Skip Navigation


Nucleic Acids Research Advance Access originally published online on March 18, 2009
Nucleic Acids Research 2009 37(8):e61; doi:10.1093/nar/gkp168
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (10363K) Freely available
Right arrow Screen PDF (1192K) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
37/8/e61    most recent
gkp168v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, Y.-S.
Right arrow Articles by Wang, T.-H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, Y.-S.
Right arrow Articles by Wang, T.-H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Computational methods
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 2009, Vol. 37, No. 8 e61
© 2009 The Author(s)
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Methods Online

Microarray labeling extension values: laboratory signatures for Affymetrix GeneChips

Yun-Shien Lee1,2, Chun-Houh Chen3, Chi-Neu Tsai4, Chia-Lung Tsai5, Angel Chao5,* and Tzu-Hao Wang2,5,*

1Department of Biotechnology, Ming Chuan University, 2Genomic Medicine Research Core Laboratory, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Tao-Yuan, 3Institute of Statistical Science, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 4Graduate Institutes of Clinical Medical Sciences, Chang Gung University and 5Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lin-Kou Medical Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan

*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +886 3 3281200 extension 5402; Fax: +886 3 3288252; Email: knoxtn{at}cgmh.org.tw Correspondence may also be addressed to Angel Chao. Email: angel945{at}cgmh.org.tw

Received November 20, 2008. Revised February 24, 2009. Accepted March 2, 2009.

Interlaboratory comparison of microarray data, even when using the same platform, imposes several challenges to scientists. RNA quality, RNA labeling efficiency, hybridization procedures and data-mining tools can all contribute variations in each laboratory. In Affymetrix GeneChips, about 11–20 different 25-mer oligonucleotides are used to measure the level of each transcript. Here, we report that ‘labeling extension values (LEVs)’, which are correlation coefficients between probe intensities and probe positions, are highly correlated with the gene expression levels (GEVs) on eukayotic Affymetrix microarray data. By analyzing LEVs and GEVs in the publicly available 2414 cel files of 20 Affymetrix microarray types covering 13 species, we found that correlations between LEVs and GEVs only exist in eukaryotic RNAs, but not in prokaryotic ones. Surprisingly, Affymetrix results of the same specimens that were analyzed in different laboratories could be clearly differentiated only by LEVs, leading to the identification of ‘laboratory signatures’. In the examined dataset, GSE10797 [NCBI GEO] , filtering out high-LEV genes did not compromise the discovery of biological processes that are constructed by differentially expressed genes. In conclusion, LEVs provide a new filtering parameter for microarray analysis of gene expression and it may improve the inter- and intralaboratory comparability of Affymetrix GeneChips data.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.