Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (339K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ferreiro, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Waters, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ferreiro, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Waters, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published online 8 March 2004

Nucleic Acids Research, 2004, Vol. 32, No. 5 1617-1626
© 2004 Oxford University Press

Cbf1p modulates chromatin structure, transcription and repair at the Saccharomyces cerevisiae MET16 locus

J. A. Ferreiro, N. G. Powell, N. Karabetsou1, N. A. Kent1, J. Mellor1 and R. Waters*,2

School of Biological Sciences, University of Wales Swansea, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK, 1 Microbiology Unit, Department of Biochemistry, Oxford University, Oxford OX1 3QU, UK and 2 Department of Pathology, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff CF14 4XN, UK

*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +44 29 20 74 48 48; Fax: +44 29 20 74 42 76; Email: watersr1{at}cf.ac.uk
Present address:
J. A. Ferreiro, Department of Functional Biology, University of Oviedo, Oviedo 33006, Spain

The presence of damage in the transcribed strand (TS) of active genes and its position in relation to nucleosomes influence nucleotide excision repair (NER) efficiency. We examined chromatin structure, transcription and repair at the MET16 gene of wild-type and cbf1{Delta} Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells under repressing or derepressing conditions. Cbf1p is a sequence-specific DNA binding protein required for MET16 chromatin remodelling. Irrespective of the level of transcription, repair at the MspI restriction fragment of MET16 exhibits periodicity in line with nucleosome positions in both strands of the regulatory region and the non-transcribed strand of the coding region. However, repair in the coding region of the TS is always faster, but exhibits periodicity only when MET16 is repressed. In general, absence of Cbf1p decreased repair in the sequences examined, although the effects were more dramatic in the Cbf1p remodelled area, with repair being reduced to the lowest levels within the nucleosome cores of this region. Our results indicate that repair at the promoter and coding regions of this lowly transcribed gene are dependent on both chromatin structure and the level of transcription. The data are discussed in light of current models relating NER and chromatin structure.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
S. Li, B. Ding, R. Chen, C. Ruggiero, and X. Chen
Evidence that the Transcription Elongation Function of Rpb9 Is Involved in Transcription-Coupled DNA Repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Mol. Cell. Biol., December 15, 2006; 26(24): 9430 - 9441.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
J. A. Ferreiro, N. G. Powell, N. Karabetsou, J. Mellor, and R. Waters
Roles for Gcn5p and Ada2p in transcription and nucleotide excision repair at the Saccharomyces cerevisiae MET16 gene
Nucleic Acids Res., February 9, 2006; 34(3): 976 - 985.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
A. Conconi, M. Paquette, D. Fahy, V. A. Bespalov, and M. J. Smerdon
Repair-Independent Chromatin Assembly onto Active Ribosomal Genes in Yeast after UV Irradiation
Mol. Cell. Biol., November 15, 2005; 25(22): 9773 - 9783.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.