Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Print PDF (554K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Itzhaki, R. F.
Right arrow Articles by Birnie, G.D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Itzhaki, R. F.
Right arrow Articles by Birnie, G.D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 1978, Vol. 5, No. 3 739-750
© 1978


Articles

Fractionation of chromatin by differential solubility in dilute salt

Ruth F. Itzhaki, Anna Hell and G.D. Birnie

Paterson Laboratories, Christie Hospital and Holt Radium Institute Manchester M20 9BX The Beatson Institute for Cancer Research, Wolfson Laboratory for Molecular Pathology Garscube Estate, Switchback Road, Bearsden, Glasgow, UK

Received December 13, 1977. Chromatin prepared from the livers of rats was fractionated on the basis of solubility in dilute NaC1. Neither of the fractions obtained was enriched in newly synthesized DNA. The salt-soluble fraction had a higher protein content (usually up to 50%) relative to the DNA, and contained 72% or more of the rapidly synthesized RNA. This RNA was found to be complexed with the salt-soluble deoxyribonucleoprotein, not merely co-solubilized with it. Also, polylysine-binding studies showed that about 70% or more of the nucleic acid phosphates were accessible as compared to about 40% in the unfractionated chromatin. These properties suggested that the soluble fraction was enriched in actively transcribed chromatin. In contrast molecular hybridization studies showed that the complexity of the DNA and its homology with cDNA transcribed from rat-liver polysomal mRNA were the same as those of DNA from unfractionated chromatin, or from the salt-insoluble fraction. This suggests that the criteria commonly accepted as distinguishing between euchromatin and heterochromatin in vitro are not invariably valid.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.