Published online 29 July 2004
Nucleic Acids Research, Vol. 32 No. 13 © Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved
Detecting single DNA copy number variations in complex genomes using one nanogram of starting DNA and BAC-array CGH
Génomique Cellulaire des Cancers, CNRS UMR 8125 and 1 Service de Génétique, Institut Gustave Roussy, 39 rue Camille Desmoulins, 94805 Villejuif Cedex, France, 2 Service de Génomique Fonctionnelle, CEA and 3 Genoscope, 2 rue Gaston Crémieux, 91057 Evry Cedex, France
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +33 1 42 11 54 21; Fax: +33 1 41 11 52 60; Email: gdanglot{at}igr.fr
Received May 27, 2004; Revised and Accepted July 9, 2004
Comparative genomic hybridization to bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC)-arrays (array-CGH) is a highly efficient technique, allowing the simultaneous measurement of genomic DNA copy number at hundreds or thousands of loci, and the reliable detection of local one-copy-level variations. We report a genome-wide amplification method allowing the same measurement sensitivity, using 1 ng of starting genomic DNA, instead of the classical 1 µg usually necessary. Using a discrete series of DNA fragments, we defined the parameters adapted to the most faithful ligation-mediated PCR amplification and the limits of the technique. The optimized protocol allows a 3000-fold DNA amplification, retaining the quantitative characteristics of the initial genome. Validation of the amplification procedure, using DNA from 10 tumour cell lines hybridized to BAC-arrays of 1500 spots, showed almost perfectly superimposed ratios for the non-amplified and amplified DNAs. Correlation coefficients of 0.96 and 0.99 were observed for regions of low-copy-level variations and all regions, respectively (including in vivo amplified oncogenes). Finally, labelling DNA using two nucleotides bearing the same fluorophore led to a significant increase in reproducibility and to the correct detection of one-copy gain or loss in >90% of the analysed data, even for pseudotriploid tumour genomes.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Huang, J. Pang, T. Watanabe, H.-K. Ng, and H. Ohgaki Whole Genome Amplification for Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization Using DNA Extracted from Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Histological Sections J. Mol. Diagn., March 1, 2009; 11(2): 109 - 116. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Fuhrmann, O. Schmidt-Kittler, N. H. Stoecklein, K. Petat-Dutter, C. Vay, K. Bockler, R. Reinhardt, T. Ragg, and C. A. Klein High-resolution array comparative genomic hybridization of single micrometastatic tumor cells Nucleic Acids Res., April 1, 2008; 36(7): e39 - e39. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Goldschneider, E. Horvilleur, L.-F. Plassa, M. Guillaud-Bataille, K. Million, E. Wittmer-Dupret, G. Danglot, H. d. The, J. Benard, E. May, et al. Expression of C-terminal deleted p53 isoforms in neuroblastoma Nucleic Acids Res., November 14, 2006; 34(19): 5603 - 5612. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Le Caignec, C. Spits, K. Sermon, M. De Rycke, B. Thienpont, S. Debrock, C. Staessen, Y. Moreau, J.-P. Fryns, A. Van Steirteghem, et al. Single-cell chromosomal imbalances detection by array CGH. Nucleic Acids Res., January 1, 2006; 34(9): e68 - e68. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Cardoso, L. Molenaar, R. X. de Menezes, C. Rosenberg, H. Morreau, G. Moslein, R. Fodde, and J. M. Boer Genomic profiling by DNA amplification of laser capture microdissected tissues and array CGH Nucleic Acids Res., October 28, 2004; 32(19): e146 - e146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

