Phosphorus 31 solid state NMR characterization of oligonucleotides covalently
bound to a solid support
Phosphorus 31 solid state NMR characterization of oligonucleotides covalently bound to a solid support
P. M.
Macdonald*
,
M. J.
Damha
1
,
K.
Ganeshan
,
R.
Braich
1
and
S. V.
Zabarylo
Department of Chemistry and Erindale College, University of Toronto,
Toronto
, Ontario M5S 1A2,
Canada
and
1
Department of Chemistry, McGill University,
Montreal
, Quebec H3A 2K6,
Canada
Received June 3, 1996;
Accepted June 22, 1996
ABSTRACT
31P cross polarization (CP) magic angle spinning (MAS) nuclear magnetic
resonance (NMR) spectra were acquired for various linear and branched di- and tri-nucleotides attached to a controlled pore glass (CPG) solid support. The technique readily distinguishes the oxidation
state of the phosphorus atom (phosphate versus phosphite), the presence or
absence of a protecting group attached directly to phosphorus (cyanoethyl), and other large changes in the phosphorus chemistry (phosphate versus
phosphorothioate). However, differences in configurational details remote from
the phosphorus atom, such as the attachment position of the ribose sugar (2'5'
versus 3'5'), or the particulars of the nucleotide bases (adenine versus uridine versus thymine), could not be resolved. When different stages of
the oligonucleotide synthetic cycle were examined,
31
P CPMAS NMR revealed that the cyanoethyl protecting group is removed during the
course of chain assembly.
INTRODUCTION
Solid-phase synthesis has become the method of choice for producing
oligonucleotides of defined sequence (
1
,
2
). The most popular solid-phase supports consist of long-chain alkylamine-modified controlled-pore glass (CPG) (
3
,
4
) and highly crossed-linked polystyrene (
5
). In the case of CPG, the long-chain alkyl spacer renders the terminal nucleoside highly accessible to
coupling reagents while the pore size favours the synthesis of very long DNA
and RNA oligomers (
6
). A typical synthesis involves successive rounds of coupling of an activated protected nucleoside precursor to the terminal pentose of the growing oligonucleotide, followed by capping of non-coupled sites and oxidation of phosphite triester linkages in preparation for the next round of coupling (
1
). When the nascent oligonucleotide has been completely assembled, it is deprotected and cleaved from the solid support.
It is undoubtedly true that such synthetic strategies as described above have
been enormously successful, and that their commercialization has placed
oligonucleotide synthesis within the reach of the non-specialist. Multiple gram solid-phase synthesis of DNA and RNA and analogs for therapeutic-based investigations (
7
), and for X-ray crystallography, NMR and other physical studies, has recently become a
reality (
8
,
9
). It is equally true that, because the chemistry involved in the individual
steps is difficult to study
in situ
, the ultimate success for any particular oligonucleotide sequence can only be
determined upon its release from the solid support. Perhaps the most common means for monitoring synthesis efficiency is spectroscopic quantification of trityl cations released
during chain elongation. The major limitation of this technique is that, other
than 5'-detritylation, it does not provide any information about
structural/chemical modifications occurring at other positions in the
oligonucleotide chain.
Solid state NMR spectroscopy affords the capability of characterizing chemical
structure, conformation and dynamics in solid-phase supported syntheses. It has been used, for instance, to analyze
surface modifications of silica particles in a variety of situations (
10
,
11
). In this report we describe the first cross-polarization (CP) magic angle spinning (MAS) phosphorus-31 (
31
P) NMR investigations of oligonucleotides covalently bound to a solid support.
31
P was chosen as the nucleus of interest because, first, it is 100% naturally
abundant and has good sensitivity in the NMR experiment, so that no isotopic
enrichment is necessary. Second, since many of the chemical manipulations
performed during the course of a typical solid phase oligonucleotide synthesis
result in changes directly affecting the phosphorus atom, the
31
P NMR spectrum should provide a sensitive monitor of the course of the
synthesis. In this study we explore the capabilities and limitations of
31
P CPMAS NMR for reporting on the detailed chemistry of the phosphorus atom in
oligonucleotides bound to controlled-pore glass, and for resolving different oligonucleotide structural motifs.
EXPERIMENTAL
Synthetic procedures
Synthesis of ApU
1a
and
1b
. Dinucleoside monophosphate ApU
1a
, shown in Figure
1
A, was synthesized by the phosphodichloridite procedure (
12
,
13
). To a cold solution (0oC) of 2,4,6-collidine (3.63 mmol, 490 [mu]l) in dry THF (0.8 ml) was added 2-cyanoethylphosphodichloridite (CNEOPCl
2
, 0.55 mmol, 68 [mu]l). A THF solution of
N
6
-benzoyl-5'-
O
-monomethoxytrityl-2'-
O
-
t
-butyldimethylsilyladenosine (0.50 mmol, 379 mg, 1.2 ml THF) was added
dropwise over a period of 15 min. After 30 min of stirring at room temperature, a THF solution of 2',3'-
O
-di-
t
-butyldimethylsilyluridine (0.40 mmol, 189 mg, 1.5 ml THF) was added and the reaction
mixture stirred for 1 h at room temperature. Finally, a solution of iodine (0.1
M) in THF/water (3:1.5; without any pyridine) was added to oxidize the phosphite triester intermediate. After 5 min, the reaction mixture was dissolved in chloroform (50 ml) and washed
with 5% sodium bisulfite aqueous solution (5 ml). The organic phase was washed with water (3 * 50 ml) to remove collidine, dried (anhydrous sodium sulfate), filtered
and concentrated. The crude product was purified on a silica gel column by
elution with ethyl acetate/chloroform, gradient 25-50% ethyl acetate. The pure product ApU
1a
was obtained in 84% yield (454 mg). ApU
1a
was stirred with triethylamine/acetonitrile (4:6 v/v) for 90 min at room temperature to afford, after evaporation under reduced pressure, ApU
1b
(the reaction was monitored by tlc which indicated quantitative conversion of
1a
into the more polar product
1b
) (
14
).
Synthesis of ApU
2
, ApUpU
3
and branched A(pU)pU
4
attached to CPG
. The structures of
2
,
3
and
4
are illustrated in Figure
1
A. The required 5'-MMT-3'-silylated uridine-CPG support was prepared as previously
described (
15
). Syntheses of linear and branched oligomers were conducted via the silyl-phosphoramidite method as described (
16
,
17
). Ancillary reagents for automated synthesis (Applied Biosystem DNA
synthesizer, Model 381A) were prepared as follows: (a) coupling reagent: 0.5 M solution of tetrazole in acetonitrile; (b) capping: cap A, 10% acetic anhydride/10% 2,6-lutidine/THF and cap B, 16%
N
-methylimidazole/THF; (c) oxidation: 0.1 M iodine in THF/pyridine/water (75:20:2 v/v/v); de-methoxytritylation: 5% trichloroacetic acid/ dichloromethane.
Syntheses were conducted on a 1 [mu]mol scale and repeated (4*) to obtain ~150 mg of each solid support (total: 4 [mu]mol of bound oligomer). Average coupling efficiencies of
ribo-U and ribo-A3'- amidites were circa 98.3% and 95.1%, respectively.
Coupling of ribo-A2',3'-bisphosphoramidite solution (0.03 M) onto CPG-ribo-U (30 [mu]mol/g) yielded ~70% of the expected branched
trinucleoside diphosphate A(pU)pU,
4
(
18
). A small portion of each support was deprotected (
16
,
17
) and analyzed by HPLC and gel electrophoresis (UV shadowing) to confirm the
efficiency of synthesis and the purity (~90% in each case) (HPLC conditions: reverse-phase Whatman Partisil ODS-2 column; solvent A: 20 mM KH
2
PO
4
, with a linear gradient 0-50% solvent B: methanol, over 25 min, 1.5 ml/min flow, room temperature).
Synthesis of TpoTpoT
5
, TpsTpoT
6
and TpsTpsT
7
attached to CPG.
These oligomers, the structures of which are illustrated in Figure
1
B, were synthesized on an Applied Biosystem DNA synthesizer (Model 381A) via the
phosphoramidite method (see above). Coupling yields were 96-98% (trityl assay method). For the preparation of TpsTpsT, the
sulfurizing reagent tetraethylthiuram disulfide (TETD) (
19
), obtained from Applied Biosystems, was used in place of the iodine oxidizing
reagent. The CPG beads were allowed to react with TEDT for 10 min at room
temperature and then washed extensively with acetonitrile. In the case of
TpsTpoT, the iodine solution was replaced by TETD reagent after the
introduction of the first internucleotide (`po') linkage. Four micromoles (~150 mg) of oligomer-bound CPG were obtained in each case for
31
P NMR analysis. HPLC and gel electrophoresis of the products cleaved from the support showed that, as expected, the deprotected, crude phosphorothioate samples were composed of a mixture of
diastereomers, of ~90% purity.
Synthesis of TpoT
8
via t-butyl hydroperoxide oxidation.
TpoT-CPG cyanoethylphosphite triester was prepared by coupling DMT-T cyanoethylphosphoramidite reagent/tetrazole in acetonitrile to T-CPG (5 * 1 [mu]mol). The solid support was then capped with acetic
anhydride/2,6-lutidine/
N
-Me imidazole/THF (5 min, room temperature). A solution containing
t
-butyl hydroperoxide (0.5 M, 6 ml) was drawn into a synthesis column containing TpT-CPG (5 [mu]mol) phosphite triester (
20
). After 3 min the solution was expelled and the solid washed with
dichloromethane followed by ether, and dried under vacuum. A small portion of
the support was detritylated to determine the extent of coupling (~100%).
NMR spectroscopy
Solid state NMR spectra were acquired using a Chemagnetics CMX300 spectrometer equipped with a Chemagnetics MAS probe doubly tuned to the resonance frequencies of phosphorus-31 (121.25 MHz) and hydrogen-1 (299.53 MHz). Samples consisting of 100-125 mg of controlled-pore glass bearing 4-5 [mu]mol oligomer were spun in a 7.5 mm o.d.
zirconium rotor at a spinning rate of 6000 Hz. A single contact cross
polarization technique was employed using a contact time of 2 ms with proton
decoupling during the acquisition period. The proton radio field strength was
50 000 Hz. The magic angle was set using the resonance signal from zinc(II)
bis(
O
,
O
'-diethyldithiophosphate) (
21
). Spectra were acquired using a sweep width of 100 kHz, a data size of 2 kHz, and a recycle delay of 2 s. Adequate signal-to-noise was generally achieved upon averaging ~32 000 transients (~18 h acquisition time). All chemical shifts were referenced to external 85%
H
3
PO
4
.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Solid state
31
P NMR of free oligonucleotides
Before we describe the results of
31
P CPMAS NMR studies of nucleotides bound to CPG, it is informative to examine
the spectra of similar compounds free of CPG, but likewise in the solid state.
Since large quantities of such nucleotides are readily available, the spinning
rotor of the MAS probe may be filled to contain upwards of a millimole of
phosphorus, provided no CPG is present. Such compounds serve, therefore, the
dual functions of acting as convenient references for the optimization of cross-polarization and signal acquisition conditions, and providing a perspective on the
31
P NMR spectra of nucleotides bound to CPG. The cross-polarization contact time (2 ms) and the relaxation delay (2 s) used throughout these measurements were chosen by optimizing
such spectra.
Figure
2
shows cross-polarization
31
P NMR spectra of a dry powder of the dinucleotides ApU
1a
and ApU
1b
acquired under both static and MAS conditions. In this instance the 3' position of the ribose sugar of adenosine is linked via a phosphate
bridge to the 5' position of the ribose sugar of uridine. Results are shown for the
phosphate with (
1a
) and without (
1b
) its cyanoethyl (CNE) protecting group. During the course of a solid-phase oligonucleotide synthesis, the CNE-protecting group blocks the non-bridging phosphate oxygen from undergoing chemical
modification, and is removed just prior to the release of the completed
oligonucleotide from the solid support.
Solid state
31
P NMR of oligonucleotides bound to CPG
When attempting to observe the
31
P NMR spectrum of short oligonucleotides bound to CPG, the bulk of the sample
volume consists of the solid-phase support itself. Consequently, the maximum phosphorus content of any
one sample is only 5 [mu]mol for a monophosphate dinucleoside, and MAS becomes an absolute necessity for
obtaining reasonable signal-to-noise spectra in reasonable lengths of time. Figure
3
shows representative
31
P CPMAS NMR spectra of selected di- and tri-nucleotides bound to CPG, after removal of the 5'-trityl protecting group. The top spectrum was obtained
with the dinucleotide ApU
2
. As with compound
1a
, the internucleotide linkage is 3'-5', but the 2' position of the uridine ribose sugar is now linked
via a long-chain alkylamine spacer to the surface of the CPG support (Fig.
1
). The middle and bottom spectra in Figure
3
were obtained with the linear trinucleoside diphosphate (`trinucleotide') ApUpU
3
and the branched `trinucleotide' A(2'pU)3'pU
4
, respectively, both attached to CPG via a long-chain alkylamine linkage to the 2' position of the ribose ring of uridine. In the linear
trinucleotide, both phosphodiesters are involved in 3'-5' links to the adjoining ribose sugars. In the branched
trinucleotide, one phosphate bridge links the 3' position of the adenosine ribose ring to the 5' position of the CPG-attached uridine ribose ring, while another links the 2' position of the adenosine ribose to the 5' position of a second uridine ribose (see Fig.
1
for structural details).
Concerning removal of the CNE-protecting group
The
31
P CPMAS results obtained here indicate that this technique is particularly
sensitive to the presence or absence of the CNE-protecting group. For phosphate phosphorus, removal of the CNE-protecting group produces a large increase in the spectral asymmetry
parameter [eta], but only small changes in the isotropic chemical shift. For
phosphorothioate phosphorus, removal of the CNE-protecting group produces a relatively small increase in the value of [eta], but a large upfield shift in the isotropic chemical shift. The
results suggest further that removal of CNE-protecting groups can occur during the course of oligonucleotide synthesis
prior to their deliberate removal. This is somewhat surprising since it has
generally been assumed that oligomers prepared on CPG supports retain CNE-protecting groups prior to deprotection with a base (usually concentrated
aqueous ammonia). In principle, CNE groups can be removed in the course of the
capping reaction, or subsequent to capping during the iodine/pyridine/water
oxidation reaction (
31
). We conducted model experiments in solution which show that ApU phosphate-triester (
1a
) is stable to the oxidizing iodine/pyridine/water reagent (24 h) and to the capping acetic anhydride/
N
-methylimidazole solution (30 min) under conditions used in the solid-phase synthesis. Also, a sample of TpU at the phosphite triester
stage was stable, in solution, to the capping reagent as judged by liquid state
31
P NMR ([delta] 140.1 and 140.3 p.p.m., CDCl
3
). Addition of iodine/pyridine/water to this sample produced a TpU phosphate triester, demonstrating that, when free in solution, a
nucleoside cyanoethyl phosphite or phosphate triester is resistant to the
reagents present in the capping or oxidation solutions. This suggests that some
surface property of the support itself contributes to the removal of CNE
groups.
Letsinger and co-workers (
20
) observed that partial loss of a P-O methyl protecting group occurred during iodine oxidation of an
oligonucleotide phosphite bond to CPG, and that the loss of the protecting
group could be avoided by substituting tertiary butyl peroxide (
t
-BuOOH) as the oxidizing agent. We tested whether this strategy could be
employed to avoid removal of the CNE-protecting group in our syntheses by comparing the
31
P CPMAS NMR spectra for TpT bound to CPG
8
for the case of iodine versus
t
-BuOOH oxidation. The results of the spectral analysis are shown in Table
1
and they indicate that the CNE-protecting group is lost during the course of the solid phase synthesis
regardless of the method of oxidation. Again, this suggests that some property
of the CPG surface environment encourages removal of the CNE-protecting group. Further investigations of these effects are clearly
warranted. It would be interesting to monitor the
13
C CPMAS NMR spectrum of
13
C-labelled cyanoethyl versus methyl protecting groups to directly observe
the point at which they are removed, rather than indirectly through
31
P NMR.
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
Solid-state CPMAS
31
P NMR spectroscopy of oligonucleotides attached to a solid-phase support provides specific information on the chemistry of the
phosphorus atom located within the oligonucleotide backbone. The phosphorus oxidation state is readily differentiated, but the detailed configuration of the phosphorus-sugar linkages (2'5' versus 3'5') are beyond the present limits of resolution. Other large
changes in the phosphorus chemistry, such as removal of the CNE-protecting group during chain assembly, or replacement of a phosphate with
a phosphorothioate moiety, are readily accessible to characterization. It seems likely that, in the future, one will be able to employ CPMAS
31
P NMR to monitor individual steps during a solid phase oligonucleotide synthetic
cycle
in situ,
and to assess the efficiency of sulfuration, and other modifications at
phosphorus, such as those that are relevant in therapeutic (antisense)
applications [for a recent review see (
32
)].
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was supported by operating grants from the National Science and
Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada to PMM and MJD.
2 Caruthers,M.H. (1987) In Narang,S. (ed.), Synthesis and Applications of DNA and RNA. Academic Press, Orlando, FL, USA, 20, 47-94.
3 Atkinson,T. and Smith,M. (1984) Oligonucleotide Synthesis: A Practical Approach. IRL Press, Oxford, pp. 35-81.
4 Pon,R.T. (1993) In Agrawal,S. (ed.), Methods in Molecular Biology-Protocols for Oligonucleotides and Analogs. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, USA, 20, 81-114.
5 McCollum,C. and Andrus,A. (1991) Tetrahedron Lett., 48, 4069-4072.
6 Adams,S.P., Kavka,K.S., Wykes,E.J., Holder,S.B. and Gallupi,G.R. (1983) J. Am. Chem. Soc., 105, 661-663.
7 Crooke,S., Lebleu,B. (eds) (1993) Antisense Research and Applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
8 Sproat,B., Colonna,F., Mullah,B., Tsou,D. andrus,A., Hampel,A. and Vinayak, R. (1995) Nucleosides Nucleotides, 14, 255-273.
9 Sinha,N.D. and Fry,S. (1994) In Sanghvi,Y.S. and Cook,D.P. (eds) Carbohydrate Modifications in Antisense Research. ACS Symposium Series, 580, 184-198.
10 Caravajal,G.S., Leyden,D.E., Quinting,G.R. and Maciel,G.E. (1988) Anal. Chem.,60, 1776-1786.
11 Kallury,K.R., Macdonald,P.M. and Thompson,M. (1994) Langmuir, 10, 492-499.
12 Letsinger,R.L. and Lunsford,W.B. (1976) J. Am. Chem. Soc., 98, 3655-3661.MEDLINE Abstract
16 Usman,N., Ogilvie,K.K., Jiang,M.-Y. and Cedergren,R.J. (1987) J. Am. Chem. Soc., 109, 7845-7854.
17 Damha,M.J. and Ogilvie,K.K. (1993) In Agrawal,S. (ed.) Methods in Molecular Biology-Protocols for Oligonucleotides and Analogs. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, USA, 20, 81-114.