Skip Navigation

Nucleic Acids Research 2005 33(15):4928-4939; doi:10.1093/nar/gki806
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (1000K) Freely available
Right arrow Screen PDF (460K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, L. K.
Right arrow Articles by Resnick, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, L. K.
Right arrow Articles by Resnick, M. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published online 1 September 2005

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved
The online version of this article has been published under an open access model. Users are entitled to use, reproduce, disseminate, or display the open access version of this article for non-commercial purposes provided that: the original authorship is properly and fully attributed; the Journal and Oxford University Press are attributed as the original place of publication with the correct citation details given; if an article is subsequently reproduced or disseminated not in its entirety but only in part or as a derivative work this must be clearly indicated. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions{at}oupjournals.org


Article

Reduction of nucleosome assembly during new DNA synthesis impairs both major pathways of double-strand break repair

L. Kevin Lewis*, G. Karthikeyan1, Jared Cassiano and Michael A. Resnick1

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Texas State University San Marcos, TX 78666, USA 1Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA

*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +1 512 245 8594; Fax: +1 512 245 2374; Email: LL18{at}txstate.edu

Received August 5, 2005. Accepted August 15, 2005.

Assembly of new chromatin during S phase requires the histone chaperone complexes CAF-1 (Cac2p, Msi1p and Rlf2p) and RCAF (Asf1p plus acetylated histones H3 and H4). Cells lacking CAF-1 and RCAF are hypersensitive to DNA-damaging agents, such as methyl methanesulfonate and camptothecin, suggesting a possible defect in double-strand break (DSB) repair. Assays developed to quantitate repair of defined, cohesive-ended break structures revealed that DSB-induced plasmid:chromosome recombination was reduced ~10-fold in RCAF/CAF-1 double mutants. Recombination defects were similar with both chromosomal and plasmid targets in vivo, suggesting that inhibitory chromatin structures were not involved. Consistent with these observations, ionizing radiation-induced loss of heterozygosity was abolished in the mutants. Nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) repair proficiency and accuracy were intermediate between wild-type levels and those of NHEJ-deficient yku70 and rad50 mutants. The defects in NHEJ, but not homologous recombination, could be rescued by deletion of HMR-a1, a component of the a1/alpha2 transcriptional repressor complex. The findings are consistent with the observation that silent mating loci are partially derepressed. These results demonstrate that defective assembly of nucleosomes during new DNA synthesis compromises each of the known pathways of DSB repair and that the effects can be indirect consequences of changes in silenced chromatin structure.


Present address: G. Karthikeyan, Office of Science and Technology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA

The authors wish it to be known that, in their opinion, the first two authors should be regarded as joint First Authors


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J.-A. Kim and J. E. Haber
Chromatin assembly factors Asf1 and CAF-1 have overlapping roles in deactivating the DNA damage checkpoint when DNA repair is complete
PNAS, January 27, 2009; 106(4): 1151 - 1156.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
P. Cejka and J. Jiricny
Interplay of DNA Repair Pathways Controls Methylation Damage Toxicity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Genetics, August 1, 2008; 179(4): 1835 - 1844.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
B. Xhemalce, K. M. Miller, R. Driscoll, H. Masumoto, S. P. Jackson, T. Kouzarides, A. Verreault, and B. Arcangioli
Regulation of Histone H3 Lysine 56 Acetylation in Schizosaccharomyces pombe
J. Biol. Chem., May 18, 2007; 282(20): 15040 - 15047.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. T. Richardson, O. M. Alekseev, G. Grossman, E. E. Widgren, R. Thresher, E. J. Wagner, K. D. Sullivan, W. F. Marzluff, and M. G. O'Rand
Nuclear Autoantigenic Sperm Protein (NASP), a Linker Histone Chaperone That Is Required for Cell Proliferation
J. Biol. Chem., July 28, 2006; 281(30): 21526 - 21534.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
A. Nabatiyan, D. Szuts, and T. Krude
Induction of CAF-1 Expression in Response to DNA Strand Breaks in Quiescent Human Cells.
Mol. Cell. Biol., March 1, 2006; 26(5): 1839 - 1849.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.