Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (158K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kohler, J
Right arrow Articles by Buttgereit, D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kohler, J
Right arrow Articles by Buttgereit, D
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1995 Oxford University Press 2543-2550

Footnote

Related enhancers in the intron of the [beta] 1 tubulin gene of Drosophila melanogaster are essential for maternal and CNS-specific expression during embryogenesis

Related enhancers in the intron of the [beta] 1 tubulin gene of Drosophila melanogaster are essential for maternal and CNS-specific expression during embryogenesis Jörg Köhler + , Sabine Schäfer-Preuss and Detlev Buttgereit*

Philipps-Universität Marburg, FB Biologie/Zoologie, 35032 Marburg , Germany

Received March 15, 1996; Revised and Accepted May 17, 1996

ABSTRACT

Expression of the [beta] 1 tubulin gene of Drosophila melanogaster is under complex developmental control. For high levels of transcription in the embryonic central nervous system (CNS) different modules dispersed over 3 kb have to co-operate. Combination of a core promoter with either far upstream localized enhancer elements or, alternatively, with an enhancer from the intron results in expression limited to only a few neuronal cells. Cooperation of all three modules, however, leads to high level expression in most neuronal cells of the CNS. In the intron, we identified a 6 bp core element which is essential for transcription in the CNS, as well as an 8 bp element required for maternal expression. Interestingly, both motifs are quite similar, with CAAAAT as the CNS core and CAAAAAT as the maternal enhancer core. Specific binding of proteins from nuclear extracts to the CNS-specific element could be demonstrated. We suggest that the [beta] 1 tubulin gene represents an ideal marker gene to elucidate connections between pro-neural or neurogenic genes and downstream target genes throughout the CNS.

INTRODUCTION

Formation of the Drosophila central nervous system (CNS) occurs from a stereospecific set of stem cells called neuroblasts, which comprise ~20% of the neuro-ectodermal region (for reviews see 1 , 2 ). Genetic data show that these cells are singled out by a lateral inhibitory process. Their further competence to adopt a neural fate is mediated by the expression of the pro-neural genes, which include daughterless ( da ), the genes of the achaete - scute complex ( AS-C ) and the ventral nervous system defective gene ( vnd ) ( 3 - 7 ). Ongoing differentiation of the CNS is marked by the expression of a group of genes referred to as pan-neural genes ( 8 ). According to mutant phenotypes, these genes probably play a role in establishing neuronal cell type identity. This would explain why in mutants for prospero , a gene encoding a nuclear protein containing a homeodomain-like sequence, incorrectly specified progeny of certain neuroblasts are produced, which show pathfinding defects ( 9 , 10 ).

Concerning regulation of the transcription of neural-specific genes, little information at the molecular level is available. At least partially, activation of the proneural genes is directed by pair-rule and dorso-ventral polarity genes. Furthermore, their activity is controlled by the lateral inhibition pathway and restricted to the neural precursors. Basically, at least in the peripheral nervous system (PNS), repressing activities seem to play a major role, as in mutants for hairy , extramacrochaete and pannier ectopic expression of the AS-C genes is observed, which leads to the formation of supernumerous sensory organs ( 1 1 - 13 ). Kramatschek and Campos-Ortega ( 1 4 ) showed that the neurogenic genes E(spl) and HLH-m5 can be activated by the pro-neural gene products.

Few target genes of the neurogenic and pro-neural gene products expressed throughout the CNS have been identified so far. By analyzing the promotor of the neuron-specifically expressed gene elav , Yao and White ( 15 ) described a 333 bp region as sufficient for CNS-specific expression. However, no distinct elements have been identified and no transactivators for elav could be shown. Surprisingly, Ip et al. ( 1 6 ) recently presented data showing that expression of the snail gene in the CNS is not dependent on the pro-neural genes, demonstrating that distinct pathways must co-exist in order to define neuronal identity.

The [beta] 1 tubulin gene of D.melanogaster is expressed maternally as well as zygotically. Transcription during embryogenesis is restricted to the CNS and PNS and to the attachment sites of the somatic muscles ( 17 ). While the [beta]1 protein is present at high levels in all tissues until hatching of the larvae, the maternal [beta]1 mRNA disappears around stage 9. Zygotic transcription in the CNS starts at stage 10, reaches its maximum level at stage 12 and decreases after stage 13 to very low levels at stage 16. In a previous report we showed that expression of the [beta] 1 tubulin gene in the CNS is dependent on the presence of the 5'-part of the intron ( 17 ). By sequence comparison with the D.hydei [beta] 1 tubulin gene (Buttgereit, unpublished results) we identified two conserved elements in the intron, which were termed IE1 and IE2. Deletion analysis revealed that IE1 is solely necessary for expression in the CNS during embryogenesis. By shifting its position to -2.3 kb upstream of the start site we present evidence that this element acts as a classical enhancer. Based on its zygotic function, the enhancer is called the c entral n ervous system-specific e nhancer, or CNE. However, the CNE alone is not sufficient for expression in the CNS, but has to cooperate with promoter-proximal and far-upstream elements in order to drive full level expression in the CNS ( 17 ). In order to identify transactivating factors, we performed in vitro assays using nuclear extracts from staged embryos. In EMSA assays we could detect specific interaction with proteins from 6-14 h old embryos, showing that factors are present which may be neural system specific. UV cross-linking experiments revealed the specific interaction of a 71 kDa protein with the CNE in nuclear extracts. Further characterization of cis - and trans -regulatory modules will yield insight into the regulatory cascades driving development of the CNS downstream of the pro-neural and neurogenic genes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plasmid constructions

The vector used for cloning was -2.2/BS, comprising [beta] 1 tubulin gene sequences from -2348 to +448 in BlueskriptII KS. The clone was cut with Nar I (+160) and Hin dIII (+473, polylinker derived from pUC19), the 5.2 kb fragment isolated and synthetic oligonucleotides were inserted. For construct [beta]1-1, the sequence used (MutD1, 56 bp) was 5'-CGCCAAGGTA AGTTTTCCCA TTTGCATTTT CCATTCATTT TCCAGTACTG GATCCA, deleting IE1 and IE2. For [beta]1-2 the oligonucleotide MutD2 comprised 129 bp, 5'-CGCCAAGGTA AGTTTTCCCA TTTGCATTTT CCATTCATTT TCCATCCAGA GTACAGTTGC CAAAATGGCG TCATTTTTGC ACGACTTCGC TGT CCATGTG GCAAAAATT T GTATTGAGTA CTGGATCCA (IE1 and IE2 are in bold). For constructs [beta]1-3 and [beta]1-4, the following oligonucleotides were used: OlIE1 with 100 bp comprising only IE1, which is in bold, 5'-CGCCAAGGTA GTTTTTCCCA TTTGCATTTT CCATTCATTT TCCATCCAGA GTACAGTTGC CAAAATGGCG TCATTTTTGC ACGACTTAGT ACTGGATCCA); OlIE2 (129 bp), 5'-CGCCAAG- GTA AGTTTTCCCA TTTGCATTTT CCATTCATTT TCCATCCAGA GTACAGTTGC CTGATCGAAC TTGTACTAGT ACGACTTCGC TGT CCATGTG GCAAAAATT T GTATTGAGTA CTGGATCCA, comprising IE2 only (bold). IE1 was mutagenized randomly. For construct [beta]1-7, the oligonucleotide SPL (55 bp), 5'-CGCCAAGGTA AGTTT CAAAA TGGCGTCATT TTTGC ACGAC TTAGTACTGG ATCCA, comprising IE1 (bold) was used. The bases in front of IE1 (+175 to +220) were deleted, but the splice site is conserved. In order to test the relevance of both IE1 and IE2, construct [beta]1-9, with the intron to +275 bp, was constructed. In contrast to [beta]1-2, IE1 and IE2 (bold) were both mutagenized by randomly shuffling bases in oligonucleotide IE1/2Mut (129 bp), 5'-CGCCAAGGTA AGTTTTCCCA TTTGCATTTT CCATTCATTT TCCATCCAGA GTACAGTTGC CGCTGTGGCG TTATCTCTAT ACGACTTCGC TGT CCATGTG GCCACATGG T GTATTGA- GTA CTGGATCCA. For construct [beta]1-8, the clone [beta]1-1/BS, which does not contain IE1 and IE2, was used. The DNA was cut with Sac I at -2.4 kb and the oligonucleotide EB1 (73 bp), 5'-CAGTTGC CAA AATGGCGTCA TTTTTGC ACG ACT- TCGCTGT C CATGTGGCA AAAAT TTGTA TTGGATCCGA GCT, comprising IE1 and IE2 (bold) was inserted. For construct [beta]1-10 the oligonucleotide Neuro (55 bp), 5'-CGCCAAGGTA AGTTT AGCTC A GGCGT CATT TTTGC ACGAC TTAGTACTGG ATCCA, which mutagenizes the CNE, was inserted. To obtain construct [beta]1-11, the oligonucleotide Mater (55 bp), 5'-CGCCAAGGTA AGTTT CAAAA T GGCGT ACGT CAGT- CACGAC TTAGTACTGG ATCCA, which mutagenizes the second motif (ME), was used.

For all oligonucleotides only one strand is shown. The double-stranded oligonucleotides had at their ends the corresponding restriction half-sites as adaptors for cloning and usually an additional Bam HI site for identification of positive clones. The fragments were excised from Bluescript with Eco RI and Sca I and ligated to the adapter fragment Sca I- Xba I from PF3 ( 17 ), containing the 3' splice site from the [beta] 1 tubulin gene and the codons to amino acid 23 fused in-frame to the Escherichia coli lacZ gene, in the P-element transformation vector pW8 ( 1 8 ) cut with Eco RI and Xba I. All constructs were checked by sequencing of the intron or upstream region, respectively.

Preparation of nuclear extracts

Nuclear extracts were prepared according to Dignam et al . ( 19 ) with modifications. Embryos were collected on apple juice/agar plates, dechorionized with 50% Clorix, washed with 0.7% NaCl, 0.1% Triton X-100 and suspended in homogenization buffer (10 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 7,6, 10 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl 2 , 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.25 M sucrose, 0.5 mM DTE, 0.5 mM leupeptin). They were homogenized with a motor-driven glass/Teflon homogenizer with a tight fitting pestle at 600 r.p.m. Intact embroys and cell debris were pelleted by centrifugation for 5 min at 800 r.p.m. The supernatant was loaded onto a cushion of 30% glycerol in homogenization buffer and nuclei were collected by centrifugation at 6000 r.p.m. for 20 min. The volume of the nuclear pellet was estimated and one volume of nuclear extraction buffer was added (20 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 7.6, 420 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl 2 , 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM DTE, 0.5 mM leupeptin). The suspension was stirred on ice for 30 min, the nuclei pelleted by centrifugation at 13 000 r.p.m. and the supernatant dialyzed twice against 200 volumes buffer A (20 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 7.6, 100 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl 2 , 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM DTE, 2 [mu]g/ml leupeptin). To remove precipitated material, the extract was centrifuged for 10 min at 13 000 r.p.m. and quick-frozen in small aliquots in liquid N 2 . Aliquots were stored at -80oC without significant loss of activity for at least 12 months.

Gel retardation assays

Standard binding reactions contained up to 30 [mu]g nuclear extract, 6 fmol 32 P-labeled oligonucleotide and 200-500 ng dI[middot]dC or dA[middot]dT as non-specific competitor in 25-50 [mu]l. Specific competition was performed in the range 5- to 500-fold excess. The gels were run in 1* TBE at 200 V for 2-3 h, dried and autoradiographed using Kodak X-Omat AR films. The oligonucleotides used for binding were AGTTGCCAAA ATGGCGTCAT TTTTGCACGA CT and, as non-specific competitor, an oligonucleotide comprising a SP1 binding site, CTTGGTGGGG GCGGGGCCTA AGCTG.

UV cross-linking

Standard binding reactions were pipetted onto Parafilmtm and exposed to UV light at 254 nm for 1 min at 4000 [mu]W/cm 2 using a Stratagenetm 2400 crosslinker. Samples were denatured and run on 10% SDS-PAGE. Gels were dried and autoradiographed using Kodak X-Omat AR films.

RESULTS

[beta] 1 mRNA in the CNS decays after stage 12, while protein is stable to stage 17

Previously we have shown that [beta]1 tubulin protein is present ubiquitously in the embryo and can be detected using an anti-[beta]1 tubulin antibody in most tissues until hatching ( 17 ). In situ hybridization to embryo sections using 3 H-labeled probes indicated that the distribution of the mRNA, however, is not homogeneous, but is present at higher levels in the CNS ( 20 ). By whole mount in situ hybridization using digoxygenin-labeled probes we extended these data (Fig. 1 ). While maternal mRNA leads to a strong homogeneous staining of early embryos (Fig. 1 A), the mRNA outside the CNS decays to undetectable levels after stage 9, while in the ventral neurogenic region three rows of cells show expression of the [beta] 1 tubulin gene at stage 10 (Fig. 1 C). These cells represent neuroblasts exclusively, as double staining with an antibody against a glial-specific marker, repo ( 21 ), reveals no overlapping patterns (data not shown). In addition, [beta]1 tubulin mRNA is detected in cells of the PNS. The mRNA levels in the CNS remain high until stage 12, after which they start to decay. Beginning at stage 13, the attachments of the somatic musculature, the apodemes, show expression of the [beta] 1 tubulin gene. At stage 15, PNS and apodemes contain high levels of [beta]1 tubulin mRNA, while it is hardly detectable in the CNS. In contrast, the [beta]1 tubulin protein is present at high levels in these tissues at all times ( 17 ).


Figure 1 . [beta]1 Tubulin mRNA distribution during embryogenesis. ( A ) Stage 9, lateral view; homogeneous staining due to maternal transcripts is shown. ( B ) Late stage 10, lateral view; maternal transcripts have completely disappeared, zygotic expression in the CNS is visible. ( C ) Late stage 10, dorsal view; neuroblasts in all three rows reveal [beta]1 tubulin mRNA (arrowheads). ( D ) Stage 13, lateral view; the highest concentration of mRNA is detected in the CNS. ( E ) Stage 16, lateral view, focus inside; mRNA levels in the CNS are very low, only the attachment sites of the somatic muscles show [beta]1 tubulin mRNA (arrowheads). ( F ) Stage 16, lateral view, focus on epidermis; high levels of [beta]1 tubulin mRNA are seen in all attachment sites (arrows) and in the chordotonal organs (arrowheads).

Expression of the [beta] 1 tubulin gene in the CNS is dependent on the 5 ' -part of the intron

During the deletion analysis of the [beta] 1 tubulin gene intron we found that sequences required for high level expression in the CNS reside within the first 270 bp of the intron ( 17 ). This conclusion was drawn from the differences in the expression patterns between strains transgenic for W[beta]1K and W[beta]1C and the results with [beta]1-1. Sequence comparison with the [beta] 1 tubulin gene of D.hydei revealed two blocks of homology in this region (Fig. 2 ; Buttgereit, unpublished results), which were named IE1 and IE2, respectively. IE1 shows 19 out of 20 bases identity, IE2 16 out of 16. The distance between the two blocks is different, with 13 bases in D.melanogaster and only four bases in D.hydei . Two closely related motifs are present in IE1: the sequence CAAAAT at +221 to +225 and the sequence ATTTTTGC at +231 to + 238. The second motif occurs a second time in IE2 on the complementary strand, from +261 to +268 (Fig. 2 ). The palindromic orientation of the second motif is reminescent of specific recognition elements for DNA binding proteins. To address the question whether these two homologies indeed represent cis -regulatory elements, deletions in the 5'-part of the intron were made, keeping the bases to the splice site and spacing of the elements as in the reference construct W[beta]1K ( 17 ). In construct [beta]1-1 (Fig. 3 ), both elements were deleted, leaving only 49 bp of 5' intron sequence. As in comparison with W[beta]1K, which contains both IE1 and IE2, an additional 169 bp from +277 to +446 were deleted due to the cloning strategy used, a control construct, [beta]1-2, including both boxes but deleting the same 169 bp as in [beta]1-1, was analyzed. Both constructs were cloned in front of a lacZ gene, inserted into the P-element vector pW8 and transgenic fly strains were established. Embryos were collected and analyzed for reporter gene expression using a polyclonal anti-[beta]-galactosidase antibody. Strains transformed with [beta]1-2 show strong maternal expression as well as high level expression in the CNS, as does W[beta]1K (Fig. 3 D). This result shows that no essential elements for maternal or zygotic expression during embryogenesis are located in the 169 bp removed. Deletion of both boxes in [beta]1-1 (Fig. 3 C), however, results in a strong reduction of maternal expression and the number of reporter gene-positive cells in the CNS is greatly reduced. This expression corresponds to the pattern observed in strains transgenic for construct W[beta]1C (Fig. 3 B), which completely lacks the intron ( 17 ), indicating that IE1 and IE2 are the only sequences necessary for CNS and maternal expression. These data furthermore prove that the bases at the 3'-end of the intron, present in W[beta]1K and [beta]1-1, for example, are not required for CNS-specific expression. However, in contrast to W[beta]1K and W[beta]1C, expression of the reporter gene is observed in the PNS with both [beta]1-1 and [beta]1-2. Thus, putative silencing elements acting in the PNS may be present in the 169 bp removed. To exclude the possibility that the deleted bases of IE1 and IE2 simply disturb the DNA topology in this region leading to the reduction of enhancer activity observed, both elements were mutagenized by shuffling the nucleotides randomly ([beta]1-9), keeping the number of bases constant. Analysis of transgenic fly strains yielded the same result as with [beta]1-1, in that very weak maternal and extremely reduced CNS expression were observed (Table 1 ). Removal of the remaining bases 5' to IE1 up to the splice site ([beta]1-7) revealed no differences in the expression pattern compared to [beta]1-2 (Table 1 ), indicating that no further sequences are relevant in this region. Thus, IE1 and IE2 are the only cis -acting sequences identified in the 5' part of the intron.


Figure 2 . ( A ) Sequence of the intron region comprising the homologies between D.melanogaster and D.hydei. The boxes IE1 and IE2 are underlined. ( B ) Sequence of the D.melanogaster intron from +211 to +281. The homologies to D.hydei are presented in bold, possible palindromic structures are indicated by arrows, the core elements CNE and ME are boxed. ( C ) Sequence of the mutagenized intron in [beta]1-9. The homology is presented in bold, the mutagenized bases in italics.


Figure 3 . Expression pattern of transgenic fly strains. The corresponding constructs are shown schematically above the micrographs. All stainings were performed in progeny of transgenic males, removing maternal expression. ( A ) Ventral view of a stage 16 W[beta]1K embryo. The CNS with the exception of the midline is strongly and homogeneously stained. ( B ) Stage 16 embryo transgenic for construct W[beta]1C; only two neuronal cells per hemisegment reveal expression of the reporter gene. ( C ) Embryo stage 16 transgenic for construct [beta]1-1; expression is reduced to a few cells. ( D ) Embryo stage 15 transgenic for construct [beta]1-2; as in W[beta]1K, a strong staining of the CNS with the exception of the midline is shown.

Table 1 . Expression pattern of transgenic fly strains
Strain

Maternal expression

CNS expression

W[beta]1K (+IE1, IE2)

+++

Strong, homogeneous

W[beta]1C (no intron)

-

Single cells

[beta]1-1 (-IE1, -IE2)

-

Single cells

[beta]1-2 (+IE1, +IE2)

+++

Strong, homogeneous

[beta]1-3 (+IE1, -IE2)

++

Strong, nearly homogeneous

[beta]1-4 (-IE1, +IE2)

++

Single cells

[beta]1-7 (+IE1, +IE2)

++

Strong, nearly homogeneous

[beta]1-8 (IE1, IE2 at 2.4 kb)

+++

Strong, homogeneous

[beta]1-9 (IE1+2 mutagenized)

+/-

Single cells

[beta]1-10 (CNE mutagenized)

+

Very weak, single cells

[beta]1-11 (ME mutagenized)

-

Strong, nearly homogeneous

Deletion analysis reveals that only IE1 drives neurogenic expression

To narrow down the activating sequences, both boxes were tested individually for their potential neural system-specific activity. As for [beta]1-1 and [beta]1-2, synthetic oligonucleotides comprising either IE1 and flanking sequences ([beta]1-3, Fig. 4 A) or IE2 and flanking sequences ([beta]1-4, Fig. 4 B) were used. Analysis of the [beta]1-3 transgenic strains show maternal as well as strong expression in the CNS. Thus, the IE1 element is capable of driving both modes of expression (Fig. 4 A). Strains harboring [beta]1-4 also show strong maternal expression, but significantly reduced expression in the CNS, as does [beta]1-1 in which both boxes are deleted (compare Figs 4 B and 3 C). Thus, IE2 is not capable of enhancing expression in the CNS, but elevates maternal transcription. As in IE1 the two motifs CAAAAT and ATTTTTGC are found, while only the second motif is repeated in IE2, the palindromic structure of the second element is not required for its function. Thus, either the first motif in IE1 alone represents the neuronal enhancer or the imperfect palindrome found in IE1 (CAAAT---N 6 ---ATTTTTG) fulfils this function. No further regulatory sequences are located in these elements, as mutagenesis of both motifs in IE1 and the motif in IE2 together in construct [beta]1-9 (Table 1 ) completely abolishes maternal as well as CNS expression.


Figure 4 . Embryonic expression pattern of strains [beta]1-3, [beta]1-4, [beta]1-10 and [beta]1-11. The constructs are presented above the micrographs. For [beta]1-10 and [beta]1-11 the sequence of IE1 is shown, the mutagenized bases are boxed. ( A ) Embryo transgenic for construct [beta]1-3, stage 15/16, ventral view, without maternally derived reporter gene expression. Staining in the CNS is nearly as strong as in W[beta]1K. ( B ) Embryo with construct [beta]1-4, stage 15/16, ventral view, without maternal components. Staining is reduced to a few neural cells, as in [beta]1-1, were both boxes are deleted. ( C ) Embryo transgenic with [beta]1-10, stage 15/16, ventral view. Only a few cells reveal expression. ( D ) Embryo from [beta]1-11 strain, stage 15/16, ventro-lateral view. Strong expression in the CNS is observed.

Only the 5 ' -CAAAAT motif in IE1 drives expression in the CNS

To further test the regulatory potential of the motifs in IE1, both were individually mutagenized. In construct [beta]1-10, the first motif CAAAAT was mutagenized to AGCTCA. Lines carrying this construct show intermediate levels of maternal expression, while expression in the CNS is reduced to very low levels, as in [beta]1-1 (Fig. 4 C). Conversely, in construct [beta]1-11, the second motif ATTTTTGC was changed to ACGTCAGT. Strains transgenic for [beta]1-11 reveal no maternal expression, while expression in the CNS is comparable to [beta]1-3 (Fig. 4 D). These results show, although both motifs are very similar, that their specificity in vivo is distinct, as the first motif exclusively drives neuronal expression, while the second motif, which is repeated in IE2, is restricted to the enhancement of maternal expression. Therefore, the first motif of the IE1 element was named CNE ( c entral n ervous system-specific e nhancer) and the second motif was termed ME ( m aternal e nhancer).

The CNE retains its function if located upstream of the [beta] 1 promoter

To check a further criterion for enhancer function of the CNE, a synthetic oligonucleotide comprising both IE1 and IE2 was cloned upstream, at -2348 bp, in the construct [beta]1-1, which lacks both IE1 and IE2 in the intron, resulting in construct [beta]1-8 (Fig. 5 ). Expression monitored by anti-[beta]-galactosidase antibody staining showed no detectable differences to [beta]1-2, demonstrating that the CNE can also exert its enhancer activity when placed upstream of the promotor (Fig. 5 ). However, in contrast to classical enhancers, its activating potential is dependent on additional sequences of the [beta] 1 tubulin gene promoter. This was shown by combination of the intron lacking only 0.15 kb at the 3'-end with the heterologous hsp70 promoter ( 17 ; construct WHI), where no CNS-specific or maternal expression is observed ( 17 ). The 0.15 kb omitted in WHI themselves are not capable of driving expression in the CNS as they are present in [beta]1-1, which definitively shows reduced expression, as does W[beta]1C.


Figure 5 . Expression pattern of the enhancer test construct [beta]1-8. ( A ) Embryo stage 9, ventral view. Strong maternal expression is shown. ( B ) Embryo stage 15/16, ventral view, without maternal expression. Strong staining in the CNS, as in W[beta]1K, is visible.

IE1 binds specifically to nuclear proteins in vitro

Having characterized the enhancer function of the CNE, the identification of proteins that specifically interact with this element became of interest. Nuclear extracts from embryos staged at 6-14 h were prepared in order to reduce the amount of maternally retained components and tested for specific interaction with a double-stranded oligonucleotide comprising the CNE and ME elements (Fig. 6 A). Several bands were detected, but competition experiments revealed that only one specific retarded signal, complex 1, resulted from specific binding to IE1. The second complex is only competed out in the presence of both IE1 and IE2, indicating that it contains different proteins. When the CNE was mutagenized according to the strategy used for [beta]1-7, no specific binding was observed (not shown). These results demonstrate that the core motifs identified indeed represent specific DNA binding elements. As both motifs of IE1 are very similar in their sequence, in addition to the gel retardation assays the interaction of proteins with these motifs was analyzed in UV cross-linking experiments. Standard binding reactions using the double-stranded oligonucleotide Mater (see Materials and Methods) were exposed to UV light and analyzed by 10% SDS-PAGE. A specific interaction of a 71 kDa protein was exclusively observed with the oligonucleotide Mater (Fig. 6 B).


Figure 6 . ( A ) EMSA assay using a nuclear extract from embryos staged at 6-14 h. The oligonucleotide used for the binding reaction contained IE1 only. Competition was performed with either the same unlabeled oligonucleotide, an oligonucletide containing a SP1 factor binding site consensus as non-specific competitor or an oligonucleotide containing both IE1 and IE2. Molar ratios were 10-, 50- and 100-fold respectively. Two retarded complexes are visible. Complex 1 is competed out by IE1, while complex 2 disappears in the presence of IE2 only. ( B ) Autoradiograph of a SDS-PAGE from a UV-cross-linking experiment. The oligonucleotide Mater was used for standard binding reactions, which were exposed to UV light, denatured and separated by 10% SDS-PAGE. Oligonucleotides Mater and Neuro were used as competitors in 10- to 100-fold molar excess. Sizes and position of standard proteins are indicated. Only one band at ~71 kDa (arrow) shows a specific interaction with the CNE.To further identify interacting proteins, we tried to purify the transactivators on different chromatographic materials, but were able to enrich the active fraction no more than 200-fold as estimated from the gel retardation assays. Further purification resulted in complete loss of activity when testing combinations of different fractions. So at the moment the identity of the transactivators is unknown.

DISCUSSION

The [beta] 1 tubulin gene of D.melanogaster is transcribed during oogenesis as well as zygotically in the nervous system and the attachments of the somatic musculature, the apodemes. The gene is subject of a complex network of transcriptional regulation during embryogenesis. Deletion analysis revealed separate elements driving expression in the CNS, the chordotonal organs and the attachment sites of the somatic musculature ( 17 , 22 ). While the intron elements necessary for expression in the chordotonal organs and apodemes also act independently of the [beta] 1 tubulin gene promoter ( 17 , 22 ), the situation for expression in the CNS is different. We could show that for complete expression at high levels at least three different modules have to interact: upstream sequences between -2348 and -1136, promoter-proximal elements and sequences from the 5'-part of the intron. None of these modules alone is capable of interacting with a heterologous promoter to drive expression in the CNS.

By deletion analysis we could show that the intron of the gene is essentiel for maternal as well as neuronal expression ( 17 ). Sequence comparison with the [beta] 1 tubulin gene from the distantly related species D.hydei revealed the presence of two conserved sequence blocks in the proximal 5'-part of the intron. The elements were termed IE1 (20 bp) and IE2 (14 bp). In this report we present evidence for the neural enhancer activity of a 6 bp core element localized in IE1. Zygotically, this enhancer is specific for the neural system, because no transcription is observed in apodemes. In total, two separate motifs were detected in IE1: the 5'-located core of 6 bp, CAAAAT, which is essential for neuronal expression in the CNS, and a 3'-located 8 bp motif, ATTTTTGC, which occurs a second time in the inverted orientation in IE2 and is required for maternal expression. Mutational analysis reveals that distortion of the 5' core sequence reduces expression in the CNS, as does complete deletion of IE1. Therefore, this sequence was termed the c entral n ervous system-specific e nhancer or CNE. Maternal expression, in contrast, is still detectable, although at lower levels, as observed in strains harboring the complete IE1 element. This result could indicate that the CNE possibly augments the activity of the ME, by stabilizing or facilitating the interaction of transactivators with the ME. Mutagenesis of the ME completely eliminates maternal expression without reducing CNS expression, showing that the reverse interaction does not occur. These results were rather surprising, as the close relationship of the CNE and ME, CAAAAT vs CAAAAAT, indicates interaction with similar factors, although with different affinities. However, the influence of the neighboring bases of these motifs on the interaction with the regulatory proteins is not clear, although at least in vitro their mutagenesis does not alter the interaction as monitored in gel retardation assays (not shown). Nevertheless, the CNE and ME motifs are essential for transcriptional regulation in vivo , as their mutagenesis completely knocks out the corresponding expression patterns. These results show that although the palindromic occurence of the motifs points to an interaction with protein dimers, these motifs are able to act independently of one another, such that a synchronous binding of a single factor or the interaction of two proteins binding to these motifs is not necessary for enhancer function. As discussed above, the palindromic structure of the IE1 motif CAAAATGGCGTCATTTTTG offers the possibility that homo- and heterodimers might interact with this element. However, constructs [beta]1-10 and [beta]1-11 clearly show that the motifs present in IE1, although being closely related, exert distinct functions in vivo : the 5'-localized CAAAAT is active only in the nervous system, while the 3'-located CATTTTTG core solely controls maternal expression. However, removal of 3'-flanking sequences in constructs [beta]1-1 to [beta]1-9 leads to an enhanced expression in the PNS which is not observed in strains transgenic for W[beta]1K. Thus, elements that negatively regulate [beta] 1 tubulin gene expression in the PNS have been deleted in these constructs. Alternatively, elements from the 3'-part of the intron in the wild-type situation or in W[beta]1K are positioned too far from the promoter to drive high levels of expression in the PNS. These elements are probably brought into closer proximity to the promoter in the deletion constructs, leading to the enhanced transcription in the PNS.

Having defined the CNE in vivo , we were interested in identifying transactivating proteins that might bind to sequences in IE1. In vitro binding studies using EMSA assays reveal the presence of nuclear proteins interacting with this element. A problem with these studies arises from the close relationship of the CNE and ME. As their relative affinities for interacting factors in vitro may be very similar, although in vivo sufficient for specific regulation, the identification of such factors in gel retardation assays may be quite difficult. Possible cofactors which are relevant in vivo may not function equivalently in vitro , or only with reduced efficiency. In UV cross-linking experiments, a 71 kDa protein showed a specific interaction with the CNE.

Concerning possible transactivators, only a few candidates are known. The products of the pro-neural gene class, as well as the E(spl) and HLH-5m proteins, which represent bHLH transcription factors, recognize a consensus motif CANNTG (E-box) or CACNAG (N-box), which is not found in the CNE, only the variant CAAAATG at the 5'-end of the motif. Analysis of the [beta]1 tubulin mRNA distribution in a mutant for a pro-neural gene belonging to the bHLH family, daughterless , revealed no significant reduction in CNS expression (Buttgereit, data not shown). Thus, the bHLH genes are unlikely to be involved in direct activation of [beta] 1 tubulin gene expression. However, due to the high maternal mRNA level in early embryogenesis stages, which overlaps with the onset of zygotic expression, this observation remains preliminary.

For two other genes, elements for expression throughout the CNS have been mapped. In the case of the elav gene, a 333 bp promoter fragment could be identified which is capable of driving high level expression in the CNS ( 15 ). This is different from the situation in the [beta] 1 tubulin gene, where the interaction of several widely dispersed, distinct motifs are essential for activation. For the snail gene it was shown ( 1 6 ) that activation in the CNS, at least, is not dependent on the pathway initiated by the genes of the achaete - scute complex. In addition, elements for the CNS and PNS could be separated. Sequence comparison of the IE1 and IE2 elements revealed no homologies to either gene, indicating that the CNE represents a new DNA binding motif. Further analysis of the CNE and the specifically interacting proteins may yield insight into the regulatory cascades leading to the differentiation of the embryonic D.melanogaster CNS. So, for the first time, the differential activity of two closely related enhancer motifs active either during oogenesis or embryogenesis has been demonstrated.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Bu816/1-2). Special thanks to Sabina Kerl for excellent technical assistance and to A.Paululat and E.Kothe for critical reading of the manuscript. The work was done in the laboratory of Renate Renkawitz-Pohl in Marburg. Her permant readiness for critical discussion was very stimulating for the progress of the experiments.

REFERENCES

1 Campos-Ortega,J.A. (1993) In Bate,M. and Martinez-Arias,A. (eds), The Development of Drosophila melanogaster. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, NY, pp. 1091-1131.

2 Jimenez,F. and Modolell,J. (1993) Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev., 3, 626-632 MEDLINE Abstract

3 Villares,R. and Cabrera,C.V. (1987) Cell, 50, 415-424. MEDLINE Abstract

4 Vaessin,H., Brand,M., Jan,L.Y. and Jan,Y.N. (1994) Development, 120, 935-945.

5 Dominguez, M. and Campuzano,S. (1993) EMBO J., 12, 2049-2060. MEDLINE Abstract

6 Martin-Bermudo,M.D., Gonzales,F., Dominguez,M., Rodriguez,I., Ruiz-Gomez,M., Romani,S., Modolell,J. and Jiminez,F. (1993) Development, 118, 1003-1012.

7 Skeath,J.B., Panganiban,G.F. and Caroll,S.B. (1994) Development, 120, 1517-1524. MEDLINE Abstract

8 Bier,E., Vaessin,H., Younger-Shepherd,S., Jan,L.Y. and Jan,Y.N. (1992) Genes Dev., 6, 2137-2151. MEDLINE Abstract

9 Doe,C.Q., Chu-LaGraff,Q., Wright,D.M. and Scott,M.P. (1991) Cell, 65, 451-464. MEDLINE Abstract

10 Matsuzaki,F., Koizumi,K., Hama,C., Yoshioka,T. and Nabeshima,Y. (1992) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 182, 1326-1332. MEDLINE Abstract

11 Van Doren,M., Bailey,A.M., Esnayra,J. Ede,K. and Posakony,J.W. (1994) Genes Dev., 8, 2729-2742. MEDLINE Abstract

12 Cubas,P. and Modolell,J. (1992) EMBO J., 11, 3385-3393. MEDLINE Abstract

13 Ramain,P., Heitzler,P., Haenlin,M. and Simpson,P. (1993) Development, 119, 1277-1291. MEDLINE Abstract

14 Kramatschek,B. and Campos-Ortega,J.A. (1994) Development, 120, 815-826. MEDLINE Abstract

15 Yao,K.M. and White,K. (1994) J. Neurochem., 63, 41-51. MEDLINE Abstract

16 Ip,Y.T., Levine,M. and Bier,E. (1994) Development, 120, 199-207. MEDLINE Abstract

17 Buttgereit,D., Leiss,D., Michiels,F. and Renkawitz-Pohl,R. (1991) Mech. Dev., 33, 107-118. MEDLINE Abstract

18 Klemenz,R.,Weber,U. and Gehring,W.J. (1987) Nucleic Acids Res., 15, 3947-3959. MEDLINE Abstract

19 Dignam, J.D., Lebovitz,R.M. and Roeder,R.G. (1983) Nucleic Acids Res., 11, 1475-1489. MEDLINE Abstract

20 Gasch,A., Hinz,U., Leiss,D. and Renkawitz-Pohl,R. (1988) Mol. Gen. Genet., 211, 8-16. MEDLINE Abstract

21 Xiong,W.C., Okano,H., Patel,N.H., Blendy,J.A. and Montell,C. (1994) Genes Dev., 8, 981-994. MEDLINE Abstract

22 Buttgereit,D. (1993) J. Cell Sci., 105, 721-727.


Return

* To whom correspondence should be addressed

+ Present address: MLP Finanzdienstleistungen, Seidlstraße 4, 80335 München, Germany
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
D. Markesich, K. Gajewski, M. Nazimiec, and K Beckingham
bicaudal encodes the Drosophila beta NAC homolog, a component of the ribosomal translational machinery*
Development, January 2, 2000; 127(3): 559 - 572.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. K. Parker and H. W. Detrich III
Evolution, Organization, and Expression of alpha -Tubulin Genes in the Antarctic Fish Notothenia coriiceps. ADAPTIVE EXPANSION OF A GENE FAMILY BY RECENT GENE DUPLICATION, INVERSION, AND DIVERGENCE
J. Biol. Chem., December 18, 1998; 273(51): 34358 - 34369.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (158K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kohler, J
Right arrow Articles by Buttgereit, D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kohler, J
Right arrow Articles by Buttgereit, D
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?