Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Print PDF (4498K)
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (25)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lilley, D.M.J.
Right arrow Articles by Houghton, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lilley, D.M.J.
Right arrow Articles by Houghton, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 1979, Vol. 6, No. 2 507-524
© 1979


Articles

The interaction of RNA polymerase II from wheat with supercoiled and linear plasmid templates

D.M.J. Lilley and M. Houghton

Departments of Biophysics and Biochemistry, Searle Research Laboratories Lane End Road, High Wycombe, HP12 4HL, UK

Received December 5, 1978. Interactions between a plant RNA polymsrase II and ColE1 based plasmid DNA templates have been studied. Gel electrophoresis indicates that the enzyme binds to both supercoiled and linear species. Using the totally double stranded pN89/SmaI fragment it is shown that transcription of completely base paired DNA is ten-fold lower than that of denatured or supercoiled plasmid, and reflects the presence of fewer initiation sites. A small proportion of the transcript remains tightly bound to supercoiled templates. 3' oligodeoxycytidine extensions on pM89/SmaI serve to promote transcription of the linear double stranded form. Using restriction kinetics it is shown that there is a small enhancement of polymerase binding at the pM89 tetracycline promoter, but that the selectivity of binding at this locus is lower than for the natural bacterial polymerase.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.