Published online 23 March 2005
Article |
Conservation versus parallel gains in intron evolution
National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health 8600 Rockville Pike, Bldg 38A, Bethesda, MD 20894, USA
*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +1 301 435 5913; Fax: +1 301 435 7794; Email: koonin{at}ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Received January 31, 2005. Revised March 2, 2005. Accepted March 2, 2005.
Orthologous genes from distant eukaryotic species, e.g. animals and plants, share up to 2530% intron positions. However, the relative contributions of evolutionary conservation and parallel gain of new introns into this pattern remain unknown. Here, the extent of independent insertion of introns in the same sites (parallel gain) in orthologous genes from phylogenetically distant eukaryotes is assessed within the framework of the protosplice site model. It is shown that protosplice sites are no more conserved during evolution of eukaryotic gene sequences than random sites. Simulation of intron insertion into protosplice sites with the observed protosplice site frequencies and intron densities shows that parallel gain can account but for a small fraction (510%) of shared intron positions in distantly related species. Thus, the presence of numerous introns in the same positions in orthologous genes from distant eukaryotes, such as animals, fungi and plants, appears to reflect mostly bona fide evolutionary conservation.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Tarrio, F. J. Ayala, and F. Rodriguez-Trelles From the Cover: Alternative splicing: A missing piece in the puzzle of intron gain PNAS, May 20, 2008; 105(20): 7223 - 7228. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Krauss, C. Thummler, F. Georgi, J. Lehmann, P. F. Stadler, and C. Eisenhardt Near Intron Positions Are Reliable Phylogenetic Markers: An Application to Holometabolous Insects Mol. Biol. Evol., May 1, 2008; 25(5): 821 - 830. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Csuros, I. B. Rogozin, and E. V. Koonin Extremely Intron-Rich Genes in the Alveolate Ancestors Inferred with a Flexible Maximum-Likelihood Approach Mol. Biol. Evol., May 1, 2008; 25(5): 903 - 911. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Irimia and S. W. Roy Spliceosomal introns as tools for genomic and evolutionary analysis Nucleic Acids Res., March 1, 2008; 36(5): 1703 - 1712. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Schwartz, J. Silva, D. Burstein, T. Pupko, E. Eyras, and G. Ast Large-scale comparative analysis of splicing signals and their corresponding splicing factors in eukaryotes Genome Res., January 1, 2008; 18(1): 88 - 103. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. K. Basu, I. B. Rogozin, O. Deusch, T. Dagan, W. Martin, and E. V. Koonin Evolutionary Dynamics of Introns in Plastid-Derived Genes in Plants: Saturation Nearly Reached but Slow Intron Gain Continues Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2008; 25(1): 111 - 119. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Zheng, I. B. Rogozin, E. V. Koonin, and T. M. Przytycka Support for the Coelomata Clade of Animals from a Rigorous Analysis of the Pattern of Intron Conservation Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2007; 24(11): 2583 - 2592. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Csuros, J. A. Holey, and I. B. Rogozin In search of lost introns Bioinformatics, July 1, 2007; 23(13): i87 - i96. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. W. Roy and D. Penny A Very High Fraction of Unique Intron Positions in the Intron-Rich Diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana Indicates Widespread Intron Gain Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2007; 24(7): 1447 - 1457. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Villasante, J. P. Abad, and M. Mendez-Lago Centromeres were derived from telomeres during the evolution of the eukaryotic chromosome PNAS, June 19, 2007; 104(25): 10542 - 10547. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. W. Roy and D. Penny Patterns of Intron Loss and Gain in Plants: Intron Loss-Dominated Evolution and Genome-Wide Comparison of O. sativa and A. thaliana Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2007; 24(1): 171 - 181. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. W. Roy and D. L. Hartl Very little intron loss/gain in Plasmodium: Intron loss/gain mutation rates and intron number Genome Res., June 1, 2006; 16(6): 750 - 756. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Gopalan, W.-G. Qiu, M. Z. Chen, and A. Stoltzfus Nexplorer: phylogeny-based exploration of sequence family data Bioinformatics, January 1, 2006; 22(1): 120 - 121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Raible, K. Tessmar-Raible, K. Osoegawa, P. Wincker, C. Jubin, G. Balavoine, D. Ferrier, V. Benes, P. de Jong, J. Weissenbach, et al. Vertebrate-Type Intron-Rich Genes in the Marine Annelid Platynereis dumerilii Science, November 25, 2005; 310(5752): 1325 - 1326. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||





