Skip Navigation


Nucleic Acids Research Advance Access originally published online on November 27, 2006
Nucleic Acids Research 2006 34(22):6450-6460; doi:10.1093/nar/gkl819
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (5583K) Freely available
Right arrow Screen PDF (1100K) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
34/22/6450    most recent
gkl819v2
gkl819v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, O. T. P.
Right arrow Articles by Go, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, O. T. P.
Right arrow Articles by Go, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 2006, Vol. 34, No. 22 6450-6460
© 2006 The Author(s).
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Computational Biology

Amino acid residue doublet propensity in the protein–RNA interface and its application to RNA interface prediction

Oanh T. P. Kim1, Kei Yura1,2,3,* and Nobuhiro Go2,4,5

1 Quantum Bioinformatics Team, Center for Computational Science and Engineering, Japan Atomic Energy Agency Kizu-cho, Souraku-gun, Kyoto 619-0215, Japan 2 Research Unit for Quantum Beam Life Science Initiative, Quantum Beam Science Directorate, Japan Atomic Energy Agency Kizu-cho, Souraku-gun, Kyoto 619-0215, Japan 3 CREST, JST, Japan Atomic Energy Agency Kizu-cho, Souraku-gun, Kyoto 619-0215, Japan 4 Computational Biology Group, Quantum Beam Science Directorate, Japan Atomic Energy Agency Kizu-cho, Souraku-gun, Kyoto 619-0215, Japan 5 Bioinformatics Unit, Nara Institute of Science and Technology Takayama-cho, Ikoma-shi, Nara 630-0196, Japan

*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +81 774 71 3462; Fax: +81 774 71 3460; Email: yura.kei{at}jaea.go.jp

Received July 11, 2006. Revised October 5, 2006. Accepted October 5, 2006.

Protein–RNA interactions play essential roles in a number of regulatory mechanisms for gene expression such as RNA splicing, transport, translation and post-transcriptional control. As the number of available protein–RNA complex 3D structures has increased, it is now possible to statistically examine protein–RNA interactions based on 3D structures. We performed computational analyses of 86 representative protein–RNA complexes retrieved from the Protein Data Bank. Interface residue propensity, a measure of the relative importance of different amino acid residues in the RNA interface, was calculated for each amino acid residue type (residue singlet interface propensity). In addition to the residue singlet propensity, we introduce a new residue-based propensity, which gives a measure of residue pairing preferences in the RNA interface of a protein (residue doublet interface propensity). The residue doublet interface propensity contains much more information than the sum of two singlet propensities alone. The prediction of the RNA interface using the two types of propensities plus a position-specific multiple sequence profile can achieve a specificity of about 80%. The prediction method was then applied to the 3D structure of two mRNA export factors, TAP (Mex67) and UAP56 (Sub2). The prediction enables us to point out candidate RNA interfaces, part of which are consistent with previous experimental studies and may contribute to elucidation of atomic mechanisms of mRNA export.


Present address: Oanh T. P. Kim, Faculty of Science, Nara Women's University, Kitauoyahigashi-machi, Nara 630-8506, Japan


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
DNA ResHome page
K. Yura, Y. Miyata, T. Arikawa, M. Higuchi, and M. Sugita
Characteristics and Prediction of RNA Editing Sites in Transcripts of the Moss Takakia lepidozioides Chloroplast
DNA Res, July 23, 2008; (2008) dsn016v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
R. P. Bahadur, M. Zacharias, and J. Janin
Dissecting protein-RNA recognition sites
Nucleic Acids Res., May 1, 2008; 36(8): 2705 - 2716.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
Y. C. Chen and C. Lim
Predicting RNA-binding sites from the protein structure based on electrostatics, evolution and geometry
Nucleic Acids Res., March 1, 2008; 36(5): e29 - e29.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
M. Terribilini, J. D. Sander, J.-H. Lee, P. Zaback, R. L. Jernigan, V. Honavar, and D. Dobbs
RNABindR: a server for analyzing and predicting RNA-binding sites in proteins
Nucleic Acids Res., July 13, 2007; 35(suppl_2): W578 - W584.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.