Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (134K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meyer, H.
Right arrow Articles by Nierhaus, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Meyer, H.
Right arrow Articles by Nierhaus, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 Oxford University Press 3996-4002

Footnote

Effects of antisense DNA against the [alpha]-sarcin stem-loop structure of the ribosomal 23S rRNA

Effects of antisense DNA against the [alpha]-sarcin stem-loop structure of the ribosomal 23S rRNA Hellmuth-Alexander Meyer 1 , Francisco Triana-Alonso 1 , Christian M. T. Spahn 1 , Tomasz Twardowski 1,2 , Andrzej Sobkiewicz 1,2 and Knud H. Nierhaus 1, *

1 Max-Planck-Institut für Molekulare Genetik, AG Ribosomen, Ihnestra[beta]e 73, D-14195 Berlin , Germany and 2 Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, Noskowskiego 12, 61-704 Poznan , Poland

Received July 1, 1996; Revised and Accepted September 2, 1996

ABSTRACT

Antisense DNAs complementary against various sequences of the [alpha] -sarcin domain (C2646-G2674) of 23S rRNA from Escherichia coli were hybridized to naked 23S rRNA as well as to 70S ribosomes. Saturation levels of up to 0.4 per 70S ribosome were found, the identical fraction was susceptible to the attack of the RNase [alpha] -sarcin. The hybridization was specific as demonstrated with RNase H digestion, sequencing the resulting fragments and blockage of the action of [alpha] -sarcin. The RNase [alpha] -sarcin seems to approach its cleavage site from the 3 ' half of the loop of the [alpha] -sarcin domain. Hybridization is efficiently achieved at 37 o C and can extend at least into the 3 ' strand of the stem of the [alpha] -sarcin domain. However, the inhibition of [alpha] -sarcin activity is observed at 30 o C but not at 37 o C. For a significant inhibition of poly(Phe) synthesis the temperature had to be lowered to 25 o C. The results imply that the [alpha] -sarcin domain changes its conformation during protein synthesis and that the conformational changes may include a melting of the stem of the [alpha]-sarcin domain.

INTRODUCTION

Hybridization of antisense DNA to exposed regions of rRNAs in intact ribosomes and ribosomal subunits has been introduced by Bogdanov and co-workers ( 1 , 2 ) and has been used to analyze structure and function of ribosomes. The effects of specific hybridization on the ribosomal functions has been studied by Hill and co-workers (for review see ref. 3 ) using an impressive set of antisense DNAs. The results with oligo(DNA) complementary to sequences of the 16S rRNA indicated, for example, that the region containing the bases 518-525 might be part of the mRNA binding site, either poly(U) and tRNA Phe competed with probes crossing C1400, whereas only the presence of both mRNA and cognate tRNA blocked probes against the bases 1534-1541 which contains the anti-Shine-Dalgarno region. Probes against the bases 807-809 blocked tRNA binding, but tRNA lacking the 3 or 4 3'-terminal nucleotides (nt)could be accommodated. tRNA could also effectively compete with probes complementary to bases 2497-2505 at the peptidyltransferase ring of the 23S rRNA. Others have linked immuno-specific ligands or avidin to antisense DNA and identified the hybridization site by electron microscopic methods ( 4 , 5 ). Attachment of psoralen ( 6 ) or photoaffinity labels ( 7 ) enabled site-specific crosslinks. The latter technique was particularly successful in identifying specific neighborhoods. For example, a photo-sensitive affinity label attached to an antisense DNA complementary to bases 2497-2505 of the peptidyltransferase ring of the 23S rRNA showed a specific crosslink to the ribosomal protein L3 ( 8 ), the label of a probe against bases 1397-1405 of 16S rRNA at or near the mRNA decoding site was specifically incorporated into proteins S1, S7, S18 and S21 ( 7 ). These few examples illustrate that hybridization of antisense DNA complementary to sequences of rRNAs represent an important complement and extension of the arsenal of methods assessing the quaternary structure and its relation to important functional domains of the ribosome.

The [alpha]-sarcin stem-loop structure of the 23S-type rRNA contains in its loop the longest universally conserved sequence (12 nt) of all rRNAs. The structure and function has been intensively studied by Endo and Wool ( 9 , for review see ref. 10 ). The hydrolysis of one phospho-diester bond after G2661 ( Escherichia coli numbering) by the highly specific RNase [alpha]-sarcin blocks all elongation factor dependent reactions but does not affect factor independent ribosomal functions ( 11 ). Binding of EF-G in the presence of fusidic acid completely prevents cleavage of the RNase [alpha]-sarcin ( 12 ), and binding of either elongation factor protects this structure against the attack of modifying reagents ( 13 ). Hybridization of an oligo(DNA) to the loop of this structure was first thought to have an disastrous effect on the integrity of the 50S subunit ( 14 ), but this dramatic effect could be traced back to the harsh incubation conditions and had nothing to do with the specific probe ( 15 ). The authors of ref. 14 asserted that the entire region of the [alpha]-sarcin domain of 23S rRNA was practically unavailable to probe binding although a 14mer covering the sequence 2654-2667 could trigger a specific cleavage of RNase H. These observations contrasted with a report suggesting that the microinjection of an antisense DNA complementary to the [alpha]-sarcin loop of 28S rRNA abolishes protein synthesis in Xenopus oocytes ( 16 ) as well with some preliminary results which were obtained with some probes against this region and according to which hybridization had severe consequences for function and structure of ribosomes ( 17 ); one of us seemed to reproduce this effect with plant ribosomes ( 18 ). In order to clarify the controversial situation we re-evaluated the effects of antisense DNA covering the [alpha]-sarcin stem-loop structure of 23S rRNA. Here we describe the results of a study analyzing ribosomal functions in vitro in the presence and absence of the corresponding oligonucleotides.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Preparation of tightly-coupled 70S ribosomes and subunits

Tightly-coupled 70S ribosomes as well as 50S subunits were prepared from E.coli AB301, strain D10 as described ( 19 ). NH 4 Cl washed 70S ribosomes were obtained by resuspending and incubating the crude 70S pellet with 1 M NH 4 Cl, 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.5 (0oC), 6 mM [beta]-mercaptoethanol for 5 h at 0oC before zonal centrifugation under the conditions of the `tightly coupled ribosomes' ( 19 ).

Preparation of DNA oligonucleotides

The DNA oligomers (listed in Table 1 ) were obtained from TIB Molbiol, Berlin. Probes were purified after detritilation by standard 20% (w/v) sequencing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis ( 20 ).

Table 1 . The antisense oligo(DNA)s used in this study were aligned to the [alpha]-sarcin domain of the 23S rRNA

Purified DNA probes were 5"-end-labeled using T4 polynucleotide kinase and [[gamma]- 32 P]ATP as described by Maxam and Gilbert ( 20 ) with the omission of the dephosphorylation step. The specific activities of the labeled probes were in the range of 700-1000 c.p.m./pmol. The same procedure was used for `cold' phosphorylated probes.

Hybridization assays

Hybridization of the various DNA oligomers to ribosomes were performed in the ionic conditions of the poly(Phe)-synthesis system described by Bartetzko and Nierhaus ( 21 ), 20 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 7.6 (0oC), 3 mM MgCl 2 , 150 mM NH 4 Cl, 2 mM spermidine, 0.05 mM spermine and 4 mM [beta]-mercaptoethanol. The DNA oligonucleotides were denatured by heating for 2 min at 70oC. After cooling on ice 10 pmol of 23S rRNA or 70S ribosomes were immediately mixed with the antisense DNA at a 35-fold molar excess if not otherwise indicated in a volume of 10 [mu]l and incubated for 10 min at 37oC followed by an incubation at 2 h at 0oC. The samples were diluted with 2 ml of the same ionic concentration and filtered through nitrocellulose filters. In order to reduce the background binding of the radioactive oligo(DNA)s the filters were soaked in the same buffer, degassed and then transferred to the same buffer containing 2 mg/ml of each poly(U) and poly(C) before use.

RNase H and [alpha] -sarcin assays

[alpha]-sarcin and RNase H were generous gifts of Dr N. Ulbricht (FU Berlin) and Dr R. Brimacombe (MPI Berlin), respectively. The digestion of 50S subunits, 70S ribosomes or 23S rRNA with [alpha]-sarcin or RNase H in the presence or absence of antisense DNA were performed under the ionic conditions of the hybridization reaction described before.

RNase H was used to demonstrate the specific binding of the DNA-oligomers to 50S subunits, 70S ribosome and naked 23S rRNA. The reaction mixture contained 10 pmol of 70S ribosomes or 23S rRNA, an excess of DNA oligomers as indicated. After the hybridization incubations as described above the digestion reaction was started by adding 5 [mu]l containing 5 [mu]g RNase H in the same buffer, an incubation of 10 min at 30oC followed. Eight microlitres were mixed with 8 [mu]l of stop-buffer [50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5 (0oC), 1 mM EDTA, 8 M urea, 0,05% (w/v) xylene cyanol, 0.05% (w/v) bromophenol blue and 1% (w/v) SDS] and heated for 3 min at 80oC. The RNA digestion products were analyzed by polyacrylamide gel electrophoreses [4 or 8% polyacrylamide, 7.5 M urea 0.1% (w/v) SDS, 90 mM Tris-borate pH 8.0 (0oC) and 2.5 mM EDTA] and the RNA bands were visualized by staining with ethidium bromide. The RNA bands were quantified by densitometry. The relative amount of the specific [alpha]-sarcin RNA-fragment was normalized to the 5S band in the same lane.

The mixture for the [alpha]-sarcin digestion after the hybridization incubations contained 24 pmol 70S, 840 pmol DNA oligomer and 1.2 [mu]g [alpha]-sarcin in 40 [mu]l. During an incubation at 30oC, 5 [mu]l samples were taken out at various time intervals and were immediately mixed with 5 [mu]l stop-buffer and subjected to gel electrophoresis as described above.

Poly(Phe)-synthesis

tRNA Phe was obtained from Biogenes, Berlin, poly(U) and GTP was purchased from Boehringer Mannheim. Long poly(U) strands were isolated by sucrose-gradient centrifugation. Twenty-five milligrams of commercial poly(U) was dissolved in 1.5 ml H 2 O and applied on a sucrose gradient [5-20% (w/v) in 20 mM HEPES-KOH (pH 7.6) at 0oC], 500 mM NaCl and 0.1 mM EDTA and centrifuged for 30 h at 25 000 r.p.m. in a SW 27 rotor (Beckman). The fractions containing the fast migrating poly(U) material were collected and poly(U) isolated by ethanol precipitation. The acylation and acetylation of tRNA Phe were done as previously described ( 22 ), the purification of the charged tRNA followed Geigenmüller and Nierhaus ( 23 ). The specific activity of [ 3 H]Phe-tRNA was ~15-20 c.p.m./pmol, that of Ac[ 14 C]Phe-tRNA 1000 c.p.m./pmol.

The poly(Phe)-synthesis followed Bartetzko and Nierhaus ( 21 ) except that the volumes of the binding reaction and of the synthesis mixture were reduced to 50 and 30 [mu]l, respectively (total volume 80 [mu]l). The ionic conditions of the system were 20 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 7.6 (0oC), 3 mM MgCl 2 , 150 mM NH 4 Cl, 2 mM spermidine, 0.05 mM spermine and 4 mM [beta]-mercaptoethanol. One aliquot contained 10 pmol 70S ribosomes. Before hybridization with the antisense(DNA) 10 pmol 70S were incubated with 15 pmol AcPhe-tRNA and 100 [mu]g poly(U) in 25 [mu]l for 30 min at 30oC. 350 pmol of the indicated oligo(DNA) was added; the final volume was 50 [mu]l. Hybridization was performed as described above. The poly(Phe) synthesis was started by adding 30 [mu]l of a pre-incubation mix containing 150 pmol tRNA Phe , 15 nmol [ 3 H]Phe (20 d.p.m./pmol), optimized amounts of S100 enzymes, 0.2 mM GTP, 2 mM ATP, 4 mM PEP and 3 [mu]g pyruvate kinase.

The poly(Phe) synthesis was linear for at least 60 s with an average rate of one to two incorporated phenylalanine molecules per ribosome and second.

matSequencing

RNA sequencing followed the protocols of Hartz et al . ( 24 ).

RESULTS

The helix 95 and its loop from 23S rRNA are known as the [alpha]-sarcin stem-loop structure or [alpha]-sarcin domain, since the RNase [alpha]-sarcin cleaves specifically the phosphodiester bond after G2661 ( E.coli numbering) in that loop ( 10 , 11 ). The [alpha]-sarcin domain extends from C2646 to G2674 and contains the universally conserved dodecamer in the loop which is shown together with the antisense DNAs used in this study in Table 1 . The following nomenclature to identify the probes was used: The oligo no. 1 (2660-16), for example, is a 16 nt oligo(DNA) and A2660 is the first (5'-) nucleotide of the [alpha]-sarcin domain to which the oligo can hybridize.

Saturation curves of three representative oligo(DNA)s are shown in Figure 1 , namely oligo no. 1 (complementary to the 3' half of the stem + loop of the [alpha]-sarcin stem-loop structure), oligo no. 7 (complementary to the loop) and oligo no. 4 (complementary to the loop + 5' half of the stem). The hybridization reached a plateau between 0.3 and 0.4 oligomer per 70S ribosome at a molar excess 30 or higher of the oligo(DNA) over ribosomes. The probes complementary to the loop or the 3'-end of the stem including the loop reproducibly hybridized a little better (~0.4 molecules per ribosome) than those complementary to the 5'-end of the stem including the loop (~0.3).


Figure 1 . Saturation of 70S ribosomes with DNA 32 P-labeled oligonucleotides complementary to the [alpha]-sarcin domain. Hybridization of oligonucleotides no. 1 ([circle]), no. 4 ([squ]), and 7 (-) to 70S ribosomes was determined by nitrocellulose filtration as described in Materials and Methods. The error bars indicate the deviations from the average values. The specific activity of the oligonucleotides was 700-1000 c.p.m./pmol.


Figure 2 . ( A ) Analysis of rRNA fragments after RNase H digestion of 70S ribosomes hybridized with DNA oligonucleotides complementary to the [alpha]-sarcin domain. 70S ribosomes were hybridized with oligo(DNA) no. 2, no. 4, and no. 7 at a molar excess of 35 and 100 over 70S ribosomes. Samples corresponding to 3 pmol 70S ribosomes were analyzed on a 4% (w/v) polyacrylamide denaturing gel (stained with ethidium bromide) after RNase H digestion. Low molecular weight RNA markers and controls (70S ribosomes digested with RNase H or with [alpha]-sarcin in the absence of oligo DNAs) are shown on the right. ( B ) Analysis of rRNA fragments after RNase H digestion of 23S rRNA hybridized with DNA oligonucleotides complementary to the [alpha]-sarcin domain. Hybrids of 23S rRNA with oligo(DNA) no. 1-8 were obtained using a 10-fold molar excess of oligo(DNA) over 23S rRNA as described in Materials and Methods. M, molecular weight markers.

To test the specificity of the oligomer hybridization we used RNase H which cleaves specifically the RNA in an RNA-DNA double strand ( 25 ). If the oligomers hybridizes specifically to the [alpha]-sarcin stem-loop structure the digestion with RNase H is expected to generate only one fragment comparable in size with the [alpha]-fragment (243 nt of the 3'-end of 23S rRNA) caused by an [alpha]-sarcin cut.

We tested the oligo(DNA)s no. 2 (2658-18), 4 (2647-18) and 7 (2653-15) which are complementary to different locations of the [alpha]-sarcin stem-loop structure. After the hybridization to intact 70S ribosomes (10 min at 37oC and then 4 h at 0oC) RNase H was added and the incubation continued for 10 min at 30oC. Only a faint band is seen at the expected position in the gel (Fig. 2 A, compare with the [alpha]-sarcin fragment in the right lane). The probe no. 4 seems to hybridize with a low efficiency since a fragment is visible only at a 100-fold excess.

The very low cutting efficiency of RNase H prevents a clear judgment of the specificity of the hybridization. In order to overcome this problem we hybridized the probes to naked 23S rRNA. Under these conditions even possibly unspecific or less specific hybridization sites should be accessible, thus competing with the specific [alpha]-sarcin domain. Figure 2 B shows only one major band of the expected size, the comparison with the intensity of the 5S rRNA band indicates that the 23S rRNA was cut at the [alpha]-sarcin domain almost quantitatively. The probes no. 1 and 2 generated an additional minor band at ~360 bases (fragment I), which amounts to <10% of the major band. The main band generated by hybridization of probe no. 2 (2658-18) was isolated and digested with RNase H after hybridization with an antisense DNA (oligo S, see Fig. 3 ). The original band disappeared and two fragments of the expected length appeared demonstrating that the original band contained only a single RNA species (not shown). With the help of the same oligo S the sequence at the 5' end of the RNA was determined: It had the expected sequence caused by a cut in the [alpha]-sarcin domain (Fig. 3 ). The important point is that the cuts of the RNase H occurred deep in the stem of the [alpha]-sarcin domain, at least G2671 was present in the RNA-DNA duplex. It follows that the 3' strand of the stem of this 23S rRNA domain was accessible during hybridization at 37oC.


Figure 3 . Identification of the cleavage site of RNase H after hybridization of 23S rRNA with oligo no. 2. The confluencing five bands at the top of the sequence (left side) indicate the stuttering cleavages of the RNase which cleaves near the 5'-end of the hybridized oligo(DNA) (25). The hybridization positions of the oligo no. 2 and the primer used for sequencing (oligo S) are indicated (right side), hybridization included at least G2671. Therefore it is clear that oligo no. 2 could hybridize at 37oC to the 3' strand of the stem of the [alpha]-sarcin domain of 23S rRNA.

In a second specificity test we analyzed whether or not the probe prevents the specific cleavage by [alpha]-sarcin of 23S rRNA within the 70S ribosome. At a 35 molar excess of oligo no. 2 (2658-18) over 70S we observed a strong inhibition of the [alpha]-sarcin activity at 30oC; an almost complete block of the [alpha]-sarcin activity was seen after 30 s and still a very strong inhibition at 10 min (Fig. 4 A). The same experiment performed at 37oC, the temperature of oligo hybridization: a slight protection against [alpha]-sarcin was observed in the first 30 s, after 10 min no inhibition was detectable (Fig. 3 A). All probes severely inhibited the action of [alpha]-sarcin at 30oC with the exception of the control no. 8 and interestingly oligonucleotide no. 5 (2647-15) which does not cross the [alpha]-sarcin cleavage site but extends just up to G2661 after which [alpha]-sarcin cuts (Fig. 4 B).


Figure 4 . Protection against [alpha]-sarcin digestion upon oligo(DNA) hybridization. ( A ) Kinetics of [alpha]-sarcin digestion at 37 and 30oC of free 70S ribosomes or their hybrids with oligo(DNA) no. 2 were performed as described in Materials and Methods. Samples taken at the indicated times were analyzed in a 8% (w/v) polyacrylamide denaturing gel. The gel was stained with ethidium bromide, the bands caused by digestion with [alpha]-sarcin RNase are shown at the upper part. The bands were derived from one gel. The digitized image of the gel was analyzed and the protection (%) against [alpha]-sarcin digestion calculated relative the intensity of the [alpha]-sarcin band of 70S ribosomes in the absence of oligo(DNA) (lower part). ( B ) Protection against [alpha]-sarcin digestion at 30oC by a set of oligo(DNA) complementary to different regions of the [alpha]-sarcin domain. Dark gray, 30 s of [alpha]-sarcin digestion; hatched, 3 min; light gray, 10 min.

We tested the effects of hybridizing the antisense (DNA) on poly(Phe) synthesis, which allows the incorporation of Phe with near in vivo perfection concerning rate and accuracy ( 21 ). Since the 70S[middot]antisense DNA complex seems to be more stable at 30oC than at 37oC (Fig. 3 A) the poly(Phe) synthesis was performed at 30oC. When we used standard tightly coupled ribosomes we could not see any effect at this temperature. Only a slight retardation of poly(Phe) synthesis was observed when 70S ribosomes were used which were washed with 1 M NH 4 Cl before. Table 2 compiles the inhibitory effects of the oligonucleotides 2 (2658-18), 4 (2647-18) and 7 (2653-15) after 45 s synthesis at various temperatures. No inhibition is found at 37oC, at 30oC all oligonucleotides inhibit the poly(Phe) synthesis for about 14 +- 3%, whereas at 25oC all oligonucleotides tested significantly impair the poly(Phe) synthesis for ~33 +- 3% with the only exception of the control oligo(DNA) no. 8. The inhibition effect is strictly temperature dependent and more pronounced at lower temperatures. When we tested various preparations of ribosomes at temperatures <30oC, the inhibition observed did not depend on a preceding salt-washing step.

We analyzed in an extensive experimental series whether any of the complementary probes affects dissociation of the ribosome or association of the ribosomal subunits, which has been described as a central effect of hybridizing probes against the [alpha]-sarcin domain in a plant system ( 18 ). Even at very high concentrations no significant effect on either association or dissociation was detected (data not shown).

DISCUSSION

The [alpha]-sarcin domain with its universally conserved dodecamer in the loop is an important functional center of the ribosome. As mentioned in the Introduction one cleavage of a phosphodiester bond of the 23S rRNA after G2661 ( E.coli numbering) in the loop abolishes the activity of ribosomes from all kingdoms ( 26 ). The result is a specific block of all reactions depending on both elongation factors, whereas all other ribosomal functions, for example the EF-G independent translocation, are not affected at all ( 11 ). EF-G blocked on the ribosome by fusidic acid prevents cleavage of the RNase [alpha]-sarcin ( 12 ), and both elongation factors protect the loop against chemical modifications ( 13 ). Accordingly, it is thought that this region is part of the binding and/or recognition site of both elongation factors. Therefore, one might expect dramatic effects on protein synthesis when an antisense DNA is hybridized to the conserved loop region. Indeed, a severe block of the protein synthesis upon a microinjection of an antisense oligo(DNA) against the loop was observed in vivo ( 16 ) .

However, in this study we cannot reproduce dramatic effects caused by hybridization against various regions of the [alpha]-sarcin domain. This failure is astonishing, since significant hybridization of up to 0.4 antisense(DNA) per 70S ribosome was achieved. The hybridization occurred almost exclusively at the [alpha]-sarcin domain as demonstrated with naked 23S rRNA (Fig. 2 B) and by sequencing the resulting fragment (Fig. 3 ). Hybridization to isolated 23S rRNA is a stronger criteria for specificity as compared with that to 50S subunit, since (at least in isolated 23S rRNA) sequences outside the [alpha]-sarcin domain are also accessible which are complementary to 6 or more nucleotides at a stretch of the antisense DNAs. About six such complementary sequences were found per antisense DNA outside the [alpha]-sarcin domain (not shown). The specificity of hybridization to 70S ribosomes was confirmed by the observation that all complementary probes effectively inhibited the specific cleavage of the RNase [alpha]-sarcin (Fig. 4 B). The only exception of the set of complement probes was oligonucleotide no. 5 (2647-15), which covers the [alpha]-sarcin domain just including G2661 but not passing the cleavage site of [alpha]-sarcin which cleaves after G2661. This oligonucleotide hybridizes with the same efficiency as the other complementary probes. The failure of this probe to inhibit the activity of the RNase [alpha]-sarcin provides evidence that [alpha]-sarcin approaches its cleavage site from the 3'-half of the loop of the [alpha]-sarcin domain.

The activity of our ribosome preparation is 70-100% as shown by tRNA binding assays in the presence of heteropolymeric mRNA ( 27 ), whereas the hybridization of up to 0.4 molecule per 70S ribosome completely blocks the specific cleavage of [alpha]-sarcin. It follows that [alpha]-sarcin can cleave the rRNA of only a fraction of ribosomes probably in a distinct functional state, and that precisely this fraction is also able to hybridize with the tested antisense DNAs. In a report where the structure of the [alpha]-sarcin domain in solution was solved with NMR the authors mentioned evidence that in ribosomes the reported structure co-exists with alternative structures ( 28 , 29 ). The solution structure described impresses as an apparently compact structure stabilized by various non-canonical base-base interactions and containing an unusual bulged nucleotide which is important for the action of the RNase [alpha]-sarcin ( 29 ). Nevertheless, the almost quantitative hybridization of the various oligos to isolated 23S rRNA indicated by the effective RNase H digestion (Fig. 2 B) demonstrates that the structure can be easily disturbed, thus allowing hybridization with high yields. In 70S ribosomes the saturation of hybridization shows that the [alpha]-sarcin domain adopts a weak structure accessible for hybridization in at least a ribosomal subpopulation of up to 40% (Fig. 1 ).

Table 2 . Poly(Phe) synthesis in the presence of various antisense DNAs
Temp. (oC)

Phe incorporation

No oligo

Oligo 2

Oligo 4

Oligo 7

Oligo 8

Phe/70s

% inhib.

Phe/70s

% inhib.

Phe/70s

% inhib.

Phe/70s

% inhib.

Phe/70s

% inhib.

37

27.4 +- 1.4

0

26.8 +- 0.9

2.3

27.8 +- 1.1

0

27.2 +- 0.9

0

27.8 +- 0.7

0

30

15.2 +- 0.7

0

13.0 +- 0.7

15

13.3 +- 0.5

12

12.9 +- 0.5

15

16.1 +- 0.3

0

25

9.6 +- 0.7

0

6.2 +- 0.6

36

6.6 +- 0.6

31

6.3 +- 0.3

35

9.9 +- 0.5

0

% inhib., inhibition in percent relative to the sample without oligo(DNA) at the same temperature. The incubation time was 45 s. Average values and deviations from the average are given.

The observation that hybridization of the complementary probes to 70S ribosomes effectively blocks [alpha]-sarcin cleavage but provokes only faint bands in the presence of RNase H means that the [alpha]-sarcin domain is-at least in a distinct ribosomal state-well exposed for hybridization and attack of the RNase [alpha]-sarcin, but that the access of RNase H is severely restricted. The efficiency of blocking the [alpha]-sarcin activity was the same regardless whether the probe (15 nt) covered the whole loop [oligo 7 (2653-15)] or only 8 nt of the 3'-half of the loop and 8 nt of the adjacent 3'-strand of the stem [oligo no. 1 (2660-16), Fig. 4 B]. Oligo(DNA)s complementary to the 5'-strand of the stem and the 5'-half of the loop hybridized only a little less efficiently. It is obviously feasible to hybridize against sequences of the stem of the [alpha]-sarcin domain which has to be melted for this hybridization. The hybridization of oligo no. 2 to the 3' strand of the stem of the [alpha]-sarcin domain could be explicitly confirmed with naked 23S rRNA (Fig. 3 ). Our preparation of 23S rRNA maintains important structural features of the 23S rRNA within the ribosome: (i) the 23S rRNA preparation is fully active in total reconstitution assays, whereas 23S rRNA unfolded in the presence of 6 M guanidinium hydrochloride is inactive (F. Dohme and K. H. Nierhaus, unpublished); (ii) unstructured RNA is totally and unspecifically degraded by the RNase [alpha]-sarcin ( 9 ), whereas our 23S rRNA preparation shows only two bands, the major one is related to the authentic [alpha]-sarcin fragment ( 11 ) which was also observed with 23S rRNA from E.coli by others ( 30 ). Taken together these findings argue for the possibility that the stem of the [alpha]-sarcin domain might be (at least transiently) melted in the course of an elongation cycle in vivo .

Our data suggest that the structure of the [alpha]-sarcin domain might be a highly dynamic one in the course of protein synthesis and probably of a single elongation cycle, and that the structural changes might include melting of the stem. This conclusion explains the universally conserved low stability of the stem of the [alpha]-sarcin stem as compared to a stem structure of the 23S-type rRNA of comparable size ( 31 ). The feature of dynamic structural transitions of the loop of the [alpha]-sarcin domain has been noted already when the structural and sequence requirements for the actions of [alpha]-sarcin and ricin were compared. Ricin is an N -glycosidase which inactivates ribosomes by depurinating A2660 adjacent to the G2661. The structural requirements of both enzymes were strikingly different suggesting that the loop of the [alpha]-sarcin domain of the 23S-type rRNA can adopt different structures which might be related to different functional states ( 32 ).

The dynamic changes of the [alpha]-sarcin domain during protein synthesis might explain the disappointing effects of hybridization on the ribosomal functions. The action of [alpha]-sarcin is hardly blocked at 37oC by the complementary probes but severely impaired at 30oC whereas little effects are seen during poly(Phe) synthesis at the latter temperature. This differential temperature effects of the activity of the RNase [alpha]-sarcin and the hybridization efficiency contrasts with the evidence that the same (functional?) fraction of ribosomes is target for [alpha]-sarcin attack and hybridization (see above). A possible explanation of these puzzling observations is that not necessarily a transition to a distinct and different structure of the [alpha]-sarcin domain occurs at the higher temperature (37oC) but rather an acceleration of the rates of switching between different conformations which increase the dissociation rates of the oligonucleotides, thus facilitating the fast attack of [alpha]-sarcin (complete cleavage after 30 s, Fig. 4 A) and impairing the slow process of hybridization during the relatively fast protein synthesis. This interpretation is also supported by the temperature dependence of the inhibition of the poly(Phe) synthesis. No inhibition is seen at 37oC, slight inhibition of 13 +- 3% at 30oC and modest but significant inhibition of 33 +- 3% at 25oC (Table 2 ). At 30oC the inhibition is nearly complete concerning the action of [alpha]-sarcin in contrast to the slight effects observed in the poly(Phe) synthesis. The latter probably promotes the structural transitions of the [alpha]-sarcin domain and therefore actively expels the hybridized antisense DNA which therefore blocks much less efficiently protein synthesis than the action of [alpha]-sarcin.

In conclusion, we demonstrate that: (i) antisense DNA can hybridize with practically the complete 3" strand of the stem of the [alpha]-sarcin domain; (ii) antisense DNA hybridizes to up to 40% of the ribosome population and that the identical fraction is susceptible to the attack of the RNase [alpha]-sarcin; (iii) the RNase [alpha]-sarcin approaches its cleavage site from the 3' half of the loop of the [alpha]-sarcin domain; (iv) the action of the RNase [alpha]-sarcin can be blocked by antisense DNA at 30oC but not at 37oC; and (v) the poly(Phe) synthesis is also strongly impaired at lower temperatures by antisense DNA. These results strongly support the view noted by Glück et al . ( 32 , for review see ref. 10 ) that the loop of the [alpha]-sarcin domain can adopt different structures. Our data indicate further that even melting the stem of the [alpha]-sarcin domain might be involved in these structural changes, which probably influence, control or even regulate the functional transitions of the ribosome during protein synthesis.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Dr R. Brimacombe and Trixi Röhrdanz for help and discussion. The work was supported by the European Community, contract no. CIPA CT 93-0263.

REFERENCES

1 Skripkin,E.A., Kopylev,E.M., Bogdanov,A.A., Vinogradov,S.V. and Berlin,Y.A. (1979) Mol. Biol. Rep. 5, 221-224. MEDLINE Abstract

2 Mankin,A.S., Skripkin,E.A., Chichkova,N.V., Kopylov,A.M. and Bogdanov,A.A. (1981) FEBS Lett. 131, 253-256. MEDLINE Abstract

3 Hill,W.E., Weller,J., Gluick,T., Merryman,C., Marconi,R.T., Tassanakjohn,A. and Tapprich,W.E. (1990) In Hill,W.E., Dahlberg,A., Garrett,R.A., Moore,P.B., Schlessinger,D. and Warner,J.R. (eds), The Ribosome: Structure, Function and Evolution. American Society for Microbiology, Washington D.C., pp. 253-261.

4 Oakes,M.I., Clark,M.W., Henderson,E. and Lake,J.A. (1986) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA , 83, 275-279. MEDLINE Abstract

5 Oakes,M.I., Scheinman,A., Atha,T., Shankweiler,G. and Lake,J.A. (1990) In Hill,W.E., Dahlberg,A., Garrett,R.A., Moore,P.B., Schlessinger,D. and Warner,J.R. (eds), The Ribosome: Structure, Function and Evolution. American Society for Microbiology, Washington D.C., pp 180-193.

6 Teare,J. and Wollenzien,P. (1989) Nucleic Acids Res., 17, 3359-3372. MEDLINE Abstract

7 Cooperman,B.S., Muralikrishna,P. and Alexander,R.W. (1993) In Nier-haus,K.H., Franceschi,F., Subramanian,A.R., Erdmann, V.A. and Wittmann-Liebold,B. (eds), The Translational Apparatus: Stucture, Function, Regulation and Evolution. Plenum Press, NewYork, pp. 465-476.

8 Muralikrishna,P. and Cooperman,B.S. (1991) Biochemistry, 30, 5421-5428. MEDLINE Abstract

9 Endo,Y. and Wool,I.G. (1982) J. Biol. Chem., 257, 9054-9060. MEDLINE Abstract

10 Wool,I.G., Endo,Y., Chan,Y.-L. and Glück A. (1990) In Hill,W.E., Dahlberg,A., Garrett,R.A., Moore,P.B., Schlessinger,D. and Warner,J.R. (eds), The Ribosome: Structure, Function and Evolution. American Society for Microbiology, Washington D.C., pp. 203-214.

11 Hausner,Th.-P., Atmadja,J. and Nierhaus,K.H. (1987) Biochimie 69, 911-923. MEDLINE Abstract

12 Miller,S.P. and Bodley,J.W. (1991) Nucleic Acids Res. 19, 1657-1660. MEDLINE Abstract

13 Moazed,D., Robertson,J.M. and Noller,H.F. (1988) Nature 334, 362-364. MEDLINE Abstract

14 Henderson,A.N. and Lake,J.A. (1985) Proc. 16th FEBS Congess, Part B, VNU Science Press, 219-228.

15 White,G.A., Wood,T. and Hill,W.E. (1988) Nucleic Acids Res., 16, 10817-10831. MEDLINE Abstract

16 Saxena,S.K. and Ackerman,E.J. (1990) J. Biol. Chem., 265, 3263-3269. MEDLINE Abstract

17 Nierhaus,K.H., Schilling-Bartetzko,S. and Twardowski,T. (1992) Biochimie 74, 403-410. MEDLINE Abstract

18 Grzywacz-Bohun,E. and Twardowski,T. (1992) Acta Biochim. Pol., 39, 65-73.

19 Rheinberger,H.-J., Geigenmüller,U., Wedde,M. and Nierhaus,K.H. (1988) Methods Enyzmol., 164, 658-670.

20 Maxam,A.M. and Gilbert,W. (1980) Methods Enyzmol., 65, 499-560.

21 Bartetzko,A. and Nierhaus,K.H. (1988) Methods Enyzmol., 164, 560-658.

22 Wurmbach,P. and Nierhaus,K.H. (1979) Methods Enyzmol., 60, 593-606.

23 Geigenmüller,U. and Nierhaus,K.H. (1990) EMBO J., 9, 4527-4533.

24 Hartz,D., McPheeters,D.S., Traut,R. and Gold,L. (1988) Methods Enyzmol., 164, 419-425.

25 Donis-Keller,H. (1979) Nucleic Acids Res. 7, 179-192.

26 Wool,I.G. (1984) Trends Biochem. 9, 14-17.

27 Gnirke,A., Geigenmüller,U., Rheinberger,H.-J. and Nierhaus,K.H. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 7291-7301. MEDLINE Abstract

28 Szewczak,A., Moore,P.B., Chan,Y.-L. and Wool,I.G. (1993) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 90, 9581-9585. MEDLINE Abstract

29 Szewczak,A. and Moore,P.B. (1995) J. Mol. Biol. 247, 81-98. MEDLINE Abstract

30 Miller,S.P. and Bodley,J.W. (1988) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 154, 404-410. MEDLINE Abstract

31 Nierhaus,K.H. and Triana,F. (1993) In Ilan,J. (ed.), Translational Regulation of Gene Expression 2. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 49-68.

32 Glück,A., Endo,Y. and Wool,I.G. (1994) Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 321-324.


Return

* To whom correspondence should be addressed
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
L. Good and P. E. Nielsen
Inhibition of translation and bacterial growth by peptide nucleic acid targeted to ribosomal RNA
PNAS, March 3, 1998; 95(5): 2073 - 2076.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (134K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meyer, H.
Right arrow Articles by Nierhaus, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Meyer, H.
Right arrow Articles by Nierhaus, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?