Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (309K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lupták, A.
Right arrow Articles by Doudna, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lupták, A.
Right arrow Articles by Doudna, J. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published online 23 April 2004

Nucleic Acids Research, 2004, Vol. 32, No. 7 2272-2280
© 2004 Oxford University Press

Distinct sites of phosphorothioate substitution interfere with folding and splicing of the Anabaena group I intron

Andrej Lupták1 and Jennifer A. Doudna*,2,3

1 Department of Chemistry, 2 Department of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry and 3 Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA

*To whom correspondence should be addressed at present address: Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, 305 Hildebrandt Hall, Mail Stop 3206, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3206, USA. Tel: +1 510 643 0225; Fax: +1 510 643 0080; Email: doudna{at}uclink.berkeley.edu
Present address:
Andrej Lupták, Department of Molecular Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

Received February 26, 2004; Revised and Accepted March 26, 2004

Although the active site of group I introns is phylogenetically conserved, subclasses of introns have evolved different mechanisms of stabilizing the catalytic core. Large introns contain weakly conserved ‘peripheral’ domains that buttress the core through predicted interhelical contacts, while smaller introns use loop–helix interactions for stability. In all cases, specific and non-specific magnesium ion binding accompanies folding into the active structure. Whether similar RNA–RNA and RNA–magnesium ion contacts play related functional roles in different introns is not clear, particularly since it can be difficult to distinguish interactions directly involved in catalysis from those important for RNA folding. Using phosphorothioate interference with RNA activity and structure in the small (249 nt) group I intron from Anabaena, we used two independent assays to detect backbone phosphates important for catalysis and those involved in intron folding. Comparison of the interference sites identified in each assay shows that positions affecting catalysis cluster primarily in the conserved core of the intron, consistent with conservation of functionally important phosphates, many of which are magnesium ion binding sites, in diverse group I introns, including those from Azoarcus and Tetrahymena. However, unique sites of folding interference located outside the catalytic core imply that different group I introns, even within the same subclass, use distinct sets of tertiary interactions to stabilize the structure of the catalytic core.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RNAHome page
J. A. Nelson and O. C. Uhlenbeck
Hammerhead redux: Does the new structure fit the old biochemical data?
RNA, April 1, 2008; 14(4): 605 - 615.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.