeping (ubiquitously expressed) genes in the mammal genome were shown here to be on average slightly GC-richer than tissue-specific genes. Both housekeeping and tissue-specific genes occupy similar ranges of GC content, but the former tend to concentrate in the upper part of the range. In the human genome, tissue-specific genes show two maxima, GC-poor and GC-rich. The strictly tissue-specific human genes tend to concentrate in the GC-poor region; their distribution is left-skewed and thus reciprocal to the distribution of housekeeping genes. The intermediately tissue-specific genes show an intermediate GC content and the right-skewed distribution. Both in the human and mouse, genes specific for some tissues (e.g., parts of the central nervous system) have a higher average GC content than housekeeping genes. Since they are not transcribed in the germ line (in contrast to housekeeping genes), and therefore have a lower probability of inheritable gene conversion, this finding contradicts the biased gene conversion (BGC) explanation for elevated GC content in the heavy isochores of mammal genome. Genes specific for germ-line tissues (ovary, testes) show a low average GC content, which is also in contradiction to the BGC explanation. Both for the total data set and for the most part of tissues taken separately, a weak positive correlation was found between gene GC content and expression level. The fraction of ubiquitously expressed genes is nearly 1.5-fold higher in the mouse than in the human. This suggests that mouse tissues are comparatively less differentiated (on the molecular level), which can be related to a less pronounced isochoric structure of the mouse genome. In each separate tissue (in both species), tissue-specific genes do not form a clear-cut frequency peak (in contrast to housekeeping genes), but constitute a continuum with a gradually increasing degree of tissue-specificity, which probably reflects the path of cell differentiation and/or an independent use of the same protein in several unrelated tissues.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
H. Robins, M. Krasnitz, and A. J. Levine
The Computational Detection of Functional Nucleotide Sequence Motifs in the Coding Regions of Organisms
Experimental Biology and Medicine, June 1, 2008; 233(6): 665 - 673.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
P. Khuu, M. Sandor, J. DeYoung, and P. S. Ho
Phylogenomic analysis of the emergence of GC-rich transcription elements
PNAS, October 16, 2007; 104(42): 16528 - 16533.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
A. E. Vinogradov and O. V. Anatskaya
Organismal complexity, cell differentiation and gene expression: human over mouse
Nucleic Acids Res., October 8, 2007; 35(19): 6350 - 6356.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
T. R. Dreszer, G. D. Wall, D. Haussler, and K. S. Pollard
Biased clustered substitutions in the human genome: The footprints of male-driven biased gene conversion
Genome Res., October 1, 2007; 17(10): 1420 - 1430.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
A. E. Vinogradov
'Genome design' model and multicellular complexity: golden middle
Nucleic Acids Res., November 6, 2006; 34(20): 5906 - 5914.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. Sinha, X. Ling, C. W. Whitfield, C. Zhai, and G. E. Robinson
Genome scan for cis-regulatory DNA motifs associated with social behavior in honey bees
PNAS, October 31, 2006; 103(44): 16352 - 16357.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
W. H. Press and H. Robins
Isochores Exhibit Evidence of Genes Interacting With the Large-Scale Genomic Environment
Genetics, October 1, 2006; 174(2): 1029 - 1040.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
M. Semon, J. R. Lobry, and L. Duret
No Evidence for Tissue-Specific Adaptation of Synonymous Codon Usage in Humans
Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2006; 23(3): 523 - 529.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
H. Robins, M. Krasnitz, H. Barak, and A. J. Levine
A Relative-Entropy Algorithm for Genomic Fingerprinting Captures Host-Phage Similarities
J. Bacteriol., December 15, 2005; 187(24): 8370 - 8374.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
H. Robins and W. H. Press
Human microRNAs target a functionally distinct population of genes with AT-rich 3' UTRs
PNAS, October 25, 2005; 102(43): 15557 - 15562.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
M. Sironi, G. Menozzi, G. P. Comi, R. Cagliani, N. Bresolin, and U. Pozzoli
Analysis of intronic conserved elements indicates that functional complexity might represent a major source of negative selection on non-coding sequences
Hum. Mol. Genet., September 1, 2005; 14(17): 2533 - 2546.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
M. T. Webster, N. G. C. Smith, L. Hultin-Rosenberg, P. F. Arndt, and H. Ellegren
Male-Driven Biased Gene Conversion Governs the Evolution of Base Composition in Human Alu Repeats
Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2005; 22(6): 1468 - 1474.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
N. Cohen, T. Dagan, L. Stone, and D. Graur
GC Composition of the Human Genome: In Search of Isochores
Mol. Biol. Evol., May 1, 2005; 22(5): 1260 - 1272.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
M. Semon, D. Mouchiroud, and L. Duret
Relationship between gene expression and GC-content in mammals: statistical significance and biological relevance
Hum. Mol. Genet., February 1, 2005; 14(3): 421 - 427.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
A. E. Vinogradov
Noncoding DNA, isochores and gene expression: nucleosome formation potential
Nucleic Acids Res., January 26, 2005; 33(2): 559 - 563.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
M. T. Webster, N. G.C. Smith, M. J. Lercher, and H. Ellegren
Gene Expression, Synteny, and Local Similarity in Human Noncoding Mutation Rates
Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2004; 21(10): 1820 - 1830.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
P. N. Robinson, U. Bohme, R. Lopez, S. Mundlos, and P. Nurnberg
Gene-Ontology analysis reveals association of tissue-specific 5' CpG-island genes with development and embryogenesis
Hum. Mol. Genet., September 1, 2004; 13(17): 1969 - 1978.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. B. Plotkin, H. Robins, and A. J. Levine
Tissue-specific codon usage and the expression of human genes
PNAS, August 24, 2004; 101(34): 12588 - 12591.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.