Skip Navigation



Nucleic Acids Research Advance Access published online on July 26, 2008

Nucleic Acids Research, doi:10.1093/nar/gkn425
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (3133K) Freely available
Right arrow Screen PDF (315K) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
36/16/e105    most recent
gkn425v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dohm, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Himmelbauer, H.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dohm, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Himmelbauer, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2008 The Author(s)
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Methods Online

Substantial biases in ultra-short read data sets from high-throughput DNA sequencing

Juliane C. Dohm1, Claudio Lottaz2, Tatiana Borodina1 and Heinz Himmelbauer1,*

1Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Ihnestr. 63-73, 14195 Berlin and 2Institute for Functional Genomics, Computational Diagnostics, University of Regensburg, Josef-Engert-Str. 9, 93053 Regensburg, Germany

*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +49 30 8413 1354; Fax: +49 30 8413 1380; Email: himmelbauer{at}molgen.mpg.de

Received December 21, 2007. Revised June 16, 2008. Accepted June 19, 2008.

Novel sequencing technologies permit the rapid production of large sequence data sets. These technologies are likely to revolutionize genetics and biomedical research, but a thorough characterization of the ultra-short read output is necessary. We generated and analyzed two Illumina 1G ultra-short read data sets, i.e. 2.8 million 27mer reads from a Beta vulgaris genomic clone and 12.3 million 36mers from the Helicobacter acinonychis genome. We found that error rates range from 0.3% at the beginning of reads to 3.8% at the end of reads. Wrong base calls are frequently preceded by base G. Base substitution error frequencies vary by 10- to 11-fold, with A > C transversion being among the most frequent and C > G transversions among the least frequent substitution errors. Insertions and deletions of single bases occur at very low rates. When simulating re-sequencing we found a 20-fold sequencing coverage to be sufficient to compensate errors by correct reads. The read coverage of the sequenced regions is biased; the highest read density was found in intervals with elevated GC content. High Solexa quality scores are over-optimistic and low scores underestimate the data quality. Our results show different types of biases and ways to detect them. Such biases have implications on the use and interpretation of Solexa data, for de novo sequencing, re-sequencing, the identification of single nucleotide polymorphisms and DNA methylation sites, as well as for transcriptome analysis.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.