Skip Navigation

Nucleic Acids Research 2004 32(Web Server Issue):W606-W609; doi:10.1093/nar/gkh400
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (323K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Claude, J.-B.
Right arrow Articles by Abergel, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Claude, J.-B.
Right arrow Articles by Abergel, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2004, the authors
Nucleic Acids Research, Vol. 32, Web Server issue © Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved

CaspR: a web server for automated molecular replacement using homology modelling

Jean-Baptiste Claude, Karsten Suhre*, Cédric Notredame, Jean-Michel Claverie and Chantal Abergel

Information Génomique & Structurale (UPR CNRS 2589), Institut de Biologie Structurale et Microbiologie, 31, chemin Joseph Aiguier, 13402 Marseille Cedex 20, France

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +33491164604; Fax: +33491164549; Email: karsten.suhre{at}igs.cnrs-mrs.fr

Received February 13, 2004; Revised March 15, 2004; Accepted March 25, 2004

Molecular replacement (MR) is the method of choice for X-ray crystallography structure determination when structural homologues are available in the Protein Data Bank (PDB). Although the success rate of MR decreases sharply when the sequence similarity between template and target proteins drops below 35% identical residues, it has been found that screening for MR solutions with a large number of different homology models may still produce a suitable solution where the original template failed. Here we present the web tool CaspR, implementing such a strategy in an automated manner. On input of experimental diffraction data, of the corresponding target sequence and of one or several potential templates, CaspR executes an optimized molecular replacement procedure using a combination of well-established stand-alone software tools. The protocol of model building and screening begins with the generation of multiple structure–sequence alignments produced with T-COFFEE, followed by homology model building using MODELLER, molecular replacement with AMoRe and model refinement based on CNS. As a result, CaspR provides a progress report in the form of hierarchically organized summary sheets that describe the different stages of the computation with an increasing level of detail. For the 10 highest-scoring potential solutions, pre-refined structures are made available for download in PDB format. Results already obtained with CaspR and reported on the web server suggest that such a strategy significantly increases the fraction of protein structures which may be solved by MR. Moreover, even in situations where standard MR yields a solution, pre-refined homology models produced by CaspR significantly reduce the time-consuming refinement process. We expect this automated procedure to have a significant impact on the throughput of large-scale structural genomics projects. CaspR is freely available at http://igs-server.cnrs-mrs.fr/Caspr/.


The online version of this article has been published under an open access model. Users are entitled to use, reproduce, disseminate, or display the open access version of this article provided that: the original authorship is properly and fully attributed; the Journal and Oxford University Press are attributed as the original place of publication with the correct citation details given; if an article is subsequently reproduced or disseminated not in its entirety but only in part or as a derivative work this must be clearly indicated.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
C. Kemena and C. Notredame
Upcoming challenges for multiple sequence alignment methods in the high-throughput era
Bioinformatics, October 1, 2009; 25(19): 2455 - 2465.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
Z. J. Miknis, E. F. Donaldson, T. C. Umland, R. A. Rimmer, R. S. Baric, and L. W. Schultz
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus nsp9 Dimerization Is Essential for Efficient Viral Growth
J. Virol., April 1, 2009; 83(7): 3007 - 3018.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
S. Baur, J. Marles-Wright, S. Buckenmaier, R. J. Lewis, and W. Vollmer
Synthesis of CDP-Activated Ribitol for Teichoic Acid Precursors in Streptococcus pneumoniae
J. Bacteriol., February 15, 2009; 191(4): 1200 - 1210.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. A. Watson, J. Brown, K. Harlos, J. A. Eble, T. S. Walter, and C. A. O'Callaghan
The Crystal Structure and Mutational Binding Analysis of the Extracellular Domain of the Platelet-activating Receptor CLEC-2
J. Biol. Chem., February 2, 2007; 282(5): 3165 - 3172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
M. K. Safo, F. N. Musayev, M. L. di Salvo, S. Hunt, J.-B. Claude, and V. Schirch
Crystal Structure of Pyridoxal Kinase from the Escherichia coli pdxK Gene: Implications for the Classification of Pyridoxal Kinases.
J. Bacteriol., June 1, 2006; 188(12): 4542 - 4552.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
G. Prag, S. Lee, R. Mattera, C. N. Arighi, B. M. Beach, J. S. Bonifacino, and J. H. Hurley
Structural mechanism for ubiquitinated-cargo recognition by the Golgi-localized, {gamma}-ear-containing, ADP-ribosylation-factor-binding proteins
PNAS, February 15, 2005; 102(7): 2334 - 2339.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.