Published online 25 May 2004
Nucleic Acids Research, 2004, Vol. 32, No. 9 e74
© 2004 Oxford University Press
Sequence-matched probes produce increased cross-platform consistency and more reproducible biological results in microarray-based gene expression measurements
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine and Pulmonary Bioinformatics, The Lung Biology Center, Brigham and Womens Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA, 1 Department of Pharmacology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA, 2 Avalon Pharmaceuticals, Germantown, MD 20876, USA and 3 Childrens Hospital Informatics Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
*To whom correspondence should be addressed at Harvard Medical School, Childrens Hospital Informatics Program, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA. Tel: +1 617 355 2179; Fax: +1 617 730 0253; Email: zszallasi{at}chip.org
Received March 21, 2004; Revised and Accepted April 21, 2004
Cancer derived microarray data sets are routinely produced by various platforms that are either commercially available or manufactured by academic groups. The fundamental difference in their probe selection strategies holds the promise that identical observations produced by more than one platform prove to be more robust when validated by biology. However, cross-platform comparison requires matching corresponding probe sets. We are introducing here sequence-based matching of probes instead of gene identifier-based matching. We analyzed breast cancer cell line derived RNA aliquots using Agilent cDNA and Affymetrix oligonucleotide microarray platforms to assess the advantage of this method. We show, that at different levels of the analysis, including gene expression ratios and difference calls, cross-platform consistency is significantly improved by sequence- based matching. We also present evidence that sequence-based probe matching produces more consistent results when comparing similar biological data sets obtained by different microarray platforms. This strategy allowed a more efficient transfer of classification of breast cancer samples between data sets produced by cDNA microarray and Affymetrix gene-chip platforms.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y.-S. Lee, C.-H. Chen, C.-N. Tsai, C.-L. Tsai, A. Chao, and T.-H. Wang Microarray labeling extension values: laboratory signatures for Affymetrix GeneChips Nucleic Acids Res., May 1, 2009; 37(8): e61 - e61. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. T. Kho, S. Bhattacharya, B. H. Mecham, J. Hong, I. S. Kohane, and T. J. Mariani Expression Profiles of the Mouse Lung Identify a Molecular Signature of Time-to-Birth Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., January 1, 2009; 40(1): 47 - 57. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Koltai and C. Weingarten-Baror Specificity of DNA microarray hybridization: characterization, effectors and approaches for data correction Nucleic Acids Res., April 1, 2008; 36(7): 2395 - 2405. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Affara, B. Dunmore, C. Savoie, S. Imoto, Y. Tamada, H. Araki, D. S. Charnock-Jones, S. Miyano, and C. Print Understanding endothelial cell apoptosis: what can the transcriptome, glycome and proteome reveal? Phil Trans R Soc B, August 29, 2007; 362(1484): 1469 - 1487. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kovacs, P. Tornvall, R. Nilsson, J. Tegner, A. Hamsten, and J. Bjorkegren Human C-reactive protein slows atherosclerosis development in a mouse model with human-like hypercholesterolemia PNAS, August 21, 2007; 104(34): 13768 - 13773. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Wang, Z.-H. Miao, Y. Pommier, E. S. Kawasaki, and A. Player Characterization of mismatch and high-signal intensity probes associated with Affymetrix genechips Bioinformatics, August 15, 2007; 23(16): 2088 - 2095. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Sykacek, R. Clarkson, C. Print, R. Furlong, and G. Micklem Bayesian modelling of shared gene function Bioinformatics, August 1, 2007; 23(15): 1936 - 1944. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Stafford and M. Brun Three methods for optimization of cross-laboratory and cross-platform microarray expression data Nucleic Acids Res., May 11, 2007; 35(10): e72 - e72. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Allegrucci and L.E. Young Differences between human embryonic stem cell lines Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2007; 13(2): 103 - 120. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S. Siddiqui, A. D. Delaney, A. Schnerch, O. L. Griffith, S. J. M. Jones, and M. A. Marra Sequence biases in large scale gene expression profiling data Nucleic Acids Res., July 13, 2006; 34(12): e83 - e83. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Wang, H. Zhao, Q. Xu, W. Jin, C. Liu, H. Zhang, Z. Huang, X. Zhang, Y. Zhang, D. Xin, et al. HPtaa database-potential target genes for clinical diagnosis and immunotherapy of human carcinoma Nucleic Acids Res., January 1, 2006; 34(suppl_1): D607 - D612. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. L. Thompson, B. A. Rosenzweig, P. S. Pine, J. Retief, Y. Turpaz, C. A. Afshari, H. K. Hamadeh, M. A. Damore, M. Boedigheimer, E. Blomme, et al. Use of a mixed tissue RNA design for performance assessments on multiple microarray formats Nucleic Acids Res., December 23, 2005; 33(22): e187 - e187. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. L. Elo, L. Lahti, H. Skottman, M. Kylaniemi, R. Lahesmaa, and T. Aittokallio Integrating probe-level expression changes across generations of Affymetrix arrays Nucleic Acids Res., December 14, 2005; 33(22): e193 - e193. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Bhattacharya and T. J. Mariani Transformation of expression intensities across generations of Affymetrix microarrays using sequence matching and regression modeling Nucleic Acids Res., October 13, 2005; 33(18): e157 - e157. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Chan, X. Lu, F. M. Merchant, J.D. Iglehart, and P. L. Miron Gene expression profiling of NMU-induced rat mammary tumors: cross species comparison with human breast cancer Carcinogenesis, August 1, 2005; 26(8): 1343 - 1353. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. K. Dobbin, E. S. Kawasaki, D. W. Petersen, and R. M. Simon Characterizing dye bias in microarray experiments Bioinformatics, May 15, 2005; 21(10): 2430 - 2437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. W. Kong, K.-B. Hwang, R. D. Kim, B.-T. Zhang, S. A. Greenberg, I. S. Kohane, and P. J. Park CrossChip: a system supporting comparative analysis of different generations of Affymetrix arrays Bioinformatics, May 1, 2005; 21(9): 2116 - 2117. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Li, M. L. Spletter, and J. A. Johnson Dissecting tBHQ induced ARE-driven gene expression through long and short oligonucleotide arrays Physiol Genomics, March 21, 2005; 21(1): 43 - 58. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. L. Yauk, M. L. Berndt, A. Williams, and G. R. Douglas Comprehensive comparison of six microarray technologies Nucleic Acids Res., August 27, 2004; 32(15): e124 - e124. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. H. Mecham, D. Z. Wetmore, Z. Szallasi, Y. Sadovsky, I. Kohane, and T. J. Mariani Increased measurement accuracy for sequence-verified microarray probes Physiol Genomics, August 11, 2004; 18(3): 308 - 315. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||







