Skip Navigation

Nucleic Acids Research 2006 34(10):3067-3081; doi:10.1093/nar/gkl381
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (617K) Freely available
Right arrow Screen PDF (230K) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tiffin, N.
Right arrow Articles by Hide, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tiffin, N.
Right arrow Articles by Hide, W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published online 6 June 2006

© 2006 The Author(s)
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commerical use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Survey and Summary

Computational disease gene identification: a concert of methods prioritizes type 2 diabetes and obesity candidate genes

Nicki Tiffin*, Euan Adie1, Frances Turner2, Han G. Brunner3, Marc A. van Driel4, Martin Oti5, Nuria Lopez-Bigas6, Christos Ouzounis7, Carolina Perez-Iratxeta8, Miguel A. Andrade-Navarro8,9, Adebowale Adeyemo10,11, Mary Elizabeth Patti12, Colin A. M. Semple2 and Winston Hide

South African National Bioinformatics Institute, University of the Western Cape Bellville, 7535, South Africa 1 Medical Genetics Section, Department of Medical Sciences, The University of Edinburgh Edinburgh, UK 2 MRC Human Genetics Unit Crewe Road Western General Hospital Edinburgh, EH42XU, UK 3 Department of Human Genetics, University Medical Centre Nijmegen PO Box 9101, 6500HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands 4 Department of Molecular Biology, Nijmegen Center for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands 5 Centre for Molecular and Biomolecular Informatics, Radboud University Nijmegen PO Box 9010, 6500GL Nijmegen, The Netherlands 6 Research Unit on Biomedical Informatics (GRIB), Universitat Pompeu Fabra Passeig Martim de la Barceloneta 37–49, 08003, Barcelona, Spain 7 Computational Genomics Group, The European Bioinformatics Institute EMBL Cambridge Outstation, Cambridge CB10 1SD, UK 8 Ontario Genomics Innovation Centre, Ottawa Health Research Institute 501 Smyth, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1H 8L6 9 Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa Ottawa, ON, Canada 10 National Human Genome Center, Howard University, Genetic Epidemiology Unit, College of Medicine 2216 6th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20059, USA 11 University of Ibadan, College of Medicine Ibadan, Nigeria 12 Harvard Medical School, Joslin Diabetes Center 1 Joslin Place, Boston, MA 02215, USA

*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +27 21 9592611; Fax: 27 21 9592512; Email: nicki{at}sanbi.ac.za

Received January 3, 2006. Revised March 25, 2006. Accepted May 2, 2006.

Genome-wide experimental methods to identify disease genes, such as linkage analysis and association studies, generate increasingly large candidate gene sets for which comprehensive empirical analysis is impractical. Computational methods employ data from a variety of sources to identify the most likely candidate disease genes from these gene sets. Here, we review seven independent computational disease gene prioritization methods, and then apply them in concert to the analysis of 9556 positional candidate genes for type 2 diabetes (T2D) and the related trait obesity. We generate and analyse a list of nine primary candidate genes for T2D genes and five for obesity. Two genes, LPL and BCKDHA, are common to these two sets. We also present a set of secondary candidates for T2D (94 genes) and for obesity (116 genes) with 58 genes in common to both diseases.


Present address: Christos Ouzounis, Computational Genomics Unit & Institute of Agrobiotechnology, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, Thessalonica, GR-57001, Greece


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
D. Shriner, T. M. Baye, M. A. Padilla, S. Zhang, L. K. Vaughan, and A. E. Loraine
Commonality of functional annotation: a method for prioritization of candidate genes from genome-wide linkage studies
Nucleic Acids Res., March 27, 2008; 36(4): e26 - e26.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
S. B. English and A. J. Butte
Evaluation and integration of 49 genome-wide experiments and the prediction of previously unknown obesity-related genes
Bioinformatics, November 1, 2007; 23(21): 2910 - 2917.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Brief BioinformHome page
M. G. Kann
Protein interactions and disease: computational approaches to uncover the etiology of diseases
Brief Bioinform, September 1, 2007; 8(5): 333 - 346.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
C. Perez-Iratxeta, P. Bork, and M. A. Andrade-Navarro
Update of the G2D tool for prioritization of gene candidates to inherited diseases
Nucleic Acids Res., July 13, 2007; 35(suppl_2): W212 - W216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
R. A. George, J. Y. Liu, L. L. Feng, R. J. Bryson-Richardson, D. Fatkin, and M. A. Wouters
Analysis of protein sequence and interaction data for candidate disease gene prediction
Nucleic Acids Res., November 14, 2006; 34(19): e130 - e130.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.