Published online 9 February 2006
Survey and Summary |
Options available for profiling small samples: a review of sample amplification technology when combined with microarray profiling
Department of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, The Norwegian Radiumhospital Montebello, 0310, Oslo, Norway
*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +47 22 93 52 71; Fax; +47 22 52 24 21; Email: vigdisny{at}radium.uio.no
Received November 28, 2005. Revised January 24, 2006. Accepted January 24, 2006.
The possibility of performing microarray analysis on limited material has been demonstrated in a number of publications. In this review we approach the technical aspects of mRNA amplification and several important implicit consequences, for both linear and exponential procedures. Amplification efficiencies clearly allow profiling of extremely small samples. The conservation of transcript abundance is the most important issue regarding the use of sample amplification in combination with microarray analysis, and this aspect has generally been found to be acceptable, although demonstrated to decrease in highly diluted samples. The fact that variability and discrepancies in microarray profiles increase with minute sample sizes has been clearly documented, but for many studies this does appear to have affected the biological conclusions. We suggest that this is due to the data analysis approach applied, and the consequence is the chance of presenting misleading results. We discuss the issue of amplification sensitivity limits in the light of reports on fidelity, published data from reviewed articles and data analysis approaches. These are important considerations to be reflected in the design of future studies and when evaluating biological conclusions from published microarray studies based on extremely low input RNA quantities.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  B. Tauris, S. Borg, P. L. Gregersen, and P. B. Holm A roadmap for zinc trafficking in the developing barley grain based on laser capture microdissection and gene expression profiling J. Exp. Bot., March 1, 2009; 60(4): 1333 - 1347. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Thiel, D. Weier, N. Sreenivasulu, M. Strickert, N. Weichert, M. Melzer, T. Czauderna, U. Wobus, H. Weber, and W. Weschke Different Hormonal Regulation of Cellular Differentiation and Function in Nucellar Projection and Endosperm Transfer Cells: A Microdissection-Based Transcriptome Study of Young Barley Grains Plant Physiology, November 1, 2008; 148(3): 1436 - 1452. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. A. Watson, L. R. Ylagan, K. M. Trinkaus, W. E. Gillanders, M. J. Naughton, K. N. Weilbaecher, T. P. Fleming, and R. L. Aft Isolation and Molecular Profiling of Bone Marrow Micrometastases Identifies TWIST1 as a Marker of Early Tumor Relapse in Breast Cancer Patients Clin. Cancer Res., September 1, 2007; 13(17): 5001 - 5009. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Juric, N. J. Lacayo, M. C. Ramsey, J. Racevskis, P. H. Wiernik, J. M. Rowe, A. H. Goldstone, P. J. O'Dwyer, E. Paietta, and B. I. Sikic Differential Gene Expression Patterns and Interaction Networks in BCR-ABL-Positive and -Negative Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemias J. Clin. Oncol., April 10, 2007; 25(11): 1341 - 1349. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. Gao, Z. K. Yang, T. J. Gentry, L. Wu, C. W. Schadt, and J. Zhou Microarray-Based Analysis of Microbial Community RNAs by Whole-Community RNA Amplification Appl. Envir. Microbiol., January 1, 2007; 73(2): 563 - 571. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. Coppola and D. H. Geschwind Microarrays and the microscope: balancing throughput with resolution J. Physiol., September 1, 2006; 575(2): 353 - 359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Yano, T. Subkhankulova, F. J. Livesey, and H. P. C. Robinson Electrophysiological and gene expression profiling of neuronal cell types in mammalian neocortex J. Physiol., September 1, 2006; 575(2): 361 - 365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|