Skip Navigation

Nucleic Acids Research 2006 34(8):2305-2315; doi:10.1093/nar/gkl099
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (620K) Freely available
Right arrow Screen PDF (625K) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow A corrigendum has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kalam, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Basu, A. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kalam, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Basu, A. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published online 5 May 2006

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved
The online version of this article has been published under an open access model. Users are entitled to use, reproduce, disseminate, or display the open access version of this article for non-commercial purposes provided that: the original authorship is properly and fully attributed; the Journal and Oxford University Press are attributed as the original place of publication with the correct citation details given; if an article is subsequently reproduced or disseminated not in its entirety but only in part or as a derivative work this must be clearly indicated. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org


Article

Genetic effects of oxidative DNA damages: comparative mutagenesis of the imidazole ring-opened formamidopyrimidines (Fapy lesions) and 8-oxo-purines in simian kidney cells

M. Abul Kalam, Kazuhiro Haraguchi1, Sushil Chandani2, Edward L. Loechler2, Maasaki Moriya3, Marc M. Greenberg1 and Ashis K. Basu*

Department of Chemistry, University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269, USA 1 Department of Chemistry, Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, MD 21218, USA 2 Biology Department, Boston University Boston, MA 02118, USA 3 Department of Pharmacological Sciences, State University of New York Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA

*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +1 860 486 3965; Fax: +1 860 486 2981; Email: ashis.basu{at}uconn.edu

Received December 1, 2005. Revised January 9, 2006. Accepted March 7, 2006.

Fapy·dG and 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-oxo-dG) are formed in DNA by hydroxyl radical damage. In order to study replication past these lesions in cells, we constructed a single-stranded shuttle vector containing the lesion in 5'-TGT and 5'-TGA sequence contexts. Replication of the modified vector in simian kidney (COS-7) cells showed that Fapy·dG is mutagenic inducing primarily targeted Fapy·G->T transversions. In the 5'-TGT sequence mutational frequency of Fapy·dG was ~30%, whereas in the 5'-TGA sequence it was ~8%. In parallel studies 8-oxo-dG was found to be slightly less mutagenic than Fapy·dG, though it also exhibited a similar context effect: 4-fold G->T transversions (24% versus 6%) occurred in the 5'-TGT sequence relative to 5'-TGA. To investigate a possible structural basis for the higher G->T mutations induced by both lesions when their 3' neighbor was T, we carried out a molecular modeling investigation in the active site of DNA polymerase ß, which is known to incorporate both dCTP (no mutation) and dATP (G->T substitution) opposite 8-oxo-G. In pol ß, the syn-8-oxo-G:dATP pair showed greater stacking with the 3'-T:A base pair in the 5'-TGT sequence compared with the 3'-A:T in the 5'-TGA sequence, whereas stacking for the anti-8-oxo-G:dCTP pair was similar in both 5'-TGT and 5'-TGA sequences. Similarly, syn-Fapy·G:dATP pairing showed greater stacking in the 5'-TGT sequence compared with the 5'-TGA sequence, while stacking for anti-Fapy·G:dCTP pairs was similar in the two sequences. Thus, for both lesions less efficient base stacking between the lesion:dATP pair and the 3'-A:T base pair in the 5'-TGA sequence might cause lower G->T mutational frequencies in the 5'-TGA sequence compared to 5'-TGT. The corresponding lesions derived from 2'-deoxyadenosine, Fapy·dA and 8-oxo-dA, were not detectably mutagenic in the 5'-TAT sequence, and were only weakly mutagenic (<1%) in the 5'-TAA sequence context, where both lesions induced targeted A->C transversions. To our knowledge this is the first investigation using extrachromosomal probes containing a Fapy·dG or Fapy·dA site-specifically incorporated, which showed unequivocally that in simian kidney cells Fapy·G->T substitutions occur at a higher frequency than 8-oxo-G->T and that Fapy·dA is very weakly mutagenic, as is 8-oxo-dA.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
Z. Bukowy, J. A. Harrigan, D. A. Ramsden, B. Tudek, V. A. Bohr, and T. Stevnsner
WRN Exonuclease activity is blocked by specific oxidatively induced base lesions positioned in either DNA strand
Nucleic Acids Res., September 1, 2008; 36(15): 4975 - 4987.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
L. M. Roy, P. Jaruga, T. G. Wood, A. K. McCullough, M. Dizdaroglu, and R. S. Lloyd
Human Polymorphic Variants of the NEIL1 DNA Glycosylase
J. Biol. Chem., May 25, 2007; 282(21): 15790 - 15798.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. Besaratinia, S.-i. Kim, S. E. Bates, and G. P. Pfeifer
Riboflavin activated by ultraviolet A1 irradiation induces oxidative DNA damage-mediated mutations inhibited by vitamin C
PNAS, April 3, 2007; 104(14): 5953 - 5958.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.