Published online 4 February 2004
Nucleic Acids Research, 2004, Vol. 32, No. 2 842-847
© 2004 Oxford University Press
Two mutations in the tetracycline repressor change the inducer anhydrotetracycline to a corepressor
Lehstuhl für Mikrobiologie, Biochemie und Genetik, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Staudtstrasse 5, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany
*To whom correspondence should be adressed. Tel: +49 9131 85 28081; Fax: +49 9131 85 28082; Email: whillen{at}biologie.uni-erlangen.de
We report for the first time the in vitro characterization of a reverse tetracycline repressor (revTetR). The dimeric wild-type repressor (TetR) binds to tet operator tetO in the absence of the inducer anhydrotetracycline (atc) to confer tight repression. We have isolated the revTetR G96E L205S mutant, which, contrary to TetR, binds tetO only in the presence of atc. This reverse acting mutant was overproduced and purified. Effector and DNA binding properties were analyzed by EMSA and quantified by fluorescence titration and surface plasmon resonance. The association constant KA of revTetR for binding of [atcMg]+ is
108 M1, four orders of magnitude lower than that of TetR. The affinity of TetR for tetO is 5.6 ± 2 x 109 M1 and that for revTetR in the presence of atc is 1 ± 0.2 x 108 M1. Both induced forms, the atc-bound TetR and the free revTetR, have the same low affinity of 4 ± 1 x 105 M1 for DNA. Therefore, atc does not act as a dimerization agent for revTetR. We discuss the structural differences between TetR and revTetR potentially underlying this reversal of activity.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. R. Whetstine, J. G. Slusser, and W. R. Zuckert Development of a Single-Plasmid-Based Regulatable Gene Expression System for Borrelia burgdorferi Appl. Envir. Microbiol., October 15, 2009; 75(20): 6553 - 6558. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Hernandez, M. J. Mate, P. C. Sanchez-Diaz, A. Romero, F. Rojo, and J. L. Martinez Structural and Functional Analysis of SmeT, the Repressor of the Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Multidrug Efflux Pump SmeDEF J. Biol. Chem., May 22, 2009; 284(21): 14428 - 14438. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Resch, H. Striegl, E. M. Henssler, M. Sevvana, C. Egerer-Sieber, E. Schiltz, W. Hillen, and Y. A. Muller A protein functional leap: how a single mutation reverses the function of the transcription regulator TetR Nucleic Acids Res., August 1, 2008; 36(13): 4390 - 4401. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kamionka, M. Majewski, K. Roth, R. Bertram, C. Kraft, and W. Hillen Induction of single chain tetracycline repressor requires the binding of two inducers Nucleic Acids Res., September 1, 2006; 34(14): 3834 - 3841. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Lin, C. Cagliero, B. Guo, Y.-W. Barton, M.-C. Maurel, S. Payot, and Q. Zhang Bile Salts Modulate Expression of the CmeABC Multidrug Efflux Pump in Campylobacter jejuni J. Bacteriol., November 1, 2005; 187(21): 7417 - 7424. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Ramos, M. Martinez-Bueno, A. J. Molina-Henares, W. Teran, K. Watanabe, X. Zhang, M. T. Gallegos, R. Brennan, and R. Tobes The TetR Family of Transcriptional Repressors Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., June 1, 2005; 69(2): 326 - 356. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kamionka, R. Bertram, and W. Hillen Tetracycline-Dependent Conditional Gene Knockout in Bacillus subtilis Appl. Envir. Microbiol., February 1, 2005; 71(2): 728 - 733. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ehrt, X. V. Guo, C. M. Hickey, M. Ryou, M. Monteleone, L. W. Riley, and D. Schnappinger Controlling gene expression in mycobacteria with anhydrotetracycline and Tet repressor Nucleic Acids Res., February 1, 2005; 33(2): e21 - e21. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Yamasaki, T. Kigawa, M. Inoue, M. Tateno, T. Yamasaki, T. Yabuki, M. Aoki, E. Seki, T. Matsuda, Y. Tomo, et al. Solution Structure of the B3 DNA Binding Domain of the Arabidopsis Cold-Responsive Transcription Factor RAV1 PLANT CELL, December 1, 2004; 16(12): 3448 - 3459. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||





