Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (138K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (45)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Svinarchuk, F
Right arrow Articles by Malvy, C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Svinarchuk, F
Right arrow Articles by Malvy, C
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 Oxford University Press 295-302

Footnote

Investigation of the intracellular stability and formation of a triple helix formed with a short purine oligonucleotide targeted to the murine c- pim -1 proto-oncogene promoter

Investigation of the intracellular stability and formation of a triple helix formed with a short purine oligonucleotide targeted to the murine c- pim -1 proto-oncogene promoter Fedor Svinarchuk 1,2, * , Arnaud Debin 1 , Jean-Remi Bertrand 1 and Claude Malvy 1

1 Laboratoire de Biochimie-Enzymologie, CNRS URA 147, Institute Gustave Roussy, rue Camille Desmoulins, 94805 Villejuif Cedex, France and 2 Department of Biochemistry, Novosibirsk Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, 8 Prospect Lavrenteva, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia

Received October 4, 1995 ; Revised and Accepted November 29, 1995

ABSTRACT

In our previous work we have shown that the oligonucleotide 5 ' -GGGGAGGGGGAGG-3 ' gives a very stable and specific triplex with the promoter of the murine c- pim -1 proto-oncogene in vitro [Svinarchuk,F., Bertrand,J.-R. and Malvy,C. (1994) Nucleic Acids Res., 22, 3742-3747]. In the present work, we have tested triplex formation with some derivatives of this oligonucleotide which are designed to be degradation-resistant inside the cells, and we show that phosphorothioate and the oligonucleotide with a 3 ' terminal amino group are still able to form triplexes. Moreover these oligonucleotides, like the 13mer oligonucleotide of similar composition [Svinarchuk,F., Paoletti,J., and Malvy,C. (1995) J. Biol. Chem., 270, 14068-14071], are able to stabilize the targeted duplex. In vivo DMS footprint analysis after electroporation of the pre-formed triplex into the cell have shown the presence of the triple helix inside the cells. This triplex structure partially blocks c- pim -1 promoter activity as shown by transient assay with a c- pim -1 promoter-luciferase gene construct. To our knowledge these data are the first direct evidence that conditions inside cells are favorable for triplex stability with non-modified oligonucleotides. However we were unable to show triplex formation inside living cells using various methods of oligonucleotide delivery. We suppose that this may be due to the oligonucleotide being sequestered by cellular processes or proteins. Further work is needed to find oligonucleotide derivatives and ways of their delivery to overcome the problem of triplex formation inside the cells.

INTRODUCTION

Homopurine-homopyrimidine regions in DNA have attracted a great deal of attention in connection with their possible role in gene regulation in eukaryotes ( 1 , 2 ). These regions raise the possibility of manipulating gene expression through artificial triple helix formation ( 3 , 4 ). Displacement of DNA-bound regulatory proteins from their recognition sites by triplex-forming oligonucleotides might provide a general strategy for the alteration of sequence-specific function in eukaryotes ( 5 ). While the formation of an oligodeoxyribonucleotide-directed triple helix as well as its stability were carefully investigated in vitro , little is known about its in vivo behavior ( 3 , 6 ). We also have not found any information about triplex formation with non-modified oligonucleotides inside the cells. In the present work, we have investigated the triplex complex formation with a 13mer polypurine oligonucleotide 5'-GGGGAGGGGGAGG-3' targeted to the promoter region of c- pim -1 gene. This proto-oncogene encodes a highly conserved serine/threonine phosphokinase which is predominantly expressed in hematopoietic organs and gonads in mammals ( 7 , 8 ). Its over-expression is linked to lymphomagenesis in mice ( 9 ), and this gene can act as an apoptotic inhibitor ( 10 ). In our previous work ( 11 ), we have shown that oligonucleotide 5'-GGGGAGGGGGAGG-3' binds to its target sequence in the presence of 50 mM Na + or K + , 10 mM MgCl 2 and 20 mM Tris-acetate, pH 7.5. This oligonucleotide is bound in an antiparallel orientation with respect to the homopurine sequence. As was shown by co-migration assay, the triplex is stable up to 65oC. At 37oC it was practically irreversible: after 24 h of co-migration assay there was no trace of triplex dissociation. As we have already shown, 13mer oligonucleotide with the similar composition even stabilizes its target double-stranded DNA ( 12 ). In the present work we have characterized triplex formation with phosphorothioate and 3' end amino-protected oligonucleotide 5'-GGGGAGGGGGAGG-3' in vivo and in vitro . Melting temperature studies have shown that all the derivatives as well as the phosphodiester stabilize their double-stranded DNA target. Once pre-formed, triple helix structures are stable for at least 24 h after electroporation into the cells as judged by in vivo DMS footprint studies. Formation of the triplex leads to a decrease in c- pim -1 promoter activity in the transient assay with a c- pim -1 promoter-luciferase construct. In contrast, when electroporated first into a cell, target DNA is inaccessible for subsequent triplex formation using various methods of oligonucleotide delivery (passive addition, cationic liposomes or electroporation). This work presents direct evidence that the conditions inside the cell are favorable for the existence of the triplex with non-modified oligonucleotides.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Oligonucleotide preparation

Oligonucleotides were synthesized using the Applied Biosystems 391A DNA synthesizer and purified by electrophoresis in 20% polyacrylamide denaturating gels. Oligonucleotides, bearing an amino group on the 3' end were synthesized on 3'-amino-Mod-C3-CPG columns (GLEN Research Corporation). Phosphorothioate oligonucleotides were purchased from GENSET.

Plasmids

Construction of the plasmid pPimN1 which contains mouse c- pim -1 promoter region (-905 to -14) has been previously described ( 11 ). Plasmid pPim-Luc was made by inserting the Bam HI- Kpn I fragment of pPimN1 (after filling-in of the Bam HI site with Klenow fragment in the presence of dATP and dGTP) into the Sal I- Kpn I sites of the vector pcLUC/[Delta] Kpn I (after filling-in of the Sal I site with Klenow fragment in the presence of dTTP and dCTP). Plasmid pcLUC/[Delta] Kpn I is a derivative of the plasmid pcLUC ( 13 ) with deleted second Kpn I site near 3' end of the luciferase gene. As an internal control in transfection experiments, we used plasmid pCMV-[beta]Gal (Clontech). All plasmids were grown in bacterial strain XL Blue 1 (Stratagene) and purified by CsCl gradient methods ( 14 ).

Cell culture

A cat fibroblast cell line (G355-5), kindly provided by Dr Thierry Heidmann, was maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% foetal calf serum (FCS), 100 [mu]g/ml streptomycin and 100 U/ml penicillin, routinely passaged every 3 days.

Electroporation

Cells which were maintained confluent for 2 days were used for these experiments. The cells were trypsinized and washed with 10 ml DMEM supplemented with 10% FCS. After centrifugation the pellets were resuspended in RPMI medium containing 10 mM MgCl 2 in a volume to give 10 8 cells/ml. Cells (150 [mu]l) were put in a 4 mm electroporation cuvette (Eurogentec), and 20 [mu]l of DNA solution was added. (The quantity of DNA is specified in figure legends and in the text). After 30 min of incubation on ice, the cells were electroporated with a single pulse (200 V, 960 [mu]F) with a BioRad electroporator system. Immediately after the pulse, the clumps of dead cells were removed and the remaining cells were washed three times with 12 ml of warm (37oC) RPMI medium containing 3 mM EDTA. The cells were then resuspended with DMEM containing 10% FCS and incubated for 10 or 24 h before treatment.

To check the efficiency of transfection, 5 [mu]g of pCMV-[beta]Gal plasmid was used for electroporation; after 2 days, [beta]-galactosidase activity was checked by a standard X-gal coloration assay ( 15 ).

In vitro and in vivo DMS footprint studies

Preparation of labeled DNA fragment. The pPimW2 plasmid (50 [mu]g, 20 pmol) ( 11 ) was cut with Cla I restriction enzyme, 3'-labeled with Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase I in the presence of 80 pmol [[alpha]- 32 P]dCTP (3000 Ci/mmol), and digested with Bam HI restriction enzyme. The smaller labeled fragment Bam HI- Cla I (445 bp) was used for in vitro and in vivo footprint experiments. Triple-helix formation. For in vivo assay, 100 pmol of the oligonucleotide or its derivative was added to 1-1.5 pmol of the radiolabeled fragment in 20 [mu]l buffered solution containing 10 mM MgAc 2 , 50 mM NaAc and 30 mM MOPS, pH 7.5. After 1 h of incubation at 37oC, the DNA was used to electroporate 1.5 * 10 7 cells. Probing with DMS in vitro. This procedure was performed as described in ( 11 ). The prepared fragment (~0.5 pmol) was dissolved in 20 [mu]l of the buffer: 50 mM MOPS, pH 7.2, 50 mM NaAc and 10 mM MgAc 2 . Then 20 pmol of the oligonucleotide 5'-GGGGAGGGGGAGG-3' was added. The mixture was incubated 1 h at room temperature. Then 2 [mu]l of 5% DMS was added and the reaction was performed for 4 min at 24oC. The reaction was stopped by the addition of a 5 [mu]l solution containing 10% [beta]-mercaptoethanol, 1 mM EDTA and 0.1 M NaAc. After double precipitation in ethanol, the samples were treated with 50 [mu]l of 10% piperidine at 95oC for 20 min and the cleavage products were separated in 6% polyacrylamide denaturating gels. Probing with DMS in vivo. Twelve or 24 h after electroporation, cells were washed five times with a solution of 0.9% NaCl and 2 mM of EDTA. Then 5 ml of 0.5% DMS was added in a buffered solution containing 0.9% NaCl, 10 mM MgAc 2 , 50 mM MOPS pH 7.5, and the reaction was performed for 4 min at room temperature. The reaction was stopped by brief washing with 0.9% NaCl solution followed by the addition of the same solution with 1% [beta]-mercaptoethanol for 2 min. To extract the DNA fragment, cells were lysed in 5 ml of solution: 20 mM EDTA, 0.5% SDS and 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5. Cellular DNA was precipitated by centrifugation at 30 000 g for 30 min after 2 h of incubation of the cell lysate with 2.5 ml of a 3 M solution of NaAc, pH 5.0, on ice. The DNA fragment was precipitated by addition of an equal volume of isopropanol to the cell supernatant. The precipitate was dissolved in 200 [mu]l water, extracted once with an equal volume of phenol:chloroform (1:1) and precipitated with 2.5 vol of ethanol at -20oC for 2 h. The DNA was collected by centrifugation for 10 min, washed once with 75% ethanol and allowed to dry for 5 min at room temperature. The samples were treated with 50 [mu]l 10% piperidine at 95oC for 20 min, and the products of cleavage were separated in 6% polyacrylamide denaturating gels.

The level of guanine protection in DMS footprinting experiments was estimated using a Fujix Bas 1000 PhosphoImager. This value for each type of the oligonucleotide (x i ) was calculated according to the equation: x i = (1 - I cc /I tc * I ti /I ci ) * 100%

where I c indicates the sum of the intensity of the five bands located near the site of protection, and I t is the sum of the intensity of the five bands inside the triplex forming region. Additionally, `c' (for the control oligonucleotide) and `i' (for the triplex-forming oligonucleotides) indicate the line in Figure 4 (and correspondingly the type of oligonucleotide we have used in the experiment). Labels I cc and I tc indicate control oligonucleotide (lines 4 and 7 for the in vivo and in vitro experiments correspondingly); I ti and I ci indicate triplex-forming oligonucleotides ( in vivo experiments: lines 1, 2 and 3 for phosphorothioate, oligonucleotide with a 3' terminal group and phosphodiester correspondingly; in vitro experiments: line 6 for phosphodiester).

UV spectroscopic temperature-dependent melting studies

Absorbance of the oligonucleotide mixture was measured at 258 nm as a function of temperature with an Uvicon 941 spectrophotometer equipped with Huber cryotermostat and Huber PD410 temperature programmer through software developed for T m recording. The rate of temperature increase/decrease was 0.5oC/min. The buffer contained 10 mM MgAc 2 , 50 mM NaAc and 20 mM Tris-acetate, pH 7.5, with each oligonucleotide at a concentration of 1.15 [mu]M. Before melting studies all samples were heated to 80oC for 15 min and then allowed to return slowly to room temperature.

Delivery of oligonucleotides after electroporation of the double-stranded DNA

Passive addition. After electroporation of the duplex DNA, the cells were incubated in 10 ml DMEM supplemented with 10% FCS which contained 5 [mu]M phosphorothioate or 3'-amino group-protected oligonucleotide. Electroporation . After electroporation of the duplex, the cells were incubated in 10 ml DMEM supplemented with 10% FCS for 2 or 10 h. After washing twice with PBS to remove the dead cells, the cells were trypsinized and electroporated, as describe above, in the presence of 15 [mu]M oligonucleotide with either an amino or phosphorothioate group at the 3' end. After a second electroporation, the cells were washed twice to remove non-internalized oligonucleotide. Cationic liposomes. A fter DNA electroporation, the cells were incubated for 2 h until attachment of the cells to the plate; then they were washed twice and incubated with 10 ml DMEM without serum containing 100 [mu]l of DOTAP:DOPE liposomes (dioleoyl phosphatidyl ethanolamine, 1:1, concentration 69 [mu]M in lipids; kindly provided by Dr F. Adnet) ( 16 ) which had been previously incubated for 10 min with 2 nM oligonucleotide.

Examination of the influence of the triplex formation on the c-pim-1 promoter activity

To estimate the ability of triplex formation to down-regulate the c- pim -1 promoter activity, we performed a co-transfection assay with the plasmids pPim-Luc and pCMV-[beta]Gal (5:1). For each electroporation we used 5 [mu]g (2 pmol) of pPim-Luc plasmid after pre-incubation with 200 pmol of the triplex-forming or control oligonucleotide using the same conditions as for the in vivo footprint experiments. For these studies, 48 h after electroporation cells were washed five times with 0.9% NaCl and harvested in 5 ml 0.9% solution of NaCl with 2 mM EDTA with the help of a cell lifter. After centrifugation, cells were lysed in 150 [mu]l buffered solution containing 0.25 M Tris-phosphate, pH 7.8, 1 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, 15% glycerol, 1 mM DTT and 0.4 mM phenylmethyl-sulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) by three freeze-thaw cycles using dry ice/ethanol and a 25oC bath. The extracts were then centrifuged in a microtube to pellet cell debris. Luciferase activity was assayed on the biocounter M2010 Lumac/3M in buffer containing 10 mM MgCl 2 , 0.2% BSA, 0.1 mM D-luciferin (Sigma), 1 mM ATP, 0.25 M Tris-phosphate, pH 7.8, 1 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, 15% glycerol, 1 mM DTT and 0.4 mM PMSF, integration time 60 s. Cellular extract (20 [mu]l) from 3 * 10 6 cells was used for each determination. The [beta]-galactosidase activity was measured by the method described in ( 17 ). Cellular extract (2 [mu]l) was used for each determination; [beta]-galactosidase activity was expressed as OD units after 30 min of incubation (linear part of the coloration reaction). As a measure for the efficiency of down-regulation through triplex formation, we compared the ratio of luciferase:[beta]-galactosidase activity of cells which had been co-electroporated with the plasmid pPim-Luc preincubated with triplex-forming oligonucleotide, or a control oligonucleotide and plasmid pCMV-[beta]Gal. Errors in the percent inhibition were calculated as the maximum deviation from the average value in three independent transfection experiments.

RESULTS

Triplex stability with the oligonucleotide derivatives in vitro

In previous work ( 11 ), we have shown that the oligonucleotide 5'-GGGGAGGGGGAGG-3' forms a very stable and specific triple helix with its target DNA in the c- pim -1 promoter region, and we have studied in vitro triplex formation with this oligonucleotide in physiological buffer conditions. In the present work, we investigate the stability of this triplex directly inside cells. Because oligonucleotides are normally quickly degraded in cell culture medium and in cells, we first tried different oligonucleotide derivatives, known to be more resistant to nuclease digestion, for their ability to form triplex in vitro . As shown in Figure 1 , either non-modified phosphodiester oligonucleotide, oligonucleotide bearing an amino group on its 3' end or phosphorothioate equally protect guanines in the purine strand of the target, indicating triplex formation under experimental conditions. In order to quantify the stability of the triplex structures with the oligonucleotide derivatives, we have performed UV spectroscopic melting temperature studies (Fig. 2 ). In all cases (duplex or duplex plus the derivative of the third strand oligonucleotide) we observed only one transition, and the melting temperature of the three-strand structure is always higher than for the duplex. (The small transition at the lower temperature could be explained by formation of a partial duplex between the third strand oligonucleotide 5'-GGGGAGGGGGAGG-3' and the pyrimidine strand of the duplex. This is in agreement with our unpublished observation, that the third strand oligonucleotide 5'-GGGGTGGGGGTGG-3', which gives the triplex the same stability, at the same time does not give additional transitions at lower temperature.) As we have already shown ( 12 ), the third strand purine oligonucleotide 5'-GGAGGGGGAGGGG-3' binds to the targeted DNA in an antiparallel orientation and stabilizes the targeted duplex under the same conditions.


Figure 1 . Autoradiogram of a 6% polyacrylamide sequencing gel showing the results of DMS footprinting experiments carried out with the third strand's oligonucleotide 5'-GGGGAGGGGGAGG-3' derivatives. 1, phosphorothioate; 2, oligonucleotide bearing NH 2 group on the 3' end; 3, phosphodiester; 4, in the presence of the control oligonucleotide 5'-GAGGCGGCAGGGCGAGAGGC-3'.


Figure 2 . Melting temperature curves and their derivatives of the equimolar mixture of the oligonucleotides 5'-GGAGGGGGAGGGG-3' and 5'-CCCCTCCCCCTCC-3' (duplex), and the same duplex with the third strand's oligonucleotide 5'-GGGGAGGGGGAGG-3' derivatives. (A) phosphodiester (duplex, `0' corresponds to 0.220 OD and `100' corresponds to 0.240 OD; triplex., `0' corresponds to 0.350 OD and `100' corresponds to 0.380 OD); (B) oligonucleotide bearing NH 2 group on the 3' end; (C) phosphorothioate; (D) control phosphodiester oligonucleotide 5'-GGCGAGGCGGAGG-3'.

Similarity of the oligonucleotide sequences and similar behavior under different probing: co-migration assay [both are stable in a co-migration assay at 65oC ( 11 , 12 )]. DMS footprint, melting temperature studies, indicate that oligonucleotides 5'-GGGGAGGGGGAGG-3' and 5'-GGAGGGGGAGGGG-3' display the same phenomena (stabilization of the duplex due to triplex formation) and that chemical modification of the oligonucleotide does not change the stability of this triple helix.

In melting temperature studies, the control oligonucleotide with two `mismatches', 5'-GGcGAGGcGGAGG-3', gives two transitions with melting temperatures at 30 and 64oC when compared with the oligonucleotide 5'-GGGGAGGGGGAGG-3'. Because the second temperature exactly fits the melting temperature of the duplex, it is most likely that the first corresponds to the melting temperature of the triplex. At the same time, in the co-migration assay, no triplex formation occurs with control oligonucleotide at room temperature (data not shown).

Delivery of the pre-formed triplex into the cells

In vitro pre-formed triplex, between oligonucleotide 5'-GGGGAGGGGGAGG-3', or its derivatives, and the radioactively labeled fragment Cla I- Bam HI of the c- pim -1 promoter, was delivered into the cells by electroporation. Because we cannot exclude that the triplex might also be present on the surface of the cells after electroporation, we have determined the conditions for triplex stability in order to dissociate the triplex outside the cells. As shown in Figure 3 , addition of EDTA completely dissociates the pre-formed triplex. This is in agreement with our own results ( 11 , 12 ) and those of others ( 18 , 19 ) that divalent cations are crucial for purine(purine-pyrimidine) triplex formation. This fact makes it possible to dissociate an external triplex by washing the cells with EDTA solution immediately after electroporation.


Figure 3 . Autoradiogram of a 6% polyacrylamide sequencing gel showing the dependence of the triplex formation on the concentration of Mg 2+ . Triplex was pre-formed under the conditions described in Materials and Methods and then subjected to DMS treatment in the same buffer containing different Mg 2+ concentrations: 1, 10 mM Mg 2+ ; 2, 5 mM Mg 2+ ; 3, 2 mM Mg 2+ ; 4, 10 mM Mg 2 + 5 mM EDTA; 5, in the presence of the control oligonucleotide 5'-GAGGCGGCAGGGCGAGAGGC-3'; 6, A+G reaction.


Figure 4 . Autoradiogram of a 6% polyacrylamide sequencing gel showing the results of in vivo DMS footprint (24 h after electroporation) of the c- pim -1 promoter region carried out with the third strand's oligonucleotide 5'-GGGGAGGGGGAGG-3' derivatives. In vivo : 1, phosphorothioate; 2, oligonucleotide bearing NH2 group on 3' end; 3, phosphodiester; 4, control phosphorothioate oligonucleotide 5'-TGAACACGCCATGTC-3'; 5, the same as 1 but the cells were not electroporated. In vitro : 6, phosphorothioate; 7, control oligonucleotide 5'-GAGGCGGCAGGGCGAGAGGC-3'; 8, A+G reaction. Ic and It, positions of the reference bands located outside and inside the targeted sequence chosen for quantification of guanine protection (see Materials and Methods for details).

In addition, in order to minimize the quantity of the DNA which could be bound to the cells due to the endocytosis process, we electroporated cells which had been maintained 2 days at confluence. Under these conditions, the quantity of the radiolabeled DNA associated with the cell after electroporation exceeds 20 times the quantity of the DNA bound to the cell without electroporation and is estimated to be 100-500 copies of the fragment per cell. (This value was determined by dividing the quantity of the radioactivity bound to the cells by the specific activity of the radiolabeled DNA fragment.)

In a parallel experiment, the efficiency of transfection has been estimated by cell coloration after electroporation of the plasmid pCMV-[beta]Gal. Under this experimental condition 50-70% of the cells express [beta]-galactosidase.

Stability of the pre-formed triplex inside the cells

To estimate stability of the pre-formed triplex inside the cells, we used in vivo DMS footprinting. In these experiments, pre-formed triplex made with the radiolabeled c- pim -1 promoter fragment with either the oligonucleotide or its derivatives was electroporated into the cells, which were subjected to DMS treatment 12 or 24 h later. As a control, we used the same DNA fragment after pre-incubating with the phosphorothioate oligonucleotide 5'-TGAACACGCCATGTC-3' which does not form triplex in vitro . It appears that there is protection of the guanines in the target sequence, which indicates presence of the triplex inside the cells (Fig. 4 ). Additional proteinase K and DNase treatment of the cells (10 min with proteinase K 1 mg/ml in 0.9 M NaCl, followed by subsequent washing with DMEM containing 10% serum, DMEM without serum and treatment with DNase 0.1 mg/ml) does not change the DMS footprint picture. This confirms the intracellular triplex localization. No protection is detected in the experiment with the control oligonucleotide, which indicates that protection of the target sequence is really due to the triplex formation and does not reflect specific protein(s) binding to the target sequence. At the same time, the level of protection is lower than in the in vitro experiments. Estimates made with the help of the PhosphoImager give 60% protection for in vivo experiments, compared with 90% protection obtained in vitro . This level of protection is consistent for all of the derivatives and is the same for non-modified phosphodiester, indicating protection against nucleases of the non-modified oligonucleotide in triple helix structure. After 12 or 24 h, the level of protection was nearly the same. Possible mechanisms for this phenomenon are discussed below.

Formation of the triplex inside the cells

To evaluate the formation of triplex inside the cells, we used the following methods of oligonucleotide delivery: (i) passive addition of the phosphorothioate to the culture medium at a concentration of 5 [mu]M 1 h after DNA electroporation; (ii) cationic liposomes with the oligonucleotide bearing an amino group at the 3' end; (iii) second electroporation of the cells in the presence of 15 [mu]M oligonucleotide either bearing an amino group or phosphorothioate at the 3' end; (iv) co-electroporation of the radiolabeled fragment (2 pmol) and the triplex-forming oligonucleotide (2500 pmol). Even in the last case we did not detect any triplex formation inside the cells. (Cell were electroporated without Mg 2+ to avoid any triplex pre-formation.) Details of the experiments are described in Material and Methods. No triplex formation in these experiments was observed (results not shown).

Influence of the triplex formation on the c-pim-1 promoter activity

To estimate the influence of the triplex formation on the c- pim -1 promoter activity, we performed a co-transfection assay with the plasmids Pim-luc and pCMV-[beta]Gal. In the case of the pre-formed triplex with 3'-amino-protected oligonucleotide the ratio luciferase activity:[beta]-galactosidase activity was 5870 +- 6%; in the presence of the control 3'-amino-protected oligonucleotide 5'-GGcGAGGcGGAGG-3' it was 7360 +- 5%. When the triplex-forming oligonucleotide or the control one were added after cell transfection this ratio was 7460 +- 7% and 7480 +- 6% correspondingly. These data are taken from three independent experiments and they clearly show reproducible down-regulation of the c- pim -1 promoter activity in the case of pre-formed triplex (20% inhibition). In accordance with the data from the footprint assay, there is no inhibition of promoter activity when triplex-forming oligonucleotide is added to the cells after electroporation.

DISCUSSION

In our previous work, we found that the oligonucleotide 5'-GGGGAGGGGGAGG-3' gives a very particular triplex structure with its target sequence in the c- pim -1 proto-oncogene promoter ( 11 ). In vitro parameters of the triplex formation are very different from those measured by other authors ( 3 , 20 ): (i) the triplex is stable at 65oC in the co-migration assay; (ii) one mismatch in the target sequence completely abolishes triplex formation as judged by the co-migration assay; (iii) the value of the dissociation constant can be estimated to be <1.5 * 10 -9 M; (iv) once formed, the triplex is practically irreversible at 37oC: after 24 h of co-migration assay, there was no trace of triplex dissociation. Following the in vitro data it was very tempting to test this oligonucleotide for its ability to form triplex inside the cells.

As a first step, we have investigated in vitro triplex formation with different oligonucleotide derivatives which are known to be more resistant to nucleases: phosphorothioates and oligonucleotides with an amino group at the 3' end. DMS footprint and melting temperature studies have shown that all tested oligonucleotide derivatives form triplexes with the same affinity as non-modified phosphodiester oligonucleotide. The behavior of the phosphorothioate oligonucleotide is in agreement with previously published data that purine-rich oligonucleotides containing phosphorothioate linkages form triplexes with affinities similar to those of the corresponding natural phosphodiester oligonucleotides ( 21 ). However the fact that phosphorothioates and oligonucleotides with an amino group at the 3' end stabilize their target double-stranded DNA is new.

In a second round we have studied the stability of the pre-formed triplexes inside the cells. As a measure of the triplex stability we have used our modification of the in vivo DMS footprint method. The main feature of this approach is electroporation of the 3' labeled DNA fragment into the cells. Experiments have shown that even 24 h after electroporation the DNA is stable enough to obtain a readable footprint. Experiments performed with pre-formed triplexes have shown that all types of oligonucleotides (phosphodiester, phosphorothioate and oligonucleotide with 3' amino group) do protect targeted DNA inside the cells. In all of our experiments, we obtained a lower level of the guanine protection than in in vitro experiments. One can suggest two possibilities to explain this phenomenon. First, it might be due to specific protein(s) which recognize the triple-stranded DNA and make the purine strand of the duplex more accessible to DMS treatment. Triplex DNA-binding proteins have already been described ( 22 ). Secondly, we can not exclude a strong attachment of a portion of the DNA to the cell's surface proteins after electroporation which makes the triplex accessible to disruption by EDTA treatment.

The reported results are the first direct proof to our knowledge that conditions inside the cell are favorable for the existence of the triplex with non-modified oligonucleotides. If the pre-formed triplexes are stable inside the cell, one expects that they would form inside the cell when an appropriate delivery route is used for the oligonucleotide.

In a third round of our experiments our aim was to know whether triplex formation is possible inside the cells. With this purpose in mind, we used three different methods of oligonucleotide delivery.

Passive addition

The phosphorothioate oligonucleotide was added to the culture medium after 1.5 h of electroporation of the labeled c- pim -1 promoter fragment. After 12 h of cell growth in the presence of 5 [mu]M oligonucleotide, there was no detectable protection of the target sequence. This was not due to phosphorothioate degradation. In agreement with the published data ( 23 ) we observed full-length oligonucleotide in the culture medium and in cells lysate even after 24 h of cell culture (data not shown). This result may be explained by different localizations of the electroporated duplex and the oligonucleotide: electroporated DNA is going to the nucleus and the localization of passively added oligonucleotides is predominantly cytoplasmic ( 24 ).

Cationic liposomes

The delivery of the oligonucleotide protected by an amino group on its 5' end with the help of cationic liposomes, which are very efficient in gene transfection experiments, also does not lead to triplex formation inside the cells. Efficiency of delivery with this type of liposome was tested with pCMV-[beta]Gal plasmid in a transient assay (typically more than 90% of transfected cells) and with fluorescein-labeled oligonucleotides in confocal microscopy experiments (all oligonucleotide bound to the cells after a few hours was located in the nucleus) (Dr F. Adnet, personal communication).

Electroporation

No triplex formation was obtained in co-electroporation experiments or after electroporation of the triplex-forming oligonucleotide either 2 or 10 h after electroporation of the radiolabeled c- pim -1 promoter fragment.

We suggest that the failure to form triplex inside the cells was not due to the high K + concentration inside the cells: we were able to see ~50% protection of the targeted site in the in vitro DMS footprinting experiments in the buffer containing 10 mM MgAc 2 , 40 mM MOPS pH 7.5, 150 mM KCl and 2.5 [mu]M of the triplex-forming oligonucleotide after 2 h incubation with 0.5 pmol of the fragment (2.5 [mu]M oligonucleotide corresponds to the concentration after electroporation of the cells in the presence of 2500 pmol oligonucleotide). Probably, this failure is due to quick trapping of the oligonucleotides by cellular proteins or different compartmentalization of the oligonucleotide and double-stranded DNA inside the cells. Some proteins which specifically bind oligonucleotides have been described ( 25 ). Another possibility is that while being electroporated, plasmid DNA quickly adopts a nucleosomal structure ( 26 ), which prevents triplex formation ( 27 ).

The oligonucleotide 5'-GGGGAGGGGGAGG-3' is targeted to the PPF 348 site ( 28 ) in the c- pim -1 promoter. As was shown in transient assay, deletion of the region of ~50 bp which contains the AP2 and the PPF 348 sites leads to a 60% decrease in human c- pim -1 promoter activity ( 28 ). In vitro footprint experiments have shown the existence of a nuclear factor specifically interacting with the PPF 348 site ( 28 ). High levels of homology between mouse and human c- pim -1 promoters in this region (only four mismatches between mouse and human sequences at the length of 70 bp) underlines the importance of the PPF 348 site for c- pim -1 promoter function. In our hands transient transfection experiments with pre-formed triplex show a reproducible down-regulation of the c- pim -1 promoter activity (20% inhibition). This value looks reasonable compared with 60% inhibition obtained in deletion analysis. We suggest that this down-regulation might be due to prevention of the regulatory protein(s) binding to the PPF 348 site by the triplex-forming oligonucleotide.

In complete agreement with the result of the experiment of in vivo DMS footprint, c- pim -1 promoter down-regulation by triplex-forming oligonucleotide is efficient only in the case of pre-formed triplex, and passive addition of the 3' end protected oligonucleotide does not influence c- pim -1 promoter activity.

Our data on the inhibition of c- pim -1 promoter activity in the transient assay are in a good agreement with those of Grigoriev et al . ( 3 , 5 ), who were able to inhibit promoter activity of IL2R only after pre-formation of the triplex in vitro or in situ with acridine or psoralene-conjugated oligonucleotides.

Specific inhibition of endogenous genes ( 4 , 29 ) or virus propagation ( 30 ) through triplex formation inside the cells has also been demonstrated. The data suggesting triplex formation inside living cells in these works are indirect, and the growing number of publications demonstrating `specific' inhibition of genes by oligonucleotides with non-related sequences ( 31 - 36 ) shows that direct proofs concerning the mechanisms of oligonucleotides action are of great importance.

Our data present direct proof that the conditions inside the cell are favorable for the existence of a triplex with non-modified short oligonucleotides. However, in each study the possibility to extrapolate triplex formation in cells from in vitro experiments should be carefully investigated. Despite the failure to form triplexes inside the cells after different routes of oligonucleotide delivery, these data offer the possibility that triplex formation could play a role in natural genetic processes (gene regulation, recombination events). Further work is needed to discover new oligonucleotide derivatives and new ways of delivery to overcome the problem of triplex formation inside the cells.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr E. Lescot for oligonucleotide synthesis and Dr U. Hazan for providing the pcLUC vector. We are very grateful to Dr J. Paoletti who gave us the software for T m recording and to Drs J. Tanaka and M. Lee for fruitful discussion. This work was supported by an Agence Nationale de Recherches sur le SIDA research fellowship to F.S., an IFSBM fellowship to A.D. and by INSERM grant no. 94 EO 08.

REFERENCES

1 Beasty,M. and Behe,M.J. (1988) Nucleic Acids Res., 16, 1517-1528. MEDLINE Abstract

2 O'Neill,D., Bornschlegel,K., Flamm,M., Castle,M. and Bank,A. (1991) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 88, 8953-8957.

3 Grigoriev,M., Praseuth,D., Guieysse,A.L., Robin,P., Thuong,N.T., Helen,C. and Harel-Bellan,A. (1993) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 90, 3501-3505. MEDLINE Abstract

4 Orson,F.M., Thomas,D.W, McShan,W.M., Kessler,D.J. and Hogan,M.E. (1991) Nucleic Acids Res., 19, 3435-3441. MEDLINE Abstract

5 Grigoriev,M., Praseuth,D., Robin,P., Hemar,A., Saison-Behmoaras,T., Dautry-Varsat,A., Thuong,N.T., Helen,C. and Harel-Bellan,A. (1992) J. Biol. Chem., 267, 3389-3385. MEDLINE Abstract

6 Wang,G., Levy,D.D., Seidman,M.M. and Glaser,P.M. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol., 25, 1759-1768.

7 Laird,P.W., Van der Lugt,N.M.T., Clarke,A., Domen,J., Linders,K., McWhir,J., Berns,A. and Hooper,M. (1993) Nucleic Acids Res., 21, 4750-4755. MEDLINE Abstract

8 Selten,G., Cuypers,H.T., Boelens,W., Robanus-Maandag,E., Verbeek,J., Domen,J., Van Beveren,C. and Berns,A. (1986) Cell, 46, 603-611. MEDLINE Abstract

9 van Lohuizen,M., Verbeek,S., Krimpenfort,P., Domen,J., Saris,C., Radaszkiewicz,T. and Berns,A. (1989) Cell, 56, 673-682. MEDLINE Abstract

10 Moroy,T., Grzeschiczek,A., Petzold,S. and Hartmann,K.-U. (1993) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 90, 10734-10738.

11 Svinarchuk,F., Bertrand,J.-R. and Malvy,C. (1994) Nucleic Acids Res., 22, 3742-3747. MEDLINE Abstract

12 Svinarchuk,F., Paoletti,J. and Malvy,C. (1995) J. Biol. Chem., 270, 14068-14071. MEDLINE Abstract

13 Schwartz,O., Virelizier,J.-L., Montagnier,L. and Hazan,U. (1990) Gene, 88, 197-205. MEDLINE Abstract

14 Sambrook,J., Fritsch,E.F. and Maniatis,T. (1989). Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd ed, Vol. 1, p.1.42, SCH Press, USA.

15 Rocancourt,D., Bonnerot,C., Jouin,H., Emerman,M. and Nicolas,J.F. (1990) J. Virol., 64, 2660-2668. MEDLINE Abstract

16 McLachlan,G., Davidson,H., Davidson,D., Dickinson,P., Dorin,J. and Porteous,D. (1994) Biochemica, 11, 19-21.

17 Simon,J.A. and Lies,J.D. (1987) Nucleic Acids Res., 15, 2971-2988. MEDLINE Abstract

18 Beal,P.A. and Dervan,P.B. (1991) Science, 251, 1360-1363. MEDLINE Abstract

19 Malkov,V.A., Voloshin,O.N., Soyfer,V.N. and Frank-Kamenetskii,M.D. (1993) Nucleic Acids Res., 21, 585-591. MEDLINE Abstract

20 Washbrook,E. and Fox,K.R. (1994) Nucleic Acids Res., 22, 3977-3982. MEDLINE Abstract

21 Hacia,J.G., Wold,B.J. and Dervan,P.B. (1994) Biochemistry, 33, 5367-5369. MEDLINE Abstract

22 Kiyama,R. and Camerini-Otero,R.A. (1991) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 88, 10450-10454. MEDLINE Abstract

23 Iwanaga,T. and Ferriola,P. (1993) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm., 191, 1152-1157.

24 Bennett,R.M. (1993) Antisense Res. Dev., 3, 235-241.

25 Svinarchuk,F.P., Lavrovsky,Y.V., Konevets,D.A. and Vlassov,V.V. (1991) Nucleic Acids Res., Symp. 24, 316.

26 Cereghini,S. and Yaniv,M. (1984) EMBO J., 3, 1243-1253. MEDLINE Abstract

27 Westin,L., Blomquist,P., Milligan,J.F. and Wrange,O. (1995) Nucleic Acids Res., 23, 2184-2191. MEDLINE Abstract

28 Meeker,T.C., Loeb,J.L., Ayres,M. and Sellers,W. (1990) Mol. Cell. Biol., 10, 1680-1688. MEDLINE Abstract

29 Postel,E.H., Flint,S.J., Kessler,D.J. and Hogan,M.E. (1991) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 88, 8227-8231. MEDLINE Abstract

30 McShan,W.M., Rossen,R.D., Laughter,A.H., Trial,J., Kessler,D.J., Zendegui,J.G., Hogan,M.E. and Orson,F.M. (1992) J. Biol. Chem., 267, 5712-5721. MEDLINE Abstract

31 Chiang,M., Chan,H., Zounes,M.A., Lima,S.M., Freier,W.F. and Bennett,C.F. (1991) J. Biol. Chem., 266, 18162-18171. MEDLINE Abstract

32 Ehrlich,G., Patinkin,D., Ginzberg,D., Zakut,H., Eckstein,F. and Soreq,H. (1994) Antisense Res. Dev., 4, 173-183. MEDLINE Abstract

33 Matsukura,M., Shinozuka,K., Zon,G., Mitsuya,H., Reitz,M., Cohen,J.S. and Broder,S. (1987) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 84, 7706-7710. MEDLINE Abstract

34 McIntyre,K.W., Lombard-Gillooly,K., Perez,J.R., Kunsch,C., Sarmiento,U.M., Larigan,J.D., Landreth,K.T. and Narayanan,R. (1992) Antisense Res. Dev., 3, 309-322. MEDLINE Abstract

35 Ojwang,J., Okleberry,K.M., Marshall,H.B., Vu,H.M., Huffman,J.H. and Rando,R.F. (1994) Antiviral Res., 25, 27-41. MEDLINE Abstract

36 Yamamoto,T., Yamamoto,S., Kataoka,T. and Tokunaga,T. (1992) Antisense Res. Dev., 4, 119-122. MEDLINE Abstract


Return

*To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Laboratoire de Biochimie-Enzymologie, PR. 2, CNRS URA 147, Institute Gustave Roussy, rue Camille Desmoulins, 94805 Villejuif Cedex, France
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
C. Shen, A. Buck, G. Mehrke, B. Polat, H.-J. Gross, M. Bachem, and S. Reske
Triplex forming oligonucleotide targeted to 3'UTR downregulates the expression of the bcl-2 proto-oncogene in HeLa cells
Nucleic Acids Res., February 1, 2001; 29(3): 622 - 628.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
Z. Intody, B. D. Perkins, J. H. Wilson, and T. G. Wensel
Blocking transcription of the human rhodopsin gene by triplex-mediated DNA photocrosslinking
Nucleic Acids Res., November 1, 2000; 28(21): 4283 - 4290.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
C. Bailey and D. L. Weeks
Understanding oligonucleotide-mediated inhibition of gene expression in Xenopus laevis oocytes
Nucleic Acids Res., March 1, 2000; 28(5): 1154 - 1161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
C. Giovannangeli, S. Diviacco, V. Labrousse, S. Gryaznov, P. Charneau, and C. Helene
Accessibility of nuclear DNA to triplex-forming oligonucleotides: The integrated HIV-1 provirus as a target
PNAS, January 7, 1997; 94(1): 79 - 84.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
F.-L. M. Lin, A. Majumdar, L. C. Klotz, A. P. Reszka, S. Neidle, and M. M. Seidman
Stability of DNA Triplexes on Shuttle Vector Plasmids in the Replication Pool in Mammalian Cells
J. Biol. Chem., December 8, 2000; 275(50): 39117 - 39124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (138K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (45)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Svinarchuk, F
Right arrow Articles by Malvy, C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Svinarchuk, F
Right arrow Articles by Malvy, C
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?