Published online 1 August 2005
Article |
Determination of proteinDNA binding constants and specificities from statistical analyses of single molecules: MutSDNA interactions
1Department of Chemistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3290, USA 2Curriculum in Applied and Materials Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3290, USA 3Genetics and Biochemistry Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +1 919 962 6370; Fax: +1 919 966 3675; Email: derie{at}unc.edu
Received May 4, 2005. Revised June 13, 2005. Accepted June 29, 2005.
Atomic force microscopy (AFM) is a powerful technique for examining the conformations of proteinDNA complexes and determining the stoichiometries and affinities of proteinprotein complexes. We extend the capabilities of AFM to the determination of proteinDNA binding constants and specificities. The distribution of positions of the protein on the DNA fragments provides a direct measure of specificity and requires no knowledge of the absolute binding constants. The fractional occupancies of the protein at a given position in conjunction with the protein and DNA concentrations permit the determination of the absolute binding constants. We present the theoretical basis for this analysis and demonstrate its utility by characterizing the interaction of MutS with DNA fragments containing either no mismatch or a single mismatch. We show that MutS has significantly higher specificities for mismatches than was previously suggested from bulk studies and that the apparent low specificities are the result of high affinity binding to DNA ends. These results resolve the puzzle of the apparent low binding specificity of MutS with the expected high repair specificities. In conclusion, from a single set of AFM experiments, it is possible to determine the binding affinity, specificity and stoichiometry, as well as the conformational properties of the proteinDNA complexes.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Labazi, L. Jaafar, and H. Flores-Rozas Modulation of the DNA-binding activity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae MSH2-MSH6 complex by the high-mobility group protein NHP6A, in vitro Nucleic Acids Res., October 20, 2009; (2009) gkp649v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Wagner, G. Moolenaar, J. van Noort, and N. Goosen Single-molecule analysis reveals two separate DNA-binding domains in the Escherichia coli UvrA dimer Nucleic Acids Res., April 1, 2009; 37(6): 1962 - 1972. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Tessmer, Y. Yang, J. Zhai, C. Du, P. Hsieh, M. M. Hingorani, and D. A. Erie Mechanism of MutS Searching for DNA Mismatches and Signaling Repair J. Biol. Chem., December 26, 2008; 283(52): 36646 - 36654. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

