Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Print PDF (1942K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (28)
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crampton, J.
Right arrow Articles by Williamson, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Crampton, J.
Right arrow Articles by Williamson, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 1980, Vol. 8, No. 24 6007-6017
© 1980


MOLECULAR BIOLOGY

The isolation of cloned cDNA sequen which are differentially expressed in human lymphocytes and fibroblasts

Julian Crampton, Stephen Humphries, Derek Woods and Robert Williamson

Biochemistry Department, St. Mary's Hospital Medical School, University of London London, W2 1PG, UK

Received November 3, 1980. Poly(A)+ RNA populations derived from normal lymphocytes and fibroblasts have been compared by hybridising each RNA to cDNA derived from the other RNA population. This indicated that approximately 75% of the sequences were common to both, and that these were present at different concentrations in the two cell types. The two RNA populations were further compared by hybridising them to a cDNA recombinant library derived from lymphocyte poly(A)+ RNA. This allowed the identification of clones containing sequences which are abundant in lymphocyte poly(A)+ RNA but absent or rare in fibroblast poly(A)+ RNA. A direct estimation of the abundance of five of these sequences in lymphocyte cDNA demonstrated that clones can be detected by such a procedure if they represent 0.2% or greater of the original cDNA population.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.