Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (80K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kuo, L.
Right arrow Articles by Cech, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kuo, L.
Right arrow Articles by Cech, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1995 Oxford University Press 3722-3727

Footnote

Conserved thermochemistry of guanosine nucleophile binding for structurally distinct group I ribozymes

Conserved thermochemistry of guanosine nucleophile binding for structurally distinct group I ribozymes Louis Y. Kuo + and Thomas R. Cech*

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Colorado, Boulder CO 80309-0215, USA

Received June 25, 1996; Revised and Accepted August 8, 1996

ABSTRACT

We report thermodynamic values for binding of the guanosine nucleophile to the ribozyme derived from the Anabaena group I intron, and find that they are similar to those measured previously for the structurally distinct Tetrahymena ribozyme. The free energy of binding guanosine 5 ' -monophosphate (pG) at 30 o C is similar for the two ribozymes. The [Delta] H o' and [Delta] S o' for pG binding to the Anabaena ribozyme-RNA substrate complex (E - S) are 3.4 " 4 kcal/mol and 27 " 10 e.u., respectively. The negligible enthalpic contribution and positive entropy change were found previously for the Tetrahymena ribozyme, and are considered remarkable for a hydrogen-bonding interaction between a nucleotide and a nucleic acid. These thermodynamic values may reflect conformational changes or water release upon pG binding that are comparable for the two ribozymes. In addition, the apparent chemical steps of the two ribozyme reactions share similar activation energies and a positive [Delta] S } . It now appears that such thermochemical values for guanosine binding and activation may be intrinsic properties of the group I intron catalytic center.

INTRODUCTION

An RNA enzyme or `ribozyme' derived from the group I intron of Tetrahymena displays unexpected thermodynamic parameters for interaction with its guanosine substrate. Although guanosine binding clearly involves hydrogen bond formation ( 1 ), it exhibits a negligible enthalpic change and a positive entropic change ( 2 ). Entropically-driven binding is common for nucleic acid-protein interactions, where much surface area is buried with release of counterions and water molecules ( 3 - 8 ). However, such thermodynamic behavior is uncommon when protein enzymes bind single nucleotides ( 9 - 12 ) and was essentially unprecedented for interactions between nucleic acids, which usually occur with a negative [Delta] S ( 13 - 15 ). The positive [Delta] S for guanosine binding could be explained by either a ribozyme conformational change or the release of water from the guanosine binding site. It was therefore of interest to determine whether these properties were peculiar to the Tetrahymena ribozyme, or common to group I introns.

Group I introns are found across phylogenetical boundaries ( 16 , 17 ). These introns are recognizable as a group because of common nucleotides and secondary structures in their catalytic cores ( 18 , 19 ). Specifically, sequence conservation is found in regions that bind the guanosine nucleophile ( 1 ) as well as those that position the P1 helix for nucleophilic attack by guanosine ( 20 , 21 ).

These group I RNAs undergo self-splicing in a two step reaction in the absence of proteins. In the first step, the intron binds exogenous guanosine (G) or guanosine 5'-monophosphate (pG) which is subsequently used as a nucleophile to attack the 5' splice site, producing an intron-3' exon molecule and a free 5' exon that ends with a 3'-hydroxyl. In the second step, the 5' and 3' exons are ligated together in a reaction that is chemically equivalent to the reverse of the first step ( 22 ).

Derivatives of several group I introns have been made that catalyze a reaction analogous to the first splicing step in an intermolecular fashion, cleaving a short RNA substrate with multiple turnovers (Fig. 1 ; 22 - 25 ). These ribozymes allow a fundamental investigation of the kinetic and thermodynamic properties of RNA intron chemistry ( 26 - 31 ). The current work makes use of a ribozyme derived from the pre-tRNA Leu intron of Anabaena , which belongs to the cyanobacteria family, a proposed progenitor of chloroplasts ( 32 - 34 ). The Anabaena ribozyme ( 24 ) differs from the Tetrahymena ribozyme in size (248 and 389 bases, respectively) and presence of peripheral structure elements. Even within the catalytic core the two ribozymes differ in 22 of 63 nt. Furthermore, because the Anabaena RNA functions naturally in a prokaryotic cellular environment, it is not at all obvious that its activity in vitro should be the same as that of the Tetrahymena RNA, which functions naturally in a eukaryotic nucleolar environment.


Figure 1 . Catalytic cycle for cleavage of an RNA substrate by the Anabaena ribozyme (24). E, ribozyme. G OH , guanosine. S, RNA substrate pCUUAAAAA. P, RNA cleavage product pCUU.

The L-8 HH Anabaena ribozyme (E) catalyzes the endonuclease reaction:

E

pCUUpAAAAA + pG --- -> pCUU + pGpAAAAA 1

(S) (P)

RNA substrate binding involves the formation of a 3 base pair (bp) duplex (P1) between the CUU sequence of the substrate (S) and the internal guide sequence of the ribozyme (Fig. 1 ). In contrast, the Tetrahymena L-21 Sca I ribozyme has a 6 bp P1 helix. This feature results in kinetic differences between the two ribozymes. For example, whereas the rate determining step of multiple-turnover cleavage of RNA by the Anabaena ribozyme is the chemistry of oligonucleotide cleavage ( 24 ), the Tetrahymena ribozyme reaction is limited by product release due to the stronger oligonucleotide-ribozyme interaction ( 28 ). However, these two ribozymes share the use of guanosine as a nucleophile, identical phosphate stereospecificity of the transesterification reaction, 10 3 -fold slower cleavage with deoxyribonucleotide leaving groups, and comparable pH profiles of the cleavage rates ( 24 , 29 , 35 - 37 ). Thus, despite the differences in size and active site nucleotides between these two group I ribozymes, they show functional similarities in sequence-specific RNA cleavage. Here we report the enthalpic and entropic contributions of pG binding to the ribozyme derived from the Anabaena tRNA Leu intron and compare them with those of the Tetrahymena ribozyme.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Terminology

The following terminology is used throughout the remainder of this manuscript: k obs , an observed rate constant; k max , single-turnover rate constant at given [E] and saturating [pG]; k cat (mt), multiple-turnover rate constant with saturating S and pG; k rel , ratio of rate constants; k c , the rate constant of the chemical step at saturating [pG]; IGS, internal guide sequence; [Delta] G o',[Delta] H o' and [Delta] S o' represent values measured under the reaction conditions by the methods herein, and the symbols [Delta] G o, [Delta] H o and [Delta] S o represent the true state functions; [Delta] G } and [Delta] H } and [Delta] S } represent values for reaching the transition state of the reaction.

Ribozyme and substrates

The L-8 HH ribozyme was prepared as described by Zaug et al . ( 24 ). Oligoribonucleotide substrates were synthesized and 32 P-radiolabeled according to previous procedures ( 24 ).

Kinetic experiments

All kinetics were carried out in 25 mM HEPES (pH 7.5) and 15 mM MgCl 2 unless otherwise indicated. A subsaturating ribozyme concentration of 0.5 [mu]M was used for all single-turnover experiments [ K m (S) = 15 " 2 [mu]M). The ribozyme was first preincubated in 25 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 15 mM MgCl 2 with G or pG for 15 min at 50oC followed by a 2 min incubation at the desired temperature. Reactions were initiated by addition of a trace amount of oligonucleotide substrate that had been preincubated at the same temperature of the kinetics run. For reactions at lower pH, preincubation of the ribozyme was done in 10 [mu]l of the same pH 7.5 buffer with guanosine, followed by the addition of the oligonucleotide substrate in 40 [mu]l of a 25 mM Mes, 15 mM MgCl 2 buffer at the desired lower pH (6.5 or 5.5). Studies involving the ribozyme-substrate complex (E-S) utilized multiple-turnover reactions with an initial substrate concentration of 100 [mu]M [ K m (S) = 12 [mu]M]. Reaction tubes were submerged for high temperature experiments. Typically six to eight portions (3-4 [mu]l each) were removed at specified times and the reaction was stopped by adding an equal volume of stop buffer consisting of 30 mM EDTA, 10 M urea, 0.01% bromophenol blue, 0.025% xylene cyanol and 0.1* TBE electrophoresis buffer (1* TBE is 0.1 M Tris base, 0.083 M boric acid and 1 mM EDTA). The reaction products were separated by electrophoresis on a 20% polyacrylamide [29:1 acrylamide:bis-acrylamide]-8 M urea gel, and the ratio of substrate to product was quantitated with a Molecular Dynamics PhosphorImager.

Data analysis

For single-turnover experiments, it had been shown that only 2-3% of the starting material was unreactive and correction of the data for this end point did not appreciably change the rate of reaction; therefore the data shown in this report are all uncorrected. Values of k obs were determined from the slopes of graphs of ln[S/(S + P)] versus time. k obs was then plotted as a function of [pG], and the equation k obs = k max [pG]/{ K m (pG) + [pG]}, in which k max is the rate constant for cleavage of the oligonucleotide substrate with saturating pG, was used to determine the K m (pG).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Preliminary kinetic characterization of Anabaena ribozyme

The focus of these studies was to examine the temperature dependence of the K d (pG) and k c values for the ribozyme reaction (equation 1 ). Single-turnover conditions were used because they involve fewer steps than multiple turnover reactions, thereby minimizing the possibility of kinetic complexities that might make K d (pG) differ from K m (pG). At subsaturating concentrations of the oligoribonucleotide substrate (S), k max was 0.40/min at 0.5 [mu]M E and 2 mM pG. This compares favorably with the value of 0.21/min reported by Zaug et al . ( 24 ) at the same ribozyme and guanosine concentration; the difference may be attributable to the guanosine nucleophile used by Zaug. In addition, we measured the K m for guanosine [ K m (G)] to be ~1.4 times larger (weaker binding to E) than that for guanosine 5'-phosphate [ K m (pG)] at 22 and 32oC. This is in accord with observations for the Tetrahymena ribozyme which showed slightly weaker binding of G both to free E and to E-S ( 37 ).

The reaction rate for the Anabaena ribozyme is limited largely by the chemical cleavage step at pH <= 7.5 ( 24 ), so the maximal k obs under saturating [pG] reflects primarily the rate of chemistry. Therefore an Arrhenius plot of this rate constant is taken to provide thermodynamic parameters of activation for reaching the transition state of the chemical step. For studies using subsaturating ribozyme (E + S), the ribozyme concentrations were varied at the lowest and highest [pG] for the lower and upper bounds of the temperature range used in this study (0 and 35oC). The observed rate was linear over a 12-fold concentration range of the ribozyme (0.5-6.0 [mu]M E), which indicated a bimolecular reaction with respect to ribozyme and oligonucleotide substrate. Furthermore, all single turnover data followed first order kinetics with no evidence of an initial lag or burst which suggests a rapid pG binding equilibrium with no buildup of any additional intermediates.

To study the reaction with saturating substrate (E-S + pG), multiple turnover reactions had to be utilized. Substrate concentration was also varied over a 10-fold range (50-500 [mu]M S) at the lowest and highest [pG] tested. Cleavage rate was independent of [S] at the highest and lowest temperatures (10 and 55oC), which implies a unimolecular process with respect to E and S consistent with a saturated ribozyme-substrate complex.

K m(G) equals the dissociation constant for G binding

It has already been established that K m (G) equals K d (G) for guanosine binding to the Tetrahymena ribozyme ( 37 ). We tested whether such a relationship also held for the Anabaena ribozyme. Specifically, if K d is equal to K m , then by definition K m is k -1 / k 1 . This implies that the rate constant for the chemical step ( k c ) makes a negligible contribution to the K m (G) term.

K m = ( k -1 + k c )/ k 1 2

The equality of K m and K d can be tested by observing the change in K m (G) or K m (pG) upon changing the rate constant for chemistry ( k c ) of the ribozyme reaction. Two methods were used to alter the rate of chemistry, varying pH and incorporating a single deoxynucleotide at the cleavage site of the substrate (Table 1 ). In the case of the deoxy substrate CU(dU)A 5, we saw a dramatic drop of 10 -3.6 in the relative rate of cleavage with saturating pG ( k rel ) with little change in the K m (pG) (Fig. 2 ). Furthermore, in spite of a 63-fold difference in the k rel at pH 5.6 compared with 7.5, the respective K m (G) values of 2.5 and 1.2 mM were similar (Table 1 ). Both of these results suggest that k c makes a minimal contribution to the K m term, which supports the approximation that K m (G) = k -1 / k 1 = K d (G).


Figure 2 . Similar K m values for reactions with widely different rate constants. The cleavage rates of CUUA 5 ([Delta]) and of CU(dU)A 5 (-), each bound to 0.5 [mu]M of ribozyme, as a function of [pG] at 30oC and pH 7.5. The cleavage of CU(dU)A 5 was measured by initial rates, because the rate was slow. The lines represent fits to the data with K m = 0.87 " 0.08 mM and k max = 0.5 min -1 for cleavage of CUUA 5 (---), and K m = 1.55 " 0.30 mM and k max = 1.29 * 10 -4 /min for cleavage of CU(dU)A 5 (-). Error bars (determined from uncertainty values of ln[S/(S + P)] versus time plots) fall within the symbols.

A similar pH effect was observed with the saturated ribozyme-substrate complex (E-S + G) wherein the K m s at pH 5.6 and 7.5 were 0.54 and 0.94 mM, respectively, in spite of a 40-fold difference in k rel .

Comparison of G binding by two ribozymes

Having established that K m (G) = K d (G) for the Anabaena ribozyme, its affinity for binding guanosine (Table 1 ) can be compared with that measured earlier for the Tetrahymena ribozyme under similar conditions of pH 5.5 and 30oC ( 37 ). Under conditions of trace RNA substrate (S), where E is unsaturated with S, K m (G) reflects binding of G to the free ribozyme rather than to the E-S complex. For the free ribozymes, the K d (G)s are 2.5 " 0.9 mM and 0.8 " 0.3 mM for the Anabaena and Tetrahymena ribozymes, respectively. For the ribozyme-RNA substrate complexes, they are 0.54 " 0.20 mM and 0.19 " 0.03 mM, respectively. Thus, while the K d s are similar for the two ribozymes, the Tetrahymena ribozyme binds G ~3-fold more tightly.

Table 1 . Kinetic parameters for reactions of the Anabaena ribozyme at 30oC
Reaction

Substrate

Nucleophile

pH

k max or k cat (mt)

k rel

K m (mM)

(min -1 )

Single-turnover a

CUUA 5

pG

7.5

0.5 b

(1.00)

0.87 " 0.08

CU(dU)A 5

pG

7.5

1.3 * 10 -4b

0.00026

1.55" 0.30

Single-turnover a

CUUA 5

G

7.5

8.1 * 10 -2b

(1.00)

1.2" 0.2

CUUA 5

G

5.6

1.3 * 10 -3b

0.016

2.5" 0.9

Multiple-turnover c

CUUA 5

G

7.5

0.21 d

(1.00)

0.94" 0.22

CUUA 5

G

5.6

6 x 10 -3d

0.025

0.54" 0.20

a Single turnover reactions with subsaturating S monitor reaction of free E. b k max determined at 0.5 [mu]M E and trace S, saturating pG or G. c Multiple turnover reactions with saturating S monitor reaction of the E-S complex. d k cat (mt) determined at 0.5 [mu]M E, 100 [mu]M S, saturating G.

In addition, the K d (G) values summarized above show tighter binding of G to the Anabaena ribozyme-RNA substrate complex than to the free ribozyme (0.54 " 0.20 mM and 2.5 " 0.9 mM, respectively). Considering pG binding at pH 7.5, the Anabaena ribozyme-RNA substrate complex again bound the nucleotide more tightly (0.42 mM) than did the free ribozyme (0.87 mM; Table 1 ). A similar observation in the case of the Tetrahymena ribozyme was attributed to thermodynamic coupling between guanosine and oligonucleotide binding ( 37 , 38 ).

Temperature dependence of K m

With the approximation that K m (pG) is equal to K d (pG), the temperature dependence of K m can be used to determine the [Delta] H o' and [Delta] S o' for pG binding using the van't Hoff equation:

ln K d (pG) = [Delta] H o'/RT - [Delta] S o'/R 3

Thus a plot of 1/T versus ln K m should give a slope that is proportional to [Delta] H o' and a y-intercept equal to -[Delta] S o'/R. One complication is that the Anabaena ribozyme begins to lose activity above 40oC (Fig. 3 A) under subsaturating RNA substrate conditions. Therefore thermodynamic interpretation of the data at high temperatures becomes problematic, which limits the useful temperature range to 2-35oC. However, even in this temperature range it is clear that the slope of the van't Hoff plot is close to zero and the intercept gives rise to a positive [Delta] S (Fig. 3 B); these results imply that the Anabaena ribozyme has thermodynamic values similar to those of the Tetrahymena ribozyme.


Figure 3 . Temperature dependence of reaction and guanosine 5'-monophosphate binding by the free ribozyme. ( A ) Temperature dependence of the chemical step with saturating [pG] in single-turnover reactions. ( B ) van't Hoff plot of the K m (pG) for the reaction of pG with free ribozyme under subsaturating [ S ]. Error bars fall within the symbols.

When the ribozyme was saturated with RNA substrate, a condition that could be attained in multiple turnover reactions, it remained active to 55oC (Fig. 4 A). A likely explanation is that the docked substrate stabilizes the ribozyme; for comparison, the maximum temperature for the self-splicing activity of the Anabaena pre-tRNA is 60oC ( 34 ). Because self-splicing is an intramolecular process, the active site is always saturated with substrate.


Figure 4 . Temperature dependence of reaction and guanosine 5'-monophosphate binding by the E-S complex. ( A ) Temperature dependence of the reaction rate for multiple turnovers k cat (mt) = k obs * ([S]/[E]) under saturating [pG] for the ribozyme-substrate complex. S (200 [mu]M) was in 200-fold excess of [E] and 8-fold greater than K m (S). Arrhenius plot was fitted to the 10-55oC range. ( B ) van't Hoff plot of the K m (pG) for the reaction of pG with E-S under saturating [S]. [Delta] H o' and [Delta] S o" for pG binding, fitted to the 10-40oC temperature range, were 3.4 " 4 kcal/mol and 27 " 10 e.u., respectively. All error bars fall within the symbols.

This enhanced stability allowed the temperature dependence on K m to be explored at higher temperatures for reactions of the E-S complex. A van't Hoff plot shows that up to 40oC, the slope is close to zero (Fig. 4 B). Between 40 and 50oC a distinct change in K m (pG) implies weaker binding of pG to the ribozyme ( K d increases from 0.31 to 0.91 mM; Fig. 4 B). Given that the ribozyme activity is increasing exponentially up to 55oC (Fig. 4 A), it is unlikely that the decrease in guanosine binding from 40 to 55oC is due to a `melting out' of the ribozyme that leads to an inactive form. Instead any conformational transition producing this K m (pG) change is probably localized in the guanosine binding site. The [Delta] H o' and [Delta] S o' for pG binding to E-S (10-40oC) are similar within the measured uncertainties to those for binding to the free ribozyme (Table 2 ).

Table 2 . Comparison of thermodynamic parameters of Anabaena and Tetrahymena ribozymes
Ribozyme

[Delta] H o'

[Delta] S o'

[Delta] G o'

E a

[Delta] H }

[Delta] S }

[Delta] G }

kcal/mol

e.u.

kcal/mol

kcal/mol

kcal/mol

e.u.

kcal/mol

Anabaena

-0.6 " 0.3

12 " 5

-4.2

-

-

-

-

(free E) a

Anabaena

3.4 " 4

27 " 10

~-5

24 " 0.5

23 " 1.5

17 " 5

18 " 0.3

(E-S) b

Tetrahymena

4.8

31

-4.6

-

-

-

-

(free E) c

Tetrahymena

0.9 " 1

23 " 4

-6.3 " 0.3

29

28 " 4

32 " 10

18.8 " 0.3

(E-S) d

a Binding of pG to free E at 15 mM Mg 2+ , pH 7.5, 30oC. b Thermodynamic parameters for binding of pG to E-S at 15 mM Mg 2+ , pH 7.5, 30oC. Kinetic parameters for reaction of E-S-pG under same conditions. c From McConnell and Cech (2), recalculated at 30oC. Binding of pG to free E at 10 mM Mg 2+ , pH 7.0. d From McConnell and Cech (2), recalculated at 30oC. Thermodynamic parameters for binding of pG to E-S are at 10 mM Mg 2+ , pH 7.0. Kinetic parameters for reaction of E-S-pG under same conditions.

Temperature dependence of rate of reaction

An Arrhenius plot for the reaction rate under multiple-turnover conditions with saturating [pG] gives a description of the thermodynamics for reaching the transition state in the reaction of E-S-pG -> E-P. The Arrhenius plot was linear over a 45oC temperature range. The E a , [Delta] H } and [Delta] G } (at 30oC) for the Anabaena ribozyme (24, 23 and 18 kcal/mol, respectively) are quite close to those found for the Tetrahymena ribozyme (29, 28 and 19 kcal/mol, respectively; 2 ). The lower [Delta] S } for Anabaena (17 " 5 e.u.) versus Tetrahymena (32 " 10 e.u.) may be due to the fact that the Anabaena kinetics was done at 5 mM higher MgCl 2 concentration. Past experiments with Tetrahymena have shown that high MgCl 2 concentrations decrease the [Delta] S } ( 2 ). The noteworthy feature here is that the positive [Delta] S } contributes to the stabilization of the transition state of the apparent chemical step for both ribozymes, with a T[Delta] S } at 30oC worth 5.2 kcal/mol for the Anabaena ribozyme versus 10 kcal/mol for Tetrahymena .

CONCLUSIONS

Group I introns share structural features in their catalytic cores, but differ in their peripheral structures and show some variability in nucleotide sequence even within their catalytic centers. Furthermore, they operate in nature in different intracellular environments-prokaryotic, eukaryotic nucleolar and mitochondrial-so they may be `tuned' to have different intrinsic activities. Thus, it seems reasonable that some mechanistic features established for the much-studied Tetrahymena group I intron will be general for all group I RNAs, while others will be inconstant. The only way to identify the common features is to test the reactivity of different introns.

The current work shows that the unusual thermochemical parameters of pG binding first found for the Tetrahymena ribozyme ( 2 ) are also characteristic of the Anabaena ribozyme. These include a near-zero enthalpic contribution, unexpected given that H-bonds are being formed, and a positive entropy change, which means that the system becomes more disordered upon complex formation. In addition, both ribozymes show a positive entropy of activation for the apparent chemical step and thermodynamic coupling between binding of guanosine and of the oligonucleotide substrate (cf. data herein for Anabaena , data of ref. 37 and 38 for Tetrahymena ). Thus, these features may be general to group I introns, although more introns will need to be characterized to test this hypothesis. These features join a growing list of conserved properties which also includes similar affinity of guanosine binding, stereoselectivity for the R p diastereomer of a phosphorothioate at the cleavage site in the RNA, and a log-linear pH-rate profile in the acid range, indicative of loss of a proton in the transition state for the chemical step ( 24 , 35 - 37 ).

A positive entropy change, observed for G binding to both the Anabaena and Tetrahymena ribozymes, is common for a globular protein-substrate interaction but not for a nucleic acid-nucleic acid interaction. As previously discussed for the Tetrahymena ribozyme, the increased disorder upon G binding seen with the Anabaena ribozyme may be attributed to a conformational change in the ribozyme or, most simply, to release of bound water from the G-binding site. An RNA aptamer that specifically binds adenosine has been discovered by in vitro selection-amplification ( 39 ), and the structure of the aptamer-AMP complex has been determined by NMR spectroscopy ( 40 , 41 ). Study of the thermodynamics of this interaction would further illuminate the generality of entropically driven binding of nucleosides by RNA.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

L.K. is grateful to Lewis & Clark College for the junior sabbatical leave and wishes to thank Art Zaug, Michael Tanner and Timothy McConnell for technical help and useful advice. We thank Alice Sirimarco for preparation of the manuscript. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant GM28039 to T.R.C. T.R.C. is an investigator of Howard Hughes Medical Institute and an American Cancer Society Professor. We thank the W. M. Keck Foundation for support of RNA science on the Boulder campus.

REFERENCES

1 Michel, F., Hanna, M., Green, R., Bartel, D. P. and Szostak, J. W. (1989) Nature, 342, 391-395. MEDLINE Abstract

2 McConnell, T. S. and Cech, T. R. (1995) Biochemistry, 34, 4056-4067. MEDLINE Abstract

3 Riggs, A. D., Bourgeois, S. and Cohn, M. (1970) J. Mol. Biol., 53, 401-417.

4 Jobe, A., Sadler, J. R. and Bourgeois, S. (1974) J. Mol. Biol., 85, 231-248. MEDLINE Abstract

5 Record, M. T., Jr, deHaseth, P. L. and Lohman, T. M. (1977) Biochemistry, 16, 4791-4796. MEDLINE Abstract

6 Ha, J.-H., Spolar, R. S. and Record, M. T., Jr (1989) J. Mol. Biol., 209, 801-816. MEDLINE Abstract

7 Mascotti, D. P. and Lohman, T. M. (1992) Biochemistry, 31, 8932-8946. MEDLINE Abstract

8 Mascotti, D. P. and Lohman, T. M. (1993) Biochemistry, 32, 10568-10579. MEDLINE Abstract

9 Burz, D. S. and Allewell, N. M. (1982) Biochemistry, 21, 6647-6655. MEDLINE Abstract

10 Gutierrez Merino, C., Menendez, M., Laynez, J. and Garcia Blanco, F. (1979) Biophys. Chem., 9, 263-271. MEDLINE Abstract

11 Mateo, P. L., González, J. F., Barón, C., López-Mayorga, O. and Cortijo, M (1986) J. Biol. Chem., 261, 17067-17072. MEDLINE Abstract

12 Hu, C. Q. and Sturtevant, J. M. (1987) Biochemistry, 26, 178-182. MEDLINE Abstract

13 Jin, R. , Breslauer, K. J., Jones, R. A. and Gaffney, B. L. (1990) Science, 250, 543-546. MEDLINE Abstract

14 Plum, G. E., Park, Y.-W., Singleton, S. F., Dervan, P. B. and Breslauer, K. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 87, 9436-9440. MEDLINE Abstract

15 Turner, D. H., Sugimoto, N. and Freier, S. M. (1990) In Saenger, W. (ed.), Nucleic Acids. Landolt-Bornstein series, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Vol. 1C, pp. 201-227.

16 Michel, R. and Dujon, B. (1983) EMBO J., 2, 33-38. MEDLINE Abstract

17 Waring, R. B., Scazzocchio, C., Brown, T. A. and Davies, R. W. (1983) J. Mol. Biol., 262, 595-605.

18 Davies, R. W., Waring, R. B., Ray, J. A., Brown T. A. and Scazzochio, C. (1982) Nature, 300, 719-724. MEDLINE Abstract

19 Michel, F., Jacquier, A. and Dujon, B. (1982) Biochimie, 64, 867-881. MEDLINE Abstract

20 Pyle, A. M., Murphy, F. L. and Cech, T. R. (1992) Nature, 358, 123-128. MEDLINE Abstract

21 Wang, J. F., Downs, W. D. and Cech, T. R. (1993) Science, 260, 504-508. MEDLINE Abstract

22 Cech, T. R. (1990) Annu. Rev. Biochem., 59, 543-568. MEDLINE Abstract

23 Zaug, A. J., Been, M. D. and Cech, T. R. (1986) Nature (London), 324, 429-433.

24 Zaug, A. J., Davila-Aponte, J. A. and Cech, T. R. (1994) Biochemistry, 33, 14935-14947. MEDLINE Abstract

25 Doudna, J. A. and Szostak, J. W. (1989) Nature, 339, 519-522. MEDLINE Abstract

26 Bevilacqua, P. C., Kierzek, R., Johnson, K. A. and Turner, D. H. (1992) Science, 258, 1355-1358. MEDLINE Abstract

27 Cech, T. R., Herschlag, D., Piccirilli, J. A. and Pyle, A. M. (1992) J. Biol. Chem., 267, 17479-17482. MEDLINE Abstract

28 Herschlag, D. and Cech, T. R. (1990) Biochemistry, 29, 10159-10171. MEDLINE Abstract

29 Herschlag, D., Eckstein, F. and Cech. T. R. (1993) Biochemistry, 32, 8299-8311. MEDLINE Abstract

30 Strobel, S. A. and Cech, T. R. (1993) Biochemistry, 32, 13593-13604. MEDLINE Abstract

31 Strobel, S. A. and Cech, T. R. (1995) Science, 267, 675-679. MEDLINE Abstract

32 Kuhsel, M. G., Strickland, R. and Palmer, J. D. (1990) Science, 250, 2570-1573. MEDLINE Abstract

33 Xu, M. Q., Kathe, S. D., Goodrich-Blair, H., Nierzwicki-Bauer, S. A. and Shub, D. A. (1990) Science, 250, 1566-1570. MEDLINE Abstract

34 Zaug, A. J., McEvoy, M. M. and Cech, T. R. (1993) Biochemistry, 32, 7946-7953. MEDLINE Abstract

35 McSwiggen, J. A. and Cech, T. R. (1989) Science, 244, 679-683. MEDLINE Abstract

36 Herschlag, D. and Khosla, M. (1994) Biochemistry, 33, 5291-5297. MEDLINE Abstract

37 McConnell, T., S., Cech, T. R. and Herschlag, D. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 90, 8362-8366. MEDLINE Abstract

38 Bevilacqua, P. C., Johnson, K. A. and Turner, D. H. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 90, 8357-8361. MEDLINE Abstract

39 Sassanfar, M. and Szostak, J. W. (1993) Nature, 364, 550-553. MEDLINE Abstract

40 Jiang, F., Kumar, R. A., Jones R. A. and Patel, D. J. (1996) Nature, 382, 171-174. MEDLINE Abstract

41 Dieckmann, T., Suzuki, E., Nakamura, G. K. and Feigon, J. (1996) RNA, 2, 628-640. MEDLINE Abstract


Return

* To whom correspondence should be addressed

+ Permanent address: Department of Chemistry, Lewis & Clark College, Portland, OR 97219, USA
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (80K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kuo, L.
Right arrow Articles by Cech, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kuo, L.
Right arrow Articles by Cech, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?