Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Print PDF (628K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (113)
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krokan, H.
Right arrow Articles by Urs Wittwer, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Krokan, H.
Right arrow Articles by Urs Wittwer, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 1981, Vol. 9, No. 11 2599-2614
© 1981


ENZYMOLOGY

Uracil DNA-glycosylase from HeLa cells: general properties, substrate specificity and effect of uracil analogs

Hans Krokan and Christian Urs Wittwer

Institute of Medical Biology, University of Tromsø 9001 Tromsø, Norway

Received April 14, 1981. Uracil-DNA glycosylase was partially purified from HeLa cells. Various substrates containing [3H]dUMP residues were prepared by nick-translatiqn of calf thymus DNA. The standard substrate was double-stranded DNA with [3H]dUMP located internally in the chain. Compared to the release of uracil from this substrate, a 3-fold increase in the rate was seen with single-stranded DNA, and a 20-fold reduction in the rate was observed when the [3H]dUMP-residue was located at the 3'end. The rate of [3H]uracil release decreased progressively when one, two or three of the dNMP residues were replaced by the corresponding rNMP; in the extreme case when the substrate contained [3H]dUMP in addition to rCMP, rGMP and rAMP, the rate of [3H]uracil release was less than 3% of that of the control. The enzyme was inhibited to the same extent by uracil and the uracil analogs 6-aminouracil and 5-azauracil, but very weakly, or not at all, by 5 other analogs. Our results suggest strongly that uracil-DNA glycosylase has a high degree of selectivity for uracil in dUMP residues located internally in DNA chains and that the recognition of the correct substrate also depends on the residues flanking dUMP being deoxyribonucleotides.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
H. S. Pettersen, O. Sundheim, K. M. Gilljam, G. Slupphaug, H. E. Krokan, and B. Kavli
Uracil-DNA glycosylases SMUG1 and UNG2 coordinate the initial steps of base excision repair by distinct mechanisms
Nucleic Acids Res., June 9, 2007; 35(12): 3879 - 3892.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. J. Rasimas, S. R. Kar, A. E. Pegg, and M. G. Fried
Interactions of Human O6-Alkylguanine-DNA Alkyltransferase (AGT) with Short Single-stranded DNAs
J. Biol. Chem., February 2, 2007; 282(5): 3357 - 3366.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Med.Home page
B. Kavli, S. Andersen, M. Otterlei, N. B. Liabakk, K. Imai, A. Fischer, A. Durandy, H. E. Krokan, and G. Slupphaug
B cells from hyper-IgM patients carrying UNG mutations lack ability to remove uracil from ssDNA and have elevated genomic uracil
J. Exp. Med., June 20, 2005; 201(12): 2011 - 2021.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
N. Acharya, R. K. Talawar, K. Saikrishnan, M. Vijayan, and U. Varshney
Substitutions at tyrosine 66 of Escherichia coli uracil DNA glycosylase lead to characterization of an efficient enzyme that is recalcitrant to product inhibition
Nucleic Acids Res., December 15, 2003; 31(24): 7216 - 7226.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
B. Kavli, O. Sundheim, M. Akbari, M. Otterlei, H. Nilsen, F. Skorpen, P. A. Aas, L. Hagen, H. E. Krokan, and G. Slupphaug
hUNG2 Is the Major Repair Enzyme for Removal of Uracil from U:A Matches, U:G Mismatches, and U in Single-stranded DNA, with hSMUG1 as a Broad Specificity Backup
J. Biol. Chem., October 11, 2002; 277(42): 39926 - 39936.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
M. E. Farez-Vidal, C. Gallego, L. M. Ruiz-Perez, and D. Gonzalez-Pacanowska
Characterization of uracil-DNA glycosylase activity from Trypanosoma cruzi and its stimulation by AP endonuclease
Nucleic Acids Res., April 1, 2001; 29(7): 1549 - 1555.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
E. Cappelli, T. Hazra, J. W. Hill, G. Slupphaug, M. Bogliolo, and G. Frosina
Rates of base excision repair are not solely dependent on levels of initiating enzymes
Carcinogenesis, March 1, 2001; 22(3): 387 - 393.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
H. Nilsen, K. S. Steinsbekk, M. Otterlei, G. Slupphaug, P. A. Aas, and H. E. Krokan
Analysis of uracil-DNA glycosylases from the murine Ung gene reveals differential expression in tissues and in embryonic development and a subcellular sorting pattern that differs from the human homologues
Nucleic Acids Res., June 15, 2000; 28(12): 2277 - 2285.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
E. Lutsenko and A. S. Bhagwat
The Role of the Escherichia coli Mug Protein in the Removal of Uracil and 3,N4-Ethenocytosine from DNA
J. Biol. Chem., October 22, 1999; 274(43): 31034 - 31038.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. A. Nagelhus, T. Haug, K. K. Singh, K. F. Keshav, F. Skorpen, M. Otterlei, S. Bharati, T. Lindmo, S. Benichou, R. Benarous, et al.
A Sequence in the N-terminal Region of Human Uracil-DNA Glycosylase with Homology to XPA Interacts with the C-terminal Part of the 34-kDa Subunit of Replication Protein A
J. Biol. Chem., March 7, 1997; 272(10): 6561 - 6566.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.