Nucleic Acids Research, 2003, Vol. 31, No. 9 e52
© 2003 Oxford University Press
Testing for differentially expressed genes with microarray data
Division of Biometry and Risk Assessment, National Center for Toxicological Research, Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, AR 72079, USA
*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +870 543 7007; Fax: +870 543 7662; Email: jchen{at}nctr.fda.gov
This paper compares the type I error and power of the one- and two-sample t-tests, and the one- and two-sample permutation tests for detecting differences in gene expression between two microarray samples with replicates using Monte Carlo simulations. When data are generated from a normal distribution, type I errors and powers of the one-sample parametric t-test and one-sample permutation test are very close, as are the two-sample t-test and two-sample permutation test, provided that the number of replicates is adequate. When data are generated from a t-distribution, the permutation tests outperform the corresponding parametric tests if the number of replicates is at least five. For data from a two-color dye swap experiment, the one-sample test appears to perform better than the two-sample test since expression measurements for control and treatment samples from the same spot are correlated. For data from independent samples, such as the one-channel array or two-channel array experiment using reference design, the two-sample t-tests appear more powerful than the one-sample t-tests.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Feig, C. Kirchhoff, R. Ivell, O. Naether, W. Schulze, and A.-N. Spiess A new paradigm for profiling testicular gene expression during normal and disturbed human spermatogenesis Mol. Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2007; 13(1): 33 - 43. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Riggi, L. Cironi, P. Provero, M.-L. Suva, K. Kaloulis, C. Garcia-Echeverria, F. Hoffmann, A. Trumpp, and I. Stamenkovic Development of Ewing's Sarcoma from Primary Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Progenitor Cells Cancer Res., December 15, 2005; 65(24): 11459 - 11468. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. M. Old, K. Meyer-Arendt, L. Aveline-Wolf, K. G. Pierce, A. Mendoza, J. R. Sevinsky, K. A. Resing, and N. G. Ahn Comparison of Label-free Methods for Quantifying Human Proteins by Shotgun Proteomics Mol. Cell. Proteomics, October 1, 2005; 4(10): 1487 - 1502. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Burgueno, J. Crossa, D. Grimanelli, O. Leblanc, and D. Autran Spatial Analysis of cDNA Microarray Experiments Crop Sci., February 23, 2005; 45(2): 748 - 757. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Brodsky, A. Leontovich, M. Shtutman, and E. Feinstein Identification and handling of artifactual gene expression profiles emerging in microarray hybridization experiments Nucleic Acids Res., March 3, 2004; 32(4): e46 - e46. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W.P. Kuo Overview of Bioinformatics and its Application to Oral Genomics Advances in Dental Research, December 1, 2003; 17(1): 89 - 94. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||





