Skip Navigation



Nucleic Acids Research Advance Access published online on July 24, 2008

Nucleic Acids Research, doi:10.1093/nar/gkn456
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (3788K) Freely available
Right arrow Screen PDF (1542K) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
36/14/4808    most recent
gkn456v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kumarevel, T.
Right arrow Articles by Yokoyama, S.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kumarevel, T.
Right arrow Articles by Yokoyama, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2008 The Author(s)
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Structural Biology

Crystal structure of glutamine receptor protein from Sulfolobus tokodaii strain 7 in complex with its effector L-glutamine: implications of effector binding in molecular association and DNA binding

Thirumananseri Kumarevel1,*, Noboru Nakano1, Karthe Ponnuraj2, Subash C. B. Gopinath3, Keiko Sakamoto1, Akeo Shinkai1, Penmetcha K. R. Kumar3 and Shigeyuki Yokoyama1,4,5

1RIKEN SPring-8 Center, Harima Institute, 1-1-1 Kouto, Sayo, Hyogo 679-5148, Japan, 2Center of Advanced Study in Crystallography and Biophysics, University of Madras, Guindy Campus, Chennai 600 025, Tamil Nadu, India, 3Institute for Biological Resources and Functions, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Central 6, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8566, 4Systems and Structural Biology Center, Yokohama Institute, RIKEN, 1-7-22 Suehiro-cho, Tsurumi, Yokohama 230-0045 and 5Department of Biophysics and Biochemistry, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan

*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +81 791 58 2838; Fax: +81 791 58 2835; Email: tskvel{at}spring8.or.jp

Correspondence may also be addressed to Shigeyuki Yokoyama. Tel: +81 45 503 9197; Fax: +81 45 503 9195; Email: yokoyama{at}biochem.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp

Received March 27, 2008. Revised June 30, 2008. Accepted July 2, 2008.

Genome analyses have revealed that members of the Lrp/AsnC family of transcriptional regulators are widely distributed among prokaryotes, including both bacteria and archaea. These regulatory proteins are involved in cellular metabolism in both global and specific manners, depending on the availability of the exogenous amino acid effectors. Here we report the first crystal structure of glutamine receptor protein (Grp) from Sulfolobus tokodaii strain 7, in the ligand-free and glutamine-bound (Grp-Gln) forms. Although the overall structures of both molecules are similar, a significant conformational change was observed at the ligand [L-glutamine (Gln)] binding site in the effector domain, which may be essential for further stabilization of the octameric structure, and in turn for facilitating DNA binding. In addition, we predicted promoter for the grp gene, and these analyses suggested the importance of cooperative binding to the protein. To gain insights into the ligand-induced conformational changes, we mutated all of the ligand-binding residues in Grp, and revealed the importance of Gln binding by biochemical and structural analyses. Further structural analyses showed that Y77 is crucial for ligand binding, and that the residues T132 and T134, which are highly conserved among the Lrp family of proteins, fluctuates between the active and inactive conformations, thus affecting protein oligomerization for DNA binding.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.