Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (82K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Calcagnile, A
Right arrow Articles by Dogliotti, E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Calcagnile, A
Right arrow Articles by Dogliotti, E
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1995 Oxford University Press 3005-3009

Footnote

Misincorporation rate and type on the leading and lagging strands of UV-damaged DNA

Misincorporation rate and type on the leading and lagging strands of UV-damaged DNA A. Calcagnile , T. Basic-Zaninovic + , F. Palombo w and E. Dogliotti*

Laboratory of Comparative Toxicology and Ecotoxicology, Istituto Superiore di Sanita', Roma , Italy

Received March 25, 1996; Revised and Accepted June 10, 1996

ABSTRACT

We have examined the fidelity of replication of the leading and lagging strands of UV-irradiated DNA by using an EBV-derived shuttle vector system which contains as marker gene for mutation analysis the bacterial gpt gene in both orientations relative to the EBV oriP. Human cells stably transformed with this vector were UV irradiated and gpt mutation rate and type were analysed. An increased mutagenicity associated with UV irradiation was observed, but the average error frequency was unaffected by the direction of replication of the target gene. Some variability by position and sequence context of leading and lagging strand errors was detected, suggesting that the different architecture of the replication complex for the two strands might, to some extent, affect mutation spectra. The comparable fidelity of translesion replication on the leading and lagging strands is in agreement with the current model for eukaryotic replication that postulates the simultaneous synthesis of both strands by a DNA polymerase with a proof-reading exonuclease.

INTRODUCTION

The irradiation of cells with UV produces lesions in their DNA which have been shown to transiently inhibit replication. The primary lesions produced are cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPD) and less frequent lesions are pyrimidine-pyrimidone (6-4) photoproducts (6-4 PP) (for a review see 1 ). Following UV irradiation of Escherichia coli cells, DNA replication is transiently arrested at DNA lesions. The arrest of DNA replication is followed by resumption of DNA synthesis past the blocking lesion. This gap-filling reaction of single-stranded DNA gaps present opposite UV lesions in the irradiated chromosome is mutagenic (for a review see 2 ). Several studies suggest that in eukaryotic cells pyrimidine dimers are also bypassed and that this bypass is mutagenic. CPD interfere with DNA replication in vitro , but the mammalian cell replication complex is capable of carrying out replication of UV-damaged templates and mutation fixation was observed opposite dipyrimidine sites ( 3 , 4 ). More recently, differential in vitro replication of a single cis , syn -thymine dimer in the leading or lagging strand was reported using human cell extracts ( 5 ), suggesting that uncoupling of concerted synthesis of the two strands might occur at lesion-blocked replication forks.

In this study we have addressed the question of whether the asymmetric nature of the replication complex might lead to differences in error rates for leading and lagging strand replication of UV-irradiated DNA. This same issue has been previously ( 6 ) investigated by using a cell-free SV40 origin-dependent replication mutagenesis assay. In this system human cell extracts replicate a SV40-derived plasmid in the presence of T antigen. In our study we have used an EBV-derived shuttle vector system stably maintained in human cells which contain as target gene for mutagenicity studies the gpt gene in both orientations relative to the EBV oriP. In this system cellular DNA polymerases replicate the plasmid molecules in synchrony with host cell DNA ( 7 ) and cellular proteins regulate DNA replication from EBV oriP ( 8 ).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plasmids and cell lines

The shuttle vector used in this study has been previously described ( 9 ). Briefly, pTF-EBV is a derivative of pF1-EBV ( 10 , 11 ) which contains as elements required for episomal replication in human cells EBV oriP and EBNA and as target for mutagenicity studies the bacterial gpt gene under the control of the inducible promoter of the mouse metallothionein I gene (MT-I). As a result of the construction scheme, in pTF-EBV the transcribed strand of the gpt gene is the leading strand, while in pF1-EBV it is the lagging strand (Fig. 1 A).


Figure 1 . ( A ) Scheme of the EBV-derived shuttle vectors used to investigate the effects of replication on mutagenesis. In the vector pF1-EBV the transcribed strand of the gpt gene is the lagging strand while in the vector pTF-EBV it is the leading strand. ( B ) UV-induced mutation frequency. Clonal 293 cell lines stably transformed with pTF-EBV (this study) or with pF1-EBV (12) shuttle vector were exposed to increasing UV doses and gpt - mutation frequency was estimated. Two independent experiments were performed for each cell line.

Clone 7, a human clonal cell line obtained by transfection of 293 cells with the vector pTF-EBV, was used for mutagenesis experiments. This cell line has been previously described ( 9 ). Briefly, clone 7 cells contain several copies of the EBV-derived shuttle vector in the episomic form and present a low gpt - mutation frequency (1.5 * 10 -5 ) and are therefore suitable for studies of induced mutagenesis. Moreover, the gpt gene carried by the shuttle vector is transcribed at basal level in clone 7 cells.

Cell treatment and analysis of mutant plasmid DNA

Exponentially growing cells were UV irradiated after removal of the growth medium. Cells were exposed to 7-21 J/m 2 UVC (15 W 15T8 low pressure mercury lamp) and immediately incubated in growth medium. After three to four cell doublings plasmid DNA was isolated by an alkaline extraction method as previously described ( 10 , 11 ). Plasmid DNA was transformed into E.coli strain DT2 ( gpt - , pur + ) by electroporation (BioRad electroporation system). Transformants were plated on minimal salt plates supplemented with ampicillin and 6-thioguanine (54 [mu]M final concentration) (MATG medium). Mutant gpt genes were amplified by PCR with Taq polymerase and a 5'-biotinylated primer. Sequencing reactions were performed on single-stranded DNA bound to magnetic beads (Dynabeads M280 Streptavidin).

RESULTS

UV-induced mutation frequency

Clone 7 cells were exposed to increasing UV doses and gpt - mutation frequency was analysed in pTF-EBV plasmid progeny. In this shuttle vector the transcribed strand of the gpt gene is the leading strand (Fig. 1 A). As shown in Figure 1 B, a dose-response curve was obtained with a 20-fold increase over background at the dose of 21 J/m 2 . Figure 1 B also displays the UV mutation frequency data previously obtained with the vector pF1-EBV ( 12 ), which contains the gpt gene in the inverted orientation (Fig. 1 A). The similarity between the two dose-response curves indicates that UV-induced mutation frequency is not significantly affected by the directionality of replication of the target gene.

Molecular analysis of UV-induced mutations


Figure 2 . Type of UV-induced base pair substitutions in the leading and lagging strands. The relative percentages of the different single base changes observed among the leading strand errors (transcribed strand of pTF-EBV) and the lagging strand errors (transcribed strand of pF1-EBV) are indicated.


Mutant selection and analysis was performed at the UV dose of 14 J/m 2 which induced a 10-fold increase in mutation frequency over background. At higher UV doses a drastic reduction in cell survival as well as in plasmid recovery was observed. The mutant plasmid population was quite heterogeneous in size. Both presumptive point mutations and deletions were recovered. The induction of deletions, which represented 30% of the mutant population, has been extensively described and discussed ( 12 ). DNA sequence analysis of UV-induced mutants was performed. As shown in Table 1 , of 37 presumptive point mutations, 31 were single base changes, three were double mutations and three were frameshift mutations. All single base changes except one (mutation at bp 189) were targeted at dipyrimidine sequences, as expected from premutagenic UV photoproducts. The majority of point mutations were GC -> AT transitions (70% of the total mutants analysed) and the remaining 30% were transversions localized at both GC and AT base pairs. Mutations were mainly targeted at the 3' C of the dimer site, in agreement with that reported in other mammalian UV spectra (for a review see 1 ). Mutation strand distribution presented a strong bias in favour of the transcribed DNA strand (T:NT 10:1). The distribution of mutable UV target sites over the two strands of the gpt gene is the most likely explanation for this phenomenon ( 12 ). A mutation hot spot (20% of the mutations analysed) was identified at base pair 418. This site has also been found to be highly mutated after treatment with alkylating agents ( 9 , 11 ), suggesting that the DNA structural features of this sequence might be the main determinant of its high mutation rate.

Mutation spectra of leading and lagging strand

In order to identify the potential contribution of fidelity of replication of the two strands to mutation spectra, the mutation pattern obtained with the vector pTF-EBV was compared with that previously obtained with the vector pF1-EBV. Since in both shuttle vectors the majority of mutations were localized on the transcribed strand, the type, site and sequence specificity of the single base changes detected on this strand were compared. Mutations detected on the transcribed strand of the vector pTF-EBV represent the errors made by the leading strand apparatus, while the mutations observed on the transcribed strand of the vector pF1-EBV are errors of the lagging strand apparatus.

Table 1 DNA sequence analysis of UV-induced mutations
Site

Sequence a

Base change

Amino acid

No. of

Dipyrimidine

Dimer

change

mutants

sites

location

3

AT G AGC

GC -> AT

Met -> Ile

2

T C

T

26

CCT G GGA

GC -> TA

Trp -> Leu

3

C C

T

27

CTG G GAC

GC -> AT

Trp -> Stop

1

C C,C C

T

42

GAT C CAT

GC -> TA

Ile -> Ile

1 A b

T C , C C

NT

52

CGT A AAC

AT -> TA

Lys -> Stop

1

T T

T

86

AAT G GAA

GC -> TA

Trp -> Leu

1

C C

T

86-87

AAT GG AAA

GC -> AT

Trp -> Leu

1

CC

T

GC -> AT

Trp -> Stop

87

ATG G AAA

GC -> AT

Trp -> Stop

1

T C , C C

T

95

GCA T TAT

AT -> TA

Ile -> Asn

1

T T

NT

118

GGT C TGG

GC -> CG

Leu -> Val

1 A b

T C , C T

NT

144

CGT G AAC

GC -> AT

Glu -> Lys

1

T C

T

189

CTA C GAT

GC -> TA

Tyr -> Stop

1

206

AGC TA GCG

Fs +2 c

1

207

GCG( C )GAG

Fs -1

1

214

CTT A AAG

AT -> TA

Lys -> Stop

2

T T

T

242

ATG G CGA

GC -> AT

Gly -> Asp

1 B b

C C

T

262

ATT G ATC

GC -> AT

Asp -> Asn

3

T C

T

274

GTG G ATA

GC -> AT

Asp -> Asn

1

C C

T

280

ACC G GTG

GC -> AT

Gly -> Ser

1 B b

C C

T

401

CCT G GAT

GC -> AT

Tyr -> Stop

1

C C

T

406

ATT G AAC

GC -> TA

Glu -> Stop

1

T C

T

417

GTG G GAT

GC -> AT

Trp -> Stop

1

C C

T

417-418

GTG GG ATA

GC -> AT

Trp -> Stop

1

CC

T

GC -> TA

Asp -> Tyr

418

TGG G ATA

GC -> AT

Asp -> Asn

9

T C , C C

T

450

CTC( C )GGT

Fs -1

1

a Sequence of the non-transcribed strand; the base affected by mutation is in bold. b Double mutant; mutations belonging to the same mutant are identified by a superscript capital letter. c Fs, frameshift mutation.

Figure 2 shows the striking similarity in mutation type between the leading and lagging strand errors. In both cases the most represented are GC -> AT transitions (70%), followed by GC -> TA (10-20%) and AT -> TA transversions (almost 10%). These mutations might arise from both CPD or 6-4 PP.

Figure 3 shows the distribution along the gpt coding sequence of the leading and lagging strand errors. Cold regions for UV mutagenesis were localized at bp 100-200 and 300-400. The gpt region that spans bp 300-400 is probably a cold domain of the protein, since few mutations have been found in this sequence in the gpt spectra available in the literature (databank kindly provided by F.Hutchinson). The region spanning bp 100-200 is a specific cold spot for UV mutations, since it is highly mutated in MNU-induced spectra ( 9 , 11 ). The distribution of errors for leading versus lagging strand replication showed that some sites were mutagenic independent of replication mode (e.g. sites 262 and 418), while the overall site specificity of mutations seemed to vary for the two strands.


Figure 3 . Distribution of UV-induced base pair substitutions in the transcribed strand of the gpt gene carried by pTF-EBV (leading strand) and pF1-EBV (lagging strand). The first base of the gpt coding sequence is at position 1.


When the sequence specificity of mutations was analysed, both leading and lagging strand errors presented preferential targeting of mutation to the 3' C of the dimer 5'-T/C- C -3' (85% of all base pair substitutions). However, when the flanking non-mutated member of the dimer was analysed, a preference for T residues was recorded in the case of lagging strand errors, while both T and C residues were detected in the leading strand errors. C residues located within short runs of pyrimidines (5'-Py C Py-3') were often mutated on both strands (Fig. 4 ). The relatively low frequency of mutations targeted at T residues (15%) is in agreement with a mechanism of UV mutagenesis that involves insertion of an A across from the lesion ( 13 ). Photolesions at T residues would not result in mutations, due to the insertion of the correct base (A) opposite the T.

DISCUSSION

In a previous study ( 9 ), using the same shuttle vector system, we have shown that the base substitution error rate and type on an alkylated substrate is similar for replication of the leading and lagging strands. In this study we have also shown that in the case of UV-induced lesions neither mode of replication (leading or lagging DNA synthesis) is more error prone during the bypass reaction. In eukaryotic cells, as inferred from the SV40 DNA replication model, there is a DNA polymerase switch from [alpha] to [delta] during initiation at the replication origin and for synthesis of each Okazaki fragment ( 14 ). This polymerase switching mechanism allows two molecules of DNA polymerase [delta] to replicate both strands of the double helix conjointly. The high fidelity of synthesis across lesions on both strands that we have observed would confirm that the contribution to lagging strand synthesis of inaccurate DNA polymerase [alpha] activity is very limited. The simultaneous synthesis of leading and lagging strand DNA by polymerase [delta] would indeed position a proof-reading exonuclease on both sides of the replication fork and therefore would prevent replication-driven mutation strand bias. Whether polymerase [epsilon] plays a role in leading and/or lagging strand synthesis of the eukaryotic genome is still an open question.


Figure 4 . Sequence specificity of UV-induced mutations. The sequences of the mutated dipyrimidine sites of the leading and lagging strands are indicated above the bars. The mutated C is identified by an arrow.


We have shown that leading and lagging strand errors lead to the same type of mutations, although some variability by position and sequence context was recorded. While in the MNU-induced mutational spectra ( 9 ) there was a striking overlap between the target sites on the leading and lagging strands (60% of target sites in common), in the UV-induced mutational spectra the same sites were less frequently mutated when replicated as leading or lagging strands (30% of sites in common). Moreover, a strong preference for T as the flanking (non-mutated) member of the dimer 5'-PyC-3' was found among lagging strand errors. These data suggest that the site and sequence specificity of mutagenic trans -dimer synthesis might be different during leading and lagging strand replication of the same sequence. In a previously published study ( 6 ) it was clearly shown that the fidelity of leading and lagging strand translesion synthesis varies by position. The architecture of the leading and lagging strand replication complex, with the lagging strand requiring RNA primer synthesis and involving DNA polymerase switching, might determine non-random rates of mutagenic trans -dimer replication (e.g. at T C and C C photodimers). Moreover, although UV photoproducts are required for UV mutagenesis, several lines of evidence indicate that the main determinants of hot and cold mutation spots for UV lesions are DNA structural features like hairpin loops ( 15 ) or sequence elements that might also be distal to the lesion ( 16 ). These data suggest that the proteins in the replisome might make contact with sequences distal to the adduct and influence mutagenesis. The replication complex of the two strands might sense these sequence-specific constraints differently.

In conclusion the `surrogate' systems used to mimic DNA replication in eukaryotes, such as the in vitro SV40 replication assay or EBV-derived shuttle vectors, clearly indicate that both the leading and lagging strand apparatus replicate both undamaged ( 17 ) and damaged substrates ( 9 , 6 , 18 ) with high and comparable fidelity. However, it is important to recall that both systems do not completely reproduce the replication of relatively long replicons, such as as those present in the eukaryotic genome. A real understanding of the cellular machinery that functions at the replication fork might hold some surprises.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank L.Gargano for technical assistance and Dr M.Bignami for critically reading the manuscript. This work has been partially supported by EC grant EV5V-CT92-0223.

REFERENCES

1 Sage,E. (1993) Photochem. Photobiol., 57, 163-174. MEDLINE Abstract

2 Walker,G.C. (1984) Microbiol. Rev., 48, 60-93. MEDLINE Abstract

3 Carthy,M.P., Hauser,J., Levine,A.S. and Dixon,K. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol., 13, 533-542. MEDLINE Abstract

4 Thomas,D.C. and Kunkel,T.A. (1993) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 90, 7744-7748. MEDLINE Abstract

5 Svoboda,D.L. and Vos,J.-M.H. (1995) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 92, 11975-11979. MEDLINE Abstract

6 Thomas,D.C., Nguyen,D.C., Piergosch,W.W. and Kunkel,T.A. (1993) Biochemistry, 32, 11476-11482. MEDLINE Abstract

7 Yates,J.L. and Guan,N. (1991) J. Virol., 65, 483-488. MEDLINE Abstract

8 Oh,S.J., Chittenden,T. and Levine,A.J. (1991) J. Virol., 65, 514-519. MEDLINE Abstract

9 Basic-Zaninovic,T., Palombo,F., Bignami,M. and Dogliotti,E. (1992) Nucleic Acids Res., 20, 6543-6548.

10 Palombo,F. and Dogliotti,E. (1989) Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1009, 251-256. MEDLINE Abstract

11 Palombo,F., Kohfeldt,E., Calcagnile,A., Nehls,P. and Dogliotti,E. (1992) J. Mol. Biol., 223, 587-594. MEDLINE Abstract

12 Basic-Zaninovic,T., Meschini,R., Calcagnile,A.S., Palombo,F., D'Errico,M., Proietti-De Sanctis,L. and Dogliotti,E. (1995) Mol Carcinogen., 14, 214-225.

13 Hsia,H.C., Lebkowski,J.S., Leong,P.-M., Calos,M.P. and Miller,J.H. (1989) J. Mol. Biol., 205, 103-113. MEDLINE Abstract

14 Waga,S. and Stillman,B. (1994) Nature, 369, 207-212. MEDLINE Abstract

15 Brash,D.E., Seetharam,S., Kraemer,K.H., Seidman,M.M. and Bredberg,A. (1987) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 84, 3782-3786. MEDLINE Abstract

16 Parris,C.N., Levy,D.D., Jessee,J. and Seidman,M.M. (1994) J. Mol. Biol., 236, 491-502. MEDLINE Abstract

17 Roberts,J.D., Thomas,D.C. and Kunkel,T.A. (1991) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 88, 3465-3469. MEDLINE Abstract

18 Minnick,D.T., Pavlov,Y.I. and Kunkel,T.A. (1994) Nucleic Acids Res., 22, 5658-5664. MEDLINE Abstract


Return

* To whom correspondence should be addressed

Present addresses: + Faculty of Food Technology and Biotechnology, University of Zagreb, Croatia and [sect] IRBM, Laboratory of Biochemistry, Pomezia, Italy
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (82K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Calcagnile, A
Right arrow Articles by Dogliotti, E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Calcagnile, A
Right arrow Articles by Dogliotti, E
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?