Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (120K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (74)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Epe, B
Right arrow Articles by Sies, H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Epe, B
Right arrow Articles by Sies, H
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 Oxford University Press 4105-4110

Footnote

DNA damage by peroxynitrite characterized with DNA repair enzymes

DNA damage by peroxynitrite characterized with DNA repair enzymes Bernd Epe* , Daniel Ballmaier , Ivan Roussyn 1 , Karlis Briviba 1 and Helmut Sies 1

Institut für Pharmazie, Universität Mainz, Staudinger Weg 5, D-55099 Mainz , Germany and 1 Institut für Physiologische Chemie I, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Postfach 101007, D-40001 Düsseldorf , Germany

Received August 26, 1996; Revised and Accepted September 25, 1996

ABSTRACT

The DNA damage induced by peroxynitrite in isolated bacteriophage PM2 DNA was characterized by means of several repair enzymes with defined substrate specificities. Similar results were obtained with peroxynitrite itself and with 3-morpholinosydnonimine (SIN-1), a compound generating the precursors of peroxynitrite, nitric oxide and superoxide. A high number of base modifications sensitive to Fpg protein which, according to HPLC analysis, were mostly 8-hydroxyguanine residues, and half as many single-strand breaks were observed, while the numbers of oxidized pyrimidines (sensitive to endonuclease III) and of sites of base loss (sensitive to exonuclease III or T4 endonuclease V) were relatively low. This DNA damage profile caused by peroxynitrite is significantly different from that obtained with hydroxyl radicals or with singlet molecular oxygen. The effects of various radical scavengers and other additives ( t -butanol, selenomethionine, selenocystine, desferrioxamine) were the same for single-strand breaks and Fpg-sensitive modifications and indicate that a single reactive intermediate but not peroxynitrite itself is responsible for the damage.

INTRODUCTION

Peroxynitrite is a relatively long-lived oxidant that may be produced in vivo in the reaction of nitric oxide with the superoxide anion radical ( 1 ), e.g. by activated macrophages, neutrophils and endothelial cells. Under physiological conditions the major reactive form of peroxynitrite (p K a = 6.8) is the protonated form, peroxynitrous acid (HOONO), which decomposes with a half-life of ~1 s ( 1 ). Peroxynitrite can cause strand breaks in plasmid supercoiled DNA ( 2 ) and in DNA of eukaryotic cells ( 3 ). Both nitration and nitrosation products [8-nitroguanine ( 4 - 6 ), 4-hydroxy- 5-nitrosooxy-guanine ( 6 )] and various oxidation products [8-hydroxyguanine (8-oxoG), 8-hydroxyadenine (8-oxoA) and an oxazolone] ( 7 , 8 ) were identified in studies with isolated DNA or nucleosides. In DNA of macrophages treated with interferon-[gamma] and lipopolysaccharides to produce nitric oxide and superoxide, 8-oxoG, 5-hydroxymethyluracil and formamidopyrimidines were detected, in addition to DNA deamination products ( 9 ). Peroxynitrite-induced DNA modifications were found to cause mutations preferentially at G-C base pairs ( 10 ).

The mechanism underlying the oxidation of biomolecules by HOONO has not yet been fully established. Initially, it was suggested that hydroxylations and nitrations were caused by hydroxyl radicals and nitrogen dioxide radicals that are generated by homolysis of peroxynitrite ( 11 ). This has been challenged more recently on the basis of thermodynamic and kinetic considerations, results obtained with radical scavengers and relatively low yields (1-4%) of hydroxyl radicals detected in spin trapping experiments ( 2 , 12 - 15 ). Rather, a reactive intermediate structurally similar to that involved in the isomerisation to nitrate, possibly an activated form of trans -peroxynitrous acid, has been claimed responsible for the reactions ( 12 , 16 ).

Repair endonucleases, which selectively recognize certain DNA base modifications and sites of base loss, can be used as sensitive probes to quantify oxidative DNA modifications ( 17 - 20 ). When several repair endonucleases are used in parallel, DNA damage profiles are obtained, which can serve as fingerprints of the ultimate DNA damaging species and thus allow the identificaton of the species responsible for the DNA damage.

We studied here the DNA damage profiles induced by peroxynitrite and by 3-morpholinosydnonimine (SIN-1), a compound that decomposes to generate the peroxynitrite precursors nitric oxide and superoxide, and compared the damage profiles with that induced by hydroxyl radicals. In addition, the effects of various scavengers were determined. The results indicate that a single species of a reactivity comparable with hydroxyl radicals, but neither peroxynitrite itself nor hydroxyl radicals, are responsible for the DNA damage observed, which consists predominantly of 8-oxoG and single-strand breaks (SSBs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

DNA repair endonucleases and chemicals

DNA from bacteriophage PM2 (PM2 DNA) was prepared according to the method of Salditt et al . ( 21 ). More than 97% was in the supercoiled form, as determined by the method described below. Formamidopyrimidine-DNA glycosylase (Fpg protein) ( 22 ) and endonuclease III from Escherichia coli were kindly provided by S. Boiteux, Fonteney aux Roses, France. T4 endonuclease V was partially purified by the method described by Nakabeppu et al . ( 23 ) from the E.coli strain A 32480 ( uvrA, recA , F'lac IQ1) carrying the plasmid ptac-denV (kindly provided by L. Mullenders, Leiden, Netherlands) after induction with isopropyl- [beta]-D-thiogalactopyranoside. Exonuclease III was purchased from Boehringer, Mannheim, Germany. All repair endonucleases were tested for their incision at reference modifications (i.e. thymine glycols induced by OsO 4 , AP sites by low pH and 8-oxoG by methylene blue plus light) under the applied assay conditions to ensure that the correct substrate modifications are fully recognized and no incision at non-substrate modifications takes place ( 24 ). 3-morpholinosydnonimine (SIN-1), N -hydroxypyridine-2-thione (2-HPT), desferrioxamine mesylate and most other chemicals were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Chemie, Deisenhofen, Germany.

Synthesis of peroxynitrite

Peroxynitrite was synthesized from sodium nitrite and hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) using a quenched-flow reactor as previously described ( 1 , 25 ) with minor modifications ( 26 ). Residual H 2 O 2 was eliminated by passage of the peroxynitrite solution over powdered manganese dioxide. Peroxynitrite was concentrated by freeze fractionation. Its concentration was determined spectrophotometrically at 302 nm ([epsilon] = 1670/M/cm).

Modification of PM2 DNA

For the reaction with SIN-1, PM2 DNA (10 [mu]g/ml) was incubated in phosphate buffer (10 mM NaH 2 PO 4 , 50 mM NaCl, pH 7.4) with SIN-1 (1-10 [mu]M) for 1 h at 37oC. The DNA was precipitated by ethanol-sodium acetate and redissolved in BE 1 buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA) for damage analysis.

For the reaction with preformed peroxynitrite, an alkaline solution of peroxynitrite (see above) was diluted with water and added at room temperature under vigorous stirring to PM2 DNA (10 [mu]g/ml) in phosphate buffer. The calculated final peroxynitrite concentrations were between 2.5 and 100 [mu]M. In all cases, the pH of the reaction mixtures did not increase >7.6. After 3 min at room temperature, the DNA was precipitated by ethanol-sodium acetate and redissolved in BE 1 buffer. After a second precipitation and dissolving in BE 1 buffer, the DNA was used for damage analysis. In control experiments, the peroxynitrite solution was incubated with phosphate buffer for 3 min at room temperature to decompose the peroxynitrite, before the DNA was added.

In some of the experiments, 10-500 mM t -butanol, 1-300 [mu]M desferrioxamine mesylate or other additives were present during the exposure to peroxynitrite or SIN-1.

Quantification of DNA modifications in PM2 DNA

The DNA relaxation assay used to quantify endonuclease-sensitive modifications and strand breaks in PM2 DNA has been described earlier ( 19 , 27 ). It makes use of the fact that supercoiled PM2 DNA is converted by either a SSB or the incision of a repair endonuclease into a relaxed (nicked) form which migrates separately from the supercoiled form in agarose gel electrophoresis. Quantification of both forms of DNA by fluorescence scanning after staining of the gel with ethidium bromide allows the calculation of the average number of SSBs per PM2 molecule (10 4 bp) or-if an incubation with a repair endonuclease precedes the gel electrophoresis-the number of SSBs plus endonuclease-sensitive sites. All data were corrected for the numbers of sites observed in untreated control DNA (<0.1 site/10 4 bp in all cases).

Modification of calf thymus DNA and HPLC analysis

Calf thymus DNA (50 [mu]g) was incubated with SIN-1 (12 [mu]M) for 1 h at 37oC in 200 [mu]l phosphate buffer. The DNA was precipitated, redissolved in 100 [mu]l phosphate buffer and incubated with 2.5 [mu]g Fpg protein for 1 h at 37oC. The excised bases were separated from the DNA on an anion exchange minicolumn (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and applied to a reversed-phase HPLC column (Nucleosil 100-5 C18, 250-4, Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany) equipped with an electrochemical detector (ESA Coulochem II; detection potential 300 mV) and eluted with 50 mM phosphate buffer pH 5.5, which contained 5% methanol, at a flow rate of 1.2 ml/min. When authentic 8-hydroxyguanine was added to unmodified DNA before the incubation with Fpg protein, the recovery was found to be 78%. Control incubations were carried out without SIN-1 or without Fpg protein.

Fe(III)-EDTA-dependent nitration of 4-hydroxyphenyl- acetate by peroxynitrite

The iron complex Fe(III)-EDTA was prepared by mixing solutions of iron-(III)-sulfate and sodium-EDTA in the ratio 1:1. Peroxynitrite (final concentration 50 [mu]M) was added to 4-hydroxyphenylacetate (4-HPA, 1 mM) in 80 mM sodium phosphate buffer containing Fe(III)-EDTA (0.5 mM) and various concentrations of t -butanol while vigorous stirring to start the reaction at room temperature, pH 7.2. Samples were incubated for 30 min at room temperature. Alternatively, as a control, 4-HPA was added 5 min after peroxynitrite to buffer alone. The final pH was measured after the reaction to account for the slight alkaline shift caused by the NaOH used to stabilize the stock solution of peroxynitrite. The pH was then adjusted to 10.0-10.6 with 3 M aqueous NaOH. The yield of 4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenylacetate (NO 2 -HPA) was calculated from its absorbance at 430 nm ([epsilon] = 4400/M/cm) ( 25 ).

Assay of peroxynitrite-mediated oxidation of dihydro- rhodamine 123

Peroxynitrite-mediated oxidation of dihydrorhodamine 123 in presence of various concentrations of t- butanol was carried out as described previously ( 28 ) with minor modifications ( 29 ). Fluorescence intensities were measured with a spectrophotometer (LS-5, Perkin-Elmer, Norwalk, USA) with excitation and emission wavelengths of 500 and 536 nm, respectively, at room temperature. The fluorescence intensity was linearly related to the rhodamine concentration between 0 and 400 nM.

RESULTS

DNA damage profiles

PM2 DNA in phosphate buffer was exposed to peroxynitrite or to SIN-1. The latter compound upon thermal decomposition under aerobic conditions generates superoxide and nitric oxide, which combine to yield peroxynitrite ( 30 , 31 ). Subsequently, the DNA was analysed for SSBs and modifications sensitive to various repair endonucleases (Table 1 ). In the case of peroxynitrite, the extent of DNA damage with increasing peroxynitrite concentration was found to follow a saturation curve, but the ratio of the DNA modifications was constant (Fig. 1 , upper panel). In contrast, a linear dose-response was observed with SIN-1 (Fig. 1 , lower panel). No DNA modifications were detected when DNA was treated with the decomposition products of peroxynitrite (Materials and Methods).

Table 1 Recognition of DNA modifications by repair endonucleases used in this study
Repair endonuclease

Concentration applied

Recognition spectrum a

Sites of base loss b

Base modifications

Fpg protein c

1 [mu]g/ml

+

8-oxoG d ; Fapy e

Endonuclease III c

10 ng/ml

+

5,6-dihydropyrimidines; hyd f

T4 endonuclease V

20 ng/ml

+

Py<>Py g

Exonuclease III

1 [mu]g/ml

+

-

a See refs 32-36. b For the recognition of sites of base loss oxidized in the 1' or 4' position, see ref. 27. c 5-hydroxycytosine and 5-hydroxyuracil have recently been described as new substrates of both Fpg protein and endonuclease III (37). d 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine (8-hydroxyguanine). e Formamidopyrimidines (imidazole ring-opened purines). f 5-hydroxy-5-methylhydantoin and other ring-contracted and fragmented pyrimidines. g Cyclobutane pyrimidine photodimers.


Figure 1 . DNA SSBs ([circle]) and modifications sensitive to Fpg protein (-) induced in PM2 DNA by various concentrations of peroxynitrite (upper panel) and SIN-1 (lower panel) in phosphate buffer pH 7.4. Data are means of four to nine independent experiments (+- SD) and are corrected for the numbers of modifications observed in untreated PM2 DNA.

The numbers of various DNA modifications induced by 80 [mu]M peroxynitrite (at room temperature) and by 10 [mu]M SIN-1 (at 37oC) are indicated in Figure 2 in the form of DNA damage profiles. For comparison, DNA damage profiles induced by two established sources of hydroxyl radicals, ionizing radiation and N -hydroxypyridine-2-thione (2-HPT) plus light ( 38 ), and a damage profile induced by a chemical source of singlet oxygen, NDPO 2 ( 39 ), are also shown. The damage profiles induced by peroxynitrite and SIN-1 were very similar to each other. They are characterized by a 2-fold excess of Fpg-sensitive modifications over SSBs and by relatively low levels of both oxidative pyrimidine modifications (sensitive to endonuclease III) and sites of base loss (sensitive to exonuclease III or T4 endonuclease V) (Fig. 2 ). In contrast, hydroxyl radicals generated SSBs, base modifications sensitive to Fpg protein and sites of base loss in approximately equal yields, while singlet oxygen generated mostly Fpg-sensitive modifications (Fig. 2 ).


Figure 2 . DNA damage profiles. Damage was induced in phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) by ( a ) peroxynitrite (80 [mu]M), ( b ) peroxynitrite (80 [mu]M) after incubation of the modified DNA for 4 h at 37oC, ( c ) SIN-1 (10 [mu]M), ( d ) ionizing radiation (20 Gy at 50 [mu]g DNA/ml), ( e ) 2-HPT (1 mM) plus light and ( f ) NDPO 2 , (3.5 mM in D 2 O). Columns indicate the numbers of various endonuclease-sensitive DNA modifications and SSBs (Table 1). They represent the means of three or more independent experiments (+- SD). Damage profiles (d)-(f) are taken from ref. 38.

The damage profile induced by peroxynitrite was not changed when the modified DNA was heated for 4 h at 37oC (Fig. 2 ) or for 1 h at 60oC (data not shown). This indicates that under these conditions neither the Fpg-sensitive base modifications nor any other modifications (not recognized by the repair endonucleases) are converted into sites of base loss and/or SSBs.

In another experiment, the Fpg protein concentration was varied. The recognition of peroxynitrite-induced modifications by Fpg protein was half-maximal at the same enzyme concentration that was required for the half-maximal recognition of 8-oxoG induced by methylene blue plus light ( 24 ) (data not shown).

HPLC analysis of Fpg-sensitive base modifications induced by SIN-1

The analysis of the modified bases excised by Fpg protein from calf-thymus DNA pretreated with SIN-1 by means of HPLC and an electrochemical detector established the presence of 8-oxoG in the damaged DNA (Fig. 3 ). After correction for the recovery of authentic 8-oxoG (78%; see Materals and Methods) and for the small amount of 8-oxoG observed in untreated calf thymus DNA (0.29 pmol; Fig. 3 C), the amount detected (1.4 pmol; Fig. 3 A) corresponded to a generation by SIN-1 of 1.8 8-oxoG residues/ 10 4 bp. These are 75% of the Fpg-sensitive modifications generated under the same reaction conditions in PM2 DNA. According to the damage profile induced by SIN-1 (Fig. 2 ), another 10% of the Fpg-sensitive modifications were sites of base loss (sensitive to exonuclease III and T4 endonuclease V). Either experimental errors or a minor fraction of Fpg-sensitive base modifications which are not 8-oxoG (Table 1 ) could account for the 15% residual modifications.


Figure 3 . HPLC chromatograms of a preparation of bases excised by Fpg protein from calf thymus DNA (50 [mu]g) exposed to SIN-1 (12 [mu]M) ( A ), control preparations, in which Fpg protein ( B ) or SIN-1 ( D ) were omitted and authentic 8-hydroxyguanine (1 pmol) ( C ).

Effects of t -butanol

The inhibition by t -butanol of DNA damage by peroxynitrite and SIN-1 and, for comparison, hydroxyl radicals generated by photodecomposition of 2-HPT, are shown in Figure 4 . For all three damaging agents, 50% inhibition was observed at ~20 mM t -butanol. Fpg-sensitive modifications and SSBs were affected to the same extent. Both these lesions, therefore, most probably emanate from the same reactive intermediate that is scavenged by t -butanol.


Figure 4 . Inhibition by t -butanol of the generation of SSBs ([circle]) and modifications sensitive to Fpg protein (-) by peroxynitrite, SIN-1 and 2-HPT plus light. Damage induced in the absence of t -butanol assumed as 100%. Data points represent means of four to six independent experiments (+- SD).

In contrast, t -butanol (200 mM) increased rather than decreased both the Fe(III)-EDTA-catalyzed nitration of 4-HPA and the oxidation of dihydrorhodamine 123 by peroxynitrite by ~40% (data not shown). No further increase was observed at higher t -butanol concentrations. For both the nitration and the oxidation reaction, the effect was half-maximal at ~20 mM t -butanol.

Effects of other scavengers

As shown in Table 2 , SOD inhibited DNA damage by SIN-1, which generates peroxynitrite via superoxide, but not by peroxynitrite itself. Catalase had no effect on the damage. The iron chelator desferrioxamine mesylate inhibited the generation by SIN-1 and peroxynitrite of both SSBs and Fpg-sensitive modifications by 50-70% (Table 2 ). Under similar reaction conditions, desferrioxamine had much less influence on the DNA damage induced by hydroxyl radicals, generated by photodecomposition of 2-HPT (Table 2 ).

Table 2 . Effects of various scavengers on DNA damage induced by peroxynitrite, SIN-1 and photodecomposition of 2-HPT
Presence of

Relative number of modifications (%) a

Peroxynitrite (40 [mu]M) b

SIN-1 (10 [mu]M) b

2-HPT (2 mM) + light c

SSB

Fpg d

SSB

Fpg

SSB

Fpg

SOD (20 [mu]g/ml)

101 +-19

95 +- 16

26 +- 3

27 +- 10

120 +- 16

85 +- 21

Catalase (315 U/ml)

96 +-15

93 +- 2

90 +- 12

113 +- 19

107 +- 11

115 +- 23

DSF e (1 [mu]M)

27 +-10

30 +- 7

78 +- 17

107 +- 22

89 +- 21

93 +- 8

(30 [mu]M)

32 +- 4

29 +- 3

45 +- 10

49 +- 7

77 +- 5

83 +- 3

(300 [mu]M)

25 +- 3

27 +- 5

31 +- 3

41 +- 15

65 +- 13

76 +- 12

Cystine (1 mM)

123 +- 22

73 +- 25

Selenocystine (1 mM)

58 +- 23

48 +- 25

Methionine (0.1 mM)

57 +-13

41 +- 21

51 +- 5

31 +- 7

70 +- 7

81 +- 7

Selenomethionine (0.1 mM)

23 +- 9

9 +- 6

8 +- 2

5 +- 3

79 +- 11

85 +- 10

a Number of modifications observed without additives defined as 100%. b Values represent means (+- SD) of four to six independent experiments. c Values represent means (+- SD) of two to three independent experiments. d DNA modifications sensitive to Fpg protein. e Desferrioxamine mesylate.

The selenium compounds, selenomethionine (0.1 mM) or selenocystine (1 mM), decreased the number of Fpg-sensitive DNA modifications caused by 40 [mu]M peroxynitrite more effectively than methionine (0.1 mM) or cysteine (1 mM), respectively (Table 2 ).

DISCUSSION

The results provide evidence that peroxynitrite generates a distinct type of DNA damage that deviates significantly both from that induced by hydroxyl radicals and that induced by singlet oxygen (Fig. 2 ). The inhibitory effect of t -butanol is similar to that observed under the same conditions for DNA damage by hydroxyl radicals, generated either by photodecomposition of 2-HPT (Fig. 4 ) or by ionizing radiation ( 40 ). This indicates that a single intermediate of a reactivity comparable with hydroxyl radicals is responsible for the generation of both SSBs and Fpg-sensitive base modifications, the two principal modifications observed in this analysis. Apparently, peroxynitrite itself is not scavenged by t -butanol, since t -butanol increased rather than decreased the yield of the products generated by peroxynitrite from 4-HPA and dihydrorhodamine. Therefore, the reactions of peroxynitrite with these substrates involve intermediates which are distinct from those involved in the reaction of peroxynitrite with DNA. That the presence of hydroxyl radical scavengers can cause such increases in products of reactions of peroxynitrite has been reported previously ( 2 , 41 ). The experiments with catalase and SOD (Table 2 ) demonstrate that a Fenton reaction catalysed by traces of transition metals is not involved in the DNA damage observed. Yet, desferrioxamine inhibits the formation of both SSBs and Fpg-sensitive modifications by 50-70% (Table 2 ). The effect is in agreement with results by Denicola et al . ( 42 ) which indicated that the reaction intermediate similar to hydroxyl radicals (probably derived from trans -peroxynitrous acid), but neither peroxynitrite itself nor cis - peroxynitrous acid acts as a one-electron oxidant of desferrioxamine. As evident from the data obtained with 2-HPT plus light (Table 2 ), a similar reaction of desferrioxamine with hydroxyl radicals is inefficient or does not occur. The non-linear dose-dependence observed with peroxynitrite, but not with SIN-1 (Fig. 1 ), suggests that the concentration of the reactive intermediate responsible for the DNA damage is diminished at high peroxynitrite concentrations (which are not reached during SIN-1 decomposition).

The very efficient inhibition of peroxynitrite-induced DNA damage by selenomethionine and selenocystine confirms the recently demonstrated protection by selenocompounds from SSB formation in supercoiled DNA ( 43 ) and may be of relevance in vivo . The big difference betwen the selenocompounds and their sulfur analogues is not observed for the damage generated by hydroxyl radicals (Table 2 ). Most probably, the selenocompounds-in contrast with t -butanol and desferrioxamine-react with peroxynitrite itself, as has been demonstrated previously for ebselen ( 26 , 44 ).

The HPLC analysis reveals that most of the bases excised by Fpg protein from SIN-1-modified calf thymus DNA are 8-oxoG residues. This lesion is known to be premutagenic, giving rise predominantly to GC -> TA transversions ( 45 , 46 ). Recently, GC -> TA transversion were indeed found to be the prevailing type of mutation when a plasmid pretreated with peroxynitrite was replicated in bacteria or mammalian cells ( 10 ).

The Fpg protein concentration dependence of the incisions at the peroxynitrite-induced modifications gives no indication that other (unknown) base modifications serve as additional substrates for Fpg protein in the case of the DNA damage induced by peroxynitrite. The recognition by Fpg protein of oxazolones or 4-hydroxy-5-nitrosooxyguanine, which were demonstrated to be generated from high concentrations (30 mM) of peroxynitrite and DNA or desoxyguanosine ( 6 , 8 ), has not been established yet. 8-Hydroxyadenine, which has been identified as a product of peroxynitrite with DNA under the same conditions, is not a good substrate for Fpg protein ( 35 , 47 ). 8-Nitroguanine, another purine modification detected in calf thymus DNA treated with peroxynitrite, but not with SIN-1 ( 5 ), does not seem to be a major reaction product under the reaction conditions employed in the present study, since this modification undergoes rapid depurination at 37oC ( 5 ), while no thermolabile modifications were detected in PM2 DNA (Fig. 2 ).

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank S. Boiteux for providing Fpg protein and endonuclease III. This work has been supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 519-B2 and SFB 503-B1) and by the National Foundation for Cancer Research, Bethesda.

REFERENCES

1 Beckman,J.S., Beckman,T.W., Chen,J., Marshall,P. and Freeman,B.A. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 87, 1620-1624. MEDLINE Abstract

2 Salgo,M.G., Stone,K., Squadrito,G.L., Battista,J.R. and Pryor,W.A. (1995) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 210, 1025-1030. MEDLINE Abstract

3 Salgo,M.G., Bermudez,E., Squadrito,G.L. and Pryor,W.A. (1995) Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 322, 500-505. MEDLINE Abstract

4 Yermilov,V., Rubio,J., Becchi,M., Friesen,M.D., Pignateli,B. and Ohshima,H. (1995) Carcinogenesis, 16, 2045-2050. MEDLINE Abstract

5 Yermilov,V., Rubio,J. and Ohshima,H. (1995) FEBS Lett., 376, 207-210. MEDLINE Abstract

6 Douki,T., Cadet,J. and Ames,B.N. (1996) Chem. Res. Toxicol., 9, 3-7. MEDLINE Abstract

7 Inoue,S. and Kawanishi, S. (1995) FEBS Lett., 371, 86-88. MEDLINE Abstract

8 Douki,T. and Cadet,J. (1996) Free Rad. Res., 24, 369-380.

9 deRojas-Walker,T., Tamir,S., Ji,H., Wishnok,J.S. and Tannenbaum,S.R. (1995) Chem. Res. Toxicol., 8, 473-477.

10 Juedes,M.J. and Wogan,G.N. (1996) Mutat. Res., 349, 51-61. MEDLINE Abstract

11 Halfpenny,E. and Robinson,P.L. (1952) J. Chem. Soc., 1952, 939-946.

12 Koppenol,W.H., Moreno,J.J., Pryor,W.A., Ischiropoulos,H. and Beckman,J.S. (1992) Chem. Res. Toxicol., 5, 834-842. MEDLINE Abstract

13 Ramezanian,M.S., Padmaja,S. and Koppenol,W.H. (1996) Chem. Res. Toxicol., 9, 232-240. MEDLINE Abstract

14 Pryor,W.A., Jin,X. and Squadrito,G.L. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 91, 11173-11177. MEDLINE Abstract

15 Pou,S., Nguyen,S.Y., Gladwell,T. and Rosen,G.M. (1995) Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1244, 62-68. MEDLINE Abstract

16 Beckman,J.S. (1996) Chem. Res. Toxicol., 9, 836-844. MEDLINE Abstract

17 Breimer,L.H. and Lindahl,T. (1985) Biochemistry, 24, 4018-4022. MEDLINE Abstract

18 Epe,B., Pflaum,M., Häring,M., Hegler,J. and Rüdiger,H. (1993) Toxicol. Lett., 67, 57-72. MEDLINE Abstract

19 Epe,B. and Hegler,J. (1994) Methods Enzymol., 234, 122-131. MEDLINE Abstract

20 Epe,B. (1995) Rev. Physiol. Biochem. Pharmacol., 127, 223-249.

21 Salditt,M., Braunstein,S.N., Camerini-Otero,R.D. and Franklin,R.M. (1972) Virology, 48, 259-262. MEDLINE Abstract

22 Boiteux,S., O'Connor,T.R., Lederer,F., Gouyette,A. and Laval,J. (1990) J. Biol. Chem., 265, 3916-3922.

23 Nakabeppu,Y., Yamashita,K. and Sekiguchi,M. (1982) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 257, 2556-2562.

24 Müller,E., Boiteux,S., Cunningham,R.P. and Epe,B. (1990) Nucleic Acids Res., 18, 5969-5973.

25 Beckman,J.S., Ischiropoulos,H., Zhu,L., van der Woerd,M., Smith,C., Chen,J., Harrison,J., Martin,J.C. and Tsai,M. (1992) Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 298, 438-445. MEDLINE Abstract

26 Masumoto,H. and Sies,H. (1996) Chem. Res. Toxicol., 9, 262-267. MEDLINE Abstract

27 Häring,M., Rüdiger,H., Demple,B., Boiteux,S. and Epe,B. (1994) Nucleic Acids Res., 22, 2010-2015.

28 Kooy,N.W., Royall,J.A., Ischiropoulos,H. and Beckman,J.S. (1994) Free Rad. Biol. Med., 16, 149-156.

29 Briviba,K., Roussyn,I. and Sharov,V.S. (1996) Biochem. J., in press.

30 Feelisch,M., Ostrowski,J. and Noack,E. (1989) J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol., 14 Suppl., 11, 13-22.

31 Hogg,N., Darley-Usmar,V.M., Wilson,M.T. and Moncada,S. (1992) Biochem. J., 281, 419-424. MEDLINE Abstract

32 Wallace,S.S. (1988) Environ. Mol. Mutagen., 12, 431-477. MEDLINE Abstract

33 Lindahl,T. (1990) Mutat. Res., 238, 305-311. MEDLINE Abstract

34 Boiteux,S. (1993) Photochem. Photobiol. B, 19, 87-96.

35 Tchou,J., Bodepudi,V., Shibutani,S., Antoshechkin,I., Miller,J., Grollman,A.P. and Johnson,F. (1994) J. Biol. Chem., 269, 15318-15324. MEDLINE Abstract

36 Demple,B. and Harrison,L. (1994) Annu. Rev. Biochem., 63, 915-948. MEDLINE Abstract

37 Hatahet,Z., Kow,Y.W., Purmal,A.A., Cunningham,R.P. and Wallace,S.S. (1994) J. Biol. Chem., 269, 18814-18820. MEDLINE Abstract

38 Epe,B., Ballmaier,D., Adam,W., Grimm,G.N. and Saha-Möller,C.R. (1996) Nucleic Acids Res., 24, 1625-1631. MEDLINE Abstract

39 Di Mascio,P. and Sies,H. (1989) J. Am. Chem. Soc., 111, 2909-2914.

40 Epe,B., Häring,M., Ramaiah,D., Stopper,H., Abou-Elzahab,M.M., Adam,W. and Saha-Möller,C.R. (1993) Carcinogenesis, 14, 2271-2276. MEDLINE Abstract

41 van der Vliet,A., Eiserich,J.P., O'Neill,C.A., Halliwell,B. and Cross,C.E. (1995) Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 319, 341-349. MEDLINE Abstract

42 Denicola,A., Souza,J.M., Gatti,R.M., Augusto,O. and Radi,R. (1995) Free Radic. Biol. Med., 19, 11-19. MEDLINE Abstract

43 Roussyn,I., Masumoto,H., Briviba,K. and Sies,H. (1996) Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 330, 216-218. MEDLINE Abstract

44 Sies,H. and Masumoto,H. (1996) Adv. Pharmacol., 38, 229-246.

45 Wood,M.L., Dizdaroglu,M., Gajewski,E. and Essigmann,J.M. (1990) Biochemistry, 29, 7024-7032. MEDLINE Abstract

46 Shibutani,S., Takeshita,M. and Grollman,A.P. (1991) Nature, 349, 431-434. MEDLINE Abstract

47 Boiteux,S., Gajewski,E., Laval,J. and Dizdaroglu,M. (1992) Biochemistry, 31, 106-110. MEDLINE Abstract


Return

*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: + 49 6131 394309; Fax: + 49 6131 395521; Email: epe@goofy.zdv.uni-mainz.de
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
N. Barraud, D. J. Hassett, S.-H. Hwang, S. A. Rice, S. Kjelleberg, and J. S. Webb
Involvement of Nitric Oxide in Biofilm Dispersal of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
J. Bacteriol., November 1, 2006; 188(21): 7344 - 7353.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
M. L. Hornback and R. M. Roop II
The Brucella abortus xthA-1 Gene Product Participates in Base Excision Repair and Resistance to Oxidative Killing but Is Not Required for Wild-Type Virulence in the Mouse Model
J. Bacteriol., February 15, 2006; 188(4): 1295 - 1300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
A. Rawlingson, K. Shendi, S. A. Greenacre, T. G. England, A. M. Jenner, R. N. Poston, B. Halliwell, and S. D. Brain
Functional Significance of Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase Induction and Protein Nitration in the Thermally Injured Cutaneous Microvasculature
Am. J. Pathol., April 1, 2003; 162(4): 1373 - 1380.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
N. Phoa and B. Epe
Influence of nitric oxide on the generation and repair of oxidative DNA damage in mammalian cells
Carcinogenesis, March 1, 2002; 23(3): 469 - 475.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
M. B. Herrero, E. de Lamirande, and C. Gagnon
Tyrosine nitration in human spermatozoa: a physiological function of peroxynitrite, the reaction product of nitric oxide and superoxide
Mol. Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2001; 7(10): 913 - 921.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
E. J. Spek, T. L. Wright, M. S. Stitt, N. R. Taghizadeh, S. R. Tannenbaum, M. G. Marinus, and B. P. Engelward
Recombinational Repair Is Critical for Survival of Escherichia coli Exposed to Nitric Oxide
J. Bacteriol., January 1, 2001; 183(1): 131 - 138.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
B. Weinberger, D. L. Laskin, D. E. Heck, and J. D. Laskin
The Toxicology of Inhaled Nitric Oxide
Toxicol. Sci., January 1, 2001; 59(1): 5 - 16.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
J. CUI, E. H. HOLMES, T. G. GREENE, and P. K. LIU
Oxidative DNA damage precedes DNA fragmentation after experimental stroke in rat brain
FASEB J, May 1, 2000; 14(7): 955 - 967.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
A.-C. Souici, J. Mirkovitch, P. Hausel, L. K.Keefer, and E. Felley-Bosco
Transition mutation in codon 248 of the p53 tumor suppressor gene induced by reactive oxygen species and a nitric oxide-releasing compound
Carcinogenesis, February 1, 2000; 21(2): 281 - 287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
L. Chazotte-Aubert, S. Oikawa, I. Gilibert, F. Bianchini, S. Kawanishi, and H. Ohshima
Cytotoxicity and Site-specific DNA Damage Induced by Nitroxyl Anion (NO-) in the Presence of Hydrogen Peroxide. IMPLICATIONS FOR VARIOUS PATHOPHYSIOLOGICAL CONDITIONS
J. Biol. Chem., July 23, 1999; 274(30): 20909 - 20915.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. Keyer and J. A. Imlay
Inactivation of Dehydratase [4Fe-4S] Clusters and Disruption of Iron Homeostasis upon Cell Exposure to Peroxynitrite
J. Biol. Chem., October 31, 1997; 272(44): 27652 - 27659.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
W. Martinet, M. W. M. Knaapen, G. R. Y. De Meyer, A. G. Herman, and M. M. Kockx
Oxidative DNA Damage and Repair in Experimental Atherosclerosis Are Reversed by Dietary Lipid Lowering
Circ. Res., April 13, 2001; 88(7): 733 - 739.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (120K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (74)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Epe, B
Right arrow Articles by Sies, H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Epe, B
Right arrow Articles by Sies, H
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?