Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (121K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alexander, H
Right arrow Articles by Alexander, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alexander, H
Right arrow Articles by Alexander, S
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 Oxford University Press 2295-2301

Footnote

rep E-the Dictyostelium homolog of the human xeroderma pigmentosum group E gene is developmentally regulated and contains a leucine zipper motif

rep E-the Dictyostelium homolog of the human xeroderma pigmentosum group E gene is developmentally regulated and contains a leucine zipper motif Hannah Alexander , Sung-Keun Lee , Sung-Lim Yu and Stephen Alexander*

Division of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia , MO 65211, USA

Received March 11, 1996 ; Revised and Accepted May 2, 1996 GenBank accession no. U50042

ABSTRACT

We have cloned and characterized the Dictyostelium discoideum rep E gene, a homolog of the human xeroderma pigmentosum (XP) group E gene which encodes a UV-damaged DNA binding protein. The rep E gene maps to chromosome 4 and it is the first gene identified in Dictyostelium that is homologous to those involved in nucleotide excision repair and their related XP diseases in humans. The predicted protein encodes a leucine zipper motif. The rep E gene is not expressed by mitotically dividing cells, and rep E mRNA is first detected during the aggregation phase of development when the cells have ceased dividing and replicating genomic DNA. The mRNA level plateaus by the time the developing cells have entered multicellular aggregates and remains at the same steady-state level for the remainder of development. In addition, we have demonstrated that the level of mRNA is very low in developing cells. These observations suggest that rep E may play a regulatory role in development. The data indicate that potential developmental roles for XP-related genes can be profitably studied in this system.

INTRODUCTION

Xeroderma pigmentosum (XP) is a rare autosomal recessive disease that is marked by extreme sensitivity to UV light and a high predisposition to skin cancer in light-exposed areas of the body ( 1 ). Human XP cells are defective in nucleotide excision repair (NER). They are divided into eight complementation groups (A-G and a variant group) which differ from each other in the degree of their repair deficiency. The genes which correspond to the various XP groups represent different genes whose products are involved in the repair process ( 2 ). These XP-related genes (named ERCC , for excision repair cross-complementing) were identified by their ability to cross-complement a series of UV-sensitive rodent cell lines which were generated by mutagenesis and have been shown to comprise at least 11 complementation groups ( 2 ).

Many XP genes have been shown to share considerable homology with the yeast RAD genes and with Drosophila homologs of the XP genes ( 3 ). These homologies with the yeast RAD genes provided the initial clues for the repair activity of these genes and imply that the repair mechanism is highly conserved across these species. However, it is clear that significant differences in the repair mechanisms exist between species and each gene has unique additional functions in different organisms.

Of all the identified XP complementation groups, XPE is the least understood with respect to its role within the repair pathway. The NER defect in some XPE cell lines has been correlated with the absence of activity of the UV-DDB (UV-damaged DNA binding) protein. The cognate monkey and human genes have been cloned and sequenced ( 4 - 6 ). A yeast homolog has not been identified and no correlation to an existing ERCC gene has been made. The XPE protein has not been identified as part of the repairosome holoenzyme ( 7 ). However, recent work in which mammalian NER was reconstituted from purified protein components showed that XPE/UV-DDB plays an accessory role in NER ( 8 ).

One perplexing problem about XP patients is that even though their genetic defects are each in single repair genes, they exhibit a wide range of phenotypes, such as predisposition to cancer, stunted growth and neurological and developmental abnormalities ( 1 ). In yeast, some of the XP homologs are actually essential for viability ( 9 , 10 ). The underlying reason for this pleiotropy is that these repair genes are involved in multiple processes in addition to NER ( 11 ). Such processes involve transcription ( 7 , 12 - 18 ), DNA replication ( 19 - 22 ) and mitotic ( 23 ) and meiotic ( 24 ) recombination.

The involvement of NER gene products in transcription and other general processes in the cell begins to explain the wide range of phenotypes that are associated with XP. However, it does not explain why phenotypes which are associated with defects in such fundamental processes are not more severe and global. This consideration raises the possibility that these genes may be affecting specific developmental decisions. Identifying the nature of these affected processes remains one of the major challenges of this field ( 25 ). Clearly these problems will benefit from studies on model developmental systems.

In this paper we report the identification and isolation of rep E, the Dictyostelium homolog of the primate UV-DDB gene. rep E is the first XP- or NER-related gene identified in this developing system. We demonstrate that expression of the rep E gene is developmentally regulated. The gene is not expressed in vegetatively growing cells, but rep E mRNA accumulates in the early stages of development. The protein has a leucine zipper motif, suggesting a role in gene regulation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Library screening

A cDNA library in [lambda]Zap and a genomic library in pBLUESCRIPT were gifts from Herbert Ennis (Columbia University). The rep E gene was serendipitously identified as part of our studies on the discoidin genes of Dictyostelium . Two positive overlapping cDNA clones (see Results and Fig. 1 B) were identified in an antibody screen of >75 000 phage from the [lambda]Zap expression library while we were attempting to clone the discoidin II gene, using a specific polyclonal antibody as a probe. The sequence of these clones did not match any of the peptide sequences we had obtained for the discoidin II protein, but did reveal their homology to the primate UV-DDB / XPE gene. We have never explained this aberrant antibody reactivity. The antibody reacts with a single band on Western blots and it is possible that the cross-reactivity is at the level of secondary structure. The two cloned cDNA fragments were used to re-screen both the [lambda]Zap and genomic libraries using standard procedures ( 26 ).


Figure 1 . rep E exists as a single copy in the genome. ( A ) Southern analysis of genomic DNA from strain Ax3. Aliquots of 10 [mu]g DNA per lane were digested with the various restriction enzymes and separated on a 0.8% agarose gel in TEA buffer. The gel was blotted onto nylon membrane and probed with a PCR-amplified fragment of the rep E gene (position 3555-3964 on the genomic sequence, Fig. 3). ( B ) Aliquots of 10 [mu]g Ax3 DNA were digested with a combination of enzymes and separated on 0.8% gels. Each gel was blotted onto two filters, using the sandwich blotting technique and probed with two distinct fragments of the rep E clone pLS3: a 0.6 kb Eco RV- Nde I fragment and a 1 kb Nde I- Nsi I fragment. These fragments allowed the unambiguous alignments of fragments that resulted from double cuts. Sizes of the fragments were extrapolated from [lambda] molecular weight markers.

Cloning genomic DNA fragments

Genomic DNA cut with Nde I or Bcl I was size fractionated on a sucrose gradient. The DNA fragments from part of each fraction were separated by electrophoresis and blotted ( 27 ). The blots were probed with a 5' fragment of the rep E cDNA clone, to identify the fractions containing the rest of the gene. The DNA from the peak fractions was cloned into the compatible vectors [pT7-7 ( 28 ) for Nde I and pUC19 for Bcl I] and the clones were screened by hybridization. All DNA manipulations were performed according to standard procedures ( 26 ). Sequencing was performed using a Sequenase kit from USB and [[alpha]- 32 P]dATP. Routinely, plasmid DNA was purified using a `Wizard prep' kit (Promega). The rep E gene was sequenced in its entirety on both strands.

Strains, developmental time course and RNA preparation

Strains Ax3 and DH1 were used throughout these studies. Ax3 is a derivative of the wild-type strain NC4, which is capable of growth on axenic medium. DH1 is a derivative of Ax3 with a deletion in the pyr5-6 (UMP synthase) gene, so that it can be used in homologous recombination experiments with selection for uracil prototropy (a gift from R.Insall). For this work, the cells were grown on SM agar plates in association with Klebsiella aerogenes as a bacterial food source. When the Dictyostelium cultures reached mid log phase (2-3 * 10 8 cells/100 mm plate) they were harvested and the remainder of the bacteria were washed away by differential centrifugation. The cells were plated on buffer-soaked black paper filters for development (10 8 cells/40 mm filter) ( 29 ). Development under these conditions is completely synchronous. When the cells reached the desired developmental stage, they were harvested by vortexing the cells off the filter. The cells were then pelleted and rapidly frozen. Total RNA was isolated at each time point as described ( 30 ) and used for Northern analyses or reverse transcription-PCR.

Reverse transcription-PCR

First strand cDNA synthesis was performed using a Life Technology (Gibco BRL) Superscript Preamplification system. For each time point, 2 [mu]g of total RNA sample was treated with DNase I in a final volume of 20 [mu]l 50 mM KCl, 20 mM MgCl 2 . Aliquots of 2.2 [mu]l of the DNase I-treated samples were used for the reverse transcription (RT) reaction, following the instructions of the manufacturer and using an oligonucleotide covering position 3473-3488 (3' -> 5', oligo 6) as a primer. Aliquots of 2 [mu]l of each sample were then amplified, using oligo 6 and an oligonucleotide covering position 2711-2726 (5' -> 3', oligo 11) as primers. PCR was performed using a Coy thermocycler for 25 cycles under the following conditions: 1 min denaturation at 94oC, 2 min annealing at 40oC and 1 min 45 s elongation at 72oC. Each reaction contained 2 [mu]l 20 [mu]M primers, 10 [mu]l 2.5 mM dNTP and 1 [mu]l Taq polymerase (AmpliTaq; Perkin Elmer) in buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.4, 50 mM NaCl and 1.5 mM MgCl 2. Results were analyzed on 1.2% agarose gels in TBE.

Intron detection

The entire cloned genomic sequence was examined for introns using a reverse transcription-coupled PCR method as described ( 31 ). Briefly, cDNA was made from mRNA by reverse transcription. The cDNA was then amplified using overlapping sets of oligonucleotide primers which covered the entire length of the cloned sequence. A similar series of amplifications was performed on the genomic clone and the size of the equivalent PCR products were compared on agarose gels.

RESULTS

Cloning the Dictyostelium rep E gene

Two overlapping cDNA clones (Fig. 1 B, clones pLS1 and pLS2 of 824 and 845 bp, respectively) were identified in an antibody screen of a [lambda]Zap cDNA library (see Materials and Methods). The sequence of these clones revealed homology to the primate UV-DDB/XPE gene. Keeping with standard Dictyostelium gene nomenclature ( 32 ), we have named the gene rep E ( rep air E). A subsequent screen of the cDNA library and a genomic library yielded an additional 1.6 kb cDNA clone (pLS3) and a genomic clone (pLS4) that covers 1.78 kb of the coding sequence and >1 kb of sequence 3' to the rep E gene. Further attempts to clone the 5'-end of the rep E gene from either of these existing libraries were unsuccessful. Therefore, we established that the rep E gene appears as a single copy in the genome (Fig. 1 A) and cloned the rest of the gene from a genomic DNA preparation.

We constructed a restriction map of the region surrounding the rep E gene using the pLS3 rep E clone as a probe (Fig. 1 B). A 2.3 kb Nde I fragment which extends 1.6 kb from the 5'-end of the previously cloned genomic sequence seemed to be long enough to cover the rest of the gene, based on homology to the primate UV-DDB gene. A genomic Nde I digest was fractionated on a sucrose gradient and the appropriate size fraction was used to construct a mini-library, from which the 2.3 kb fragment was cloned. Sequence analysis of this fragment (clone pSKSL2) revealed that it was still missing the 5'-end of the gene due to the presence of an intron. We therefore repeated this procedure, cloning an overlapping Bcl I fragment (clone pSKSL3). This clone contained the 5'-end of the rep E coding sequence, 585 bp of 5' upstream region and most of the neighboring upstream gene.

Characterization of the rep E gene

The genomic sequence of the rep E gene is 3512 bp long (Fig. 2 ). There is a single 92 bp intron at position 2568 which was revealed by comparing the genomic and cDNA sequences. The absence of additional introns within the genomic sequence, for which we did not have corresponding cDNA clones, was established by comparing PCR products of the genomic segment to PCR products of RT cDNA from the same region ( 31 ).


Figure 2 . Schematic presentation of the sequence of the rep E gene. The 585 bp intergenic region is shown as a single line upstream of the rep E ATG initiation codon. The three black boxes are the poly(Asp) regions and the hatched box is the region encoding the leucine zipper. The position of the 92 bp intron is indicated. The stippled box at the left is the mannosyl transferase gene mnt A, which runs in the opposite orientation to rep E. The entire sequence is available through GenBank, accession no. U50042.

We have sequenced 585 bp of the 5' upstream region. This short untranslated region is shared with the neighboring gene, which runs in the opposite direction from rep E. This gene is the Dictyostelium homolog of the yeast ALG1 gene, which encodes the mannosyl transferase which catalyzes the formation of dolichol pyrophosphate-GlcNAc 2 Man in the pathway of N -glycosylation ( 33 ). We have named this gene mnt A.

There are a number of TAATA sequences between -70 and -39 bp upstream of the rep E ATG, but the exact position of the TATA box has not been established. In addition, the upstream region contains many features that are characteristic of Dictyostelium genes: There are three consecutive stop codons in-frame just upstream of the ATG; two G+C-rich regions and several stretches of poly(dT).

The location of the rep E gene within the Dictyostelium genome was determined by hybridization to the Dictyostelium YAC library (kindly performed by A.Kuspa and W.Loomis; 34 , 35 ). It maps towards the end of chromosome 4 between the tag B gene, which encodes a multidrug resistance transporter/serine protease ( 36 ), and psd A, which encodes the 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase ( 37 ).

The two rep E exons comprise 3420 bp of open reading frame which encodes a predicted protein of 1140 amino acids with a molecular weight of 127.6 kDa. This is identical to the reported molecular weight of 127 kDa for the UV-DDB/XPE protein. Even though the codon usage is typical of Dictyostelium ( 38 ), it is noteworthy to mention that in most cases where there are two adjacent identical amino acids they are usually encoded by two different codons. The significance of this is not known.

At positions 110-135, 403-423 and 850-857 there are three poly(Asp) regions. We do not know whether these regions separate distinct functional domains. No similar sequences are found in the primate genes (see Discussion).

Homology to XPE-related genes

The predicted protein sequence of rep E shares a 40% identity and over 60% similarity with the primate UV-DDB gene (Fig. 3 ). A search of the NCBI non-redundant database, using the BLAST program ( 39 ) has not revealed any homology between the sequence of RepE or the primate UV-DDB protein and the previously identified proteins of the NER complex (such as the products of the yeast RAD genes or members of the ERCC family of genes). As such, the rep E and UV-DDB / XPE genes encode a novel, highly conserved family of proteins. A Drosophila homolog of primate UV-DDB (dm127) has recently been cloned. It shares 60% homology with the primate UV-DDB protein and about 40% homology with the RepE protein (M.Takao and M.Protic, personal communication).


Figure 3 . Homology between rep E and the primate UV-DDB gene. Sequence homology between rep E and UV-DDB (GenBank accession no. pir/s37614) was established with the Align program of DNASTAR.

Leucine zipper motif

The translated protein sequence of rep E contains a region which encodes a leucine zipper motif and an adjacent basic region, for a putative DNA binding site (double line in Fig. 4 ). This region exhibits a very high degree of sequence conservation between the RepE, the UV-DDB and the Drosophila dm127 proteins (64% identity and 82% similarity), as is shown in Figure 4 . Moreover, there is a limited sequence homology to the bacterial UvrB protein, which is involved in the recognition step of the NER pathway in prokaryotes. This homology further highlights the functional importance of this sequence in these proteins.


Figure 4 . Sequence homology within the leucine zipper region. Comparison of the sequences representing the putative leucine zipper motif of RepE, UV-DDB, Drosophila dm127 and UvrB (GenBank accession nos: dm127, D82865; UvrB, U01743) was established using the Megalign program of DNASTAR. Similar sequences (2 units distance) are boxed and shaded. Leu/Ile residues, as well as the basic region, are indicated.

Developmental pattern of expression of rep E mRNA

The RepE protein is expressed in the cells at very low levels. A number of attempts to identify the mRNA by conventional Northern analysis, as well as by RNase protection experiments, were unsuccessful. Thus, we prepared rep E-specific cDNA from equal amounts of mRNA from time points taken throughout the entire developmental sequence. The cDNAs were amplified using synthetic oligonucleotides as primers and analyzed by electrophoresis (Fig. 5 ). We were able to show that rep E mRNA accumulates in a developmentally controlled manner. It begins to accumulate at 3 h of development, during the onset of aggregation, peaks at 5-7 h of development, when the cells are forming discrete multicellular structures, and stays at a relatively constant level throughout the remainder of development. There is no measurable rep E mRNA during vegetative growth on bacteria.


Figure 5 . Developmental pattern of rep E expression. An aliquot of 2 [mu]g total RNA purified from cells harvested from sequential developmental stages was reverse transcribed for first strand cDNA synthesis and the cDNA was then amplified by PCR as described in Materials and Methods. Samples of 15 [mu]l of each PCR reaction were analyzed on 1.2% agarose gels in TBE buffer and the gels were stained with ethidium bromide and photographed.

DISCUSSION

The genes encoding the proteins involved in NER play a pivotal role in repairing DNA damaged by UV and chemical agents ( 3 ). Indeed, mutations in these genes result in the pathological conditions of XP, Cockayne's syndrome (CS) and trichothiodystropy (TTD). Some of the NER proteins play dual roles as part of the basal transcription complex TFIIH, while others are involved in other fundamental processes in the cell. These interactions begin to shed some light on why individuals with these diseases often have associated developmental and neurological abnormalities. However, it does not explain why these pleiotropic effects are not more severe. It appears that these genes affect specific developmental decisions and that model systems are needed for the study of the role of these gene products in development.

This work presents the identification and characterization of the first XP-related gene in the cellular slime mold Dictyostelium discoideum . The organism is ideal for the study of the role of XP- and NER-related genes during development. Dictyostelium is a haploid single celled amoebae which grows by mitotic division, feeding on either bacteria or axenic medium. Following exhaustion or removal of the food source, cell division and genomic DNA replication cease and starvation signals the beginning of differentiation. The amoebae aggregate to form cohesive multicellular assemblies each containing 10 5 cells. These aggregates undergo a complex program of development, resulting in spatially localized spores resting on top of a cellular stalk (see illustration in Fig. 5 ). The synchronized development allows the correlation of biochemical and cellular events to the overall program of morphogenesis.

Our findings show that there is no measurable rep E mRNA in vegetatively growing cells or at the onset of development. However, rep E mRNA begins to be expressed during the aggregation stage of development, increases to a maximum by the time the cells have entered aggregates and stays at this steady-state level for the remainder of development. The level of rep E mRNA is very low even at its maximum during development. The pattern of developmental expression of rep E is reminiscent of that reported for the Drosophila haywire gene (XPB homolog), where lower levels of mRNA were found in embryos than in the larva and the adult stage ( 40 ). Our finding that rep E mRNA accumulates during development demonstrates that the expression of the gene is developmentally regulated.

The rep E gene is highly homologous to the UV-DDB / XPE gene of primates. A Drosophila homolog has been found but no yeast equivalent has been reported. The Dictyostelium gene encodes a protein with a predicted molecular weight of 127 kDa, which is identical to that of the primate UV-DDB protein. The primate UV-DDB / XPE gene encodes a nuclear protein which preferentially binds to UV-damaged DNA (primarily 6-4 pyrimidine dimers) as well as to DNA damaged by chemical agents ( 4 , 41 - 43 ). There is now considerable evidence indicating that the UV-DDB protein functions as a two subunit complex of p127 and p48 ( 5 ). The activity of the UV-DDB protein is missing in some XPE patients ( 4 , 6 , 44 - 46 ). It has been suggested that cells from XPE patients which do not exhibit loss of DNA binding activity of p127 may lack either the other subunit of the complex or have a defect in the domain of the XPE protein which is responsible for the protein-protein interaction, but not the DNA binding domain. Microinjection of UV-DDB mRNA ( 47 ) or purified DDB protein ( 48 ) have been shown to increase unscheduled DNA synthesis in XPE cells. However, no sequence analysis of the gene from a human XPE patient has been done in order to unambiguously correlate an aberrant gene with the XPE phenotype. The identification of rep E in Dictyostelium may help to shed light on the role of this protein in repair and/or other processes, as it will allow us to generate specific mutations in the gene and analyze the resultant developmental and repair phenotypes.

The predicted rep E gene product contains a leucine zipper motif and associated basic region which suggest that it plays a regulatory role and that it may be localized to the nucleus ( 49 , 50 ). There is a 64% identity and 82% similarity around this region between RepE, the primate and Drosophila UV-DDB sequences, indicating the functional importance of this region. Moreover, there is a 40% homology to the Escherichia coli UvrB protein. The latter protein functions in a complex with UvrA (UvrA 2 B) to enable binding to damaged DNA (the recognition step in prokaryotic NER). The similarity to this protein is very intriguing. Although it has been shown that eukaryotic NER performs the same functions as the prokaryotic pathway, there is little homology on the primary sequence level between the protein components of the two NER pathways. The homology in the region of the leucine zipper between the RepE, UV-DDB and the prokaryotic UvrB proteins suggests an evolutionary relation between these proteins. The regulatory role of RepE suggested by the presence of the leucine zipper is consistent with our data showing that the level of expression of rep E is very low and that its expression is under developmental regulation.

The presence of leucine zippers in proteins is often an indication that the protein functions as a dimer. A recent study showed, using the yeast two-hybrid system, that the human UV-DDB protein, which they named X-associated protein (XAP-1), interacts with the hepatitis B virus X protein in order to initiate viral multiplication in vivo ( 51 ). It was hypothesized that the interaction of the X protein with the DNA repair protein may modify cellular transcription processes. This protein-protein interaction demonstrates a regulatory function for the UV-DDB/XPE protein separate from its involvement in DNA repair, similar to many other components of the NER pathway which have dual functions. We are now trying to identify the protein partner of the repE gene product in Dictyostelium .

The rep E gene product has another striking structural feature, three extended stretches of poly(Asp). These poly(Asp) regions are absent in the primate homolog. The function of these regions in the predicted Dictyostelium RepE protein is not known and they may be acting merely as spacers between discrete functional domains of the protein. However, they may have specific functional roles in this organism. A search of the GenBank for proteins containing poly(Asp) regions resulted in the identification of numerous proteins whose function involves interaction with DNA. Some of these include: topoisomerase II ( 52 ), RNA polymerase I ( 53 ) and the RNA polymerase III large subunit ( 54 ) from Plasmodium falciparum ; Suppressor of Zeste from Drosophila ( 55 ); the yeast DNA binding protein BAF1 ( 56 ) and transcription factor ADR6 ( 57 ); and the Dictyostelium RNA helicase (Mahal,B. and Nellen,W., unpublished, s49262.) and G box binding protein ( 58 ). Thus the presence of the poly(Asp) regions in RepE may further indicate that this protein is involved in interaction with DNA. Interestingly, the poly(Asp) regions are reminiscent of the poly(Gln) regions found in the proteins associated with neurodegenerative diseases such as Huntington's disease. In these diseases the length of these poly(Gln) regions increases in succeeding generations and the increase in length appears to be responsible for the phenomenon of genetic anticipation ( 59 ). Moreover, there is evidence that these long poly(Gln) regions can form polar zippers with other proteins ( 60 ). These newly discovered protein-protein interactions may be responsible for the pathology of these diseases. It is possible that the poly(Asp) regions in the rep E gene product may be involved in protein-protein interactions similar to the poly(Gln) polar zippers. The precise roles of the poly(Asp) regions are directly testable because of the ease with which homologous gene replacement can be performed in Dictyostelium .

The results presented here show that expression of the rep E gene is intimately tied to development and encodes motifs that suggest that the protein has a regulatory role. Efforts are now underway to use this system to elucidate the precise roles of rep E and other XP-related genes in morphogenesis and cell differentiation in this organism.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work is presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the PhD degree by Sung-Keun Lee and Sung-Lim Yu at the University of Missouri. The work was supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation (IBN9206891). SA is the recipient of an American Cancer Society Faculty Research Award (FRA448). S-LY was partially supported by a University of Missouri Graduate Fellowship. We thank Bill Loomis and Adam Kuspa for chromosome mapping the rep E gene. We thank Lisa Sydow and Christine Bonnin for their help in the initial cloning experiments. We also thank Drs M.Takao and M.Protic for valuable discussions regarding the primate and Drosophila UV-DDB genes and Vince McGuire for comments on the manuscript.

REFERENCES

1 Kraemer,K.H., Levy,D.D., Parris,C.N., Gozukara,E.M., Moriwaki,S., Adelberg,S. and Seidman,M.M. (1994) J. Invest. Dermatol., 103, 96S-101S.

2 Hoeijmakers,J.H.J. (1993) Trends Genet., 9, 173-177. MEDLINE Abstract

3 Friedberg,E.C., Walker,G.C. and Siede,W. (eds) (1995) DNA repair and Mutagenesis, ASM Press, Washington, DC.

4 Takao,M., Abramic,M., Moos,M.J., Otrin,V.R., Wootton,J.C., Mclenigan,M., Levine,A.S. and Protic,M. (1993) Nucleic Acids Res., 21, 4111-4118. MEDLINE Abstract

5 Dualan,R., Brody,T., Keeney,S., Nichols,A.F., Admon,A. and Linn,S. (1995) Genomics, 29, 62-69. MEDLINE Abstract

6 Hwang,B.J., Liao,J.C. and Chu,G. (1996) Mutat. Res. DNA Repair, 362, 105-117.

7 Svejstrup,J.Q., Wang,Z., Feaver,W.J., Wu,X., Bushnell,D.A., Donahue,T.F., Friedberg,E.C. and Kornberg,R.D. (1995) Cell, 80, 21-28. MEDLINE Abstract

8 Aboussekhra,A., Biggerstaff,M., Shivji,M.K.K., Vilpo,J.A., Moncollin,V., Podust,V.N., Protic,M., Hübscher,U., Egly,J.M. and Wood,R.D. (1995) Cell, 80, 859-868. MEDLINE Abstract

9 Higgins,D.R., Prakash,S., Reynolds,P., Polakowska,R., Weber,S. and Prakash,L. (1983) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 80, 5680-5684.

10 Sweder,K.S. and Hanawalt,P.C. (1994) J. Biol. Chem., 269, 1852-1857. MEDLINE Abstract

11 Sancar,G.B., Siede,W. and Van-Zeeland,A.A. (1996) Mutat. Res., 362, 127-146. MEDLINE Abstract

12 Mellon,I. and Hanawalt,P.C. (1989) Nature, 342, 95-98. MEDLINE Abstract

13 Mauldin,S.K., Freeland,T.M. and Deering,R.A. (1994) Mutat. Res. DNA Repair, 314, 187-198.

14 Lommel,L. and Hanawalt,P.C. (1991) Mutat. Res. DNA Repair, 255, 183-191.

15 Venema,J., Mullenders,L.H.F., Natarajan,A.T., Van Zeeland,A.A. and Mayne,L.V. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 87, 4704-4711.

16 Hanawalt,P. and Mellon,I. (1993) Curr. Biol., 3, 67-69.

17 Van Vuuren,A.j., Vermeulen,W., Ma,L., Weeda,G., Appeldoorn,E., Jaspers,N., Van der Eb,A.j., Bootsma,D., Hoeijmakers,J., Humbert,S., Schaeffer,L. and Egly,J.M. (1994) EMBO J., 13, 1645-1653. MEDLINE Abstract

18 Drapkin,R., Reardon,J.T., Ansari,A., Huang,J.C., Zawel,L., Ahn,K., Sancar,A. and Reinberg,D. (1994) Nature, 368, 769-772. MEDLINE Abstract

19 Zeng,X.R., Jiang,Y., Zhang,S.J., Hao,H. and Lee,M. (1994) J. Biol. Chem., 269, 13748-13751. MEDLINE Abstract

20 Lee,S.H., Kim,D.K. and Drissi,R. (1995) J. Biol. Chem., 270, 21800-21805. MEDLINE Abstract

21 He,Z., Henricksen,L.A., Wold,M.S. and Ingles,C.J. (1995) Nature, 374, 566-569. MEDLINE Abstract

22 Li,L., Lu,X.Y., Peterson,C.A. and Legerski,R.J. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol., 15, 5396-5402. MEDLINE Abstract

23 Schiestl,R.H. and Prakash,S. (1990) Mol. Cell. Biol., 10, 2485-2491. MEDLINE Abstract

24 Sekelsky,J.J., McKim,K.S., Chin,G.M. and Hawley,R.S. (1995) Genetics, 141, 619-627.

25 Hanawalt,P.C. (1994) Science, 266, 1957-1958. MEDLINE Abstract

26 Sambrook,J., Fritsch,E.F. and Maniatis,T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd Edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.

27 Lee,S.-K., Yu,S.-L., Alexander,H. and Alexander,S. (1996) BioTechniques, in press.

28 Tabor,S. (1990) In Ausubel,F.M., Brent,R., Kingston,R.E., Moore,D.D., Smith,J.A., Seidman,J.G. and Struhl,K. (eds), Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. Green Press, New York, NY, pp. 16.2.1-16.2.11.

29 Sussman,M. (1987) Methods Cell Biol., 28, 9-29. MEDLINE Abstract

30 Blusch,J., Alexander,S. and Nellen,W. (1995) Differentiation, 58, 253-260. MEDLINE Abstract

31 Alexander,H. and Alexander,S. (1996) Biotechniques, 20, 778-780.

32 Demerec,M., Adelberg,E.A., Clark,A.J. and Hartman,P.E. (1966) Genetics, 54, 61-76. MEDLINE Abstract

33 Albright,C.F. and Robbins,P.W. (1990) J. Biol. Chem., 265, 7042-7049. MEDLINE Abstract

34 Loomis,W.F., Welker,D., Hughes,J., Maghakian,D. and Kuspa,A. (1995) Genetics, 141, 147-157. MEDLINE Abstract

35 Kuspa,A., Maghakian,D., Bergesch,P. and Loomis,W.F. (1992) Genomics, 13, 49-61. MEDLINE Abstract

36 Shaulsky,G., Kuspa,A. and Loomis,W.F. (1995) Genes Dev., 9, 1111-1122. MEDLINE Abstract

37 Lacombe,M.L., Podgorski,G.J., Franke,J. and Kessin,R.H. (1986) J. Biol. Chem., 261, 16811-16817. MEDLINE Abstract

38 Warrick,H. and Spudich,J. (1988) Nucleic Acids Res., 16, 6617-6635. MEDLINE Abstract

39 Altschul,S.F., Gish,W., Miller,W., Myers,E.W. and Lipman,J.D. (1990) J. Mol. Biol., 215, 403-410. MEDLINE Abstract

40 Mounkes,L.C., Jones,R.S., Liang,B.C., Gelbert,W. and Fuller,M.T. (1992) Cell, 71, 925-937. MEDLINE Abstract

41 Feldberg,R.S. and Grossman,L. (1976) Biochemistry, 15, 2402-2408. MEDLINE Abstract

42 Reardon,J.T., Nichols,A.F., Keeny,S., Smith,C.A., Taylor,J.-S., Linn,S. and Sancar,A. (1993) J. Biol. Chem., 268, 21301-21308. MEDLINE Abstract

43 Payne,A. and Chu,G. (1994) Mutat. Res. Fundam. Mol. Mech. Mutagen., 310, 89-102.

44 Chu,G. and Chang,E. (1988) Science, 242, 564-567. MEDLINE Abstract

45 Treiber,K.D., Chen, Z. and Essigmann,J.M. (1992) Nucleic Acids Res., 20, 5805-5819. MEDLINE Abstract

46 Keeny,S., Changs,G.J. and Linn,S. (1993) J. Biol. Chem., 268, 21293-21300. MEDLINE Abstract

47 Okuno,Y., Tateishi,S. and Yamaizumi,M. (1994) Mutat. Res. DNA Repair, 314, 11-19.

48 Keeney,S., Eker,A., Brody,T., Vermeulen,W., Bootsma,D., Hoeijmakers,J. and Linn,S. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 91, 4053-4056. MEDLINE Abstract

49 Abel,T. and Maniatis,T. (1989) Nature, 341, 24-25. MEDLINE Abstract

50 Johnson,P.F. and Mcknight,S.L. (1989) Annu. Rev. Biochem., 58, 799-839. MEDLINE Abstract

51 Lee,T.H., Elledge,S.J. and Butel,J.S. (1995) J. Virol., 69, 1107-1114. MEDLINE Abstract

52 Cheesman,S., McAleese,S., Goman,M., Jhonson,D., Horrock,P., Ridley,R.G. and Kilbey,B.J. (1994) Nucleic Acids Res., 22, 2547-2551. MEDLINE Abstract

53 Fox,B.A., Li,W.B., Tanaka,M., Inselburg,J. and Bzik,D.J. (1993) Mol. Biochem. Parasitol., 61, 37-48. MEDLINE Abstract

54 Li,W.B., Bzik,D.J., Tanaka,M., Gu,H., Fox,B.A. and Iselburg,J. (1991) Mol. Biochem. Parasitol., 46, 229-240. MEDLINE Abstract

55 Brunk,B.P. and Adler,P.N. (1991) Nucleic Acids Res., 19, 3149. MEDLINE Abstract

56 Halfter,H., Kavety,B., Vandekerckhove,J., Kiefer,F. and Gallwitz,D. (1989) EMBO J., 8, 4265-4272. MEDLINE Abstract

57 Ohara,P.J., Horowitz,H., Eichinger,H. and Young,E.T. (1988) Nucleic Acids Res., 16, 10153-10170. MEDLINE Abstract

58 Schnitzler,G.R., Fischer,W.H. and Firtel,R.A. (1994) Genes Dev., 8, 502-514. MEDLINE Abstract

59 Ashley,C.T. and Warren,S.T. (1995) Annu. Rev. Genet., 29, 703-728.

60 Stott,K., Blackburn,J.M., Butler,P.J.M. and Perutz,M. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 92, 6509-6513. MEDLINE Abstract


Return

* To whom correspondence should be addressed
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (121K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alexander, H
Right arrow Articles by Alexander, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alexander, H
Right arrow Articles by Alexander, S
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?