Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (392K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Feng, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Tang, M.-s.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Feng, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Tang, M.-s.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 2003, Vol. 31, No. 20 5897-5906
© 2003 Oxford University Press

Effects of genomic context and chromatin structure on transcription-coupled and global genomic repair in mammalian cells

Zhaohui Feng1, Wenwei Hu1, Lawrence A. Chasin2 and Moon-shong Tang*,1,3,4

1 Department of Environmental Medicine, 3 Department of Medicine and 4 Department of Pathology, New York University School of Medicine, Tuxedo, NY 10987, USA and 2 Department of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA

*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +1 845 731 3585; Fax: +1 845 351 2385; Email: tang{at}env.med.nyu.edu
The authors wish it to be known that, in their opinion, the first two authors should be regarded as joint First Authors

It has been long recognized that in mammalian cells, DNA damage is preferentially repaired in the transcribed strand of transcriptionally active genes. However, recently, we found that in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, UV-induced cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) are preferentially repaired in both the transcribed and the non-transcribed strand of exon 1 of the dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) gene. We mapped CPD repair at the nucleotide level in the transcriptionally active DHFR gene and the adjacent upstream OST gene, both of which have been translocated to two chromosomal positions that differ from their normal endogeneous positions. This allowed us to study the role of transcription, genomic context and chromatin structure on repair. We found that CPD repair in the transcribed strand is the same for endogenous and translocated DHFR genes, and the order of repair efficiency is exon 1 > exon 2 > exon 5. However, unlike the endogenous DHFR gene, efficient repair of CPDs in the non-transcribed strand of exon 1 is not observed in the translocated DHFR gene. CPDs are efficiently repaired in the transcribed strand in endogenous and translocated OST genes, which indicates that efficient repair in exon 1 of the non-transcribed strand of the endogenous DHFR gene is not due to the extension of transcription-coupled repair of the OST gene. Using micrococcal nuclease digestion, we probed the chromatin structure in the DHFR gene and found that chromatin structure in the exon 1 region of endogenous DHFR is much more open than at translocated loci. These results suggest that while transcription-coupled repair is transcription dependent, global genomic repair is greatly affected by chromatin structure.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
H. Episkopou, S. A. Kyrtopoulos, P. P. Sfikakis, M. Fousteri, M. A. Dimopoulos, L. H.F. Mullenders, and V. L. Souliotis
Association between Transcriptional Activity, Local Chromatin Structure, and the Efficiencies of Both Subpathways of Nucleotide Excision Repair of Melphalan Adducts
Cancer Res., May 15, 2009; 69(10): 4424 - 4433.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.