Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (38K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beld, M
Right arrow Articles by Boom, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Beld, M
Right arrow Articles by Boom, R
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 Oxford University Press 2618-2619

Footnote

Fractionation of nucleic acids into single-stranded and double-stranded forms

Fractionation of nucleic acids into single-stranded and double-stranded forms Marcel Beld , Cees Sol , Jaap Goudsmit and René Boom *

Department of Human Retrovirology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 15, 1105 AZ Amsterdam , The Netherlands

Received March 11, 1996; Revised and Accepted May 15, 1996

We describe a rapid and efficient procedure for the fractionation of mixtures of nucleic acids (NA) into double-stranded (ds) and single-stranded (ss) forms regardless of the nature of the nucleic acid (DNA or RNA). The procedure is based on the differential binding of ds- and ss-NA forms to silica particles in different lysis/binding buffers which have in common that they contain a high concentration of the chaotropic agent guanidinium thiocyanate (GuSCN).

Previously we reported on a procedure (protocol Y) for the routine purification of total NA from clinical specimens ( 1 ). The method is based on the lysing and nuclease-inactivating properties of the chaotropic agent GuSCN together with the NA-binding properties of silica particles (or diatoms) in the presence of this agent. Comparison of different GuSCN-containing lysis/binding buffers with respect to the binding of different NA-types to silica particles revealed that only ds-forms were bound when using lysis/binding buffer L11 (see below) whereas both ds- and ss-forms were bound in lysis/binding buffer L6 ( 1 ). This observation formed the basis for the development of a procedure (protocol R) for the fractionation of mixtures of ss- and ds-NA. The procedure is summarised in Figure 1 . A 50 [mu]l specimen (containing a mixture of NA-types in TE buffer) was added to a mixture of 900 [mu]l lysis/binding buffer L11 and 40 [mu]l size-fractionated silica particles (SC) in an Eppendorf tube and subsequently homogenized by vortexing. After a 10 min binding step at room temperature, the tube was centrifuged (2 min at ~12 000 g ) which resulted in a silica/ds-NA pellet (`initial silica pellet') and a supernatant containing ss-NA. To recover ss-NA forms (protocol R-sup) 900 [mu]l of the supernatant were added to a mixture of 400 [mu]l binding buffer L10 (see below) and 40 [mu]l SC. Thereafter the ss-NA was bound during a 10 min binding step at room temperature. The tube was subsequently centrifuged (15 s at ~12 000 g ), and the supernatant discarded (by suction). The resulting pellet was subsequently washed twice with 1 ml of washing buffer L2 ( 1 ), twice with 1 ml ethanol 70% (vol/vol) and once with 1 ml acetone. The silica pellet was dried (10 min at 56oC with open lid in an Eppendorf heating block) and eluted (10 min at 56oC; closed lid) in 50 [mu]l TE buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0). After centrifugation (2 min at ~12 000 g ) the supernatant contained the ss-NA fraction. To recover ds-NA forms (protocol R-pellet) from the initial silica-pellet, the remaining supernatant was discarded, and the silica pellet was washed twice with 1 ml lysis/binding buffer L11 to remove unbound ss-NA. The resulting silica pellet was subsequently washed twice with washing buffer L2, twice with ethanol 70%, once with acetone, dried and eluted as described for protocol R-sup. After centrifugation (2 min at ~12 000 g ) the supernatant contained the ds-NA fraction.


Figure 1 . Outline of protocol R. Recovery of ds-NA takes place from the initial pellet (R-pellet), recovery of ss-NA takes place from the initial supernatant (R-sup). L11, L10, L6 and L2 are GuSCN containing buffers; SC is silica particle suspension. For details see text.

Lysis/binding buffer L11 was made by dissolving 120 g of GuSCN (Fluka) in 100 ml 0.2 M EDTA (Merck), pH 8.0. Dissolution of the GuSCN was facilitated by heating in a 60oC water bath under continuous shaking. Binding buffer L10 was prepared by dissolving 120 g GuSCN in 100 ml 0.35 M Tris-HCl (Boehringer), pH 6.4. Dissolution of GuSCN was facilitated by heating in a 60oC water bath under continuous shaking. Subsequently 22 ml 0.2 M EDTA (pH 8.0) and 9.1 g Triton X-100 (Packard) were added and the solution was homogenized. Finally 11 g of solid MgCl 2 .6H 2 O (Merck) was added and the resulting solution was homogenized. Buffer L6 and washing buffer L2 (both containing GuSCN) and size-fractionated silica particles (SC) were prepared as described ( 1 ).

To illustrate the fractionation of ds-DNA and ss-DNA, a mixture of ds-DNA and ss-DNA was subjected to fractionation (in duplicate) by protocol R (Fig. 2 A). This experiment showed that the fractionation of a mixture containing ds-DNA and ss-DNA into ds-DNA (R-pellet) and ss-DNA (R-sup) was complete at the level of detection by UV-illumination.


Figure 2 . Fractionation of NA by protocol R. (A ) Fractionation of ds-DNA and ss-DNA. NA was purified (in duplicate) by protocol R from a mixture of 1 [mu]g ds-DNA (molecular weight marker Vlll, Boehringer) and 1 [mu]g ss-DNA (phage M13 DNA, Boehringer). Half (25 [mu]l) of the eluate was electrophoresed (3) through a 1.8% agarose gel (containing ethidium bromide) which was subsequently photographed (Polaroid) under UV-illumination. Lane 1, 100% recovery marker for ds-DNA fragments (500 ng); lane 2, 100% recovery marker ss-DNA (500 ng); lane 3, 100% recovery marker mixture ds-DNA/ss-DNA. Lanes 4 and 5, output protocol R-pellet; lanes 6 and 7, output protocol R-sup. Molecular weight marker VIII ds-DNA fragments 1114, 500 and 110 (bp) and phage M 13 ss-DNA are indicated. ( B ) Fractionation of ds-RNA and ss-RNA. NA was purified (in duplicate) by protocol R from a mixture of ds-RNA (Rotavirus ds-RNA, previously purified from faeces of an infected individual) and 800 ng ss-RNA (phage MS2 RNA, Boehringer). Half (25 [mu]l) of the eluate was electrophoresed through a 1% agarose gel (containing ethidium bromide) which was subsequently photographed under UV-illumination. Lane 1, 100% recovery marker for ds-RNA segments; lane 2, 100% recovery marker ss-RNA (400 ng); lane 3, 100% recovery marker ds RNA/ss-RNA mixture. Lanes 4 and 5, output protocol R-pellet; lanes 6 and 7, output protocol R-sup. The ds-RNA segments (segments 2 and 3, and segments 7, 8 and 9 comigrate) and MS2 ss-RNA are indicated. Asterisk indicates low molecular weight NA, presumably breakdown products of DNA and RNA present in the faeces specimen used for isolation of Rotavirus ds-RNA.

For fractionation of a mixture of ds-RNA and ss-RNA into ds-forms and ss-forms, we used a mixture containing rotavirus ds-RNA [the human Rotavirus genome consists of 11 ds-RNA segments; for a review see ( 2 )] previously purified from faeces of an infected individual by protocol Y ( 1 ) and phage MS2 ss-RNA as input material for protocol R. The data (Fig. 2 B) show complete fractionation of the ds-RNA/ss-RNA mixture into ds-forms (R-pellet) and ss-forms (R-sup) at the level of detection by UV-illumination.

Double-stranded DNA could also be efficiently separated from ss-RNA (phage MS2 ss-RNA) by protocol R; similar results were obtained when Escherichia coli rRNA (23S and 16S) was used as ss-RNA input (data not shown). The detection limit of the system used (UV-illumination of ethidium bromide stained gels) was ~5 ng for ds-DNA fragments. In order to estimate the amount of ds-DNA still present in the ss-NA fraction, we performed Southern blotting with a homologous 32 P-labelled probe, for detection. This experiment showed that the ss-RNA fraction contained <0.1% of the ds-DNA present in the starting mixture (data not shown). When the separation of high molecular-weight genomic ds-DNA and ss-RNA was examined by direct fractionation using E.coli bacteria as input for protocol R, it appeared that the ds-DNA fraction was contaminated with rRNA and ss-RNA recovery was low (data not shown). This was presumably due to trapping of ss-NA by high molecular weight genomic DNA during binding of ds-NA to the silica particles. This phenomenon could be circumvented by first isolating total NA by protocol Y/D ( 1 ) which uses diatoms rather than silica particles for NA binding. Genomic DNA thus purified is sheared to an estimated mean size of ~40 kb ( 1 ) and trapping of ss-RNA into the ds-DNA fraction was significantly reduced when total NA purified from E.coli bacteria was used as input material for fractionation by protocol R (data not shown).

We have shown that mixtures of ds- and ss-NA forms can be efficiently separated into ss- and ds-fractions, regardless of the nature of the nucleic acid (DNA or RNA), in the described 1 h procedure (protocol R). It was also seen that DNA/RNA hybrids behaved like ds-NA (data not shown). The mechanism of differential binding is not understood. In our experiments recoveries of ss- and ds-NA exceeded 50%, and the ss-NA fraction contained <0.1% of ds-DNA present in the starting mixture. NA purified by protocol R has appeared to be a good substrate in RT-PCR experiments (data not shown). The procedure may have wide applications in the separation of ss-NA probes from ds-NA hybrids or in the separation of in vitro synthesized ss-RNA transcripts from ds-DNA templates.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Ans van Strien for the utmost care in the preparation of buffers and Wim van Est and Eelco Roos for the artwork.

REFERENCES

1 Boom,R., Sol,C.J.A., Salimans,M.M.M., Wertheim van Dillen,P.M.E. and van der Noordaa,J. (1990) J. Clin. Microbiol., 28, 495-503.

2 Holmes,I.H. (1988) In Lenette,E.H, Halonen,P. and Murphy,F.A., Laboratory Diagnosis of Infectious Diseases, vol. II. Springer Verlag, New York Inc., pp. 384-413.

3 Aaij,C. and Borst,P. (1972) Biochim. Biophys. Acta., 269, 192-200.


Return

* To whom correspondence should be addressed
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
R. A. Rashid, T. A. Tabata, M. J. Oatley, T. E. Besser, P. I. Tarr, and S. L. Moseley
Expression of Putative Virulence Factors of Escherichia coli O157:H7 Differs in Bovine and Human Infections
Infect. Immun., July 1, 2006; 74(7): 4142 - 4148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
S. G. Bavykin, J. P. Akowski, V. M. Zakhariev, V. E. Barsky, A. N. Perov, and A. D. Mirzabekov
Portable System for Microbial Sample Preparation and Oligonucleotide Microarray Analysis
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., February 1, 2001; 67(2): 922 - 928.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (38K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beld, M
Right arrow Articles by Boom, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Beld, M
Right arrow Articles by Boom, R
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?