Published online 5 October 2004
Nucleic Acids Research, Vol. 32 No. 17 © Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved
DNA double strand break repair in human bladder cancer is error prone and involves microhomology-associated end-joining
Cancer Research UK Clinical Centre, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +44 113 206 4908; Fax: +44 113 242 9886; Email: J.Bentley{at}cancermed.leeds.ac.uk
Received June 18, 2004; Revised and Accepted September 3, 2004
In human cells DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) can be repaired by the non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) pathway. In a background of NHEJ deficiency, DSBs with mismatched ends can be joined by an error-prone mechanism involving joining between regions of nucleotide microhomology. The majority of joins formed from a DSB with partially incompatible 3' overhangs by cell-free extracts from human glioblastoma (MO59K) and urothelial (NHU) cell lines were accurate and produced by the overlap/fill-in of mismatched termini by NHEJ. However, repair of DSBs by extracts using tissue from four high-grade bladder carcinomas resulted in no accurate join formation. Junctions were formed by the non-random deletion of terminal nucleotides and showed a preference for annealing at a microhomology of 8 nt buried within the DNA substrate; this process was not dependent on functional Ku70, DNA-PK or XRCC4. Junctions were repaired in the same manner in MO59K extracts in which accurate NHEJ was inactivated by inhibition of Ku70 or DNA-PKcs. These data indicate that bladder tumour extracts are unable to perform accurate NHEJ such that error-prone joining predominates. Therefore, in high-grade tumours mismatched DSBs are repaired by a highly mutagenic, microhomology-mediated, alternative end-joining pathway, a process that may contribute to genomic instability observed in bladder cancer.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. D. Figueroa, N. Malats, N. Rothman, F. X. Real, D. Silverman, M. Kogevinas, S. Chanock, M. Yeager, R. Welch, M. Dosemeci, et al. Evaluation of genetic variation in the double-strand break repair pathway and bladder cancer risk Carcinogenesis, August 1, 2007; 28(8): 1788 - 1793. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Lee and S. E. Lee Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sae2- and Tel1-Dependent Single-Strand DNA Formation at DNA Break Promotes Microhomology-Mediated End Joining Genetics, August 1, 2007; 176(4): 2003 - 2014. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Decottignies Microhomology-Mediated End Joining in Fission Yeast Is Repressed by Pku70 and Relies on Genes Involved in Homologous Recombination Genetics, July 1, 2007; 176(3): 1403 - 1415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kuhfittig-Kulle, E. Feldmann, A. Odersky, A. Kuliczkowska, W. Goedecke, A. Eggert, and P. Pfeiffer The mutagenic potential of non-homologous end joining in the absence of the NHEJ core factors Ku70/80, DNA-PKcs and XRCC4-LigIV Mutagenesis, May 1, 2007; 22(3): 217 - 233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Decottignies Capture of Extranuclear DNA at Fission Yeast Double-Strand Breaks Genetics, December 1, 2005; 171(4): 1535 - 1548. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Liang, L. Deng, Y. Chen, G. C. Li, C. Shao, and J. A. Tischfield Modulation of DNA End Joining by Nuclear Proteins J. Biol. Chem., September 9, 2005; 280(36): 31442 - 31449. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Zingler, U. Willhoeft, H.-P. Brose, V. Schoder, T. Jahns, K.-M. O. Hanschmann, T. A. Morrish, J. Lower, and G. G. Schumann Analysis of 5' junctions of human LINE-1 and Alu retrotransposons suggests an alternative model for 5'-end attachment requiring microhomology-mediated end-joining Genome Res., June 1, 2005; 15(6): 780 - 789. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. P. Diggle, J. Bentley, M. A. Knowles, and A. E. Kiltie Inhibition of double-strand break non-homologous end-joining by cisplatin adducts in human cell extracts Nucleic Acids Res., May 4, 2005; 33(8): 2531 - 2539. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||





