ABSTRACT
Homopurine sequences of duplex DNA are binding sites for triplex-forming oligodeoxyribopyrimidines. The interactions of synthetic duplex
DNA targets with an oligodeoxyribopyrimidine containing
N
4-(6-amino- 2-pyridinyl)deoxycytidine (1), a nucleoside designed to
interact with a single C[middot]G base pair interruption of the purine target tract, was studied by UV
melting, circular dichroism spectroscopy and dimethylsulfate alkylation
experiments. Nucleoside 1 supports stable triplex formation at pH 7.0 with
formation of a 1[middot]Y[middot]Z triad, where Y[middot]Z is a base pair in the homopurine tract of the target.
Selective interaction was observed when Y[middot]Z was C[middot]G, although A[middot]T and, to a lesser extent, T[middot]A and G[middot]C base pairs were also recognized. The
circular dichroism spectra of the triplex having a 1[middot]C[middot]G triad were similar to those of a triplex having a C+[middot]G[middot]C triad, suggesting that the overall structures
of the two triplexes are quite similar. Removal of the 6-amino group from 1 essentially eliminated triplex formation. Reaction of a
triplex having the 1[middot]C[middot]G triad with dimethylsulfate resulted in a 50% reduction of
methylation of the G residue of this triad. In contrast, the G of a similar
triplex containing a U[middot]C[middot]G triad was not protected from methylation by dimethylsulfate.
These results are consistent with a binding mode in which the 6-amino-2-pyridinyl group of 1 spans the major groove of the target
duplex at the 1[middot]C[middot]G binding site and forms a hydrogen bond with the O6 of G. An
additional stabilizing hydrogen bond could form between the N4 of the imino tautomer of 1 and the N4 amino group of C.
Oligodeoxyribonucleotides can interact with double-stranded DNA to form triple-stranded complexes. There is considerable interest in the structure
of these triplexes and in the possibility of using triplex-forming oligonucleotides as novel reagents to control gene expression (
1
). Currently, sequence recognition of DNA by triplex-forming oligonucleotides is limited to interactions between oligopyrimidines or oligopurines and homopurine tracts within the DNA target. Although purine sequences of considerable length are frequently found in human and eukaryotic genes (
2
,
3
), these sequences are often interrupted by one or a few pyrimidine bases. Such
py[middot]pu
base pair interruptions essentially act as mismatches and reduce the stability of the triplex or prevent triplex formation altogether (
4
-
10
). The range of sequences recognized by triplex-forming oligonucleotides could be expanded considerably if means could be found to deal with these interruptions.
Various strategies have been developed to accommodate isolated
py[middot]pu
interruptions of purine tracts. One approach is to simply skip the
interruption. However, incorporation of an abasic site into an oligopyrimidine at a site opposite a single
py[middot]pu
interruption resulted in considerable destabilization of the triplex (
11
). Apparently, maintenance of continuous stacking interactions along the third
strand is an important contributor to triplex stability.
Natural nucleic acid bases can interact with a
py[middot]pu
interruption. Thus guanine can interact with a T
[middot]
A base pair to form a G
[middot]
T
[middot]
A triad (
6
,
8
,
12
) and thymine can form a T
[middot]
C
[middot]
G triad (
6
-
10
). Both the G
[middot]
T
[middot]
A and T
[middot]
C
[middot]
G triads involve the formation of a single hydrogen bond between the third
strand base and the pyrimidine interruption (
13
-
15
). This and distortions of the triplex at the site of the G
[middot]
T
[middot]
A or T
[middot]
C
[middot]
G triad may account for the generally observed reduced stability of triplexes
involving these base triads.
Nucleoside analogs have also been shown to interact with C
[middot]
G interruptions.When incorporated into an oligopurine, 2'-deoxynebularine interacts selectively with C
[middot]
G and A
[middot]
T base pairs in a purine
[middot]
purine
[middot]
pyrimidine triplex motif (
16
). Similar recognition was observed for 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine, an analog of thymidine (
17
). The
N
-7-benzoyl derivative of 2'-deoxyformycin A was also found to allow triplex
formation involving C
[middot]
G interruptions (
18
).
Non-natural nucleosides which recognize
py[middot]pu
interruptions have been synthesized. Thus 1-(2-deoxy-[beta]-D-ribofuranosyl)-4- (3-benzamidophenyl)imidazole
when incorporated into an oligopyrimidine specifically recognizes T
[middot]
A and C
[middot]
G interruptions (
19
). This nucleoside was found to interact by sequence-specific intercalation, rather than by hydrogen bonding to the base pair
interruption (
20
). Azole-2'-deoxyribonucleosides incorporated into triplex-forming oligopurines allow formation of triplexes with
duplex targets containing T
[middot]
A or C
[middot]
G interruptions (
21
,
22
). The manner in which these nucleosides interact with the interruption remains to be characterized. Recently, 2-methyl-8-(
N
'-
n
-butylureido)naphth[1,2-
d
]imidazole was shown to hydrogen bond to a C
[middot]
G base pair in chloroform solution (
23
).
We have reported in a preliminary communication that an oligopyrimidine containing
N
4
-(6-amino-2-pyridinyl)deoxycytidine forms a triplex with a duplex target containing a
single C
[middot]
G interruption (
24
). In this report we describe the syntheses of oligonucleotides containing this and other
N
4
-(aryl)deoxycytidine derivatives and studies which further characterize triplex formation by these oligonucleotides.
Reagent grade chemicals were used unless otherwise noted. HPLC grade
acetonitrile was dried over calcium hydride. Anhydrous pyridine and methylene
chloride were from Aldrich Chemical Co. Inc. Protected nucleoside 3'-(2-cyanoethyl-
N
,
N
-diisopropylphosphoramidites) and nucleoside-derivatized controlled pore glass supports were from Glen Research. Flash chromatography
was carried out using EM Science Kieselgel 60 (230-400 mesh). Thin layer chromatography (TLC) was performed on EM Reagents
silica gel plates (0.2 mm). Analytical and preparative reversed phase HPLC were carried out on 4.6 * 150 mm and 10 * 250 mm Microsorb 5 [mu]m C-18 columns (Rainin Instrument Co.) respectively at flow
rates of 1.0 or 2.0 ml/min. Proton NMR spectra were recorded on a Brucker AMX
300 spectrometer. Chemical shifts are reported in p.p.m. Mass spectra were
obtained using electron ionization (EI) or fast atom bombardment (FAB)
techniques. Circular dichroism spectra were recorded on an Aviv circular
dichroism spectropolarimeter fitted with a thermostatted cell compartment.
A rapidly stirred suspension of 8.4 g 1,2,4-triazole in 120 ml dry acetonitrile was treated at 0oC by slow addition of 2.4 ml phosphorus oxychloride followed by
dropwise addition of 18 ml triethylamine. The suspension was left stirring for
30 min and a solution of 936 mg 3',5'-di-
O
-acetyl-2'-deoxyuridine (
25
) in 15 ml dry acetonitrile was added over a period of 20 min. Stirring was continued for 1.5 h until TLC showed no starting material remained. The reaction was stopped by addition of 150 ml saturated sodium bicarbonate.
The aqueous solution was extracted with methylene chloride and the methylene
chloride was removed by rotatory evaporation. The product, which was crystallized from ethyl acetate, was obtained in 73% yield as 800 mg of a pale yellow solid. Silica gel TLC
R
f
: 0.25, ethyl acetate/hexane (3:1 v/v).
1
H NMR (DMSO-d
6
): d p.p.m. 1.92 (s, 3H, CH
3
), 1.87 (s, 3H, CH
3
), 2.33 (m, 2H, H2', H2''), 4.13 (m, 2H, H5'), 4.22 (m, 1H, H4'), 5.07 (m, 1H, H3'), 5.99 (t, 1H, H1'), 6.89 (d, 1H, H5), 8.03 (s,
1H, triazole), 8.25 (d, 1H, H6), 9.21 (s, 1H, triazole).
A solution of 804 mg, 1 mmol, nucleoside
4
and 804 mg, 8 mmol, 2,6-diaminopyridine in 10 ml dry pyridine was refluxed for 3 days. TLC showed that no starting material remained. Pyridine was removed by evaporation, the residue was extracted into methylene chloride and the organic layer was washed with water. The methylene
chloride was evaporated and the residue was subjected to silica gel flash
chromatography using chloroform/methanol (10:1 v/v) as solvent. Nucleoside
5a
was obtained in 53% yield as a pale yellow glassy solid. Silica gel TLC
R
f
: 0.22, chloroform/methanol (10:1 v/v). FAB MS(+): 404 (M+H)
+
, 204 (M-ribose+H)
+
.
1
H NMR (DMSO-d
6
): d p.p.m. 1.92 (s, 3H, CH
3
), 1.93 (s, 3H, CH
3
), 2.19 (m, 2H, H2', H2''), 4.06~4.11 (m, 3H, H4', H5'), 5.04 (m, 1H, H3'), 5.65 (s, 2H, NH
2
), 6.03 (m, 2H, H1', Hpyr), 6.45 (br, 1H, H5), 7.16 (m, 2H, Hpyr), 7.06 (d, 1H, H6), 9.67
(br, 1H, NH).
Sixty milligrams, 0.15 mmol, nucleoside
5a
was dissolved in 6 ml water/methanol (1:1 v/v) solution containing 0.2 N sodium
hydroxide. The solution was stirred at room temperature for 20 min and was then neutralized by addition of 6 N hydrochloric acid at 0oC. The solvents were removed and the residue was taken up in methanol. The
resulting precipitate was removed by filtration and the filtrate was
evaporated. The residue was subjected to silica gel column chromatography using
chloroform/methanol (3:1 v/v) as solvent. The product was obtained as a white
solid. Silica gel TLC
R
f
: 0.15, chloroform/methanol (4:1 v/v). Reversed phase HPLC retention time, 19.3
min, using a gradient of 2-3% acetonitrile, 0-12 min, and 3-30% acetonitrile in 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 5.8.
1
H NMR (DMSO-d
6
): d p.p.m. 1.85 (m, 1H, H2'), 2.00 (m, 1H, H2''), 3.41 (br, 2H, H5'), 3.64 (m, 1H, H4'), 3.92 (m, 1H, H3'), 4.86 (d, 1H, 3'OH), 5.06 (t, 1H, 5'OH), 5.73 (br, 2H, NH
2
), 5.99 (m, 2H, H1', H pyr), 6.41 (br, 1H, H5), 7.00 (br, 1H, H pyr), 7.20 (t, 1H, H pyr),
7.84 (d, 1H, H6), 9.71 (br, 1H, NH).
A solution of 200 mg, 0.5 mmol, nucleoside
5a
in 5 ml dry pyridine was treated by dropwise addition of 0.17 ml, 1.5 mmol,
benzoyl chloride at 0oC. The solution was stirred at room temperature for 2.5 h. Saturated sodium
bicarbonate was added at 0oC, the solution was extracted with methylene chloride and the organic layer
was washed with water. The organic layer was evaporated and the residue was
washed with ethanol. Nucleoside
5b
was obtained in 71% yield as a white precipitate. Silica gel TLC
R
f
: 0.33, ethyl acetate/hexane (5:1 v/v).
1
H NMR (DMSO-d
6
): p.p.m. 2.05 (s, 3H, CH
3
), 2.11 (s, 3H,CH
3
), 2.37 (m, 2H, H2', H2''), 4.25~4.43 (m, 3H, H4', H5'), 5.25 (m, 1H, H3'), 6.13 (t, 1H, H1'), 6.56 (d, 1H, H5), 7.66
(m, 14H, Ar), 11.0 (s, 1H, NH).
Two hundred milligrams, 0.3 mmol, nucleoside
5b
was dissolved in 20 ml water/methanol (1:1 v/v) solution containing 0.2 N
sodium hydroxide. The solution was stirred at room temperature for 20 min and
then neutralized by addition of 6 N hydrochloric acid. The product was obtained
as a white precipitate which was removed by filtration, washed several times
with ice water and dried under vacuum in the presence of phosphorous pentoxide.
Product
6a
was obtained in 70% yield as 89 mg of a white solid.
1
H NMR (DMSO-d
6
): p.p.m. 2.08 (m, 1H, H2'), 2.28 (m, 1H, H2''), 3.52 (m, 2H, H5'), 3.80 (m, 1H, H4'), 4.30 (m, 1H, H3'), 5.09 (t, 1H, 5'OH), 5.30 (d, 1H, 3'OH), 6.25 (t, 1H, H1'), 7.24 (br, 1H,
H pyr), 7.60~8.04 (m, 8H, H5, H Ar), 8.16 (d, 1H, H6), 10.24 (s, 1H, NH), 10.55 (s, 1H,
NH).
A solution of 80 mg, 0.19 mmol, nucleoside
6a
in 2 ml dry pyridine was treated with 80 mg dimethoxytrityl chloride and 3 mg 4-
N
,
N
-dimethylaminopyridine for 2 h at room temperature. A 0.5 ml aliquot of methanol was added and stirring was continued for 20 min. The solvents were evaporated, the residue was dissolved in methylene
chloride and the solution was extracted with water. The organic layer was evaporated and the residue subjected to silica gel column
chromatography using a solvent which contained 5% triethylamine in ethyl
acetate/methanol (15:1 v/v). The product,
6b
, was obtained in 72% yield as a white glassy solid. Silica gel TLC
R
f
: 0.38, 5% triethylamine in ethyl acetate/methanol (15:1 v/v).
1
H NMR (DMSO-d
6
): p.p.m. 1.88 (s, 6H, CH
3
), 2.40 (m, 2H, H2', H2''), 3.92 (m, 3H, H4', H5'), 4.12 (m, 1H, H3'), 5.23 (d, 1H, 3'OH), 6.07 (t, 1H, H1'), 6.55 (br, 1H, H5),
7.26 (m, 21H, Ar), 7.85 (d, 1H, H6), 10.06 (s, 1H, NH), 10.31 (s, 1H, NH).
Nucleoside
6b
was dried under vacuum for 48 h in the presence of phosphorous pentoxide.
Eighty milligrams
6a
were dissolved in a solution containing 1 ml dry methylene chloride and 0.061
ml dry triethylamine. The stirred solution was treated by dropwise addition of 0.037 ml
N
,
N
-
bis
-(diisopropylamino)-2-cyanoethoxy-phosphine and stirring was continued for 15 min.
Methanol was added and stirring was continued for an additional 10 min. The
solution was diluted with ethyl acetate and then washed several times with
saturated sodium bicarbonate. The organic layer was evaporated and the residue
was subjected to silica gel column chromatography using ethyl acetate/methylene chloride/triethylamine (1:1:0.1 v/v) as solvent. The product was obtained in 70% yield as a glassy
solid after evaporation of solvents. It was dried under vacuum in the presence
of phosphorous pentoxide. Silica gel TLC
R
f
: 0.38, ethyl acetate/methylene chloride/triethylamine (1:1:0.1 v/v).
31
P NMR (CDCl
3
): d p.p.m. 148.03, 148.62.
A solution of 726 mg nucleoside
4
and 1.7 g 1,3-phenylenediamine in 20 ml dry pyridine was refluxed for 4 h. The solvents were
evaporated, the residue was dissolved in methylene chloride and the solution
was washed with water. The organic layer was evaporated and the residue was
subjected to silica gel column chromatography using chloroform/methanol (20:1 v/v) as solvent. The product, 3',5'-di-
O
-acetyl-
N
4
-(3-aminophenyl)-2'-deoxycytidine, was obtained in 51% yield as 420 mg of a pale
yellow glassy solid. MS FAB (+): 403.2 (M+H)
+
, 203.1 (M-ribose+H)
+
. TLC
R
f
: 0.21 (CHCl
3
/MeOH 20:1).
1
H NMR (DMSO-d
6
): p.p.m. 1.93 (s, 3H, CH
3
), 1.96 (s, 3H, CH
3
), 2.22 (m, 2H, H2', H2''), 4.12 (m, 3H, H4', H5'), 4.98 (s, 2H, NH
2
), 5.07 (m, 1H, H3'), 5.89 (d, 1H, H5), 6.10 (t, 1H, H1'), 6.19 (d, 1H, H
Ar
), 6.80 (br, 1H, H
Ar
), 6.83 (t, 2H, H
Ar
), 7.64 (d, 1H, H6), 9.39 (s, 1H, NH).
A 70 mg portion of the nucleoside was dissolved in 10 ml of a solution
containing 0.2 N sodium hydroxide in methanol/water (1:1 v/v). The solution was
stirred at room temperature for 20 min and then neutralized by addition of 6 N
hydrochloric acid at 0oC. The solvents were evaporated, the residue was taken up in methanol and
the resulting precipitate was removed by filtration. The filtrate was
evaporated and the residue was subjected to silica gel column chromatography
using chloroform/methanol (6:1 v/v) as solvent. The product,
2
, was obtained as a white solid. Silica gel TLC
R
f
: 0.30, chloroform/methanol (5:1 v/v). Reversed phase HPLC retention time, 18.4
min using a gradient of 2-3% acetonitrile, 0-12 min, and 3-30% acetonitrile in 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 5.8.
1
H NMR (DMSO-d
6
): p.p.m. 2.17 (m, 1H, H2'), 2.32 (m, 1H, H2''), 3.75 (m, 2H, H5'), 3.96 (m, 1H, H4'), 4.41 (m, 1H, H3'), 5.27 (s, 2H, NH
2
), 6.24 (d, 1H, H5), 6.35 (t, 1H, H1'), 6.40 (d, 1H, H
Ar
), 7.12 (m, 3H, H
Ar
), 8.10 (d, 1H, H6), 9.82 (s, 1H, NH).
A solution of 726 mg nucleoside
4
and 1.4 g 2-aminopyridine in 20 ml dry pyridine was refluxed for 6 days. The solvents
were evaporated, the residue was dissolved in methylene chloride and the
organic solution was washed with water. The organic layer was evaporated and
the residue subjected to silica gel column chromatography using chloroform/methanol (20:1 v/v) as solvent. The product, 3',5'-di-
O
-acetyl-
N
4
-(2-pyridinyl)-2'-deoxycytidine, was obtained in 63% yield as 470
mg of a pale yellow glassy solid. Silica gel TLC
R
f
: 0.51, chloroform/methanol (20:1 v/v). MS FAB(+): 388 (M+H)
+
, 189 (M-ribose+H)
+
.
1
H NMR (DMSO-d
6
): p.p.m. 2.03 (s, 3H, CH
3
), 2.06 (s, 3H, CH
3
), 2.31 (m, 2H, H2', H2''), 4.23 (m, 3H, H4', H5'), 5.18 (m, 1H, H3'), 6.18 (t, 1H, H1'), 6.48 (br, 1H, H5), 7.07 (t,
1H, H
Ar
), 7.79 (m, 2H, H
Ar
), 8.31 (m, 2H, H
Ar
, H6), 10.40 (s, 1H, NH).
A 420 mg portion of the nucleoside was dissolved in 50 ml of a solution
containing 0.2 N sodium hydroxide in methanol/water (1:1 v/v). The solution was
stirred at room temperature for 20 min and then neutralized by addition of 6 N
hydrochloric acid at 0oC. The solvents were evaporated, the residue was taken up in methanol and
the resulting precipitate was removed by filtration. The filtrate was
evaporated and the residue was subjected to silica gel column chromatography
using chloroform/methanol (6:1 v/v) as solvent. The product,
3
, was obtained as a white solid. Silica gel TLC
R
f
: 0.25, chloroform/methanol (6:1 v/v). Reversed phase HPLC retention time, 18.6
min using a gradient of 2-3% acetonitrile, 0-12 min, and 3-30% acetonitrile in 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 5.8.
1
H NMR (DMSO-d
6
): p.p.m. 1.90 (m, 2H, H2', H2''), 3.62 (m, 1H, H4'), 4.05 (m, 1H, H3'), 5.97 (t, 1H, H1'), 6.29 (br, 1H, H5), 6.88 (t, 1H, H
Ar
), 7.60 (t, 1H, H
Ar
), 7.92 (d, 1H, H
Ar
), 8.14 (m, 2H, H
Ar
, H6), 10.20 (br, 1H, NH).
These were synthesized on an Applied Biosystems Model 392 DNA/RNA synthesizer using standard phosphoramidite chemistry (
26
). The 5'-terminal dimethoxytrityl group was removed from the support-bound protected oligomer by the synthesizer. The oligomers
were cleaved from the support and deprotected by treating the controlled pore
glass support with a solution containing concentrated ammonium
hydroxide/pyridine (1:1 v/v) at 55oC for 6 h. In the case of oligomers containing
N
4
-(6- amino-2-pyridinyl)-2'-deoxycytidine, treatment was extended to 18 h to ensure complete removal
of the 6-benzamido protecting group from this nucleoside. Deprotected oligomers
were purified by preparative C-18 reversed phase HPLC using a 40 ml linear gradient of 5-15% acetonitrile in 50 mM sodium phosphate, pH 5.8. The column was operated at a flow rate of 2.0 ml/min and was monitored at 280 nm. Oligomers were desalted on C-18 SEP PAK cartridges (Water Associates) or on a small
Microsorb (Rainin Instruments) C-18 reversed phase HPLC guard column cartridge. The oligomers gave the
expected products after digestion to their component nucleosides using a
combination of snake venom phosphodiesterase and bacterial alkaline phosphatase. Their extinction coefficients were determined as previously described (
27
).
Solutions containing 1.8 [mu]M [
32
P]
IV
and 2.2 [mu]M
V
or 2.2 [mu]M
IV
and 1.8 [mu]M [
32
P]
V
in 50 mM MOPS, pH 7.0, 20 mM MgCl
2
, 0.1 M NaCl were prepared. A 5 [mu]l aliquot of the preformed duplex, which contained 12 000 d.p.m. of
32
P-labeled oligonucleotide, was mixed with a 5 [mu]l aliquot of buffer or buffer containing 2, 10 or 20 [mu]M
I
at room temperature. These solutions were incubated overnight at 4oC. The solutions were then incubated for 30 min at 0oC. Each solution was treated with 1 [mu]l dimethylsulfate for 3 min at 0oC. The reaction was quenched by addition of 2 [mu]l 2-mercaptoethanol. Each solution was diluted with 3 [mu]l 3 M NaOAc, 10 [mu]g in 1 [mu]l salmon sperm DNA and 100 [mu]l ethanol. The solutions were placed
on dry ice for 1 h and then centrifuged at 4oC at 16 000 r.p.m. for 20 min. The supernatant was removed and the
precipitate was washed with 100 [mu]l 90% ethanol. The pellet was dried under vacuum, dissolved in 50 [mu]l 1 M aqueous piperidine and the solution was incubated at 90oC for 30 min. The solvent was removed by evaporation and the
residue was evaporated once with 20 [mu]l 50% acetonitrile/water. The residue was then dissolved in 10 [mu]l 90% formamide loading buffer. The solution was heated for 1 min at 90oC, loaded onto a 40 cm, 20% denaturing polyacrylamide gel and the
samples were electrophoresed at 800 V. The gels were dried and subjected to
autoradiography at -80oC and were also scanned by a phosphorimager.
Triplex formation was studied in the intermolecular systems
I[middot]II[middot]III(X[middot]Y[middot]Z)
and
I[middot]IV[middot]V(X[middot]Y[middot]Z)
, shown in Figure
1
. The duplex targets contained the four possible Watson-Crick base pairs at position
Y[middot]Z
. The third strand oligopyrimidine
I(X)
, whose backbone is parallel to the purine-rich strands of the duplexes, contained two 5-methyldeoxycytidines (
The deoxycytidine derivatives were prepared as outlined in Figure
2
and described in Materials and Methods. The oligomers used the corresponding
phosphoramidites following standard procedures.
With the exceptions noted below, the A
260
vs tempeature profiles of triplex
I[middot]II[middot]III(X[middot]Y[middot]Z)
and triplex
I[middot]IV[middot]V(X[middot]Y[middot]Z)
showed two sigmoidal transitions corresponding first to dissociation of the
third strand and second dissociation of the duplex. Only small linear increases
in absorbance were seen when the individual strands of these triplexes were
heated, suggesting that these strands do not undergo self-interactions (data not shown). The melting temperatures at pH 7.0 for
dissociation of oligomer
I(X)
from these triplexes are shown in Table
1
and
2
. Oligomer
I(1)
interacted to various extents with all eight duplex targets. The most stable
triplexes were formed with duplex targets which contained
C[middot]G
or
A[middot]T
base pairs at position
Y[middot]Z
.
Table 1
Melting temperatures of
I[middot]II[middot]III(X[middot]Y[middot]Z)
triplexes containing base analogs
As shown in Figure
3
, triplex
I[middot]II[middot]III(1[middot]C[middot]G)
melted in a unique manner. When the triplex was heated at a rate of 0.5oC/min, two transitions corresponding to dissociation of
I(1)
from target duplex
II[middot]III(C[middot]G)
were observed with
T
m
values of 25 and 38oC. These transitions occured prior to dissociation of the target duplex,
whose
T
m
is 48oC.
Only a single transition was seen at 25oC when the sample was cooled. When the sample was heated at a slower rate,
0.2oC/min, a single broad transition was observed whose inflection point is 28oC. Prolonged incubation of
I[middot]II[middot]III(1[middot]C[middot]G)
at 4oC prior to melting resulted predominantly in the appearance of the
transition at 38oC.
Reactions of duplex
IV[middot]V
with dimethylsulfate in the presence of increasing concentrations of
I(1)
or
I(U)
were carried out at 0oC. This temperature is well below the
T
m
values for the dissociation of the third strands of these triplexes.
Autoradiograms of the gels from reactions run in the presence of
I(U)
or
I(1)
are shown in Figure
5
A and B respectively. The topmost band observed in these gels is undissociated
duplex
IV[middot]V
. Lanes 1-4 of Figure
5
A show that G19 of the upper strand of the duplex (strand
IV
) was protected from methylation by
I(U)
. Protection was almost complete at a 1:1 stoichiometry of
I(U)
to duplex. This result is consistent with formation of a triplex between
I(U)
and the duplex target. Although G16 is also part of the binding site for
I(U)
, it was not protected by the oligomer. In addition, G31 and G32, which are
located outside the oligomer binding site, appeared to be hypermethylated.
Similar hypermethylation of guanines outside a triplex binding site has been
observed in other systems (
28
). No decrease in methylation is observed for G20 of the lower strand (strand
V
), even in the presence of a 10-fold excess of
I(U)
, as shown in lanes 5-8.
Figure
When
I(1)
was used as the third strand in these experiments, G19 of strand
IV
was again protected from methylation, as shown in Figure
5
B, lanes 1-4. This result demonstrates that a triplex was formed between
I(1)
and
IV[middot]V
under the conditions of the experiment. The pattern of methylation of the other
guanines of strand
IV
was essentially identical to those observed when
I(U)
was used as the third strand oligomer. In contrast to the results obtained in
the presence of
I(U)
, G20 of strand
V
was partially protected from methylation by
I(1)
. Quantitation of the G20 band in lanes 5-6 by phosphorimaging showed that methylation decreased ~50% in the presence of 1, 5 and 10 [mu]M
I(1)
relative to methylation seen in the absence of
I(1)
.
The pyrimidine base of a
py[middot]pu
interruption provides only one site for hydrogen bond formation with a base of
a triplex-forming oligonucleotide. Base analogs which can potentially form hydrogen
bonds with both bases of the
py[middot]pu
base pair might enhance triplex stability and/or specificity at the site of interruption. Previously, we showed that oligomer
I(X)
, where
X
is
N
4
-(3-acetamidopropyl)deoxycytidine, formed a stable, but rather weak, triplex with
II[middot]III(C[middot]G)
(
29
). The flexible acetamidopropyl arm of this deoxycytidine derivative is sufficiently long to span the major
groove of the duplex and potentially hydrogen bond to the guanine base of the
C[middot]G
base pair.
N
4
-(6-Amino-2-pyridinyl)deoxycytidine (
1
) has a more rigid arm and two potential hydrogen bonding sites for interaction
with a
C[middot]G
base pair (
24
). Molecular models indicate that the pyridine ring of
1
is capable of spanning the major groove of the target duplex. As shown in
Figure
6
, this would place the 6-amino group of
1
within hydrogen bonding proximity to the O6 or N7 of G. Formation of the imino
tautomer of
1
would allow additional hydrogen bonding between the N4 of
1
and the
N
4
-amino group of the C
[middot]
G base pair. In addition to providing a rigid platform to position the hydrogen
bonding groups, the planar aromatic ring of
1
could also participate in stabilizing stacking interactions with bases
neighboring
1
. Alternatively, the pyridine ring of
I
could intercalate into the duplex in a manner analogous to the binding mode of 1-(2-deoxy-[beta]-D-ribofuranosyl)-4-(3-benzamidophenyl) imidazole (D
3
) (
20
).
Figure
The UV spectrum of
1
has two absorption maxima at 284 and 323 nm at pH 6.5. These maxima appear at
wavelengths longer than those observed for the absorption maxima of
deoxycytidine (270 nm) and diaminopyridine (308 nm). The observed red shifts of
these two maxima suggest conjugation between the two heterocyclic rings of the
nucleoside, which could arise as a consequence of tautomerization. The observation that the absorption maxima of
O
4
-(3-aminophenyl)-2'-deoxyuridine, which cannot tautomerize, are not
red shifted relative to the absorption maxima of deoxyuridine or 3-aminophenol is consistent with this suggestion.
The proton NMR spectrum of
1
shows temperature-dependent broadening of the H5 proton of the cytosine ring and the H3
proton of the pyridine ring (
24
). These resonances both sharpen to doublets when the temperature is raised to
67oC, behavior which suggests restricted rotation about the C4-N4 bond of the nucleoside. Similar temperature-dependent broadenings were also observed for the cytosine H5 protons of
N
4
-(3-aminophenyl) deoxycytidine (
2
) and
N
4
-(2-pyridinyl)deoxycytidine (
3
), but not for
O
4
-(3-aminophenyl)deoxyuridine or
O
4
-(2-pyridinyl)deoxyuridine, analogs of
2
and
3
in which an oxygen replaces the exocyclic nitrogen at the 4 position of the
pyrimidine ring.
Oligonucleotide
I(1)
forms a stable triplex with duplex target
II[middot]III(C[middot]G)
at neutral pH (Table
1
). The unusual biphasic transition which is observed prior to melting of the
duplex target (Fig.
3
) suggests the formation of two distinct triplexes between oligomer
I(1)
and
II[middot]III(C[middot]G)
. When the triplex is heated at a rate of 0.2oC/min, a single broad transition replaces the biphasic transition seen when
the triplex is heated at 0.5oC/min. In addition, prolonged incubation of
I[middot]II[middot]III(1[middot]C[middot]G)
at 4oC prior to melting shifts dissociation of
I(1)
predominantly to the higher temperature, as monitored by the relative change in
hypochromicity of the transition. Thus the two triplexes appear to be
interconvertable. The transition seen at 38oC corresponds to melting of the more thermodynamically stable triplex and
that seen at 25oC to the less stable triplex. The latter triplex is initially formed when
the three strands are cooled at 0.5oC/min and the less stable triplex converts to the more stable triplex upon
prolonged incubation at 4oC. Similar melting behavior is seen with
I[middot]II[middot]III(2[middot]C[middot]G)
, which suggests that this phenomena is not unique to the pyridinyl ring. The
formation of two triplexes suggests that
1
or
2
can bind by two distinct modes. Thus the bases could interact by intercalation
as well as by hydrogen bonding.
The formation of two types of triplexes appears to be unique to the interactions
between
I(1)
or
I(2)
and duplex target
II[middot]III(C[middot]G)
. Thus only a single melting transition was observed for the third strand
dissociation of triplex
I[middot]IV[middot]V(1[middot]C[middot]G)
. Target
IV[middot]V(C[middot]G)
consists of 45 bp, whereas
II[middot]III(C[middot]G)
contains 15 bp, which is the same length as oligomer
I(1)
. When
I(1)
interacts with
IV[middot]V(C[middot]G)
, the resulting triplex is flanked on either side by a 15mer duplex. The
presence of these flanking duplexes may impose limitations on the
conformational flexibility of the triplex and thus restrict the interaction of
I(1)
to the formation of a single type of triplex. Such conformational restrictions
may be absent when
I(1)
interacts with
II[middot]III(C[middot]G)
to form triplex
I[middot]II[middot]III(1[middot]C[middot]G)
, which lacks flanking duplex regions.
Despite the unusual melting behavior of
I[middot]II[middot]III(1[middot]C[middot]G)
, the circular dichroism spectum (data not shown) of this triplex at 10oC is almost identical to previously studied triplexes,
I[middot]II[middot]III(X[middot]G[middot]C)
, where
X
is 2'-deoxycytidine or 8-oxo-2'-deoxyadenosine (
27
). The circular dichroism spectrum of
I[middot]II[middot]III(1[middot]C[middot]G)
is thus characteristic of triplexes having mostly T
[middot]
A
[middot]
T triads (
30
). This suggests that the presence of the
1[middot]C[middot]G
triad in either binding mode does not lead to significant structural distortions of the triplex.
The
T
m
values for the third strand dissociations of
I[middot]II[middot]III(1[middot]C[middot]G)
and
I[middot]IV[middot]V(1[middot]C[middot]G)
compare favorably with those of corresponding triplexes which contain
C
+
[middot]G[middot]C
triads at positions
X[middot]Y[middot]Z
(Tables
1
and
1
). Oligomer
I(1)
also forms stable triplexes,
I[middot]II[middot]III(1[middot]A[middot]T)
and
I[middot]IV[middot]V(1[middot]A[middot]T)
, in which
A[middot]T
occupies position
Y[middot]Z
of the duplex target. The stabilities of these triplexes are somewhat greater
than that of triplex
I[middot]II[middot]III(T[middot]A[middot]T)
, which contains a
T[middot]A[middot]T
triad at position
X[middot]Y[middot]Z
. The
A[middot]T
base pair presents hydrogen bonding sites similar to those of the
C[middot]G
base pair. Consequently,
N
4
-(6-amino-2-pyridinyl)deoxycytidine could interact with
A[middot]T
in a manner similar to that proposed for its interaction with
C[middot]G
, as shown in Figure
6
. An additional hydrogen bond may be formed with the N7 of A and such formation
could account for the greater stability of
I[middot]II[middot]III(1[middot]A[middot]T)
than of
I[middot]II[middot]III(T[middot]A[middot]T)
.
The 6-amino group of
1
plays an essential role in the interactions between oligomer
I(1)
and target duplexes
II[middot]III(Y[middot]Z)
and
IV[middot]V(C[middot]G)
. Thus, replacement of the 6-amino-2-pyridinyl group of
1
with a 2-pyridinyl group essentially eliminates interaction between
I(3)
and its targets. This result is consistent with the hydrogen bonding schemes
proposed for the formation of the
1[middot]C[middot]G
and
1[middot]A[middot]T
triads. Formation of the imino tautomeric form of
1
, which provides a hydrogen bond acceptor site for the
N
4
-H of
C[middot]G
and the
N
6
-H of
A[middot]T
may be facilitated by the ability of the 6-amino group of
1
to interact with O6 of
G
or the O4 of
T
of these base pairs. Alternatively, the 6-amino group of
1
may participate in hydrogen bonding interactions with the base neighboring the
Y[middot]Z
site. Such interactions may contribute to formation of less stable triplexes
when
T[middot]A
and
G[middot]C
occupy the
Y[middot]Z
position of a target duplex.
Table 2
Stabilities of
I[middot]IV[middot]V(X[middot]Y[middot]Z)
triplexes
Further insight into the interaction between
1
and the
C[middot]G
base pair was obtained from experiments in which triplexes
I[middot]IV[middot]V(U[middot]C[middot]G)
and
I[middot]IV[middot]V(1[middot]C[middot]G)
were probed with dimethylsulfate. Previous experiments showed that deoxyuridine
can form a stable
U[middot]C[middot]G
triad (
10
) and the third strand dissociation of
I[middot]IV[middot]V(U[middot]C[middot]G)
has a
T
m
of 14oC (Table
2
). Protection of G19 of strand
V
was observed when
I[middot]IV[middot]V(U[middot]C[middot]G)
was treated with dimethylsulfate (Fig.
5
A), but no protection of G20 of strand
V
was seen. This is expected, because only a single hydrogen bond is formed
between deoxyuridine and deoxycytidine when a
U[middot]C[middot]G
triad is formed (
15
). This is because deoxyuridine is located on the side of the major groove
nearest strand
IV
, where the N7 of G20 of strand
V
is exposed and available for reaction with dimethylsulfate.
When
I[middot]IV[middot]V(1[middot]C[middot]G)
reacts with dimethylsulfate, protection of G19 of strand
IV
is again observed, consistent with triplex formation. Based on the similarity
of the methylation patterns of
I[middot]IV[middot]V(U[middot]C[middot]G)
and
I[middot]IV[middot]V(1[middot]C[middot]G)
, the overall structures of these two triplexes appear to be similar, if not
identical. A significant difference is seen, however, for G20 of strand
V,
which is partially protected from methylation. This result is consistent with
the proposed hydrogen bonding scheme shown in Figure
6
. By spanning the major groove, the 6-aminopyridinyl ring restricts access of dimethylsulfate to the N7 of G20.
Because methylation of G20 is not completely blocked, it is unlikely that the 6-amino group of
I(1)
hydrogen bonds to the N7 of G20.
Oligonucleotide
I(1)
preferentially forms a triplex with duplex targets containing a
C[middot]G
interruption, although less stable triplexes are also observed when other base
pairs are present at this position. This behavior is in contrast to that
observed when
N
4
-(3-acetamidopropyl)-2'-deoxycytidine is located at position
X
of oligomer
I
(
29
). In that case the oligomer interacts only with target
II[middot]III(Y[middot]Z)
, which contains a
C[middot]G
interruption, although the stability of this triplex is less than that of the
one formed by oligomer
I(1)
. The ability of
I(1)
to form triplexes with targets having different base pairs may be due in part
to stabilizing base stacking interactions between the aromatic pyridinyl ring
and neighboring bases of the oligomer when it forms a triplex. Such stacking
interactions are unlikely to occur in oligomers which contain
N
4
-(3-acetamidopropyl)deoxycytidine. The ability to stack and the
potential for
1
to exist in multiple tautomeric forms may account for the reduced sequence
specificity of
1
versus
N
4
-(3-acetamidopropyl)deoxycytidine.
Our results show that
N
4
-(6-amino-2-pyridinyl)deoxycytidine may be used to address single
C[middot]G
interruptions of a homopurine tract in duplex DNA targets. Nucleoside
derivatives of this type may thus be used to extend the range of sequences
recognized by triplex-forming oligonucleotides. This ability may prove useful in the design of
novel antigene oligonucleotides.
The authors wish to thank Ms Sarah Kipp for help in synthesizing the
oligonucleotides, Dr Tina L.Trapane for help in obtaining the circular
dichroism spectra and Dr David Shortle for use of the circular dichroism spectropolarimeter. This research was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (GM45012). NMR studies were
performed in the Biochemistry NMR Facility at the Johns Hopkins University,
which was established by a grant from the National Institutes of Health
(GM27512) and a Biomedical Shared Instrumentation Grant (RR06262). C-YH was a GENTA Inc. post-doctoral fellow in the Department of Biochemistry.
+
Present address: Chiron Inc., 4560 Houton Street, Emeryville, CA 94608, USA




REFERENCES
Return


