Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (169K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goldman-Levi, R
Right arrow Articles by Zak, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goldman-Levi, R
Right arrow Articles by Zak, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 Oxford University Press 3121-3129

Footnote

Expanding the Mot1 subfamily: 89B helicase encodes a new Drosophila melanogaster SNF2-related protein which binds to multiple sites on polytene chromosomes

Expanding the Mot1 subfamily: 89B helicase encodes a new Drosophila melanogaster SNF2-related protein which binds to multiple sites on polytene chromosomes Ronit Goldman-Levi , Chaya Miller , Joel Bogoch and Naomi B. Zak*

Hubert H.Humphrey Center for Experimental Medicine and Cancer Research, Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem 91120, Israel

Received June 14, 1996; Revised and Accepted July 3, 1996 EMBL accession no. U45025

ABSTRACT

Many proteins of the SNF2 family, which share a similar DNA-dependent ATPase/putative helicase domain, are involved in global transcriptional control and processing of DNA damage. We report here the partial cloning and characterization of 89B helicase , a gene encoding a new Drosophila melanogaster member of the SNF2 family. 89B Helicase protein shows a high degree of homology in its ATPase/helicase domain to the global transcriptional activators SNF2 and Brahma and to the DNA repair proteins ERCC6 and RAD54. It is, however, most strikingly similar to the Saccharomyces cerevisiae protein Mot1, a transcriptional repressor with many target genes for which no homologue has yet been described. 89B helicase is expressed throughout fly development and its large transcript encodes a >200 kDa protein. Staining with anti-89B Helicase antibodies reveals that the protein is present uniformly in early embryos and then becomes localized to the ventral nerve cord and brain. On the polytene chromosomes, 89B Helicase is bound to several hundred specific sites that are randomly distributed. The homology of 89B Helicase to Mot1, its widespread developmental expression and its large number of targets on the polytene chromosomes of larval salivary gland cells suggest that 89B Helicase may play a role in chromosomal metabolism, particularly global transcriptional regulation.

INTRODUCTION

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae transcriptional activator SNF2 ( 1 ) has been implicated in control of expression of a broad range of diversely regulated genes. SNF2 is part of a complex of proteins, including four other SNF proteins and six non-SNF proteins ( 2 - 5 ). The SNF2-containing complex is thought to carry out its role in global regulation of transcription by remodelling chromatin structure and counteracting the non-specific repressive effects of histones and other proteins involved in gene packaging (reviewed in 6 ). Chromatin restructuring could affect such processes as nucleosome packing ( 7 ), DNA looping or attachment to the nuclear matrix ( 8 ). Whether the chromatin alterations then facilitate binding of general transcription factors, assist a variety of gene-specific DNA binding activators to gain access to their DNA binding sites, promote interactions between the general and specific classes of proteins or act in some other way to bring about transcription, is presently under investigation ( 9 ).

Recently, many eukaryotic and several prokaryotic and viral ( 10 , 11 ; reviewed in 12 , 13 ) regulatory proteins with similarity to SNF2 have been discovered. Many of the SNF2-related proteins are also likely to function in regulation of gene transcription as part of multiprotein complexes ( 14 , 15 ). These include Drosophila melanogaster Brahma (Brm; 16 ), an activator of the homeotic genes, and its vertebrate homologues ( 17 - 20 ) and the Drosophila ISWI protein, which is required to perturb nucleosome structure and generate an accessible heat shock promoter ( 21 , 22 ). In contrast to the activators SNF2, Brm and ISWI, another SNF2-related protein, Mot1, acts as a transcriptional repressor in S.cerevisiae ( 23 , 24 ). Additional members of the SNF2 family function in other aspects of chromosomal metabolism, such as DNA repair. These include human ERCC6, which is involved in excision repair of transcriptionally active DNA ( 25 ), and its yeast homologue RAD26 ( 26 , 27 ).

We have identified a gene encoding a new Drosophila member of the SNF2 family and tentatively designated it 89B helicase , according to its chromosomal location and the presence within it of the ATPase/presumptive helicase domain which characterizes the family. This domain includes seven motifs (I, Ia and II-VI) which have been defined for two related superfamilies of DNA- and RNA-dependent ATPases and putative helicases ( 28 - 30 ). Motifs I and II are responsible for binding of the Mg-nucleoside triphosphate moiety. Among members of the SNF2 family, motifs V and VI have the largest differences from the corresponding motifs of other helicase families ( 10 , 11 ). The nucleic acid-stimulatable ATPase/helicase domain is functionally significant. For both SNF2 ( 31 ) and the mammaliam Brm homologue Brg1 ( 17 ), mutations in this domain have been shown to impair transcriptional activation in vivo . However, additional experiments have shown that this region is not sufficient ( 17 , 31 - 33 ) and that other domains participate in transcriptional regulation.

The sequence identity of the ATPase/helicase region of the 89B Helicase protein is shown to be greatest to the global transcriptional repressor Mot1, which until now has been the only representative within its own SNF2 subfamily ( 13 ). 89B Helicase also shares homology with Mot1 outside the ATPase signature motifs. The expression of 89B helicase throughout Drosophila development and the tissue distribution of its protein product in embryos is presented. We have examined the possibility that 89B Helicase protein binds to the polytene chromosomes of larval salivary glands and observed targetting of the protein to a large number of chromosomal sites. Together these data suggest that 89B Helicase may be a global transcriptional regulator of many target genes that functions throughout Drosophila development.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Isolation of genomic and cDNAs

Drosophila melanogaster insertion strain P282 ( 34 ), carrying a P element insertion in position 89B on the third chromosome, was obtained from the Drosophila Stock Center (Bloomington, IN). We identified this line as carrying a mutation in the morphogenetic locus serpent , which we were interested in cloning, by virtue of its non-complementarity to a known allele of srp . While embryos homozygous for this insertion die, their cuticular phenotype is almost normal. DNA was extracted from adult heterozygous flies, restricted with either Eco RI, Bam HI or Sal I and plasmid rescue was carried out as described ( 35 ).

A 3.15 kb Eco RI fragment from the plasmid-rescued DNA (Fig. 1 A) was labelled with the Multiprime DNA Labelling System (Amersham) and used to probe a random-primed 0-16 h embryonic cDNA library ( 36 ). Two of the ~200 000 recombinant phage hybridized to the genomic Eco RI probe. These were called RP2 and RP3. The same probe was used to screen a poly(A) + -primed 0-14 h embryonic cDNA library ( 37 ), yielding another two hybridizing phage, MN0.9kb and MN1.4kb. Finally, sequences from cDNA clones RP3, MN0.9kb and MN1.4kb were applied to a poly(A) + -primed 9-12 h size-selected embryonic library ( 38 ). This probe detected two phage, YKZ12 and YKZ9.


Figure 1 . Genomic and cDNA maps of 89B helicase . ( A ) Genomic DNA isolated by plasmid rescue of DNA adjacent to the P element insertion in line P282 and mapping of a partial cDNA 89B helicase clone onto the genomic map. The largest fragment of genomic DNA was isolated by Sal I (S) digestion of genomic DNA isolated from heterozygous P282 flies. The other restriction sites shown are Eco RI (E), Hin dIII (H) and Bam HI (B). The alignment of the composite partial 89B helicase cDNA clone relative to the genomic DNA is indicated. There is an ~100 bp intron in the Bam HI- Hin dIII segment of the gene at position 2082, as shown. ( B ) Partial composite map of 89B helicase cDNA. The location of the seven ATPase/presumptive helicase motifs are shown and the Eco RI and Hin dIII sites that encompass most of the cDNA, as well as the Bam HI site between them. The Eco RI site at position 24 of the cDNA, found in YKZ12, corresponds to the Eco RI site that is 6.25 kb from the P element insertion site and the Hin dIII site at nucleotide position 2876 of the cDNA, found in YKZ9, corresponds to the Hin dIII site observed in the genomic DNA 3.3 kb from the P element insertion. The extent of each of the different partial cDNA clones isolated is indicated beneath the composite map. Thickened lines indicate the parts of each cDNA clone that were sequenced. These clones are RP2 (422 bp), RP3 (1917 bp), MN0.9kb (927 bp), MN1.4kb (1335 bp), YKZ9 (1995 bp), which contains an 18 nt poly(A) + tract, and YKZ12 (2794 bp), which provides the most 5' part of the 89B helicase thus far isolated.

Inserts of all the hybridizing recombinant phage were subcloned into Bluescript II KS (Stratagene). Double-stranded plasmid DNA was prepared using the Wizard Miniprep kit (Promega) and sequenced using the Sequenase kit (US Biochemical) or at the sequencing facilities of the Weizman Institute of Science (Rehovot, Israel). Synthetic primers were made to allow complete sequencing of both strands.

The National Center for Supercomputer Applications electronic mail server was used to identify sequences related to 89B helicase in the GenBank (90.0), EMBL(43.0), PIR (45.0) and Swiss-Prot (31.0) databases using the Fasta and Gap programs. To compare 89B Helicase with Mot1 we also used the Simplify, Compare and DotPlot programs.

The GenBank accession no. for the sequence of the 89B helicase clones that we have isolated is U45025.

Northern analysis

Poly(A) + RNA was isolated from flies of different developmental stages using Dynabeads Oligo(dT) 25 (Dynal). Frozen, ground tissues were homogenized in lysis buffer as per the manufacturer's recommendations and the supernatant applied to beads. Approximately 4 [mu]g of poly(A) + RNA was loaded per well in a formaldehyde-containing gel. A mixed probe with sequences from cDNA clones RP3, MN0.9kb and MN1.4kb was applied to nylon filters (Nytran; Schleicher & Schuell). The following day, the blots were washed in 0.2* SSC (0.3 M sodium chloride, 0.03 M sodium citrate, pH 7), 1% SDS at 65oC.

Generation of antibodies

Antibodies were generated against a bacterial fusion protein containing 140 amino acids from 89B Helicase by inserting RP2 into the pGEX 2T expression vector (Pharmacia LKB Biotechnology Inc.). The 89B Helicase fusion protein was induced, harvested ( 39 ) and then absorbed onto glutathione-agarose beads (Sigma). For further purification prior to immunization into rabbits, it was released from the beads and isolated by preparative SDS-PAGE, followed by light staining with Coomassie blue.


Figure 2 . Amino acid sequence of the partial 89B Helicase protein. The seven motifs common to the nucleotide-dependent ATPases/putative helicases are overdrawn with brackets.

Prior to use in Western analysis of bacterial extracts or immunochemical localization in embryos, the rabbit antiserum and pre-immune serum were absorbed on glutathione-agarose beads with bound GST carrier and on formaldehyde-fixed, Triton X 100-permeabilized Schneider L2 cells, since we did not observe any 89B helicase transcripts upon Northern analysis of poly(A) + RNA isolated from these cells (not shown).

In immunoblot analyses of extracts from bacteria expressing the fusion protein, the anti-89B Helicase antibodies, pre-absorbed as described, specifically recognized a protein which bound to glutathione-agarose beads and had the predicted mobility for the 89B Helicase fusion protein without recognizing other bacterial proteins. Although these antibodies still detect GST when it is highly expressed, the immunostaining patterns that we observe are not due to this cross-reactivity, because they were not seen in parallel experiments using polyclonal rabbit antibodies raised against another GST fusion protein (not shown).

Western blots and immunohistochemical analysis of tissues

Schneider L2 cells were grown in Schneider medium (Biological Industries, Kibbutz Beit HaEmek) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) and two Kc derivatives, 167 and 7E10 ( 40 ), were grown in D22 (Sigma), 5% FCS. For Western analysis, the cells pelleted from 1 ml medium were dissolved in 20 [mu]l Laemmli buffer and the supernatant applied to a 7.5% polyacrylamide minigel (BioRad mini Protean gel apparatus). After transfer to a Nytran filter, the immunoblots were blocked with 5% low fat milk and 2% bovine serum albumen (BSA) overnight in the cold. They were treated with a 1:100 dilution of primary antibody in 5% normal goat serum (NGS) for 1 h and then alkaline phosphatase-conjugated affinity-purified goat anti-rabbit antibody (Jackson) at a 1:2000 dilution in 2% NGS, also for 1 h. Detection of bound antibody was carried out by adding nitroblue tetrazolium chloride (Boehringer) and X-phosphate (Boehringer). The reaction was stopped with 20 mM EDTA.

For immunohistochemistry of cells, these were pelleted, fixed in 4% formaldehyde and spread onto poly-L-lysine-treated slides. They were then stained by previously described procedures ( 41 ) with some slight modifications. The primary antibodies were applied at a 1:200 dilution and the peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit antibody (Jackson) was used at a 1:300 dilution. The staining solution contained 200 [mu]l DAB [1 mg/ml 3,3'-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (Sigma) in PBS with 0.1% Triton (PBT)], 100 [mu]l phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and 3 [mu]l 3% H 2 O 2 . The cells were viewed and photographed with Nomarski optics on a Zeiss Axioskop.

For examination of the localization of 89B Helicase in embryos, embryos of mixed ages were fixed, stained and viewed as for the cells, except that the secondary antibody was conjugated to alkaline phosphate and an appropriate substrate was applied as in Western analysis. In these experiments anti-89B Helicase or pre-immune serum that had been pre-absorbed on fixed Schneider L2 cells and GST were employed.

Immunohistochemical analysis of polytene chromosomes

Salivary glands of wandering third instar larvae that had been growing at 18oC on molasses-containing medium were dissected into PBT. They were fixed for 10 s in 3.7% formaldehyde in PBT followed by 2-3 min in 3.7% formaldehyde in 50% acetic acid, spread onto 0.1% poly-L-lysine (Sigma)-coated slides and covered with Sigmacote (Sigma)-treated coverslips. The slides were frozen in dry ice and the coverslips flipped off. The chromosomes were washed twice in PBS and then kept in 100% ethanol for up to 1 week.

For staining, the chromosomes were rehydrated in PBS, incubated for 1 h in a moist chamber covered with blocking solution [PBS containing 3% BSA, 10% powdered non-fat milk, 0.2% Nonidet P40 (Sigma) and 0.2% Tween 20 (Baker)] and rinsed. The anti-89B Helicase antibody was diluted 1:50 in blocking solution containing 2% NGS and applied under a coverslip at 4oC. The following day, the slides were washed in solution 1 (300 mM NaCl, 0.2% Nonidet P40, 0.2% Tween 20 in PBS), solution 2 (like solution 1 but 400 mM NaCl) and PBS. Affinity-purified biotinylated goat anti-rabbit antibody (Jackson) was applied for 1 h at a 1:200 dilution in blocking solution containing 2% NGS followed by extra-avidin peroxidase (Sigma) at a 1:40 dilution in PBS for 30 min at 37oC. The slides were washed in 3% H 2 O 2 and transferred to staining solution. The chromosomes were mounted in gelatin/glycerol (Sigma) for observation at 100* (oil immersion) without counterstaining.

RESULTS

Cloning of 89B helicase and homology of the predicted protein to members of the SNF2 family


Figure 3 . Sequence alignment of the DNA-dependent ATPase/putative helicase motifs of the SNF2, Brahma, Mot1 and 89B Helicase (89B) proteins. Identities between adjacent sequences are marked by vertical lines. The number of amino acids separating one motif from another are marked after each motif. Note the higher degree of identity between Mot1 and 89B Helicase than between these proteins and SNF2 and Brm.


Genomic DNA containing part of the 89B helicase gene was isolated by plasmid rescue of sequences flanking the P element insertion site in flies from line P282 ( 34 ). A restriction map of the isolated DNA is shown in Figure 1 A. Six overlapping clones of 89B helicase cDNA were cloned from three different libraries using a genomic Eco RI- Eco RI fragment derived from the plasmid-rescued DNA as a probe (Fig. 1 B).

The composite partial 89B helicase cDNA that we have obtained is 2909 bp long, encodes 920 amino acids and includes an open reading frame until nucleotide 2763. The single stop codon at position 2763 is followed in short succession by another three stop codons at positions 2807, 2870 and 2873. There are two recognizable AATAAA motifs at the 3'-end of the cDNA, 20 and 30 nt before the 18 nt poly(A) tract, indicating that the sequence is complete at the 3'-end and that there is a short 3' untranslated region.

The region closely related to SNF2 is located between nucleotides 1100 and 2522 of the partial 89B helicase cDNA. This segment contains the seven motifs common to DNA-dependent ATPases/presumptive helicases. The area of highest similarity at the DNA level are motifs V and VI, which, as was noted above, most characterize the SNF2-related family of helicases. In the region containing these motifs 89B helicase is ~60% identical to Drosophila brm ( 16 ), its human homologues brg1 ( 17 ) and h brm ( 18 , 19 ), ISWI ( 32 ) and ERCC6 ( 25 ). However, the greatest identity (65%) over the longest stretch encompassing these motifs (468 bp) is to the yeast mot1 gene ( 23 , 24 ).

At the amino acid level, too, there is the highest degree of homology between the proteins encoded by conceptual translation of 89B helicase and of mot1 . The two proteins are 47% identical (and 65% similar) over a stretch of 843 amino acids that includes all the helicase motifs within the helicase domain of 89B Helicase and 300 amino acids of the N-terminal non-helicase domain encoded by the partial 89B helicase clone (Fig. 2 ). The areas of homology to other proteins of the family are more limited. 89B Helicase is 30% identical to RAD54, a S.cerevisiae protein involved in recombinational repair ( 42 ), over the helicase domain, but not in the N-terminal region. Interestingly, while 89B Helicase exhibits 31% identity to Brm in motifs V and VI, the greatest identity (also ~30%) to ERCC6, SNF2 and SNF2L ( 43 ) is in the sequences encompassing domains I-IV, and 42% identity is shown with RAD26, but only over domains II-IV. In addition, the entire helicase domain is similarly placed in the C-termini of both 89B Helicase and Mot1, unlike in several other members of the family, such as SNF2 itself and Brm, in which an additional domain, termed the bromodomain, is present between the helicase domain and the C-terminus of the protein (Fig. 2 ; 13 , 44 ).


Figure 4 . Developmental expression of the 89B helicase mRNA. A blot containing poly(A) + RNA isolated from embryos (E), third instar larvae (L), pupae (P) and adult males ([male]) was hybridized to radiolabeled sequences from cDNA clones RP3, MN0.9kb and MN1.4 kb and washed under conditions of high stringency. The upper panel shows a short exposure and the lower panel shows a long exposure of the same blot. The molecular weight markers, in kilobases, are shown on the left.


Within the helicase domain, 89B Helicase and Mot1 display near identity in the helicase signature motifs themselves. Figure 3 shows that the motifs in Mot1 and 89B Helicase are much more similar to one another than they are to the motifs in SNF2 and Brahma. The spacing between motifs is somewhat more similar between Mot1 and 89B Helicase than between 89B Helicase and the others. In all, these results strongly suggest that 89B Helicase and Mot1 comprise two members of a new subfamily within the family of SNF2-related proteins ( 13 ).

Identification of 89B helicase RNA and the developmental pattern of expression of 89B helicase

The 89B helicase RNA was identified by Northern blot analysis of poly(A) + RNA prepared from embryos, third instar larvae, pupae and adult males. Using stringent washing conditions, we detected a prominent transcript >7.4 kb in size that is large enough to encompass the partial cDNA of 89B helicase . This transcript was present at all the developmental stages examined (Fig. 4 , upper panel), including staged embryos aged 2-5 and 5-9 h and adult females (not shown). Upon longer exposures of the same blot, we also observed a number of smaller RNA species at all the examined stages (Fig. 4 , lower panel). The most visible of these are two very small species of 1.3 and 1.1 kb and another two of 2.2 and 1.7 kb. Some of these multiple mRNA components might be the products of alternative RNA processing of the 89B helicase gene, since under conditions of reduced stringency we saw no evidence for an additional cross-hybridizing gene in the Drosophila genome (data not shown). However, since the cDNA that we have in hand is larger than these smaller species, their relevance is unclear. From these blots it can be concluded that 89B helicase is expressed at all stages of Drosophila development.


Figure 5 . Western blot and immunohistochemical analyses of Drosophila tissue culture cell lines with anti-89B Helicase antibodies. (Top) Western blots of extracts from Kc167, Kc7E10 or Schneider L2 cells were probed with anti-89B Helicase antibody (left) or pre-immune serum (right) that had not been pre-absorbed on GST or fixed Schneider L2 cells. A low mobility band at ~210 kDa in size is visualized in the Kc167 and Kc7E10 cell extracts (arrow), but not in Schneider L2 cell extracts or in the blots treated with pre-immune serum. (Bottom) Fixed and permeabilized Kc167 ( A and B ), Kc7E10 ( C and D ) and Schneider L2 ( E and F ) cells were stained with unabsorbed anti-89B Helicase antibody (A, C and E) or pre-immune serum (B, D and F). An immunoreactive signal is displayed by Kc167 and Kc7E10 cells, but not Schneider L2 cells or any of the cells treated with pre-immune serum.

Antibodies against 89B Helicase recognize a >200 kDa protein in Kc167 and Kc7E10 cells

In order to visualize the protein encoded by 89B helicase , we generated anti-89B Helicase antibodies as described in Materials and Methods and employed them in Western analyses of protein extracts from three Drosophila tissue culture cells lines. Based on the size of the predominant 89B helicase transcript and the partial cDNA, we expect the encoded protein to be >90 kDa in size. Indeed, the anti-89B Helicase antibodies recognized a common slowly migrating (>200 kDa) polypeptide in extracts from two Kc-derived lines, 167 and 7E10 (Fig. 5 , upper panel, left, arrow). As anticipated, the antibodies, although not pre-absorbed in this case (see Materials and Methods) on Schneider L2, which do not express 89B helicase transcripts (not shown), did not detect a large protein in these cells (Fig. 5 , upper panel, left). The ~210 kDa polypeptide was also absent from all the cell extracts in parallel Western blots treated with pre-immune serum (Fig. 5 , upper panel, right).

We examined whether the anti-89B Helicase antibodies can be employed for immunohistochemistry by staining the same three Drosophila cell lines (again with antibodies that had not been pre-absorbed). The immunohistochemical results confirmed what we observed in Western analysis; while Kc167 and Kc7E10 cells did exhibit an immunoreactive signal (Fig. 5 A and C), the anti-89B antibodies did not stain Schneider L2 cells (Fig. 5 E). There was no reaction with the pre-immune serum (Fig. 5 B, D and F). Thus, the >200 kDa protein observed in Western blots of extracts from Kc cells is likely to represent a polypeptide encoded by 89B helicase . Furthermore, the anti-89B Helicase antibodies appear to give a specific signal when employed for immunohistochemistry.

89B Helicase protein is abundant in the CNS and brain of post-germband retraction embryos

In order to determine the tissue distribution of 89B Helicase throughout embryonic development, whole mount embryos of different ages were treated with anti-89B Helicase antibodies that had been pre-absorbed as described in Materials and Methods. While pre-immune serum (Fig. 6 A and B) or antiserum against GST (not shown) gave no specific immunohistochemical signal, the anti-89B Helicase antibodies revealed expression of the protein in unfertilized eggs and early embryos. 89B Helicase is ubiquitously distributed throughout the embryo (but not in pole cells) during the first part of embryogenesis, including the blastoderm stage (Fig. 6 C), gastrulation and germband extension (not shown). At ~8 h of embryogenesis, during germband retraction, the protein becomes highly localized to the ventral nerve cord and brain (Fig. 6 D). In the CNS, it is preferentially found in the longitudinal connectives rather than in the horizontal commissures of the scaffold (Fig. 6 E). The same pattern of expression was observed using anti-89B Helicase antibodies that had been pre-absorbed on fixed embryos (not shown). These results demonstrate that, despite the widespread developmental expression of 89B helicase , there are differential levels of the protein in different developing tissues.


Figure 6 . Distribution of 89B Helicase during embryogenesis. 89B Helicase was detected by immunohistochemistry of whole mount preparations of Drosophila embryos. ( A and B ) No staining was observed at any stage when pre-immune antiserum was employed. When pre-absorbed (see Materials and Methods) 89B Helicase-specific antibodies were used, the protein was observed throughout the unfertilized egg (not shown) and in embryos from the blastoderm ( C ) through the germband extended (not shown) stages. After germband retraction, the protein was differentially expressed at a higher level in the brain and ventral nerve cord, as seen in lateral view ( D ) and from the ventral side ( E ). In addition, 89B Helicase appears to be expressed at a high level in the filzkorper (D). In (E) note the greater concentration of protein in the longitudinal connectives of the ventral cord. [Embryos are oriented with their anterior to the left and dorsal up, except in (E), where the embryo is viewed from the ventral side.]

89B Helicase protein is associated with many potential targets on polytene chromosomes of larval salivary glands

Several transcriptional regulator proteins that control a large number of target genes in Drosophila bind to multiple sites on polytene chromosomes, including their known targets of regulation (see for example 45 , 46 ). After ascertaining immunohistochemically that 89B Helicase is found in the nuclei of third instar larvae salivary glands (data not shown, but see Discussion), we examined the possibility that 89B Helicase is also associated with the chromosomes. Spread polytene chromosomes from third instar larval salivary glands were treated with anti-89B Helicase followed by a biotinylated secondary antibody and extra-avidin-conjugated peroxidase. Following colour development, we observed brown bands of immunoreactivity distributed over all the chromosomes (Fig. 7 ) and estimate that 89B Helicase is associated with several hundred sites along the polytene chromosomes. It is absent from puffed regions of the chromosomes (Fig. 7 and inserts at the top). While different samples of the same chromosome exhibited identical staining patterns (Fig. 7 , inserts), we did not detect any periodicity or pattern in the distribution of 89B Helicase immunoreactivity on the polytene chromosomes. This implies that 89B Helicase is associated with particular target genes that are randomly dispersed in the genome.


Figure 7 . Binding of 89B Helicase to polytene chromosomes. Spread polytene chromosomes of third instar larvae were treated immunohistochemically with anti-89B Helicase antibodies. The immunoreactive sites are marked by a brown precipitate. The chromosomes were not counterstained. A widespread banding pattern along all the chromosomes is observed. Inserts show two examples of each of three chromosome tips (2R, X and 3R, clockwise from the top) exhibiting identical staining patterns. The inserts at the top are also examples of large puffs that are consistently left unstained by the anti-89B Helicase antibodies.

DISCUSSION

The number of proteins assigned to the SNF2-related family of DNA-dependent ATPases/putative helicases that function in various aspects of DNA maintenance and processing has increased rapidly over the last few years. Among these proteins, Mot1 is one of the few that is the only representative within its proposed subfamily ( 13 ). In addition to the absence of any known homologue, Mot1 is unique among the previously known SNF2 proteins because it acts as a global transcriptional repressor. Here we describe the isolation, partial cloning and characterization of 89B helicase , a new Drosophila gene encoding a product with sequence homology to the SNF2 family. In the sequence and positioning within the protein of the ATPase/helicase domain, the spacing of the individual helicase motifs and the absence of a C-terminal bromodomain, 89B Helicase is most similar to yeast Mot1. Thus, 89B Helicase identifies a new member of the Mot1 subfamily of proteins within the SNF2-related family. The particularly high overall degree of similarity between 89B Helicase and Mot1 argues in favour of 89B Helicase, like Mot1, playing a role in transcriptional control ( 13 ). The widespread expression of the gene product of 89B helicase , as observed in developmental Northern blots and immunohistochemical analysis of embryonic tissues probed with anti-89B Helicase antibodies, implies that it may play a prominent role throughout development. This is further supported by the prevalent distribution of 89B Helicase at several hundred specific sites on larval salivary gland polytene chromosomes.

mot1 encodes an essential protein required for repression of basal transcription of many genes in yeast ( 23 , 24 ). Mot1 is thought to function in negative control of transcription by acting as a polymerase II-specific TATA binding protein (TBP)-associated factor (TAF) that complexes with TBP. It may catalyse the removal of TBP from DNA in an ATP-dependent manner ( 47 - 49 ), thus destabilizing the binding of TFIID, which consists of TBP and TAFs, to DNA. It has been suggested that the function of Mot1 in ATP-dependent removal of TBP from DNA may be analogous to the proposed role of the SNF complex in displacement of histones from DNA. Whether 89B Helicase functions in a manner similar to that proposed for other SNF proteins or at the level of the basal transcriptional machinery, as demonstrated for Mot1, remains to be examined.

89B helicase is expressed throughout the Drosophila life cycle. In Northern analysis there was prominent expression of a >7.4 kb transcript at all stages of fly development and in adult males and females. This transcript encodes a >200 kDa protein that we have visualized in Drosophila tissue culture cell extracts. The large size of the protein is characteristic of many members of the SNF2 family, such as SNF2 ( 1 ), Brg1 ( 17 ), hBrm ( 19 ) and Mot1 ( 48 ). The early appearance of the 7.4 kb transcript in poly(A) + RNA derived from staged embryos and the immunohistochemical observation of 89B Helicase in pre-blastoderm stage embryos suggest that there may be a maternal contribution of 89B helicase to the embryo.

We have observed differential levels of expression of 89B Helicase in embryonic tissues by indirect immunohistochemical analysis with anti-89B Helicase antibodies. While the results from Northern analysis using an 89B helicase probe are indicative of a very general pattern of expression over time and early embryos do exhibit uniform staining, in the latter part of embryogenesis there is a concentration of protein in the ventral nerve cord and brain, two tissues where, presumably, the complex cell differentiation events that occur require many levels of gene regulation. Although we did not observe nuclear expression for 89B Helicase in embryos or tissue culture cells, we have detected the protein localized to the nuclei of cells from the salivary glands of wandering third instar larvae (from which the polytene chromosomes were removed to examine binding of 89B Helicase). Interestingly, its subnuclear distribution is strikingly non-homogeneous in these cells. Furthermore, when we examined salivary glands of slightly older animals (very early prepupae prior to the stage of salivary gland histolysis at 15 h after puparium formation; 50 ), the nuclear distribution was altered and we also detected 89B Helicase in the cytoplasm (Goldman-Levi and Zak, in preparation). These observations indicate that 89B Helicase can be found either in the nucleus or the cytoplasm. Alterations in the subcellular distribution of this protein may be one mode of regulating its level of activity.

Using our anti-89B Helicase antibodies to examine the sites of 89B Helicase binding on spread polytene chromosomes, we have demonstrated a distinct pattern of bands that implies an association of the protein with particular genes. 89B Helicase is thus, to our knowledge, the first SNF2-related protein shown to bind to polytene chromosomes. How is 89B Helicase bound to chromatin? While several of the SNF proteins do have motifs characteristic of activators, such as glutamine- and proline-rich regions in SNF5 ( 51 ) and acidic regions in SNF6 ( 52 ), they do not have clear DNA binding motifs. They were thus, until recently, thought to be directed to DNA in general, and specifically to particular promoters, via interactions with other proteins that do bind DNA, such as as-yet-uncharacterized members of the SNF complex or the DNA binding gene-specific activators whose activation they assist, such as yeast GAL4 ( 53 , 54 ), Drosophila Bicoid ( 53 ) and fushi tarazu ( 54 ) and mammalian glucocorticoid ( 55 ), estrogen and retinoic acid receptors ( 18 ). Now, however, it has been shown that the purified SNF complex does have a high affinity for DNA ( 56 ) and also that the SNF gene products are integral components of the yeast RNA polymerase II holoenzyme ( 57 ). It remains to be seen whether a DNA binding motif is present in 89B Helicase, as in CHD1, the only helicase domain-containing protein that has been demonstrated to possess DNA binding capability ( 58 , 59 ), or whether the binding of 89B Helicase too is mediated by protein-protein interactions.

The large but discrete number of anti-89B Helicase immunoreactive bands on the polytene chromosomes, together with the widespread developmental pattern of expression of the 89B helicase gene, suggests that the protein plays a global role in some aspect of chromosomal metabolism. This does not, however, appear to be associated with basic housekeeping functions that are required for viability of tissue culture cells, since the loss of 89B Helicase from Drosophila Schneider L2 cells is not lethal. The absence of 89B Helicase from chromosomal puffs implies that the protein is not targetted to all areas which are transcriptionally active. It will be interesting to determine whether there is a correlation between the presence or absence of this protein and the transcriptional state of the DNA.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This research was supported by a Research Career Development Award of the Israel Research Cancer Fund to NBZ, a research grant from the Israel Academy of Arts and Sciences to NBZ and pre-doctoral support by the Kraut Endowment Fund to RG-L. We would like to thank Jeremy Thorner and Karin Hansen for helpful discussions about mot1 , Allen Shearn and Dennis LaJeunesse for advice in immunohistochemical staining of the polytene chromosomes and Ze'ev Paroush for careful reading of the manuscript.

REFERENCES

1 Laurent,B.C., Treitel,M.A. and Carlson,M. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 88, 2687-2691. MEDLINE Abstract

2 Cairns,B.R., Kim,Y.-J., Sayre,M.H., Laurent,C. and Kornberg,R.D. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 91, 1950-1954. MEDLINE Abstract

3 Coté,J., Quinn,J., Workman,J.L. and Peterson,C.L. (1994) Science, 265, 53-60. MEDLINE Abstract

4 Peterson,C.L., Dingwall,A.K. and Scott,M.P. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 91, 2905-2908. MEDLINE Abstract

5 Treich,I., Cairns,B.R., de los Santos,T., Brewster,E. and Carlson,M. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol., 15, 4240-4248. MEDLINE Abstract

6 Winston,F. and Carlson,M. (1992) Trends Genet., 8, 387-391. MEDLINE Abstract

7 Hirschorn,J.N., Brown,A., Clark,D and Winston,F. (1992) Genes Dev., 6, 2288-2298. MEDLINE Abstract

8 Felsenfeld,G. (1992) Nature (Lond.), 355, 219-224.

9 Kingston,R.E.,Bunker,C.A. and Imbalzano,A.N. (1996) Genes Dev., 10, 905-920. MEDLINE Abstract

10 Bork,P. and Koonin,E.V. (1993) Nucleic Acids Res., 21, 751-752. MEDLINE Abstract

11 Kolsto,A.-B., Bork,P., Kvaloy,K., Lindback,T., Gronstadt,A., Kristensen,T. and Sander,C. (1993) J. Mol. Biol., 230, 684-688. MEDLINE Abstract

12 Carlson,M. and Laurent,B.C. (1994) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 6, 396-402. MEDLINE Abstract

13 Eisen,J.A., Sweder,K.S. and Hanawalt,P.C. (1995) Nucleic Acids Res., 23, 2715-2723. MEDLINE Abstract

14 Kwon,H., Imbalzano,A.N., Khavari,P.A., Kingston,R.E. and Green,M.R. (1994) Nature (Lond.), 370, 477-481.

15 Dingwall,A.K., Beek,S.J., McCallum,C.M., Tamkun,J.W., Kalpana,G.V., Goff,S.P. and Scott,M.P. (1995) Mol. Biol. Cell, 6, 777-791. MEDLINE Abstract

16 Tamkun,J.W., Deuring,R., Scott,M.P., Kissinger,M., Pattatucci,A.M., Kaufman,T.C. and Kennison,J.A. (1992) Cell, 68, 561-572. MEDLINE Abstract

17 Khavari,P.A., Peterson,C.L., Tamkun,J.W., Mendel,D.B. and Crabtree,G.R. (1993) Nature (Lond.), 366, 170-174.

18 Chiba,H., Muramatsu,M., Nomoto,A. and Kato,H. (1994) Nucleic Acids Res., 22, 1815-1820. MEDLINE Abstract

19 Muchardt,C. and Yaniv,M. (1993) EMBO J., 12, 4279-4290. MEDLINE Abstract

20 Randazzo,F.M., Khavari,P., Crabtree,G., Tamkun,J. and Rossant,J. (1994) Dev. Biol., 161, 229-242. MEDLINE Abstract

21 Tsukiyama,T. and Wu,C. (1995) Cell, 83, 1011-1020. MEDLINE Abstract

22 Tsukiyama,T., Daniel,C., Tamkun,J. and Wu,C. (1995) Cell, 83, 1021-1026. MEDLINE Abstract

23 Davis,J.L., Kunisawa,R. and Thorner,J. (1992) Mol. Cell Biol., 12, 1879-1892. MEDLINE Abstract

24 Piatti,S., Tazzi,R., Pizzagalli,A., Plevani,P. and Lucchini,G. (1992) Chromosoma, 102, S107-S113.

25 Troelstra,C., Hesen,W., Bootsma,D. and Hoeijmakers,J.H. (1993) Nucleic Acids Res., 21, 419-426. MEDLINE Abstract

26 Van Gool,A.J., Verhage,R., Swagemakers,S.M.A., van de Putte,P., Brouwer,J., Troelstra,C., Bootsma,D. and Hoeijmakers,J.H.J. (1994) EMBO J., 13, 5361-5369. MEDLINE Abstract

27 Huang,M.E., Chuat,J.C. and Galibert,F. (1994) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 201, 310-317. MEDLINE Abstract

28 Gorbalenya,E.G., Koonin,E.V., Donchenko,A.P. and Blinov,V.M. (1988) Nature (Lond.), 333, 22.

29 Hodgman,T.C. (1988) Nature (Lond.), 333, 23.

30 Linder,P., Lasko,P.F., Nielsen,P.J., Nishi,K. and Slonimski,P.P. (1989) Nature (Lond.), 337, 121-122.

31 Laurent,B.C., Treich,I. and Carlson,M. (1993) Genes Dev., 7, 583-591. MEDLINE Abstract

32 Elfring,L.K., Deuring,R., McCallum,C.M., Peterson,C.L. and Tamkun,J.W. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol., 14, 2225-2234. MEDLINE Abstract

33 Laurent,B.C., Yang,X. and Carlson,M. (1992) Mol. Cell. Biol., 12, 1893-1902. MEDLINE Abstract

34 Cooley,L., Kelley,R. and Spradling,A. (1988) Science, 239, 1121-1128. MEDLINE Abstract

35 Ashburner,M. (1989) Drosophila: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, pp. 321-323.

36 Hovemann,B.T. (1991) Drosophila Informat. Serv., 70, 250.

37 Frigerio,G., Burri,M., Bop,D., Baumgartner,S. and Noll,M. (1986) Cell, 47, 735-746.

38 Zinn,K., McAllister,L. and Goodman,C.S. (1988) Cell, 53, 577. MEDLINE Abstract

39 Paroush,Z., Finley,R.L.,Jr, Kidd,T., Wainwright,S.M., Ingham,P.W., Brent,R. and Ish-Horowicz,D. (1994) Cell, 79, 805-815. MEDLINE Abstract

40 Fessler,J.H., Nelson,R.E. and Fessler,L.I. (1994) In Goldstein,L.S.B and Fryberg,E.H. (eds), Drosophila melanogaster: Practical Uses in Cell and Molecular Biology. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, Ch. 18, pp. 303-328.

41 Zak,N.B., Wides,R.J., Schejter,E.D., Raz,E. and Shilo,B.-Z. (1990) Development, 109, 865-874. MEDLINE Abstract

42 Emery,H.S., Schild,D., Kellogg,D.E. and Mortimer,R.K. (1991) Genes Dev., 5, 1786-1799. MEDLINE Abstract

43 Okabe,I., Bailey,L.C., Attree,O., Srinivasan,S., Perkel,J.M., Laurent,B.C., Carlson,M., Nelson,D.L. and Nussbaum,R.L. (1992) Nucleic Acids Res., 20, 4649-4655. MEDLINE Abstract

44 Haynes,S.R., Dollard,C., Winston,F., Beck,S., Trowsdale,J. and Dawid,I.B. (1992) Nucleic Acids Res., 20, 2603. MEDLINE Abstract

45 Zink,B. and Paro,R. (1989) Nature, 337, 468-471. MEDLINE Abstract

46 Kuzin,B., Tillib,S., Sedkov,Y., Mizrokhi,L. and Mazo,A. (1994) Genes Dev., 8, 2478-2490. MEDLINE Abstract

47 Auble,D.T. and Hahn,S. (1993) Genes Dev., 7, 844-856. MEDLINE Abstract

48 Auble,D.T., Hansen,K.E., Mueller,C.G.F., Lane,W.S., Thorner,J. and Hahn,S. (1994) Genes Dev., 8, 1920-1934. MEDLINE Abstract

49 Poon,D., Campbell,A.M., Bai,Y. and Weil,P.A. (1994) J. Biol. Chem., 269, 23135-23140. MEDLINE Abstract

50 Hartenstein,V. (1993) Atlas of Drosophila Development. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.

51 Laurent,B.C., Treitel,M.A. and Carlson,M. (1990) Mol. Cell. Biol., 10, 5616-5625. MEDLINE Abstract

52 Estruch,F. and Carlson,M. (1990) Mol. Cell. Biol., 10, 2544-2553. MEDLINE Abstract

53 Laurent,B.C. and Carlson,M. (1992) Genes Dev., 6, 1707-1715. MEDLINE Abstract

54 Peterson,C.L. and Herskowitz,I. (1992) Cell, 68, 573-583. MEDLINE Abstract

55 Yoshinaga,S.K., Peterson,C.L., Herskowitz,I. and Yamamoto,K.R. (1992) Science, 258, 1598-1604. MEDLINE Abstract

56 Quinn,J., Fryberg,A.M., Ganster,R.W., Schmidt,M.C. and Peterson,C.L. (1996) Nature, 379, 844-847. MEDLINE Abstract

57 Wilson,C.J., Chao,D.M., Imbalzano,A.N., Schnitzler,G.R., Kingston,R.E. and Young,R.A. (1996) Cell, 84, 235-244. MEDLINE Abstract

58 Delmas,V., Stokes,D.G. and Perry,R.P. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 90, 2414-2418. MEDLINE Abstract

59 Stokes,D.G. and Perry,R.P. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol., 15, 2745-2753. MEDLINE Abstract


Return

* To whom correspondence should be addressed
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
D. R. Arnett, J. L. Jennings, D. L. Tabb, A. J. Link, and P. A. Weil
A Proteomics Analysis of Yeast Mot1p Protein-Protein Associations: Insights into Mechanism
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, November 1, 2008; 7(11): 2090 - 2106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. P. Darst, A. Dasgupta, C. Zhu, J.-Y. Hsu, A. Vroom, T. Muldrow, and D. T. Auble
Mot1 Regulates the DNA Binding Activity of Free TATA-binding Protein in an ATP-dependent Manner
J. Biol. Chem., April 4, 2003; 278(15): 13216 - 13226.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
L. A. Pereira, J. A. van der Knaap, V. van den Boom, F. A. J. van den Heuvel, and H. T. M. Timmers
TAFII170 Interacts with the Concave Surface of TATA-Binding Protein To Inhibit Its DNA Binding Activity
Mol. Cell. Biol., November 1, 2001; 21(21): 7523 - 7534.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
M. Ruhf, A Braun, O Papoulas, J. Tamkun, N Randsholt, and M Meister
The domino gene of Drosophila encodes novel members of the SWI2/SNF2 family of DNA-dependent ATPases, which contribute to the silencing of homeotic genes
Development, January 4, 2001; 128(8): 1429 - 1441.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
K. Staehling-Hampton, P. J. Ciampa, A. Brook, and N. Dyson
A Genetic Screen for Modifiers of E2F in Drosophila melanogaster
Genetics, September 1, 1999; 153(1): 275 - 287.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
T. A. Muldrow, A. M. Campbell, P. A. Weil, and D. T. Auble
MOT1 Can Activate Basal Transcription In Vitro by Regulating the Distribution of TATA Binding Protein between Promoter and Nonpromoter Sites
Mol. Cell. Biol., April 1, 1999; 19(4): 2835 - 2845.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
M. A. Crosby, C. Miller, T. Alon, K. L. Watson, C. P. Verrijzer, R. Goldman-Levi, and N. B. Zak
The trithorax Group Gene moira Encodes a Brahma-Associated Putative Chromatin-Remodeling Factor in Drosophila melanogaster
Mol. Cell. Biol., February 1, 1999; 19(2): 1159 - 1170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
J. J. Chicca II, D. T. Auble, and B. F. Pugh
Cloning and Biochemical Characterization of TAF-172, a Human Homolog of Yeast Mot1
Mol. Cell. Biol., March 1, 1998; 18(3): 1701 - 1710.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
Genetic Analysis of brahma: The Drosophila Homolog of the Yeast Chromatin Remodeling Factor SWI2/SNF2
Genetics, January 1, 1998; 148(1): 251 - 266.



Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. A. van der Knaap, J. W. Borst, P. C. van der Vliet, R. Gentz, and H. Th. M. Timmers
Cloning of the cDNA for the TATA-binding protein-associated factorII170 subunit of transcription factor B-TFIID reveals homology to global transcription regulators in yeast and Drosophila
PNAS, October 28, 1997; 94(22): 11827 - 11832.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. I. Adamkewicz, K. E. Hansen, W. A. Prud'homme, J. L. Davis, and J. Thorner
High Affinity Interaction of Yeast Transcriptional Regulator, Mot1, with TATA Box-binding Protein (TBP)
J. Biol. Chem., April 6, 2001; 276(15): 11883 - 11894.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (169K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goldman-Levi, R
Right arrow Articles by Zak, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goldman-Levi, R
Right arrow Articles by Zak, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?