Published online 21 December 2004
Nucleic Acids Research, Vol. 32 No. 22 © Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved
Looking into DNA recognition: zinc finger binding specificity
Laboratoire de Biochimie Théorique, CNRS UPR 9080, Institut de Biologie Physico-Chimique, 13 rue Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris 75005, France
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +33 1 5841 5016; Fax: +33 1 5841 5026; Email: rlavery{at}ibpc.fr
Received August 17, 2004; Revised and Accepted November 27, 2004
We present a quantitative, theoretical analysis of the recognition mechanisms used by two zinc finger proteins: Zif268, which selectively binds to GC-rich sequences, and a Zif268 mutant, which binds to a TATA box site. This analysis is based on a recently developed method (ADAPT), which allows binding specificity to be analyzed via the calculation of complexation energies for all possible DNA target sequences. The results obtained with the zinc finger proteins show that, although both mainly select their targets using direct, pairwise proteinDNA interactions, they also use sequence-dependent DNA deformation to enhance their selectivity. A new extension of our methodology enables us to determine the quantitative contribution of these two components and also to measure the contributions of individual residues to overall specificity. The results show that indirect recognition is particularly important in the case of the TATA box binding mutant, accounting for 30% of the total selectivity. The residue-by-residue analysis of the proteinDNA interaction energy indicates that the existence of amino acidbase contacts does not necessarily imply sequence selectivity, and that side chains without contacts can nevertheless contribute to defining the protein's target sequence.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. A. Temiz and C. J. Camacho Experimentally based contact energies decode interactions responsible for protein-DNA affinity and the role of molecular waters at the binding interface Nucleic Acids Res., July 1, 2009; 37(12): 4076 - 4088. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Jamal Rahi, P. Virnau, L. A. Mirny, and M. Kardar Predicting transcription factor specificity with all-atom models Nucleic Acids Res., November 1, 2008; 36(19): 6209 - 6217. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Donald, W. W. Chen, and E. I. Shakhnovich Energetics of protein-DNA interactions Nucleic Acids Res., February 28, 2007; 35(4): 1039 - 1047. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. W. Siggers and B. Honig Structure-based prediction of C2H2 zinc-finger binding specificity: sensitivity to docking geometry Nucleic Acids Res., February 28, 2007; 35(4): 1085 - 1097. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. B. Becker, L. Wolff, and R. Everaers Indirect readout: detection of optimized subsequences and calculation of relative binding affinities using different DNA elastic potentials Nucleic Acids Res., November 14, 2006; 34(19): 5638 - 5649. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Flor-Parra, M. Vranes, J. Kamper, and J. Perez-Martin Biz1, a Zinc Finger Protein Required for Plant Invasion by Ustilago maydis, Regulates the Levels of a Mitotic Cyclin PLANT CELL, September 1, 2006; 18(9): 2369 - 2387. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. V. Morozov, J. J. Havranek, D. Baker, and E. D. Siggia Protein-DNA binding specificity predictions with structural models Nucleic Acids Res., October 24, 2005; 33(18): 5781 - 5798. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

