Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (332K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (31)
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hardeland, U.
Right arrow Articles by Schär, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hardeland, U.
Right arrow Articles by Schär, P.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 2003, Vol. 31, No. 9 2261-2271
© 2003 Oxford University Press

The versatile thymine DNA-glycosylase: a comparative characterization of the human, Drosophila and fission yeast orthologs

Ulrike Hardeland, Marc Bentele, Josef Jiricny and Primo Schär

Institute of Molecular Cancer Research, University of Zürich, August Forel Strasse 7, CH-8008 Zürich, Switzerland

*To whom correspondence should be addressed at Institute of Molecular Cancer Research, University of Zürich, August Forel Strasse 7, CH-8008 Zürich, Switzerland. Tel: +41 1 6348926; Fax: +41 1 6348904; Email: schaer{at}imr.unizh.ch

Human thymine-DNA glycosylase (TDG) is well known to excise thymine and uracil from G·T and G·U mismatches, respectively, and was therefore proposed to play a central role in the cellular defense against genetic mutation through spontaneous deamination of 5-methylcytosine and cytosine. In this study, we characterized two newly discovered orthologs of TDG, the Drosophila melanogaster Thd1p and the Schizosaccharomyces pombe Thp1p proteins, with an objective to address the function of this subfamily of uracil-DNA glycosylases from an evolutionary perspective. A systematic biochemical comparison of both enzymes with human TDG revealed a number of biologically significant facts. (i) All eukaryotic TDG orthologs have broad and species-specific substrate spectra that include a variety of damaged pyrimidine and purine bases; (ii) the common most efficiently processed substrates of all are uracil and 3,N4- ethenocytosine opposite guanine and 5-fluorouracil in any double-stranded DNA context; (iii) 5-methylcytosine and thymine derivatives are processed with an appreciable efficiency only by the human and the Drosophila enzymes; (iv) none of the proteins is able to hydrolyze a non-damaged 5'-methylcytosine opposite G; and (v) the double strand and mismatch dependency of the enzymes varies with the substrate and is not a stringent feature of this subfamily of DNA glycosylases. These findings advance our current view on the role of TDG proteins and document that they have evolved with high structural flexibility to counter a broad range of DNA base damage in accordance with the specific needs of individual species.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. Maiti, M. T. Morgan, E. Pozharski, and A. C. Drohat
Crystal structure of human thymine DNA glycosylase bound to DNA elucidates sequence-specific mismatch recognition
PNAS, July 1, 2008; 105(26): 8890 - 8895.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Med.Home page
J. M. Di Noia, G. T. Williams, D. T.Y. Chan, J.-M. Buerstedde, G. S. Baldwin, and M. S. Neuberger
Dependence of antibody gene diversification on uracil excision
J. Exp. Med., December 24, 2007; 204(13): 3209 - 3219.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Nucleic Acids ResHome page
X. Guan, A. Madabushi, D.-Y. Chang, M. E. Fitzgerald, G. Shi, A. C. Drohat, and A-L. Lu
The human checkpoint sensor Rad9 Rad1 Hus1 interacts with and stimulates DNA repair enzyme TDG glycosylase
Nucleic Acids Res., September 25, 2007; 35(18): 6207 - 6218.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. T. Morgan, M. T. Bennett, and A. C. Drohat
Excision of 5-Halogenated Uracils by Human Thymine DNA Glycosylase: ROBUST ACTIVITY FOR DNA CONTEXTS OTHER THAN CpG
J. Biol. Chem., September 21, 2007; 282(38): 27578 - 27586.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Nucleic Acids ResHome page
U. Hardeland, C. Kunz, F. Focke, M. Szadkowski, and P. Schar
Cell cycle regulation as a mechanism for functional separation of the apparently redundant uracil DNA glycosylases TDG and UNG2
Nucleic Acids Res., June 28, 2007; 35(11): 3859 - 3867.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
Q. An, P. Robins, T. Lindahl, and D. E. Barnes
5-Fluorouracil Incorporated into DNA Is Excised by the Smug1 DNA Glycosylase to Reduce Drug Cytotoxicity
Cancer Res., February 1, 2007; 67(3): 940 - 945.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
R. D. Mohan, A. Rao, J. Gagliardi, and M. Tini
SUMO-1-Dependent Allosteric Regulation of Thymine DNA Glycosylase Alters Subnuclear Localization and CBP/p300 Recruitment
Mol. Cell. Biol., January 1, 2007; 27(1): 229 - 243.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
F. Agius, A. Kapoor, and J.-K. Zhu
Role of the Arabidopsis DNA glycosylase/lyase ROS1 in active DNA demethylation
PNAS, August 1, 2006; 103(31): 11796 - 11801.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
C. Kress, H. Thomassin, and T. Grange
Active cytosine demethylation triggered by a nuclear receptor involves DNA strand breaks
PNAS, July 25, 2006; 103(30): 11112 - 11117.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
T. Morales-Ruiz, A. P. Ortega-Galisteo, M. I. Ponferrada-Marin, M. I. Martinez-Macias, R. R. Ariza, and T. Roldan-Arjona
DEMETER and REPRESSOR OF SILENCING 1 encode 5-methylcytosine DNA glycosylases
PNAS, May 2, 2006; 103(18): 6853 - 6858.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
E. Moe, I. Leiros, A. O. Smalas, and S. McSweeney
The Crystal Structure of Mismatch-specific Uracil-DNA Glycosylase (MUG) from Deinococcus radiodurans Reveals a Novel Catalytic Residue and Broad Substrate Specificity
J. Biol. Chem., January 6, 2006; 281(1): 569 - 577.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Nucleic Acids ResHome page
M. J. Lucey, D. Chen, J. Lopez-Garcia, S. M. Hart, F. Phoenix, R. Al-Jehani, J. P. Alao, R. White, K. B. Kindle, R. Losson, et al.
T:G mismatch-specific thymine-DNA glycosylase (TDG) as a coregulator of transcription interacts with SRC1 family members through a novel tyrosine repeat motif
Nucleic Acids Res., November 10, 2005; 33(19): 6393 - 6404.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum Mol GenetHome page
H. D. Morgan, F. Santos, K. Green, W. Dean, and W. Reik
Epigenetic reprogramming in mammals
Hum. Mol. Genet., April 15, 2005; 14(suppl_1): R47 - R58.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
H. D. Morgan, W. Dean, H. A. Coker, W. Reik, and S. K. Petersen-Mahrt
Activation-induced Cytidine Deaminase Deaminates 5-Methylcytosine in DNA and Is Expressed in Pluripotent Tissues: IMPLICATIONS FOR EPIGENETIC REPROGRAMMING
J. Biol. Chem., December 10, 2004; 279(50): 52353 - 52360.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Bekesi, I. Zagyva, E. Hunyadi-Gulyas, V. Pongracz, J. Kovari, A. O. Nagy, A. Erdei, K. F. Medzihradszky, and B. G. Vertessy
Developmental Regulation of dUTPase in Drosophila melanogaster
J. Biol. Chem., May 21, 2004; 279(21): 22362 - 22370.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Nucleic Acids ResHome page
J.-H. Yoon, S. Iwai, T. R. O'Connor, and G. P. Pfeifer
Human thymine DNA glycosylase (TDG) and methyl-CpG-binding protein 4 (MBD4) excise thymine glycol (Tg) from a Tg:G mispair
Nucleic Acids Res., September 15, 2003; 31(18): 5399 - 5404.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.