Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (178K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (146)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holm, L
Right arrow Articles by Sander, C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Holm, L
Right arrow Articles by Sander, C
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 Oxford University Press 206-210

The FSSP database: fold classification based on structure-structure alignment of proteins

The FSSP database: fold classification based on structure-structure alignment of proteins Liisa Holm and Chris Sander

European Molecular Biology Laboratory, D-69012 Heidelberg , Germany

Received October 2, 1995 ; Accepted October 4, 1995

ABSTRACT

The FSSP database presents a continuously updated classification of 3-D protein folds based on an all-against-all comparison of structures currently in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) [Bernstein et al . (1977) J. Mol. Biol. , 112, 535-542]. The database currently contains an extended structural family for each of 600 representative protein chains which have <25% mutual sequence identity. The results of the exhaustive pairwise structure comparisons are reported in the form of a fold tree generated by hierachical clustering and as a series of structurally representative sets of folds at varying levels of uniqueness. For each query structure from the representative set, there is a database entry containing structure-structure alignments with its structural neighbours in the representative set and its sequence homologs in the PDB. All alignments are based purely on the 3-D co-ordinates of the proteins and are derived by an automatic structure comparison program (Dali). The FSSP database is accessible electronically on the World Wide Web and by anonymous ftp.

INTRODUCTION

Most newly determined protein sequences can be classified into families by sequence homology. However, protein families are known to retain the shape of the fold even when sequences have diverged below the limit of detection of significant similarities at the sequence level. These similarities can be detected by structural comparisons that merge protein families of known 3-D structure into structural classes, the members of which may or may not be evolutionarily related ( 1 - 4 ). The FSSP database contains a fold classification based on exhaustive structural alignments of known structures. The database provides a rich source of information for the study of both divergent and convergent aspects of the evolution of protein folds and defines useful test sets and a standard of truth for assessing the correctness of sequence-sequence or sequence-structure alignments.

The major new developments since last year ( 5 ) are continuous updates of the database and easy access to the data using browsers on the World Wide Web (WWW).

Form and content of the database

Fold classification

The basic structural entity used currently in the FSSP database are protein chains, which are identified by the Protein Data Bank (PDB) entry code plus chain identifier. All protein chains in the PDB entries that are >30 residues are listed alphabetically in PROTEIN INDEX which gives the pointer to the representative structure of the protein family and short summary information about the strength of similarity to the representative. The sequence-representative set is derived using algorithm #1 of ref. 6 so that all pairwise sequence identities within this set are <25%. For example, PROTEIN INDEX (Fig. 1 ) tells you that the protease inhibitor domain of Alzheimer's amyloid beta-protein precursor is deposited in the PDB as entry 1AAP which has two chains, A and B. Both the A and B chain are 45% sequence identical to the representative structure of the family, which is bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor (PDB entry 9PTI). As expected from the high sequence identity, the folds of both of the 1AAP chains and that of 9PTI are as good as identical (1.0-1.1 Å root-mean-square deviation of CA positions).


Figure 1 . Finding proteins in FSSP. All protein structures in the PDB are listed alphabetically in the PROTEIN INDEX table. The index can be used for searching by protein name or PDB code. In this example, 31 PDB chains clustered into the sequence family represented by bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor (9PTI) have been extracted from the table. These include multiple determinations of the same protein in different crystallographic conditions (chains with 100% sequence identity to the representative) and homologs from other species with sequence identity down to 33% relative to the representative. Notation: PDBid, PDB entry name, chain identifier appended; Repre, representative structure of the family; Rmsd, root-mean-square deviation of CA atoms in 3-D superimposition; Lali, number of structurally equivalent residues; Lseq, number of residues in PDBid; %ide, percentage of identical residues between PDBid and Repre in structural alignment; Compound, protein name echoed from the PDB entry.

Classifying proteins into sequence families yields a reduction from nearly 5000 protein chains in the PDB to ~600 representatives. This set includes many pairs of remote homologs that have completely superimposable 3-D structures despite low sequence similarity and pairs with recurrent common folding motifs. The sequence-representative set is clustered further based on all-against-all structure comparison within the sequence-representative set.

FOLDTREE is a tree representation of the sequence-representative set produced by hierarchical clustering. The tree gives a simple overview of protein families, grouping together remote homologs and joining topologically similar but not necessarily evolutionarily related proteins in the lower branches. Cutting the tree at a level of Z = 2 (i.e. structural similarity scores two standard deviations above database average, taking domain size into acccount) yields 200 fold classes. For example, Figure 2 shows how the first C2 domain of synaptotagmin I (PDB entry 1RSY), which presented a new calcium-binding fold ( 7 ), is firmly anchored in a large structural class that contains beta-sandwich proteins with topological similarity to immunoglobulin-like domains and blue copper proteins.


Figure 2 . Overview of protein fold space. ( a ) Part of fold tree obtained by hierarchical clustering based on structural similarities between proteins in the representative set (<25% pairwise sequence identity). ( b ) The same part of the fold tree as it appears in the FOLDTREE table. A fold index is constructed by cutting an average linkage clustering tree at a similarity level of two standard deviations above expected (Z = 2), for example 31 in 31.2.5.3.1.1. for synaptotagmin. Subfamilies are defined and indexed according to cuts at similarity levels of Z = 3, 4, 5, 6 and 10, that is increasing levels of stringency. For example, the cut at Z = 4 (31.2.*) separates between blue copper proteins, hemocyanin, coagulation factor, cadherin, bacterial and eukaryotic immunoglobulin-like domains and superoxide dismutases. Indentation in the `PDB code' column corresponds to the fold indices and means that a protein belongs to the same structural family/subfamily as the protein above. (c) Stereo view of superimposition between synaptotagmin I (PDB entry 1RSY, thick line) and a fibronectin type III domain (PDB entry 1FNA, thin line) reveals the common topological arrangement of strands in the beta sandwich (cf. ref. 7). Plotted with WhatIf (17).

An alternative way of defining clusters in protein fold space is used to derive the PDBfolds series of structurally representative sets using algorithm #2 of ref. 6 . The sets of representative folds contain a maximal number of protein folds where no pair is allowed to have a larger fraction of structurally equivalent residues than a given threshold percentage. This reduces the number of unique folds to consider for structural analysis, depending on the threshold chosen. For example, the common structural core covers >90% of the chain in all globin-globin pairs and >70% in any phycocyanin-globin pair. Accordingly, there is only one globin structure in the 90% list and only one representative for the phycocyanin-globin fold in the 70% list of PDBfolds.

Structural alignments

For each protein chain in the representative set, with PDB identifier Nxxx (like: 1PPT, 5PCY) and chain identifier Y (omitted if blank), there is an ASCII (text) file Nxxx.FSSP or NxxxY.FSSP which contains a few or tens of proteins structurally similar to the search structure, alongside the secondary structure and solvent accessibility extracted from the 3-D coordinates of the search structure ( 8 ). The structural neighbours that are reported include any sequence homologs to the query structure that have a structure in the PDB and all structurally similar chains from the representative set (Z >= 2). Details about the Dali method used to derive the database are given in refs 9 and 10 .

An FSSP file is divided in five formatted blocks and a free text footer which explains the format. (i) The header block identifies the query structure, database and structural alignment method used and gives the number of structural neighbours. (ii) The summary block gives a one-line summary for each neighbour, including the statistical significance of the similarity (Z-score), positional root-mean-square deviation of superimposed CA coordinates, total number of equivalent residues and the percentage of sequence identity over structurally equivalent positions. (iii) The alignments block is a multiple structural alignment, printed vertically and showing the sequence and secondary structure of matched residues. (iv) The equivalences block is a machine readable listing that gives the residue numbers of the structurally equivalent segments. (v) The matrices block gives the rotation-translation matrices that, when applied to the 3-D coordinates in the respective PDB entries, yield the least-squares superimposition of the matched protein onto the query structure. See below for automatic parsing of FSSP entries.

Distribution

World Wide Web

The FSSP database is accessible over the WWW addressing URL http://www.embl-heidelberg.de/dali/fssp/.

The most convenient starting point for a walk in fold space is via clicking the `alignment' link in the FOLDTREE table. FSSP entries are parsed on the fly to display structural neighbours of individual proteins in the form of structure alignments laid out horizontally, multiple structure alignments (known structures) combined with multiple sequence alignments [sequences homologous to a known structure: HSSP database ( 11 )] or superimposed coordinates [retrieved from PDB ( 12 )] for viewing with molecular graphics programs such as Rasmol ( 13 ). There are further hypertext links to functional annotations and literature references via SRS ( 14 ). For example, a study of the p21 ras family could start from the FOLDTREE table, which immediately shows transducin alpha, the ADP-ribosylation factor 1 and elongation factor G as the closest structural neighbours. From the structural alignment of these remote homologs one can identify the conserved sequence motifs GxxxxGKS and NKxD ( 15 ). These patterns are conserved in all members of the protein families as seen by extending the structure alignment with the results from a sequence database search ( 11 ). The number of sequence relatives displayed can be reduced from several hundred to a few tens using a cutoff of 50% identity between any pair that is displayed (Fig. 3 ). Clicking on the sequence identifier (e.g. rash_rat) pops up the Swissprot ( 16 ) annotation for this sequence.


Figure 3 . Combining multiple structure-structure alignments with multiple sequence-sequence alignments. A multiple sequence alignment of four protein families: p21 ras , transducin alpha, ADP-ribosylation factor 1 and elongation factor G. Only structurally equivalent blocks are shown; the middle part of the alignment has been omitted in order to highlight the conserved sequence signatures near the N- and C-termini. Structural alignment defines the register of each of the families (indicated in the FSSP column) relative to p21 ras . In addition to the guide structures, the alignment includes representative sequence homologs (Swissprot column; first sequence corresponds to the known structure) taken from the HSSP database of sequence-sequence alignments (11). The combined multiple alignment is filtered so that any sequence pair displayed has <50% sequence identity. For example, the original HSSP entry for 5p21 lists 189 sequences; here, only 29 representative ras sequences are shown. Notation: ~, nonequivalent segments and trailing ends from structure alignment; blanks and dots, gaps and trailing ends from sequence alignment; lowercase, insertions in sequence alignment.

Anonymous ftp

The FSSP data sets can be obtained by anonymous ftp from ftp.embl-heidelberg.de in the directory:

/pub/databases/protein_extras/fssp.

Conditions

Academic redistribution of single files or of the entire database is permitted. No inclusion in other databases or database services, academic or other, without explicit permission of the authors. All rights reserved. Not to be used for classified research. Users are asked to refer to ref. 9 and this paper in reporting results obtained using the database.

SIZE OF THE CURRENT RELEASE

The size of the FSSP database is tightly coupled to that of the PDB from which it is derived. The FSSP database is updated with each release of new structures by the PDB. The size of the sequence-representative set of chains was 600 in August 1995, an 80% increase from June 1994. The complete set of result files requires ~60 Mb of disk storage.

Limitations

The current database contains at most one alignment per pair of full length proteins. The alignments are constrained to be sequential as this is biologically meaningful though not imposed by the Dali method. Different chains in one PDB entry are compared separately; chains with <30 residues or unknown sequence are excluded.

The structure comparison program Dali ( 9 ) defines the extent of the common structural core by maximizing the agreement of intra molecular CA-CA distances. The scoring function was deliberately designed to allow inter-domain conformational flexibility; hence, positional root mean square deviations for the corresponding rigid-body superimpositions are often higher than for comparison methods that put an absolute upper limit on inter molecular positional deviations. This, however, is only an apparent disadvantage.

Related service

Requests for alignments of newly solved crystallographic or solution NMR structures (C [alpha] co-ordinates required) may be sent to the Dali e-mail server with Internet address:

dali{at}embl-heidelberg.de

More information on the Dali server ( 10 ) is available on the WWW at:

URL http://www.embl-heidelberg.de/dali/dali.html.

Kindly report any problems to the authors by e-mail.

REFERENCES

1 Murzin, A.G., Brenner, S.E., Hubbard, T. and Chothia, C. (1994) J. Mol. Biol., 247, 536-540. MEDLINE Abstract

2 Overington J., Johnson M.S., Sali A. and Blundell T.L. (1990) Proc. Royal Soc. Lond., B241, 132-145.

3 Orengo C.A., Flores T.P., Taylor W.R. and Thornton J.M. (1993) Protein Eng., 6, 485-500.

4 Holm L. and Sander C. (1994) Proteins, 19, 165-173.

5 Holm L. and Sander C. (1994) Nucleic Acids Res., 22, 3600-3609.

6 Hobohm, U., Scharf, M., Schneider, R. and Sander, C. (1992) Protein Sci., 1, 409-417.

7 Sutton R.B., Davletov B.A., Berghuis A.M., Sudhof T.C. and Sprang S.R. (1995) Cell, 80, 929-935.

8 Kabsch W. and Sander C. (1983) Biopolymers, 22, 2577-2637.

9 Holm L. and Sander C. (1993) J. Mol. Biol., 233,123-138.

10 Holm L. and Sander C. (1995) Trends Biol. Sci., 20, 478-480.

11 Sander C. and Schneider R. (1991) Proteins, 9, 56-68.

12 Bernstein F.C., Koetzle T.F., Williams G.J.B., Meyer E.F., Brice M.D., Rodgers J.R., Kennard O., Shimanouchi T. and Tasumi M. (1977) J. Mol. Biol., 112, 535-542.

13 Sayle R.A. and Milner-White, E.J. (1995) Trends Biol. Sci., 20, 374-376.

14 Etzold T. and Argos P. (1993) CABIOS, 9, 49-57.

15 Valencia,A., Kjeldgaard, M., Pai, E.F. and Sander, C. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 88, 5443-5447. MEDLINE Abstract

16 Bairoch, A. (1992) Nucleic Acids Res., 20, 2013-2018. MEDLINE Abstract

17 Vriend, G. (1990) J. Mol. Graphics, 8, 52-56.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
T. Margraf, G. Schenk, and A. E. Torda
The SALAMI protein structure search server
Nucleic Acids Res., July 1, 2009; 37(suppl_2): W480 - W484.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
C. Ottmann, B. Luberacki, I. Kufner, W. Koch, F. Brunner, M. Weyand, L. Mattinen, M. Pirhonen, G. Anderluh, H. U. Seitz, et al.
A common toxin fold mediates microbial attack and plant defense
PNAS, June 23, 2009; 106(25): 10359 - 10364.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
M. M. Babu, L. M. Iyer, S. Balaji, and L. Aravind
The natural history of the WRKY-GCM1 zinc fingers and the relationship between transcription factors and transposons
Nucleic Acids Res., December 2, 2006; 34(22): 6505 - 6520.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
F. Peelman, H. Iserentant, A.-S. De Smet, J. Vandekerckhove, L. Zabeau, and J. Tavernier
Mapping of Binding Site III in the Leptin Receptor and Modeling of a Hexameric Leptin{middle dot}Leptin Receptor Complex
J. Biol. Chem., June 2, 2006; 281(22): 15496 - 15504.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
K. Fleming, L. A Kelley, S. A Islam, R. M MacCallum, A. Muller, F. Pazos, and M. J.E Sternberg
The proteome: structure, function and evolution
Phil Trans R Soc B, March 29, 2006; 361(1467): 441 - 451.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
F. Forouhar, M. Hussain, R. Farid, J. Benach, M. Abashidze, W. C. Edstrom, S. M. Vorobiev, R. Xiao, T. B. Acton, Z. Fu, et al.
Crystal Structures of Two Bacterial 3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA Lyases Suggest a Common Catalytic Mechanism among a Family of TIM Barrel Metalloenzymes Cleaving Carbon-Carbon Bonds
J. Biol. Chem., March 17, 2006; 281(11): 7533 - 7545.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
S. Balaji, M. M. Babu, L. M. Iyer, and L. Aravind
Discovery of the principal specific transcription factors of Apicomplexa and their implication for the evolution of the AP2-integrase DNA binding domains
Nucleic Acids Res., July 21, 2005; 33(13): 3994 - 4006.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
L. M. Iyer, E. V. Koonin, D. D. Leipe, and L. Aravind
Origin and evolution of the archaeo-eukaryotic primase superfamily and related palm-domain proteins: structural insights and new members
Nucleic Acids Res., July 15, 2005; 33(12): 3875 - 3896.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
G. Qi, R. Lee, and S. Hayward
A comprehensive and non-redundant database of protein domain movements
Bioinformatics, June 15, 2005; 21(12): 2832 - 2838.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
E. J. Deeds, H. Hennessey, and E. I. Shakhnovich
Prokaryotic phylogenies inferred from protein structural domains
Genome Res., March 1, 2005; 15(3): 393 - 402.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
D.-S. Han, H.-S. Kim, W.-H. Jang, S.-D. Lee, and J.-K. Suh
PreSPI: a domain combination based prediction system for protein-protein interaction
Nucleic Acids Res., December 1, 2004; 32(21): 6312 - 6320.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. A. Koch, L.-O. Wittenberg, S. Basu, D. A. Jeyaraj, E. Gourzoulidou, K. Reinecke, A. Odermatt, and H. Waldmann
Compound library development guided by protein structure similarity clustering and natural product structure
PNAS, November 30, 2004; 101(48): 16721 - 16726.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
I. A. Hubner, M. Oliveberg, and E. I. Shakhnovich
Simulation, experiment, and evolution: Understanding nucleation in protein S6 folding
PNAS, June 1, 2004; 101(22): 8354 - 8359.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
I.-G. Choi, J. Kwon, and S.-H. Kim
Local feature frequency profile: A method to measure structural similarity in proteins
PNAS, March 16, 2004; 101(11): 3797 - 3802.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
S. S. Krishna, I. Majumdar, and N. V. Grishin
Structural classification of zinc fingers: SURVEY AND SUMMARY
Nucleic Acids Res., January 15, 2003; 31(2): 532 - 550.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
E. Kussell, J. Shimada, and E. I. Shakhnovich
A structure-based method for derivation of all-atom potentials for protein folding
PNAS, April 16, 2002; 99(8): 5343 - 5348.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Morillas, P. Gomez-Puertas, B. Rubi, J. Clotet, J. Arino, A. Valencia, F. G. Hegardt, D. Serra, and G. Asins
Structural Model of a Malonyl-CoA-binding Site of Carnitine Octanoyltransferase and Carnitine Palmitoyltransferase I. MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS OF A MALONYL-CoA AFFINITY DOMAIN
J. Biol. Chem., March 22, 2002; 277(13): 11473 - 11480.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
W. W. Li, B. V. B. Reddy, J. G. Tate, I. N. Shindyalov, and P. E. Bourne
CKAAPs DB: a Conserved Key Amino Acid Positions DataBase
Nucleic Acids Res., January 1, 2002; 30(1): 409 - 411.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
N. V. Grishin
KH domain: one motif, two folds
Nucleic Acids Res., February 1, 2001; 29(3): 638 - 643.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
W. W. Li, B. V. B. Reddy, I. N. Shindyalov, and P. E. Bourne
CKAAPs DB: a conserved key amino acid positions database
Nucleic Acids Res., January 1, 2001; 29(1): 329 - 331.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
X. Shao and N. V. Grishin
Common fold in helix-hairpin-helix proteins
Nucleic Acids Res., July 15, 2000; 28(14): 2643 - 2650.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
J. Willuda, A. Honegger, R. Waibel, P. A. Schubiger, R. Stahel, U. Zangemeister-Wittke, and A. Pluckthun
High Thermal Stability Is Essential for Tumor Targeting of Antibody Fragments: Engineering of a Humanized Anti-epithelial Glycoprotein-2 (Epithelial Cell Adhesion Molecule) Single-Chain Fv Fragment
Cancer Res., November 1, 1999; 59(22): 5758 - 5767.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
M. Y. Galperin, D. R. Walker, and E. V. Koonin
Analogous Enzymes: Independent Inventions in Enzyme Evolution
Genome Res., August 1, 1998; 8(8): 779 - 790.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Morillas, P. Gomez-Puertas, R. Roca, D. Serra, G. Asins, A. Valencia, and F. G. Hegardt
Structural Model of the Catalytic Core of Carnitine Palmitoyltransferase I and Carnitine Octanoyltransferase (COT). MUTATION OF CPT I HISTIDINE 473 AND ALANINE 381 AND COT ALANINE 238 IMPAIRS THE CATALYTIC ACTIVITY
J. Biol. Chem., November 21, 2001; 276(48): 45001 - 45008.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
P. Mallick, K. E. Goodwill, S. Fitz-Gibbon, J. H. Miller, and D. Eisenberg
Selecting protein targets for structural genomics of Pyrobaculum aerophilum: Validating automated fold assignment methods by using binary hypothesis testing
PNAS, March 14, 2000; 97(6): 2450 - 2455.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
E. Kussell, J. Shimada, and E. I. Shakhnovich
A structure-based method for derivation of all-atom potentials for protein folding
PNAS, April 16, 2002; 99(8): 5343 - 5348.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (178K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (146)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holm, L
Right arrow Articles by Sander, C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Holm, L
Right arrow Articles by Sander, C
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?