Published online 20 February 2004
Nucleic Acids Research, 2004, Vol. 32, No. 3 e34
© 2004 Oxford University Press
LSimpute: accurate estimation of missing values in microarray data with least squares methods
1 Department of Informatics and 2 Computational Biology Unit, BCCS, University of Bergen, HIB, N5020 Bergen, Norway
*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +47 55584067; Fax: +47 55584199; Email: trondb{at}ii.uib.no
Microarray experiments generate data sets with information on the expression levels of thousands of genes in a set of biological samples. Unfortun ately, such experiments often produce multiple missing expression values, normally due to various experimental problems. As many algorithms for gene expression analysis require a complete data matrix as input, the missing values have to be estimated in order to analyze the available data. Alternatively, genes and arrays can be removed until no missing values remain. However, for genes or arrays with only a small number of missing values, it is desirable to impute those values. For the subsequent analysis to be as informative as possible, it is essential that the estimates for the missing gene expression values are accurate. A small amount of badly estimated missing values in the data might be enough for clustering methods, such as hierachical clustering or K-means clustering, to produce misleading results. Thus, accurate methods for missing value estimation are needed. We present novel methods for estimation of missing values in microarray data sets that are based on the least squares principle, and that utilize correlations between both genes and arrays. For this set of methods, we use the common reference name LSimpute. We compare the estimation accuracy of our methods with the widely used KNNimpute on three complete data matrices from public data sets by randomly knocking out data (labeling as missing). From these tests, we conclude that our LSimpute methods produce estimates that consistently are more accurate than those obtained using KNNimpute. Additionally, we examine a more classic approach to missing value estimation based on expectation maximization (EM). We refer to our EM implementations as EMimpute, and the estimate errors using the EMimpute methods are compared with those our novel methods produce. The results indicate that on average, the estimates from our best performing LSimpute method are at least as accurate as those from the best EMimpute algorithm.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. E. Hystad, J. H. Myklebust, T. H. Bo, E. A. Sivertsen, E. Rian, L. Forfang, E. Munthe, A. Rosenwald, M. Chiorazzi, I. Jonassen, et al. Characterization of Early Stages of Human B Cell Development by Gene Expression Profiling J. Immunol., September 15, 2007; 179(6): 3662 - 3671. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. S. V. Wong, F. K. Wong, and G. R. Wood A multi-stage approach to clustering and imputation of gene expression profiles Bioinformatics, April 15, 2007; 23(8): 998 - 1005. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Hua and Y. Lai An ensemble approach to microarray data-based gene prioritization after missing value imputation Bioinformatics, March 15, 2007; 23(6): 747 - 754. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D.-W. Kim, K.-Y. Lee, K. H. Lee, and D. Lee Towards clustering of incomplete microarray data without the use of imputation Bioinformatics, January 1, 2007; 23(1): 107 - 113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. Anensen, A. M. Oyan, J.-C. Bourdon, K. H. Kalland, O. Bruserud, and B. T. Gjertsen A Distinct p53 Protein Isoform Signature Reflects the Onset of Induction Chemotherapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2006; 12(13): 3985 - 3992. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 X. Gan, A. W.-C. Liew, and H. Yan Microarray missing data imputation based on a set theoretic framework and biological knowledge Nucleic Acids Res., March 20, 2006; 34(5): 1608 - 1619. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Tuikkala, L. Elo, O. S. Nevalainen, and T. Aittokallio Improving missing value estimation in microarray data with gene ontology Bioinformatics, March 1, 2006; 22(5): 566 - 572. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J.-E. Gottenberg, N. Cagnard, C. Lucchesi, F. Letourneur, S. Mistou, T. Lazure, S. Jacques, N. Ba, M. Ittah, C. Lepajolec, et al. Activation of IFN pathways and plasmacytoid dendritic cell recruitment in target organs of primary Sjogren's syndrome PNAS, February 21, 2006; 103(8): 2770 - 2775. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. Scheel, M. Aldrin, I. K. Glad, R. Sorum, H. Lyng, and A. Frigessi The influence of missing value imputation on detection of differentially expressed genes from microarray data Bioinformatics, December 1, 2005; 21(23): 4272 - 4279. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Jornsten, H.-Y. Wang, W. J. Welsh, and M. Ouyang DNA microarray data imputation and significance analysis of differential expression Bioinformatics, November 15, 2005; 21(22): 4155 - 4161. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. S. B. Sehgal, I. Gondal, and L. S. Dooley Collateral missing value imputation: a new robust missing value estimation algorithm for microarray data Bioinformatics, May 15, 2005; 21(10): 2417 - 2423. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Kim, G. H. Golub, and H. Park Missing value estimation for DNA microarray gene expression data: local least squares imputation Bioinformatics, January 15, 2005; 21(2): 187 - 198. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|