Published online 16 February 2005
Methods Online |
Reproducibility, bioinformatic analysis and power of the SAGE method to evaluate changes in transcriptome
Oncology and Molecular Endocrinology Research Center, Laval University Medical Center, Department of Anatomy and Physiology, Université Laval Québec, Canada 1 Virginia Bioinformatics Institute, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Blacksburg, VA 24061-0477, USA
*To whom correspondence should be addressed at Functional Genomics Laboratory, Oncology and Molecular Endocrinology Research Center, Laval University Hospital Center (CHUL) 2705, boulevard Laurier, Québec, Canada G1V 4G2. Tel: +1 418 654 2296; Fax: +1 418 654 2761; Email: Jonny.St-Amand{at}crchul.ulaval.ca
Received September 14, 2004. Revised January 19, 2005. Accepted January 19, 2005.
The serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE) method is used to study global gene expression in cells or tissues in various experimental conditions. However, its reproducibility has not yet been definitively assessed. In this study, we have evaluated the reproducibility of the SAGE method and identified the factors that affect it. The determination coefficient (R2 ) for the reproducibility of SAGE is 0.96. However, there are some factors that can affect the reproducibility of SAGE, such as the replication of concatemers and ditags, the number of sequenced tags and double PCR amplification of ditags. Thus, corrections for these factors must be made to ensure the reproducibility and accuracy of SAGE results. A bioinformatic analysis of SAGE data is also presented in order to eliminate these artifacts. Finally, the current study shows that increasing the number of sequenced tags improves the power of the method to detect transcripts and their regulation by experimental conditions.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. B. Lupien, C. Bolduc, S. Landreville, and C. Salesse Comparison between the Gene Expression Profile of Human Muller Cells and Two Spontaneous Muller Cell Lines Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 2007; 48(11): 5229 - 5242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. B. Kim, G. J. Porreca, L. Song, S. C. Greenway, J. M. Gorham, G. M. Church, C. E. Seidman, and J. G. Seidman Polony Multiplex Analysis of Gene Expression (PMAGE) in Mouse Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Science, June 8, 2007; 316(5830): 1481 - 1484. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Khattra, A. D. Delaney, Y. Zhao, A. Siddiqui, J. Asano, H. McDonald, P. Pandoh, N. Dhalla, A.-l. Prabhu, K. Ma, et al. Large-scale production of SAGE libraries from microdissected tissues, flow-sorted cells, and cell lines Genome Res., January 1, 2007; 17(1): 108 - 116. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Metta, R. Gudavalli, J.-M. Gibert, and C. Schlotterer No Accelerated Rate of Protein Evolution in Male-Biased Drosophila pseudoobscura Genes Genetics, September 1, 2006; 174(1): 411 - 420. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S. Siddiqui, A. D. Delaney, A. Schnerch, O. L. Griffith, S. J. M. Jones, and M. A. Marra Sequence biases in large scale gene expression profiling data Nucleic Acids Res., July 13, 2006; 34(12): e83 - e83. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Richards, S.-P. Tan, W.-K. Chan, and A. Bongso Reverse Serial Analysis of Gene Expression (SAGE) Characterization of Orphan SAGE Tags from Human Embryonic Stem Cells Identifies the Presence of Novel Transcripts and Antisense Transcription of Key Pluripotency Genes Stem Cells, May 1, 2006; 24(5): 1162 - 1173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Yoshioka, A Boivin, P Ye, F Labrie, and J St-Amand Effects of dihydrotestosterone on skeletal muscle transcriptome in mice measured by serial analysis of gene expression. J. Mol. Endocrinol., April 1, 2006; 36(2): 247 - 259. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Nishida, M. Yoshioka, and J. St-Amand Regulation of hypothalamic gene expression by glucocorticoid: implications for energy homeostasis Physiol Genomics, March 13, 2006; 25(1): 96 - 104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||







