Skip Navigation

Nucleic Acids Research 2004 32(14):4137-4144; doi:10.1093/nar/gkh763
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (317K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (23)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Takenaka, M.
Right arrow Articles by Brennicke, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Takenaka, M.
Right arrow Articles by Brennicke, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published online 4 August 2004

Nucleic Acids Research, Vol. 32 No. 14 © Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved

Complex cis-elements determine an RNA editing site in pea mitochondria

Mizuki Takenaka*, Julia Neuwirt and Axel Brennicke

Molekulare Botanik, Universität Ulm, 89069 Ulm, Germany

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +49 731 502 2616; Fax: +49 731 502 2626; Email: mizuki.takenaka{at}biologie.uni-ulm.de

Received June 14, 2004; Revised and Accepted July 26, 2004

The cis-requirements for the first editing site in the atp9 mRNA from pea mitochondria were investigated in an in vitro RNA editing system. Template RNAs deleted 5' of –20 are edited correctly, but with decreased efficiency. Deletions between –20 and the edited nucleotide abolish editing activity. Substitution of the sequences 3' of the editing site has little effect, which suggests that the major determinants reside upstream. Stepwise mutated RNA sequences were used as templates or competitors that divide the cis-elements into several distinct regions. In the template RNAs, mutation of the sequence between –40 and –35 reduces the editing activity, while the region from –15 to –5 is essential for the editing reaction. In competition experiments the upstream region can be titrated, while the essential sequence near the editing site is largely resistant to excess competitor. This observation suggests that either one trans-factor attaches to these separate cis-regions with different affinities or two distinct trans-factors bind to these sequences, and one of which is present in limited amounts, wheras the other one is more abundant in the lysate.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant CellHome page
K. Okuda, A.-L. Chateigner-Boutin, T. Nakamura, E. Delannoy, M. Sugita, F. Myouga, R. Motohashi, K. Shinozaki, I. Small, and T. Shikanai
Pentatricopeptide Repeat Proteins with the DYW Motif Have Distinct Molecular Functions in RNA Editing and RNA Cleavage in Arabidopsis Chloroplasts
PLANT CELL, January 1, 2009; 21(1): 146 - 156.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. Verbitskiy, J. A. van der Merwe, A. Zehrmann, A. Brennicke, and M. Takenaka
Multiple Specificity Recognition Motifs Enhance Plant Mitochondrial RNA Editing in Vitro
J. Biol. Chem., September 5, 2008; 283(36): 24374 - 24381.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
M. Rudinger, M. Polsakiewicz, and V. Knoop
Organellar RNA Editing and Plant-Specific Extensions of Pentatricopeptide Repeat Proteins in Jungermanniid but not in Marchantiid Liverworts
Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2008; 25(7): 1405 - 1414.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
S. Bentolila, L. E. Elliott, and M. R. Hanson
Genetic Architecture of Mitochondrial Editing in Arabidopsis thaliana
Genetics, March 1, 2008; 178(3): 1693 - 1708.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
Y. Kobayashi, M. Matsuo, K. Sakamoto, T. Wakasugi, K. Yamada, and J. Obokata
Two RNA editing sites with cis-acting elements of moderate sequence identity are recognized by an identical site-recognition protein in tobacco chloroplasts
Nucleic Acids Res., January 17, 2008; 36(1): 311 - 318.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
R. M. Mulligan, K. L. C. Chang, and C. C. Chou
Computational Analysis of RNA Editing Sites in Plant Mitochondrial Genomes Reveals Similar Information Content and a Sporadic Distribution of Editing Sites
Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2007; 24(9): 1971 - 1981.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. Okuda, T. Nakamura, M. Sugita, T. Shimizu, and T. Shikanai
A Pentatricopeptide Repeat Protein Is a Site Recognition Factor in Chloroplast RNA Editing
J. Biol. Chem., December 8, 2006; 281(49): 37661 - 37667.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
M. Tillich, P. Lehwark, B. R. Morton, and U. G. Maier
The Evolution of Chloroplast RNA Editing
Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2006; 23(10): 1912 - 1921.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
S. Bentolila, A.-L. Chateigner-Boutin, and M. R. Hanson
Ecotype Allelic Variation in C-to-U Editing Extent of a Mitochondrial Transcript Identifies RNA-Editing Quantitative Trait Loci in Arabidopsis
Plant Physiology, December 1, 2005; 139(4): 2006 - 2016.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RNAHome page
J. NEUWIRT, M. TAKENAKA, J. A. VAN DER MERWE, and A. BRENNICKE
An in vitro RNA editing system from cauliflower mitochondria: Editing site recognition parameters can vary in different plant species
RNA, October 1, 2005; 11(10): 1563 - 1570.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
D. Choury, J.-C. Farre, X. Jordana, and A. Araya
Different patterns in the recognition of editing sites in plant mitochondria
Nucleic Acids Res., December 7, 2004; 32(21): 6397 - 6406.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.