Skip Navigation


Nucleic Acids Research Advance Access originally published online on January 10, 2008
Nucleic Acids Research 2008 36(2):e12; doi:10.1093/nar/gkm1167
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (143K) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
36/2/e12    most recent
gkm1167v2
gkm1167v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buza, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Burgess, S. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Buza, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Burgess, S. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 2008, Vol. 36, No. 2 e12
© 2008 The Author(s)
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Methods Online

Gene Ontology annotation quality analysis in model eukaryotes

Teresia J. Buza1,3, Fiona M. McCarthy1,3,*, Nan Wang2,3, Susan M. Bridges2,3,4 and Shane C. Burgess1,3,4,5

1Department of Basic Sciences, 2Department of Computer Science and Engineering, 3Institute of Digital Biology, 4Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station and 5Life Sciences and Biotechnology Institute, Mississippi State University, Mississippi 39762, USA

*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +1 662 325 5859; Fax: +1 662 325 1031; Email: fmccarthy{at}cvm.msstate.edu

Received September 4, 2007. Revised November 30, 2007. Accepted December 18, 2007.

Functional analysis using the Gene Ontology (GO) is crucial for array analysis, but it is often difficult for researchers to assess the amount and quality of GO annotations associated with different sets of gene products. In many cases the source of the GO annotations and the date the GO annotations were last updated is not apparent, further complicating a researchers’ ability to assess the quality of the GO data provided. Moreover, GO biocurators need to ensure that the GO quality is maintained and optimal for the functional processes that are most relevant for their research community. We report the GO Annotation Quality (GAQ) score, a quantitative measure of GO quality that includes breadth of GO annotation, the level of detail of annotation and the type of evidence used to make the annotation. As a case study, we apply the GAQ scoring method to a set of diverse eukaryotes and demonstrate how the GAQ score can be used to track changes in GO annotations over time and to assess the quality of GO annotations available for specific biological processes. The GAQ score also allows researchers to quantitatively assess the functional data available for their experimental systems (arrays or databases).


The authors wish it to be known that, in their opinion, the first two authors should be regarded as joint First Authors.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
M. F. Rogers and A. Ben-Hur
The use of gene ontology evidence codes in preventing classifier assessment bias
Bioinformatics, May 1, 2009; 25(9): 1173 - 1177.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.