Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Print PDF (1559K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wray, V. P.
Right arrow Articles by Wray, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wray, V. P.
Right arrow Articles by Wray, W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 1980, Vol. 8, No. 18 4155-4164
© 1980


MOLECULAR BIOLOGY

Proteins of metaphase chromosomes and interphase chromatin

Virginia P. Wray1, Sarah C.R. Elgin2 and Wayne Wray3,

1Dep. Cell Biology, Univ. Texas System Cancer Cent., M.D. Anderson Hospital and Tumor Inst. Houston, TX 77030 2Dep. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Harvard Univ. Cambridge, MA 02138 3Dep. Cell Biology, Baylor Coll. Medicine Houston, TX 77030, USA

Address communication to: Dr. Wayne Wray, Department of Cell Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, 1200 Moursund, Houston, TX 77030, USA

Received June 17, 1980. Metaphase chromosomal and interphase chromatin proteins from cells of two species have been campared by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Consistent, common changes in the quantitative distribution of the nonhistone chromosomal proteins are observed in both species. Proteins of ca. 65,000 and 68,000 MW are enriched In interphase chromatin while proteins of ca. 50,000 and 200,000 are more prominent components of metaphase chromosomes. A group of proteins of 90,000–100,000 are also increased in metaphase chromosomes compared to interphase chromatin. By two dimensional gel analysis, the nost abundant proteins from chromosomes of both cell types are similar, suggesting a structural role for these nonhistone proteins (1).


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.