Published online 18 March 2004
Nucleic Acids Research, 2004, Vol. 32, No. 5 e51
Oxford University Press
Improving the sensitivity and specificity of gene expression analysis in highly related organisms through the use of electronic masks
The Institute for Genetic Medicine, University of Southern California, 2250 Alcazar Street, IGM 240, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA and 1 Department of Microbiology, 51 Newton Road, 3401 BSB, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +1 323 442 3030; Fax: +1 323 442 2764; Email: hacia{at}usc.edu
The authors wish it to be known that, in their opinion, the first two authors should be regarded as joint First Authors
Received January 16, 2004; Revised and Accepted February 23, 2004
DNA microarrays are powerful tools for comparing gene expression profiles from closely related organisms. However, a single microarray design is frequently used in these studies. Therefore, the levels of certain transcripts can be grossly underestimated due to sequence differences between the transcripts and the arrayed DNA probes. Here, we seek to improve the sensitivity and specificity of oligonucleotide microarray-based gene expression analysis by using genomic sequence information to predict the hybridization efficiency of orthologous transcripts to a given microarray. To test our approach, we examine hybridization patterns from three Escherichia coli strains on E.coli K-12 MG1655 gene expression microarrays. We create electronic mask files to discard data from probes predicted to have poor hybridization sensitivity and specificity to cDNA targets from each strain. We increased the accuracy of gene expression analysis and identified genes that cannot be accurately interrogated in each strain using these microarrays. Overall, these studies provide guidelines for designing effective electronic masks for gene expression analysis in organisms where substantial genome sequence information is available.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. A. Greenhall, M. A. Zapala, M. Caceres, O. Libiger, C. Barlow, N. J. Schork, and D. J. Lockhart Detecting genetic variation in microarray expression data Genome Res., August 1, 2007; 17(8): 1228 - 1235. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Gilad, S. A. Rifkin, P. Bertone, M. Gerstein, and K. P. White Multi-species microarrays reveal the effect of sequence divergence on gene expression profiles Genome Res., May 1, 2005; 15(5): 674 - 680. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. W. Karaman, S. Groshen, C.-C. Lee, B. L. Pike, and J. G. Hacia Comparisons of substitution, insertion and deletion probes for resequencing and mutational analysis using oligonucleotide microarrays Nucleic Acids Res., February 18, 2005; 33(3): e33 - e33. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Ji, W. Zhou, K. Gregg, N. Yu, S. Davis, and S. Davis A method for cross-species gene expression analysis with high-density oligonucleotide arrays Nucleic Acids Res., July 1, 2004; 32(11): e93 - e93. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

