Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (244K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nourrit, F
Right arrow Articles by Kallenbach, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nourrit, F
Right arrow Articles by Kallenbach, S
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 Oxford University Press 3968-3974

Footnote

The presence of direct repeats does not influence coding joint formation during V(D)J recombination

The presence of direct repeats does not influence coding joint formation during V(D)J recombination Françoise Nourrit , Quang Tri Nguyen , François Rougeon* and Sacha Kallenbach +

Unité de Génétique et Biochimie du Développement, CNRS URA 1960, Institut Pasteur, 25 rue du Dr. Roux, 75724 Paris Cedex, France

Received July 8, 1996; Revised and Accepted September 6, 1996

ABSTRACT

During the recombination process that assembles immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor gene segments, the coding ends to be joined are extensively processed. Contradictory reports have been made in the past about the existence of homology directed mechanisms in V(D)J recombination. In this study we analyse coding end processing and the influence of the presence of homology stretches on coding joint formation using artificial substrates in which short sequence changes creating direct repeats have been introduced. These changes were monitored 3 bp away from the termini in order to avoid any differences due to the initiation steps of V(D)J recombination. Our results show that the sequence of the coding ends influences joint formation, but no evidence was found for a mechanistic bias due to the presence of direct repeats.

INTRODUCTION

Functional immunoglobulin (Ig) and T-cell receptor (TcR) genes are assembled from separately encoded gene segments during lymphocyte differentiation (for a review see ref. 1 ). This assembly process, called V(D)J recombination, is site specific. The signal sequences that are recognised, are composed of a palindromic heptamer, a 12 or 23 bp spacer and a nonamer. The presence of two signal sequences with different spacer lengths is sufficient to direct recombination of artificial substrates introduced into recombination proficient cells. The recombination process produces two types of joints, the signal joint which is formed by the precise juxtaposition of the heptamers, and the coding joint formed by the gene segments. The coding ends are extensively processed. Deletions ranging in size from 1 to 15 or 20 nucleotides can be observed as well as two types of nucleotides additions: P-nucleotides form short palindromes with the unprocessed coding sequence ( 2 , 3 ) and are thought to result from the asymetric opening of a hairpin intermediate ( 4 , 5 ); N-regions are random nucleotide insertions that can occur after deletion or P-nucleotide insertion, as well as on full length coding ends, and have been shown to be added by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT) ( 6 - 8 ). In the absence of TdT expression, the Ig and TCR repertoires are restricted and the junctions of Ig and TCR gene segments are often formed at sites of homology between the coding ends ( 3 , 9 - 12 ). The observation of these canonical joints led to the hypothesis that the high incidence of these joints might be due to a mechanistic bias towards formation of joints at short direct repeats ( 11 , 12 ). However, canonical joints are not observed for all segment combinations ( 8 , 12 , 13 ). Reports on the influence of short stretches of homology on the V(D)J recombination reaction are contradictory. Pandey et al. showed that the bias observed in endogenous genes in mucovy duck is due to selection ( 14 ). In other experiments where unrearranged transgenes could not undergo selection, the formation of canonical junctions still occurred ( 15 ). Experiments with artificial substrates containing homopolymers as coding regions show that the extent of junctional deletion is not altered by the presence of homology ( 16 ), while another study with substrates bearing randomised coding end sequences concluded that junctions were preferentially formed at overlapping nucleotides ( 17 ).

Here we report on the influence of coding end sequences on coding joint formation during V(D)J recombination. Extrachromosomal V(D)J recombination substrates provide excellent tools to address this question. Unlike the endogenous Ig and TCR genes, these artificial substrates used in transient tranfection assays are not subject to antigen selection but only submitted to the constraints imposed by the recombination process itself. Small changes in the coding end sequences can be monitored, and their effect on coding joint formation can be analysed after site specific rearrangement.

Our results show that the sequence of the coding ends affects the distribution of coding joints. However, no evidence was found for a mechanistic bias triggered by the presence of direct repeats.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Vectors

All the vectors contain the polyoma early region necessary for autonomous replication in mouse fibroblasts, the replication sequences and the [beta]-lactamase gene necessary for growth and selection in Escherichia coli . To test how coding end sequences would influence coding end resolution, we constructed four extrachromosomal V(D)J recombination substrates (Fig. 1 ). The coding end associated with the recombination signal sequence that has a 12 bp spacer (12-coding end) is identical in the four plasmids. Six base pairs were inserted into the Hin cII site of the 23-coding end of pBlueRec ( 18 ) to obtain the three other plasmids. The double strand oligonucleotides are ATCCTA for pBlueH4 and pBlueI4 (in opposite orientation) and AGTGGA for pBlueH6.


Figure 1 . Schematic representation of the V(D)J recombination substrates ( A ). Sequences of the coding ends of the V(D)J recombination substrates ( B ). Sequences of the maximum homology coding joints for the V(D)J recombination substrates and corresponding junction sizes. The nucleotides forming the direct repeats can not be attributed unambiguously to the 12- or 23-coding end; they are shown aligned with the 12-coding end and are underlined. P-nucleotides are in lower case.( C ).

Cell culture and transfection

NIH 3T3 mouse embryo fibroblasts were grown in Dulbecco modified Eagle medium supplemented with 10% newborn calf serum. This cell line was chosen, because it does not express endogenous terminal transferase activity. In V(D)J recombination assays, cells were transfected by electroporation (960 [mu]F, 300 V) following the procedure described by Chu et al . ( 19 ). Cells (2 * 10 6 ) were transfected with 2.5 [mu]g of one of the recombination substrates and 6 [mu]g of M2CD.7 (pRag1) and 4.8 [mu]g of R2RCD.2 (pRag2) ( 20 ). After the electric pulse, cells were plated in three separate dishes. Cells were harvested after 40-48 h incubation at 37oC, and washed with phosphate-buffered saline; plasmid DNA was prepared according to a modified procedure of alkaline minilysis ( 21 ). DNA pellets were resuspended in 20 [mu]l of sterile water. At least 10 independent transfections were performed with each V(D)J recombination substrate.

Analysis of the recombinant plasmids

To score the V(D)J recombination frequency, 5 [mu]l of the DNA solution obtained after transfection were digested by Dpn I, which only cleaves its recognition site when it is dam methylated on both strands, in order to eliminate non replicated plasmids and thus to enrich for plasmids which have penetrated into the nucleus, and transformed into XLI-blue bacteria by electroporation. Bacteria were plated on LB agar plates containing 80 [mu]g/ml X-Gal, 150 [mu]M IPTG, 100 [mu]g/ml ampicillin and 10 [mu]g/ml tetracyclin. Rearrangement frequency was calculated as the (number of blue clones * 3)/total number of clones ( 18 ).

For the analysis of the joints obtained after V(D)J rearrangement, 5 [mu]l of the DNA solution obtained after transfection were digested by either Eco RV or Cla I, which cleave between the RSS, to eliminate non recombined plasmids and transformed into XLI-blue bacteria by electroporation. Bacteria were immediately plated on LB agar plates containing 100 [mu]g/ml ampicillin. Recombinant clones were picked directly or after screening with an internal oligonucleotide that is deleted if rearrangement has occurred. Small scale DNA preparations were made by the boiling method ( 22 ). DNA was resuspended in 50 [mu]l of 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8; 1 mM EDTA; 10 [mu]g/ml RNase. An aliquot of 5 [mu]l was digested by Pvu II and analysed on an agarose gel to identify rearranged plasmids (not shown). A volume of 10 [mu]l was denatured by alkaline treatment, precipitated and sequenced with reverse primer according to Sanger et al ( 23 ). For each transfection 10 joints were sequenced. Identical sequences were only taken into account when obtained from independent transfections.

Statistical analysis

The observed distributions of coding joints were compared using a two-tailed [chi] 2 test. Significance was assessed at P -value <= 0.05. When two distributions were found significantly different, post hoc individual frequencies were examined to determine which classes of recombination products could account for the discrepancies.

RESULTS

Size distribution of the coding joints

Recombination substrates were designed where the 12-coding ends were conserved and different sequences introduced at the 23-coding ends (Fig. 1 ). The changes generate direct repeats of various lengths and at various distances from the recombination signals. These direct repeats are located within the coding sequences or in the loops that lead to P-nucleotide formation. Since the sequences immediately adjacent to the heptamer have been reported to influence the initiation steps of recombination ( 24 ), the sequence changes were monitored 3 bp away from the heptamer sequence, in order to study only the resolution steps of the recombination reaction.

The four V(D)J recombination substrates were transfected in 3T3 fibroblasts alone or with Rag1 and Rag2 expression vectors. Plasmid DNA was recovered after 48 h and tested in E.coli for recombination. In all cases recombination only occurs when both Rag1 and Rag2 are expressed (Table 1 ). The recombination frequencies are similar from one substrate to the other indicating that the presence of direct repeats in the coding sequences does not affect the efficiency of rearrangement. Similar results were obtained by others ( 17 ).


Figure 2 . Distribution of the coding joints according to their size as defined by the balance of nucleotide deletions and insertions. For instance, a joint with size 0 can have no deletions on either coding end, or one nucleotide deletion and one insertion etc. Joints formed at overlapping nucleotides are depicted by the motifs indicated (h = number of overlapping nucleotides). 110 joints were analysed for pBlueRec, 95 for pBlueH6, 68 for pBlueH4 and 74 for pBlueI4. Recombination frequency was calculated as the (number of blue clones *3)/total number of clones *100. The data shown are representative of three independent experiments.

Table 1 Recombination frequencies obtained after transfection of the substrate alone or with Rag1 and Rag2 expression vectors

Sequences of 347 independent joints obtained after V(D)J recombination induced by Rag1 and Rag2 in 3T3 fibroblasts were determined. In order to test whether the changes introduced in the substrates influence the formation of coding joints, we plotted the number of independent sequences obtained against the size of the junction (Fig. 2 ). We defined the size of the joint as being the balance between insertions and deletions occurring at the joint compared to a precise joint (size 0).

The majority of the joints (96%) had <12 nucleotide deletions. Only 12 joints extended beyond this point. The most extreme junction size is -34. The reference plasmid pBlueRec shows a major peak at junction size -4 and three minor peaks at 0, -2 and -8 (Fig. 2 ). If direct repeats influence coding joint resolution, a shift towards the size of deletion which corresponds to maximum homology should be observed for the other plasmids when compared with the distribution of pBlueRec coding joints. These peaks should be at -7 for pBlueH4, at -6 and -12 for pBlueH6, and at -5 and -11 for pBlueI4. pBlueH6 and pBlueI4 junction sizes have the same overall distribution as pBlueRec (Fig. 2 ). No increase of the junction sizes corresponding to maximum homology could be observed: there is no significant difference between the distribution of junctions for these plasmids and the reference plasmid pBlueRec ( P values 0.6564 and 0.5921 respectively). It should be noted that the major peak in these three plasmids corresponds to a junction of size -4. Only a minor fraction of the joints with this deletion size are formed at the overlap of 2 nucleotides, indicating that the bias in favour of this junction size is not due to the influence of homology. In contrast, the pBlueH4 coding joint size distribution (Fig. 2 ) is different from the reference plasmid ( P = 0.0297). Post hoc cell contribution indicates that the difference between pBlueH4 and pBlueRec is likely to reside in junction sizes -4 and -7. A decrease of the number of sequences of junction size -4 is observed for pBlueH4 compared with pBlueRec, this decrease can be attributed to the absence of joints with no deletion at the 12-coding end and 4 nucleotides deleted at the 23-coding end. On the contrary, an increase in the number of joints of size -7 is observed for pBlueH4 compared with pBlueRec, corresponding to the site of maximum homology. As both joints can be formed by recombination involving the undeleted 12-coding end, the balance observed between them might suggest a competition at the stage of ligation during the recombination reaction.


Figure 3 . 12-coding end sequences and the corresponding P-nucleotide insertions are represented in ordinate, and 23-coding end sequences and P-nucleotides on the abcissa. Corresponding deletion sizes are indicated. P-nucleotides are shown in lower case. The number of sequences found for each joint is indicated at the intersection of deletion sizes for each coding end. Joints having the same junction size are found on the same diagonal. When a joint can be formed by several coding end combinations, the corresponding cases are fused. For instance, coding joint GTGG-GTCG of pBlueRec is obtained by deletion of 4 nucleotides on the 12-coding end and no deletion on the 23-coding end, and is found six times. The following combinations of deletions give rise to joints with the same sequence, which is found seven times: TGGATC-GACC joint 1-3; TGGAT-CGACC joint 2-2; TGGA-TCGACC joint 3-1. Joints with non templated insertions, P-nucleotide insertions >4 nucleotides or deletions >12 nucleotides are not represented.

Sequence distribution of the individual coding junctions

The representation in Figure 3 allows a visualisation of the distribution of the observed joints in comparison to the theoretical coding end combinations. We refer to individual joints by mentioning the number of nucleotides deleted at the 12-coding end followed by the number of nucleotides deleted at the 23-coding end. Each predicted joint is represented at the intersection of the corresponding deletion sizes or P inserts at each end. For instance, junction 4-0 has 4 nucleotides deleted at the 12-coding end and none at the 23-coding end, and is found six times for pBlueRec. It is important to notice that joints formed at n overlapping nucleotides can be formed by n + 1 combinations of coding ends. These joints are thus represented by the fusion of the corresponding cases. For instance, junctions 2-5, 1-6 and 0-7 of pBlueRec are formed at the direct repeat CC and can not be distinguished from each other. Joints having deletions >12 nucleotides at either end, or P-nucleotide insertions >4, as well as sequences with non templated insertions, are not included here and are shown in Figure 4 .


Figure 4 . Sequences of the joints that were not included in Figure 3, because they have deletions that >12 nucleotides at one of the ends, P-nucleotide insertions >4 and non templated insertions (indicated as P and I respectively). Sequences of the junctions are aligned with the sequence of the unrearranged vectors. Nucleotides that could be attributed to either end are indicated in italic at the 23-coding end. The number of occurences for each sequence is indicated.

Joints formed at direct repeats are well represented (Fig. 3 ). Their frequency however, is not higher, and in some cases even lower, than that of other joints. For instance, the joints of size -4 with the direct repeat TC. As explained above, this junction can be formed in three ways (1-3, 2-2, 3-1) and in the absence of any mechanistic bias it is thus expected to be found three times as frequently as the neighbouring joints 4-0 and 0-4 which can be formed by only one coding end combination. However, in pBlueRec those last joints are found six and seven times, while the junction formed at the site of the 2 bp homology TC is found seven times, indicating that the joint with the direct repeat is underrepresented ( P = 0.019). Similarly, in the other three plasmids the same blocks of homology are present, but are never used above the frequency expected for a random distribution. The peaks at junction size -4 found for pBlueRec, pBlueH6 and pBlueI4 (Fig. 2 ) are not due to a high frequency of joint formation at the overlapping nucleotides, but rather to a high representation of the other joints of this size : 4-0 and 0-4 (Fig. 3 ). The lower frequency of joints of size 4 in pBlueH4 confirms this statement. Indeed the same overlapping nucleotides are present in this plasmid and the abs


Figure 5 . Distribution of the coding joints according to the number of P-nucleotides and deleted nucleotides on the 12-coding end ( A ) and on the 23-coding end ( B ) expressed as the percentage of joints analysed for each vector. When a nucleotide could not be unambiguously attributed to one coding end the percentage of joints was equally distributed among the corresponding deletion sizes. ence of junction 0-4 is responsible for this decrease.

This representation of the sequences also shows that some sequences are clearly underrepresented compared to a random distribution, for instance joints 3-0 and 2-0 are not found in any plasmid.

P-nucleotide and non-templated nucleotide insertions

P-nucleotide insertions of 1-5 nucleotides length are observed at an overall frequency of 17% but are unequally distributed between the 12- and 23-coding ends (4 and 13% respectively). Fourteen (4%) joints had 1 or 2 non templated nucleotide insertions (Fig. 4 ). In seven joints, these insertions were coupled to the presence of P-nucleotide insertions. In two joints, a point mutation is observed near the junction.

We believe that non-templated nucleotide insertions are not due to terminal transferase and that a separate mechanism is responsible for these additions. Indeed, 3T3 fibroblasts do not exhibit TdT activity and non templated insertions of 1 nucleotide were also found after V(D)J recombination of endogenous genes in homozygous terminal transferase knock out mice at a comparable frequency (3%) ( 8 ). A search within the recombination substrates for potential template sequences for these joints with extra nucleotides did not give convincing results. Several ligation or polymerisation based mechanisms can account for these insertions: for example all DNA polymerases tested have been shown to catalyse the addition of one non templated nucleotide ( 25 ) and hence may be responsible for these additions.

Deletion patterns

In order to understand the irregular distribution of the junctions we analysed the deletion and P-nucleotide insertion patterns of the 12- and 23-coding ends separately (Fig. 5 ). It appears that the profiles obtained for the 12-end, which is identical in the four plasmids, is the same for all the vectors despite the introduction of direct repeats by modification of the 23-coding end. On the reverse, the 23-coding ends exhibit different profiles. Nevertheless, this difference was not significant by [chi] 2 analyis, perhaps due to the small number of joints analysed for which the deletions extend in the region where the sequences of the vectors diverge.

The theoretical distribution of the joints as predicted by the mutiplication of the frequencies observed for each deletion size does not correspond to the observed coding joint distributions depicted in Figure 3 for any of the plasmids. Again some joints are under-represented while others are over-represented independently of the presence of direct repeats.

DISCUSSION

In this study we analysed coding joint formation of four V(D)J recombination substrates in which the coding end associated with the RSS12 is conserved and the 23-coding end is varied over six nucleotides which lead to the introduction of short stretches of homology (Fig. 1 ).

The distribution of the junctions among the theoretical coding end combinations is not random as can be seen in the representation in Figure 3 . The coding end sequence seems to have some influence on the deletion and P-nucleotide insertion patterns as illustrated by the conservation of the deletion profiles of the 12-coding end in the four substrates. This can be the result of preferential opening of the hairpin intermediates at some sites as well as of pauses of an exonuclease activity at favoured sites. However, the coding joint distribution is not a simple combination of the 12- and 23-coding end deletion profiles. When compared with a distribution predicted by the deletion patterns some joints are under-represented while others are over-represented. This indicates that the two coding ends are not processed independently. Other factors, like the ligation efficiency, must have an important role in the formation of the coding joint. Artificial recombination substrates with different combinations of homopolymers at the coding ends are not recombined with the same efficiency ( 26 ). It should be noted however that in these experiments the effects of the initation and the ligation steps can not be distinguished.

No correlation can be made between the over-representation of some joints and the presence of direct repeats when it is taken into account that joints formed at direct repeats are expected a higher frequencies as they can be formed by several combinations of deletions on each coding end. The results obtained by Zhang et al . ( 27 ) with mutated transgenic substrates also suggest that the presence of a direct repeat is not per se sufficient to bias recombination. Indeed, the presence of a direct repeat AT or ATA in their constructs does lead to a preferential joining while an AG or AGCT repeat does not. The experiments performed with homopolymeric substrates by Boubnov et al . ( 16 ) also indicate that DNA homology does not stabilize coding end structures for processing and joining. We can not formally exclude the hypothesis that nucleotide pairing influences the formation of the coding joint, but this process would then be strongly dependent on the sequence and location of the direct repeats. We rather favour the hypothesis according to which a so called canonical joint results from the coincidence of a direct repeat, which is naturally expected at a higher frequency, and one or several coding end combinations that are preferentially formed due to their sequence. In conclusion, our results show that beside their effect on the initiation step of V(D)J rearrangement, the coding end sequences influence the distribution of the coding joints. The presence of direct repeats, however, does not bias the recombination reaction.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are very grateful to Catherine Papanicolaou for helpful discussions and reading of the manuscript. We thank Patricia Barbot for technical assistance. F.N. was supported by a fellowship from le Ministère de la Recherche et de la Technologie. Q.T.N. was supported by a fellowship from Fonds d'Etudes et de Recherche du Corps Médical des Hôpitaux de Paris.

REFERENCES

1 Lewis, S.M. (1994) Adv. Immunol. 56, 27-150. MEDLINE Abstract

2 McCormack, W.T., Tjoelker, L.W., Carlson, L.M., Petryniak, B., Barth, C.F., Humphries, E.H. and Thompson, C.B. (1989) Cell 56, 785-791. MEDLINE Abstract

3 Lafaille, J.J., DeCloux, A., Bonneville, M., Takagaki, Y. and Tonegawa, S. (1989) Cell 59, 859-870. MEDLINE Abstract

4 McBlane, J.F., van Gent, D.C., Ramsden, D.A., Cuomo, C.A., Gelllert, M. and Oettinger, M.A. (1995) Cell 83, 387-395. MEDLINE Abstract

5 van Gent, D., McBlane, J.F., Ramsden, D.A., Sadofsky, M.J., Hesse, J.E. and Gelllert, M. (1995) Cell 81, 1-20.

6 Kallenbach, S., Doyen, N., Fanton d'Andon, M. and Rougeon, F. (1992) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89, 2799-2803. MEDLINE Abstract

7 Komori, T., Okada, A., Stewart, V. and Alt, F.W. (1993) Science 261, 1171-1175. MEDLINE Abstract

8 Gilfillan, S., Dierich, A., Lemeur, M., Benoist, C. and Mathis, D. (1993) Science 261, 1175-1178. MEDLINE Abstract

9 Ichihara, Y., Hayashida, H., Miyazawa, S. and Kurosawa, Y. (1989) Eur. J. Immunol. 19, 1849-1854. MEDLINE Abstract

10 Asarnow, D.M., Kuziel, W.A., Bonyhadi, M., Tigelaar, R.E., Tucker, P.W. and Allison, J.P. (1988) Cell 55, 837-847. MEDLINE Abstract

11 Feeney, A.J. (1992) J. Immunol. 149, 222-229. MEDLINE Abstract

12 Gu, H., Förster, I. and Rajewsky, K. (1990) EMBO J. 9, 2133-2140. MEDLINE Abstract

13 Victor, K.D., Vu, K. and Feeney, A.J. (1994) J. Immunol. 3467-3475.

14 Pandey, A., Tjoelker, L. and Thompson, C. (1993) J. Exp. Med. 177, 329-337. MEDLINE Abstract

15 Asarnow, D.M., Cado, D. and Raulet, D.H. (1993) Nature 362, 158-160. MEDLINE Abstract

16 Boubnov, N.V., Wills, Z.P. and Weaver, D.T. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 6957-6968. MEDLINE Abstract

17 Gerstein, R.M. and Lieber, M.R. (1993) Nature 363, 625-627. MEDLINE Abstract

18 Kallenbach, S., Goodhardt, M. and Rougeon, F. (1990) Nucleic Acids Res. 18, 6730. MEDLINE Abstract

19 Chu, G., Hayakawa, H. and Berg, P. (1987) Nucleic Acids Res. 15, 1311-1326. MEDLINE Abstract

20 Oettinger, M.A., Schatz, D.G., Gorka, C. and Baltimore, D. (1990) Science 248, 1517-1523. MEDLINE Abstract

21 Birnboim, H.C. and Doly, J. (1979) Nucleic Acids Res. 7, 1513-1523. MEDLINE Abstract

22 Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E.F. and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York.

23 Sanger, F., Nicklen, S. and Coulson, A.R. (1977) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 74, 5463-5467. MEDLINE Abstract

24 Gerstein, R.M. and Lieber, M.R. (1993) Genes Dev. 7, 1459-1469. MEDLINE Abstract

25 Clark, J.M. (1988) Nucleic Acids Res. 16, 9677-9686. MEDLINE Abstract

26 Ezekiel, U.R., Engler, P., Stern, D. and Storb, U. (1995) Immunity 2, 381-389. MEDLINE Abstract

27 Zhang, Y., Cado, D., Asarnow, D.M., Komori, T., Alt, F.W., Raulet, D.H. and Allison, J.P. (1995) Immunity 3, 439-447. MEDLINE Abstract


Return

* To whom correspondence should be addressed

+ Present address: Laboratoire de Génétique et Physiologie du Développement, CNRS UMR 9943, Institut de Biologie de Développement de Marseille, Case 907, 13288 Marseille cedex 09, France
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (244K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nourrit, F
Right arrow Articles by Kallenbach, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nourrit, F
Right arrow Articles by Kallenbach, S
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?