Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (83K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chrast-Balz, J
Right arrow Articles by Hooft van Huijsduijnen, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chrast-Balz, J
Right arrow Articles by Hooft van Huijsduijnen, R
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 Oxford University Press 2900-2904

Footnote

Bi-directional gene switching with the tetracycline repressor and a novel tetracycline antagonist

Bi-directional gene switching with the tetracycline repressor and a novel tetracycline antagonist Jacqueline Chrast-Balz and Rob Hooft van Huijsduijnen*

Geneva Biomedical Research Institute, 14, Chemin des Aulx, Case Postale 674, 1228 Plan-les-Ouates, Geneva , Switzerland

Received May 17, 1996; Revised and Accepted June 20, 1996

ABSTRACT

We have screened a panel of tetracycline (tc)-like compounds for their potential use with tc-repressor (tetR) based gene switches. The interaction between tc and tetR appears quite specific, as only tc itself and its close homologues anhydro-tc and doxycycline strongly inhibited DNA binding. However, a single tc-like compound, GR33076X, increased DNA binding of the tetR-VP16 fusion protein, both in eukaryotic cells and in bacteria. We provide evidence that this antagonist of tetracycline is potentially useful for accelerated gene switching, especially in whole animals.

INTRODUCTION

One of the most powerful, regulatable gene switches that has been developed for eukaryotic cells is based on the Escherichia coli Tn10 tetracycline (tc) operon ( 1 - 3 ). Briefly, the system is based on a fusion protein (tTA) which contains the DNA-binding tc-repressor (tetR) and the C-terminal domain of the herpes simplex virus VP16 trans -activator. In absence of tc, tTA binds and trans- activates minimal promoters carrying multiple tet -operator sites. In the presence of tc, DNA binding does not occur and the gene of interest is silent. The utility of this system has been abundantly demonstrated in cell lines and in transgenic animals and plants ( 4 - 16 ). Recently, a mutant of tTA, rtTA was described that displays a `reversed' phenotype, i.e. it requires a tc analogue, doxycycline, for trans -activation, and has a silent default state ( 17 ).

The successful use of these regulatory systems for the production of recombinant protein, the study of gene function or in gene therapy protocols is partly dependent on the availability of pharmaceutical compounds tailored to specific applications of the switch. In particular, the long half-lives of tc (4-12 h) and doxycycline (12-24 h) are an obstruction to fast on/off switching in whole animals ( 18 , and our unpublished results). We therefore set out to explore the effect of a number of tc-like compounds on both the tTA and rtTA-mediated genetic switches.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Transformations and luciferase assays

HeLa cells were co-transfected in duplicate 3 cm wells with a 1:1 ratio of regulatable luciferase reporter pUHC13-3 ( 1 ) plus tTA expression vector pUHG15-1 ( 11 ), or a derivative of pUHG15-1 in which we had introduced the four point mutations of rtTA ( 17 ). A total of 1.25 [mu]g DNA was used per well, complexed with DOTAP (Boehringer Mannheim), according to the manufacturer's instructions. The tc-like compounds were added from a 0.25 mg/ml stock solution in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) along with the DNA, until harvesting 2 days later. Extracts were prepared as described ( 19 ), except that buffer without BSA was used. The protein concentration was determined ( 20 ), and samples containing 20 [mu]g protein were tested for luciferase activity ( 19 ) in microtiter plates (FluoroNunc ® , Nunc) using a MicroLumat LB96P luminometer (10 s delay after mixing with the substrate followed by 10 s counting).

Construction of the ptetA-GFP expression vector and fluorescence assay

The Tn10 tetA promoter plus first codons was PCR-amplified using oligonucleotides ATA GGT CTC ACC ACC GAA TGG CCA GAT GAT TAA TTC C and CAT TTT TTG CCC TCG TTA TCT AGA TTT TTG TCG AAC TAT TCA TTT CAC, with pASK85-D1.3 ( 21 ) as template. A modified green fluorescent protein (GFP) cDNA was amplified from pBAD-GFP/AC2 (Crameri, Whitehorn, Tate and Stemmer, submitted) using oligonucleotides AGA TAA CGA GGG CAA AAA ATG GCT AGC AAA GGA GAA GAA CT and ATA GGT CTC ACC ACG ACA AAA AAA ATG TCG CAC AAT GTG CGC CAT TTT TCA CGA ATT CAT TAT TTG TAG AGC TCA TCC ATG CC. This latter oligo includes the transcriptional stop site also used in pASK85-D1.3. Finally, these two overlapping PCR fragments were mixed and `ligated' in a PCR using the first and the last oligonucleotides mentioned above. The resulting gene was Bsa I digested and cloned into the pBK-CMV (Stratagene) Bsa I site. Bacteria carrying this construct are strongly UV fluorescent. Into this construct, tTA or rtTA cDNA was cloned as a Pst I- Not I fragment, PCR-amplified using oligonucleotides ATA CTG CAG GAT GTC TAG ATT AGA TAA AAG TAA AGT GAT TAA C and GGA GGA GCG GCC GCC CCC TAC CCA CCG TAC TC, and pUHG15-1 or the derivative carrying rtTA as template.

XL1-Blue bacteria (Stratagene) were transformed with the ptetA-GFP vector. Overnight cultures were diluted 400* in Luria Broth (LB) and grown overnight at 37oC in duplicate 200 [mu]l wells in a flat-bottom 96-well plate fitted in a microtiter plate shaker (Heidolph), in presence of kanamycin (30 [mu]g/ml), 1 mM IPTG and 1 [mu]g/ml of the tc-like compounds. The cultures were diluted 1000-fold (to ~10 6 c.f.u./ml) in filtered (40 nm pore size) LB and 10 5 particles were analysed by FACS.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Screening of tc-like compounds

A panel of tc-like compounds was composed (Fig. 1 ) to examine their activities in both types of tc-regulatable switches. HeLa cells were transiently transfected with a regulatable luciferase reporter plasmid plus a plasmid expressing either tTA or rtTA, in the presence or absence of compounds (50 or 500 ng/ml). In absence of compounds, tTA (Fig. 2 , black bars) induced high luciferase activity, whereas rtTA (white bars) showed low induction. In presence of 5a,6-anhydro-tc or doxycyclin, the situation was reversed. As shown previously ( 17 ) and confirmed in Figure 2 , tc itself is a good co-repressor of tTA, but a poor co-activator of rtTA. Repression of tTA appears specific in that only tc itself and its close homologues doxycyclin, anhydro-tc and compounds c, i, l and n gave good repression. Induction of rtTA followed sometimes (c) but not always (f, o) the reverse pattern seen for tTA. Surprisingly, one of the compounds, f, strongly increased rather than decreased tTA trans -activation.


Figure 1 . Structural formulae of tc (tetracycline)-like compounds used in this work.

Compound f, or GR33076X (Fig. 3 A), was further tested at lower concentrations. As Figure 3 B shows, GR33076X increased tTA activity up to 10-fold at 50 ng/ml, and its activity could be seen at concentrations as low as 0.5 ng/ml. Since a similarly increased trans -activation was also seen when tTA was transcribed from a different plasmid, and GR33076X had no effect on the reporter alone (data not shown), we hypothesize that this compound acts by increasing DNA binding of tTA. This property of GR33076X may be useful for the rapid induction of the tc switch in whole animals; by administering the compound at the same time when tc or anhydro-tc is withdrawn, the `turning point' where tTA starts binding DNA would be reached much sooner.

In order to test the latter point, we transformed cells in presence of both co-activator (GR33076X) and co-repressor (anhydro-tc) at different ratios, all at a total concentration of 0.5 [mu]g/ml total compound (Fig. 3 C). Comparison of these results with an activity curve for anhydro-tc alone (Fig. 3 D) indicates that GR33076X is a strong antagonist of anhydro-tc activity. In Figure 3 D, anhydro-tc gives strong inhibition at 0.5 and 5 ng/ml (also represented by stars in Fig. 3 C). As Figure 3 C shows, this inhibition is completely or partly reversed in the presence of GR33076X.


Figure 2 . Effect of various tc-like compounds on tTA and rtTA-mediated luciferase reporter gene induction in HeLa cells. Each compound was tested at 0.05 (left) and 0.5 (right) [mu]g/ml. The horizontal lines indicate the induction margins for the `standard' compounds.


Figure 3 . ( A ) Structural formulae of GR33076X/compound f and tc. Ring numbering in tc is as in Hinrichs et al . (1994) (34). ( B ) Concentration dependence of GR33076X-enhanced tTA trans -activation. HeLa cells were transformed in duplicate with luciferase reporter and tTA-expressing pUHG15-1, in presence of various concentrations of GR33076X. ( C ) tTA transactivation in presence of GR33076X/anhydro-tc mixtures. Cells were transfected in presence of GR33076X plus anhydro-tc at various ratios; the total concentration was always 0.5 [mu]g/ml. The stars indicate luciferase activities for anhydro-tc alone, at the same concentration as in the mixture for that point. ( D ) tTA activity curve for anhydro-tc.


Figure 4 . ( A ) Map of vector ptetA-GFP. The green fluorescent protein (GFP) cDNA is under the prokaryotic Tn10 tc-inducible promoter; (r)tTA is under the IPTG-inducible lac promoter. ( B ) Percentage fluorescent bacteria carrying ptetA-GFP without (r)tTA (`none'), with tTA or rtTA insert, grown in presence or absence of tc-like compounds.


Activity of GR33076X in bacteria

In order to obtain further insight into GR33076X's mode of action, the compound was also tested in bacteria. A vector was constructed carrying an improved green fluorescent protein (GFP) cDNA under the original tetA promoter, derived from Tn10. In addition, a tTA or rtTA cDNA was cloned into an expression cassette in this plasmid (Fig. 4 A). In bacteria harbouring the plasmid with the tTA cDNA insert, tTA binds the two tet operator sites in the tetA promoter. As VP16 does not transactivate transcription in bacteria, little GFP was expressed in absence of any tc-like compound (Fig. 4 B, tTA bars); however, addition of tc or anhydro-tc resulted in increased fluorescence. Conversely, addition of GR33076X significantly reduced the background fluorescence, by ~50%. The construct carrying rtTA showed the opposite effect with respect to anhydro-tc, namely, a reduction of fluorescence when this compound is present. Again, GR33076X reduced fluorescence, although its effect was relatively weaker than for the tTA-containing construct. Constructs lacking rtTA or tTA inserts (Fig. 4 B, `none') showed high fluorescence, that was not affected by the presence of tc-like compounds. The overall fluorescence levels of the (r)tTA-carrying constructs is well below that of the `empty' vector. This may be due to `leakiness' of the system, i.e. some binding of tetR may occur even in presence of tc-like compounds. Alternatively, overexpression of tTA may result in cell death; our FACS analysis cannot distinguish cell debris from true c.f.u.s.

The most straightforward explanation of our results, substantiated by their close structural similarity (Fig. 3 A), is that GR33076X is a true antagonist of tc and its close homologues and directly binds the tetR moiety in tTA, resulting in enhanced DNA-binding. The results in bacteria make a non-specific effect on eukaryotic transcription, or via VP16 unlikely. Another possibility is that GR33076X somehow increases the stability of tTA, perhaps by shielding it from proteolytic activity. A similar situation is encountered when transcription factors are protected from proteolysis by DNA binding (e.g . 22 ). Ligand binding may also stabilize dimerization or (in eukaryotes) nuclear uptake.

The tetR and a number of its mutants have been studied in considerable molecular detail, and the DNA- and tc-binding domains are well-known ( 23 - 33 ). Moreover, the 2.5 Å crystal structure of the [tetR D -tc-Mg] + complex has recently been elucidated ( 34 ). This complex has the same peptide folding as tetR B , which is the tetR variant used in tTA ( 34 ). Based on this structure it has been proposed that two strictly conserved His-residues (His 64 and His 100 ) are both involved in tetR binding of the [tc-Mg] + complex. As two out of the three oxygen atoms (at C 2 and C 11 ; Fig. 3 A) in tc that are involved in this interaction are also present in GR33076X, one may speculate that GR33076X binds the same tetR `pocket' as tc.

On the other hand it has been observed that none of the four point mutations in rtTA involve amino acids thought to be directly involved in tc-binding ( 17 ), and many of the point mutations that block anhydro-tc activation of the tetR turned out to be on the [alpha]6 helix, and not in the tc-pocket ( 34 ). These observations suggest that the `tetR-switch' involves amino acid residues that are not part of the tc pocket. It is therefore also possible that GR33076X directly interacts with these domains, instead of binding the tc pocket. The availability of tetR mutants and structure data may be helpful in distinguishing between these possibilities. Either way, and elaborating on the `see-saw' model for tetR conformation change upon its binding of the [tc-Mg] + complex ( 34 ), one may speculate that GR33076X somehow antagonizes the proposed displacement of the [alpha]1-3 DNA-binding helices and `locks' the tetR instead in its tc-free conformation with DNA-binding domains exposed. If non-tc-ligated tetR is normally in dynamic equilibrium between the two conformational states, this might explain how GR33076X enhances tTA-mediated gene activation.

GR33076X seems highly unique in its action; compound g (Fig. 1 ) is structurally very similar to it, yet it does not display the same activity. Recently, variants of the tc-switch have been devised in which tetR alone ( 35 - 37 ), or fused with the KRAB repressor domain from the human Krox-1 transcription factor ( 38 ) was used to inhibit various promoters in which tet operator sites had been inserted. Since all these systems are based on the wild-type tetR, we anticipate GR33076X to function in those as well.

We observed no cytotoxicity for GR33076X in HeLa cells at the concentrations and duration (3 d) tested. Also, GR33076X was not antibiotic for tc-sensitive bacteria at the highest concentration tested ( <= 12 [mu]g/ml; data not shown). On the basis of these results we believe that GR33076X will prove useful for the accelerated and enhanced gene switching with tetR based systems in both eukaryotes and bacteria.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr A. Jaxa-Chamiec for searching the Glaxo-Wellcome database and providing us with tc-like compounds, Dr J.-P. Aubry for the FACS analyses, Dr P. Stemmer for plasmid pBAD-GFP/AC2 and Dr A. Skerra for pASK85-D1.3.

REFERENCES

1 Gossen,M. and Bujard,H. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 89, 5547-5551. MEDLINE Abstract

2 Gossen,M., Bonin,A.L. and Bujard,H. (1993) Trends Biol. Sci., 18, 471-475.

3 Schmid,S.L. (1995) Trends Cell. Biol., 5, 267-268.

4 Efrat,S., Fusco DeMane,D., Lemberg,H., al Emran,O. and Wang,X. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 92, 3576-3580. MEDLINE Abstract

5 Damke,H., Baba,T., Warnock,D.E. and Schmid,S.L. (1994) J. Cell. Biol., 127, 915-934. MEDLINE Abstract

6 Fishman,G.I., Kaplan,M.L. and Buttrick,P.M. (1994) J. Clin. Invest., 93, 1864-1868. MEDLINE Abstract

7 van Meir,E.G., Polverini,P.J., Chazin,V.R., Su Huang,H.J., de Tribolet,N. and Cavenee,W.K. (1994) Nature Genet., 8, 171-176. MEDLINE Abstract

8 Weinmann,P., Gossen,M., Hillen,W., Bujard,H. and Gatz,C. (1994) Plant J., 5, 559-569. MEDLINE Abstract

9 Resnitzky,D., Hengst,L. and Reed,S.I. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol., 15, 4347-4352. MEDLINE Abstract

10 Pescini,R., Alouani,S., Proudfoot,A., Power,C., Mermod,J.-J., DeLamarter,J.F. and Hooft van Huijsduijnen,R. (1994) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm., 202, 1664-1667.

11 Ghersa,P., Whelan,J., Pescini,R., DeLamarter,J.F. and Hooft van Huijsduijnen,R. (1994) Gene, 151, 331-332. MEDLINE Abstract

12 Passman,R.S. and Fishman,G.I. (1994) J. Clin. Invest., 94, 2421-2425. MEDLINE Abstract

13 Wimmel,A., Lucibello,F.C., Sewing,A., Adolph,S. and Muller,R. (1994) Oncogene 9, 995-997. MEDLINE Abstract

14 Furth,P., St. Onge,L., Böger,H., Gruss,P., Gossen,M., Kistner,A., Bujard,H. and Hennighausen,L. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 91, 9302-9306. MEDLINE Abstract

15 Lang,Z. and Feingold,J.M. (1996) Gene, 168, 169-171. MEDLINE Abstract

16 Paulus,W., Baur,I., Boyce,F.M., Breakefield,X.O. and Reeves,S.A. (1996) J. Virol. 70, 62-67. MEDLINE Abstract

17 Gossen,M., Freundlieb,S., Bender,G., Muller,G., Hillen,W. and Bujard,H. (1995) Science 268, 1766-1769. MEDLINE Abstract

18 Grahame-Smith,D.G. and Aronson,J.K. (1992), Oxford Textbook of Clinical Pharmacology and Drug Therapy. Second Ed., Oxford University Press, London, pp. 26.

19 Lieber,A., Sandig,V., Sommer,W., Bähring,S. and Strauss,M. (1993) In Wu,R. (ed.), Recombinant DNA. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, USA, Vol. 217 part H, pp. 47-66.

20 Bradford,M. (1976) Anal. Biochem., 72, 248-254. MEDLINE Abstract

21 Skerra,A. (1994) Gene, 151, 131-135. MEDLINE Abstract

22 Hooft van Huijsduijnen,R.A.M., Bollekens,J., Dorn,A., Benoist,C. and Mathis,D. (1987) Nucleic Acids Res., 15, 7265-7282. MEDLINE Abstract

23 Altschmied,L., Baumeister,R., Pfleiderer,K. and Hillen,W. (1988) EMBO J., 7, 4011-4017. MEDLINE Abstract

24 Baumeister,R., Müller,G., Hecht,B. and Hillen,W. (1992) Proteins, 14, 168-177. MEDLINE Abstract

25 Baumeister,R., Helbl,V. and Hillen,W. (1992) J. Mol. Biol., 226, 1257-1270. MEDLINE Abstract

26 Berens,C., Altschmied,L. and Hillen,W. (1992) J. Biol. Chem., 267, 1945-1952. MEDLINE Abstract

27 Ettner,N., Metzger,J.W., Lederer,T., Hulmes,J.D., Kisker,C., Hinrichs,W., Ellestad,G.A. and Hillen,W. (1995) Biochemistry, 34, 22-31. MEDLINE Abstract

28 Hansen,D., Altschmied,L. and Hillen,W. (1987) J. Biol. Chem., 262, 14030-14035. MEDLINE Abstract

29 Lederer,T., Takahashi,M. and Hillen,W. (1995) Anal. Biochem., 232, 190-196.

30 Smith,L.D. and Bertrand,K.P. (1988) J. Mol. Biol. 203, 949-959. MEDLINE Abstract

31 Takahashi,M., Altschmied,L. and Hillen,W. (1986) J. Mol. Biol., 187, 341-348. MEDLINE Abstract

32 Wissmann,A., Wray,L.V.,Jr, Somaggio,U., Baumeister,R., Geissendörfer,M. and Hillen,W. (1991) Genetics, 128, 225-232. MEDLINE Abstract

33 Wissmann,A., Baumeister,R., Müller,G., Hecht,B., Helbl,V., Pfleiderer,K. and Hillen,W. (1991) EMBO J., 10, 4145-4152. MEDLINE Abstract

34 Hinrichs,W., Kisker,C., Duvel,M., Muller,A., Tovar,K., Hillen,W. and Saenger,W. (1994) Science, 264, 418-420. MEDLINE Abstract

35 Wirtz,E. and Clayton,C. (1995) Science, 268, 1179-1183. MEDLINE Abstract

36 Roder,F.T., Schmulling,T. and Gatz,C. (1994) Mol. Gen. Genet., 243, 32-38. MEDLINE Abstract

37 Gatz,C., Kaiser,A. and Wendenburg,R. (1991) Mol. Gen. Genet., 227, 229-237. MEDLINE Abstract

38 Deuschle,U., Meyer,W.K. and Thiesen,H.J. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol., 15, 1907-1914. MEDLINE Abstract


Return

* To whom correspondence should be addressed
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
J. Love, G. C. Allen, C. Gatz, and W. F. Thompson
Differential Top10 promoter regulation by six tetracycline analogues in plant cells
J. Exp. Bot., September 1, 2002; 53(376): 1871 - 1877.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
H.-J. Park and U. L. RajBhandary
Tetracycline-Regulated Suppression of Amber Codons in Mammalian Cells
Mol. Cell. Biol., August 1, 1998; 18(8): 4418 - 4425.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
B Bello, D Resendez-Perez, and W. Gehring
Spatial and temporal targeting of gene expression in Drosophila by means of a tetracycline-dependent transactivator system
Development, January 6, 1998; 125(12): 2193 - 2202.
[Abstract] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (83K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chrast-Balz, J
Right arrow Articles by Hooft van Huijsduijnen, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chrast-Balz, J
Right arrow Articles by Hooft van Huijsduijnen, R
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?